28.01.2014 Views

evaluation of certain food additives - libdoc.who.int - World Health ...

evaluation of certain food additives - libdoc.who.int - World Health ...

evaluation of certain food additives - libdoc.who.int - World Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

proportion <strong>of</strong> consumers in this group was higher. In all these studies, the<br />

beverages covered by Food Category 14.1.4 had provisions for cyclamates.<br />

In the one submission from Australia, three analyses were performed:<br />

1) The first assumed Codex GSFA maximum use levels in the low-joule<br />

(low-energy) version <strong>of</strong> all <strong>food</strong> categories, including beverages covered<br />

by Food Category 14.1.4 (where identified), and in the <strong>who</strong>le <strong>food</strong> category,<br />

for which the version was not identified. Individual body weights<br />

were used in the calculations.<br />

2) The second assumed the above was true, except for beverages covered by<br />

Food Category 14.1.4, for which it was assumed that cyclamates were<br />

added to all these beverages.<br />

3) The third assumed typical use levels for cyclamates in Australia for the<br />

low-joule versions <strong>of</strong> all <strong>food</strong> categories and the proposed GSFA use levels<br />

for low-joule beverages covered by Food Category 14.1.4.<br />

Dietary exposures were presented for all models for the baseline (i.e. no cyclamates<br />

in beverages covered by Food Category 14.1.4) and maximum use<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/kg, as well as for a level <strong>of</strong> 350 mg/kg,<br />

which is the current permitted level <strong>of</strong> use in Australia and New Zealand for<br />

this category <strong>of</strong> beverages. The same <strong>food</strong> consumption data derived from<br />

individual records from the 1995 Australian National Nutrition Survey were<br />

used for estimating dietary exposures to cyclamates for all the models. For<br />

the <strong>who</strong>le population aged 2 years and over <strong>who</strong> were consumers <strong>of</strong> beverages<br />

covered by Food Category 14.1.4, mean consumption amounts ranged from<br />

375 to 560 g/day, and 90th-percentile amounts ranged from 625 to 1040 g/<br />

day. For children aged 2–6 years <strong>who</strong> were consumers <strong>of</strong> beverages covered<br />

by Food Category 14.1.4, mean consumption amounts ranged from 230 to<br />

420 g/day, and 90th-percentile amounts ranged from 320 to 900 g/day.<br />

For the first model, for the <strong>who</strong>le population aged 2 years and over, mean<br />

and 90th-percentile dietary exposures for consumers <strong>of</strong> products containing<br />

cyclamates were below the ADI <strong>of</strong> 0–11 mg/kg bw (25–30% <strong>of</strong> the ADI for<br />

mean consumers, 55–75% <strong>of</strong> the ADI for 90th-percentile consumers). For<br />

children aged 2–6 years, mean dietary exposures to cyclamates for consumers<br />

were also below the ADI (60–65% <strong>of</strong> the ADI). However, in this age group,<br />

dietary exposures to cyclamates exceeded the ADI at the 90th percentile <strong>of</strong><br />

exposure at baseline and for all optional levels <strong>of</strong> cyclamates in beverages<br />

covered by Food Category 14.1.4 (120–150% <strong>of</strong> the ADI). The higher dietary<br />

exposures expressed per kilogram body weight for young children compared<br />

with adults are to be expected, owing to relatively higher levels <strong>of</strong> consumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong> per kilogram body weight; additionally, members <strong>of</strong> this age<br />

group are relatively high consumers <strong>of</strong> fine bakery wares, juices and juice<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!