Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong> <strong>2008</strong>: <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />
93<br />
preparations for and during the Games, as well as long after the Games are finished, can<br />
China host a truly successful <strong>Olympics</strong>.<br />
Changing the rules mid-game<br />
An aspiring Olympic host city must clear many hurdles. For <strong>Beijing</strong>, it took two attempts,<br />
one in 1993, and the second successful bid in 2001. With the old lobbying practices now<br />
deemed corrupt and unethical, cities had to navigate a complex bureaucratic process set<br />
forth in the new “candidature acceptance procedures” adopted by the Executive Board of<br />
the International Olympic Committee in February 2000.<br />
Applicant cities must present to the Executive Board, through their respective national<br />
Olympic committees, a completed questionnaire that addresses six themes: motivation<br />
and concept, political and public support (including any opposition), general infrastructure,<br />
sports infrastructure (including environmental impact), logistics and experience, financing.<br />
In August 2000, the Executive Board named five cities to proceed as candidate cities:<br />
<strong>Beijing</strong>, Istanbul, Osaka, Paris and Toronto. These candidate cities had to meet rigorous<br />
application requirements including 10-minute presentations to the board, submit a<br />
candidacy file, together with a non-refundable deposit of $150,000, and host a four-day<br />
site visit by an evaluation commission. The candidacy file had to address 18 themes and<br />
149 questions. Between mid-February and mid-April 2001, the International Olympic<br />
Committee's evaluation commission conducted site visits to each of the cities. As part of<br />
the application requirements, guarantees were required from national, regional, and local<br />
authorities, as well as city and other competent authorities.<br />
Based upon review of the candidacy files and the report, the board drew up the final list of<br />
candidate cities to be submitted to the International Olympic Committee session for<br />
election through secret balloting. The April 3, 2001 evaluation commission's report offered<br />
this assessment of the <strong>Beijing</strong> bid:<br />
This is a government-driven bid with considerable assistance of the NOC (National<br />
Olympic Committee). The combination of a good sports concept with complete<br />
Government support results in a high quality bid. The Commission notes the<br />
process and pace of change taking place in China and <strong>Beijing</strong> and the possible<br />
challenges caused by population and economic growth in the period leading up to<br />
<strong>2008</strong> but is confident that these challenges can be met. There is an environmental<br />
challenge but the strong government actions and investment in this area should<br />
resolve this and improve the city. It is the Commission's belief that a <strong>Beijing</strong> Games<br />
would leave a unique legacy to China and to sport and the Commission is confident<br />
that <strong>Beijing</strong> could organize excellent Games.<br />
On July 13, 2001, in Moscow, the International Olympic Committee voted to award China<br />
the honor of hosting the <strong>2008</strong> Olympic Games. Despite its failed first Olympic bid in 1993,<br />
despite its serious record of ongoing human rights abuses, and despite achieving a top<br />
rating in only one out of 10 applicant selection categories, <strong>Beijing</strong> had come from behind<br />
to beat Osaka, Paris, Toronto, and Istanbul.