Networking Etiquette Workshop Student Learning Outcomes Report ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

This chart breaks up the positive comments about networking from the student evaluations from all three days. Sample comments for each category are as follows: Timing Timing was good, ten min. sessions were enough time but made time go quickly. It was a good amount of time that allowed for learning without going too long. Hosts The hosts I met were friendly and well-prepared. The two guys were great. Material I liked the networking sessions and the topics we discussed. I believe they were topics of everyday importance and could really be useful. I enjoyed and learned very valuable information. Organization I thought it was very well organized. Overall I enjoyed the evening. Thanks! Great experience. Types of <strong>Student</strong> Good Comments (networking) 4% 35% 30% 22% 9% Timing (5) Hosts (2) Material (7) Organization (1) Overall (8)
This chart breaks up the comments suggesting improvement about networking from the student evaluations from all three days. Sample comments for each category are as follows: Timing The 10 minute sessions were at times too long a time, maybe go to 1-8 minute sessions. Possibly more time to get through stuff. Hosts Nothing against the presenter tonight, but I think a women should speak about prof./business/casual attire. He didn't really address a woman's clothing. If possible find better professionals Material Talk more about interviews & the kinds of questions to ask during them. Possibly suggesting more topics to discuss in introduction conversations, as well as how to handle "quiet" people. Types of Professionals Professionals in the technology field, especially when required for a technology class. Would have likes to have more hosts from different areas. Facilities Find ways to make it easier to hear the presenters in groups. Loud space-hard to hear speakers sometimes. Format More of interactive, all together w/ the circles during workshop it put you in small groups. For interviewing it would be more productive to have each individual speak to a group in a interview style setting. Other Large print on nametag. Overall Waste of time. The first part was not very effective.
Page 1 and 2: INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY CAREER CEN
Page 3 and 4: Assessment of program / event At th
Page 5 and 6: STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Network
Page 7 and 8: Additional Questions: Any comments/
Page 9 and 10: HOST EVALUATION Tuesday, November 4
Page 11 and 12: HOST EVALUATION Three Day Summaries
Page 13 and 14: This chart breaks up the positive c
Page 15 and 16: This chart compares the host positi
Page 19 and 20: This chart compares the host positi
Page 23 and 24: This chart breaks up the positive a
Page 25 and 26: This chart compares the host additi
Page 27: Dress for Success: Prior to this wo
Page 30 and 31: STUDENT EVALUATION Tuesday, Novembe
Page 32 and 33: STUDENT EVALUATION Quantitative Com
Page 36 and 37: Types of Student Improvement Commen
Page 38 and 39: STUDENT EVALUATION Dining Comments
Page 40 and 41: This chart breaks up the comments s
Page 42 and 43: STUDENT EVALUATION Administration C
Page 46 and 47: STUDENT EVALUATION Additional Comme
Page 50 and 51: STUDENT EVALUATION More Information
Page 52 and 53: Introductions Meeting others Introd
Page 54 and 55: STUDENT vs HOST EVALUATION These fo
Page 56 and 57: STUDENT EVALUATION Student Demograp

Networking Etiquette Workshop Student Learning Outcomes Report ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?