07.02.2014 Views

Driven Quantum Systems - Institut für Physik

Driven Quantum Systems - Institut für Physik

Driven Quantum Systems - Institut für Physik

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

266 <strong>Driven</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Systems</strong><br />

for the description of optical properties such as the dipole moment. We have for the<br />

expectation<br />

µ(t) =tr{ϱ TLS σ x } =tr{ϱ T σ z }, (5.92)<br />

where ϱ ... is the density matrix in the corresponding representation. Note that a static<br />

asymmetry energy can be included if the field assumes a static component, i.e. λ sin(ωt+<br />

φ) → λ sin(ωt + φ)+λ 0 .<br />

Explicit results for the time-periodic Schrödinger equation require numerical methods,<br />

cf. Sect. 5.5, one must solve for the quasienergies ɛ αn and the Floquet modes<br />

Ψ αn (x, t). Without proof we state here some results that are very important in discussing<br />

driven tunneling in the deep quantum regime. For example, Shirley [11] already<br />

showed that in the high-frequency regime ∆ ≪ max[ω, (λω) 1/2 ] the quasienergies obey<br />

the difference<br />

ɛ 2,−1 − ɛ 1,1 =¯hω 0 J 0 (4λ/ω), (5.93)<br />

where J 0 denotes the zeroth order Bessel function of the first kind. The sum of the two<br />

quasienergies obeys the rigorous relation [11]<br />

ɛ 2n + ɛ 1k = E 1 + E 2 =0 (mod¯hω). (5.94)<br />

For weak fields, one can evaluate the quasienergies by use of the stationary perturbation<br />

theory in the composite Hilbert space R⊗T. In this way one finds:<br />

(i) Exact crossings at the parity forbidden transitions where ω 0 =2nω, n =1,2,...,<br />

so that<br />

ɛ 2,1 =0 (mod¯hω). (5.95)<br />

(ii) At resonance ω = ω 0 :<br />

ɛ 2,1 = ± 1 2¯hω 0<br />

(<br />

1+ 2λ √<br />

)<br />

1−λ<br />

ω 2 /4ω0<br />

2<br />

0<br />

(mod ¯hω). (5.96)<br />

(iii) Near resonance, one finds from the RWA approximation readily the result<br />

ɛ 2,1 = ± 1 (<br />

2¯hω 1+ Ω )<br />

(mod ¯hω), (5.97)<br />

ω<br />

where Ω denotes the Rabi frequency in (5.87). Correcting this result for counterrotating<br />

terms, an improved result, up to order O(λ 6 ), reads [27]<br />

ɛ 2,1 = ± 1 (<br />

2¯hω 1+ ¯Ω )<br />

(mod ¯hω), (5.98)<br />

ω<br />

with the effective Rabi frequency ¯Ω<br />

¯Ω 2 = δ 2 + 8ω 0λ 2<br />

(ω + ω 0 ) − 8ω 0λ 4<br />

(ω + ω 0 ) 3 . (5.99)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!