07.02.2014 Views

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong> <strong>2008</strong>: <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />

31<br />

penalty appeals to the Supreme Court. Although the number of executions is a state<br />

secret, there are reasons to believe that the number did drop slightly in 2007.<br />

In late 2007, in the weekly Nanfang Zhoumo, a number of legal experts and intellectuals<br />

jointly released an appeal to eliminate laojiao, the system of reeducation through labor.<br />

This system of administrative detention has been denounced for decades by international<br />

human rights organizations. It remains to be seen whether the government is willing to<br />

move towards its elimination.<br />

In both cases, the press has given space to debates taking place in the upper levels of<br />

power and ran stories about them in real time. The coverage of general news, scandals<br />

and tragedies has greatly developed. In the last decade, the Chinese press seems to have<br />

taken on the role of orchestrating public outcries against bad practices at various levels of<br />

the government. Scandals of all sorts have been denounced, such as corruption cases,<br />

modern slavery and ecological disasters. Journalists have clearly expressed the view that<br />

excessive control of the press is detrimental to good governance.<br />

In February <strong>2008</strong>, the bad weather in the south during the spring festival holiday season<br />

provided the occasion to run editorials raising the issue of the State's responsibility for the<br />

lack of disaster relief response. The time is not so far distant when no disaster ever<br />

appeared in a Chinese newspaper.<br />

In the past few years, two key events in China have been extensively covered by the<br />

press, making it apparent even to the Chinese government that its control of the press<br />

could actually be detrimental to the smooth handling of crises.<br />

The first event was the SARS health crisis. In early 2003, newspapers in the south of<br />

China reported a mysterious illness, that had been creating a panic since the previous<br />

November. Health authorities then resorted to an old habit and orchestrated a news<br />

blackout. But in March, the illness spread to Hong Kong, and questions arose about SARS<br />

from the rest of the world. A military doctor, Jiang Yanyong, revealed the scale of the<br />

epidemic to a German magazine Der Spiegel. The government then stopped denying the<br />

crisis and started tackling the problem with a little more openness and efficiency.<br />

Those events were turning points for the press. The words “transparency,” “responsibility”<br />

and “public opinion” began appearing in Chinese editorials. When Chinese authorities<br />

seek to cover up information, editorials now often recall the SARS crisis to warn of the<br />

consequences of news blackouts.<br />

In May 2003, Sun Zhigang, a young designer with no residence permit in Canton, was<br />

arrested by the police for being an illegal migrant. He was taken to a repatriation center<br />

for migrants, where he was beaten to death. The story was revealed by the local<br />

newspaper Nanfang Dushi Bao, and was then quickly taken up by the entire Chinese<br />

press. A public outcry followed, and legal scholars stepped in to demand the abolition of<br />

the repatriation centers for migrants. They were abolished in the following months.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!