28.01.2014 Views

evaluation of certain food additives - libdoc.who.int - World Health ...

evaluation of certain food additives - libdoc.who.int - World Health ...

evaluation of certain food additives - libdoc.who.int - World Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Finally, the forty-first session <strong>of</strong> CCFA agreed to a priority list <strong>of</strong> compounds<br />

for <strong>evaluation</strong>/re-<strong>evaluation</strong> by JECFA and also agreed to revise the text <strong>of</strong><br />

the Circular Letter on Priority List <strong>of</strong> Food Additives Proposed for Evaluation<br />

by JECFA to allow an indication <strong>of</strong> the names <strong>of</strong> the country either where the<br />

compound is legally traded or where it has been approved and to include more<br />

details on data to be submitted by JECFA.<br />

2.3 Principles governing the <strong>evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> compounds on the agenda<br />

In making recommendations on the safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>additives</strong>, the Committee<br />

took <strong>int</strong>o consideration the principles established and contained in Environmental<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Criteria, No. 70 (EHC 70), Principles for the safety assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>additives</strong> and contaminants in <strong>food</strong> (Annex 1, reference 76), as well<br />

as the principles elaborated subsequently at a number <strong>of</strong> its meetings (Annex<br />

1, references 77, 83, 88, 94, 107, 116, 122, 131, 137, 143, 149, 152, 154,<br />

160, 166, 173, 176, 178, 184, 187 and 190), including the present one. EHC<br />

70 contains the most important observations, comments and recommendations<br />

made, up to the time <strong>of</strong> its publication, by the Committee and associated<br />

bodies in their reports on the safety assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>additives</strong>.<br />

2.3.1 Codex GSFA-related questions<br />

The Committee received two questions from the United States <strong>of</strong> America<br />

(USA), which arose when the USA was preparing a paper on the Codex GSFA<br />

for the next session <strong>of</strong> CCFA.<br />

Sodium and potassium sulfates<br />

The Committee was asked whether the ADI for sodium sulfate also applied<br />

to sodium hydrogen sulfate and whether the ADI for potassium sulfate also<br />

covered potassium hydrogen sulfate. The Committee had previously evaluated<br />

sodium and potassium sulfate; the sulfate ion was allocated an ADI “not<br />

specified” at the twenty-n<strong>int</strong>h meeting (Annex 1, reference 70). In evaluating<br />

sodium hydrogen sulfate at the present meeting, the Committee considered<br />

that the principles elaborated at the twenty-n<strong>int</strong>h meeting for fully ionizable<br />

salts were applicable. It further considered that this approach could also be<br />

used in evaluating other fully ionizable sulfates, including <strong>food</strong>-grade potassium<br />

sulfate and potassium hydrogen sulfate. In conclusion, the ADI “not<br />

specified” for potassium sulfate is also applicable to potassium hydrogen<br />

sulfate.<br />

Nisin and nisin preparation<br />

In response to the question as to whether the ADI refers to nisin or nisin<br />

preparation, the Committee noted that when the name had been changed from<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!