07.02.2014 Views

Driven Quantum Systems - Institut für Physik

Driven Quantum Systems - Institut für Physik

Driven Quantum Systems - Institut für Physik

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

282 <strong>Driven</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Systems</strong><br />

This control by a periodic continuous-wave driving can be generalized by recourse to<br />

more complex perturbations. The goal by which a pre-assigned task for the output of<br />

a quantum dynamics is imposed from the outside by applying a sequence of properly<br />

designed (in phase and/or shape) pulse perturbations is known as quantum control<br />

[8]. For example, a primary goal in chemical physics is to produce desired product<br />

yields or to manipulate the atomic and molecular properties of matter [8, 42, 43]. As<br />

an archetype situation, we present the control of the quantum dynamics of two coupled<br />

electronic surfaces<br />

⎛<br />

i¯h ∂ Ψ ⎞ ⎡<br />

⎤ ⎛<br />

g<br />

H g −µ(R)E(t)<br />

⎝ ⎠ =<br />

Ψ ⎞<br />

g<br />

⎣<br />

⎦ ⎝ ⎠ , (5.167)<br />

∂t Ψ e −µ(R)E ∗ (t) H e Ψ e<br />

where R denotes the nuclear coordinates and H g,e are the Born-Oppenheimer Hamiltonians<br />

for the ground- (g) and excited- (e) field free surfaces, respectively. The surfaces<br />

are coupled within the dipole approximation by the transition dipole operator µ(R)and<br />

the generally complex-valued radiation field E(t). Notice that the structure in (5.167)<br />

is identical to that obtained in the driven TLS. Following Kosloff, Hammerich, and<br />

Tannor [43], the rate of change to the ground-state population n g (t) =〈Ψ g (t)|Ψ g (t)〉<br />

is readily evaluated to read<br />

dn g<br />

dt =2Re〈Ψ g|˙Ψ g 〉<br />

If we set with C(t) a real-valued function<br />

=− 2¯h Im ( 〈Ψ g (t)|µ(R)|Ψ e (t)〉E(t) ) . (5.168)<br />

E(t) → E 0 (t) =〈Ψ e (t)|µ(R)|Ψ g (t)〉C(t), (5.169)<br />

we can freeze the population transfer (null-population transfer), with (5.169),<br />

dn g<br />

=0, (5.170)<br />

dt<br />

for all times t. In other words, the population in the ground electronic surface, and<br />

necessarily also the population of the excited surface, remains fixed. If we were to<br />

chose E(t) → iE 0 (t), it would cause population to be transferred to the upper state,<br />

while E(t) →−iE 0 (t) would dump population down to the groundstate. Hence, by<br />

controlling the phase of a laser, we can control the population transfer at will. This<br />

phenomenon applies equally well to driven tunneling in a TLS. What can we achieve<br />

if we manipulate the amplitude C(t)? The change in the energy of the ground state<br />

surface, which can be varied by exciting specific ground-state vibrational modes, is<br />

obtained as<br />

dE g<br />

dt<br />

= d dt<br />

〈Ψ g (t)|H g |Ψ g (t)〉<br />

. (5.171)<br />

〈Ψ g (t)|Ψ g (t)〉

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!