07.02.2014 Views

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Beijing</strong> <strong>Olympics</strong> <strong>2008</strong>: <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />

64<br />

what we call black box computers that are set up in countries around the world that we<br />

control ourselves through a secure shell account, allowing us to test 24/7.<br />

The software connects back to databases in Toronto and Cambridge in which we have put<br />

together thousands of urls (Internet addresses) and key words. There are two main<br />

baskets of data, the global list and the local list. The global list includes urls on everything<br />

from civil rights to pornography. We run it in every country that we test in, and then we<br />

also run a local list which varies from country to country. These lists are put together by<br />

locals who understand the context and these consist of web sites, key words and urls,<br />

usually in the local languages, that the experts expect will be targeted for filtering in the<br />

country under investigation. Again, local experts are very important to this research. More<br />

than 20 languages are used in the construction of the local language tests, and we are<br />

presently running tests as we speak in 71 countries around the world.<br />

We have been investigating China for several years. We have produced a major report in<br />

2004 2005, updated 2006-7. We intend to continue to do this throughout the period<br />

leading up to and after the <strong>Olympics</strong>, so that we can gauge exactly what is being filtered.<br />

We categorize China as the world's most active filterer of Internet content. It employs<br />

technical, legal and social means to try to control access. We found that filtering is<br />

centralized in China. No matter where you connect from, at some point you meet the<br />

filters at the main international gateways at the backbone of the network, and the<br />

filtering that takes place there is remarkably consistent. There are basically three methods<br />

that are used.<br />

The first interferes with the system that cross-references domain names, such as www.<br />

example.com with the numerical address. When you try to access a filtered web site the<br />

translation to the numerical address gets redirected to a non-existent site so it looks to all<br />

intents and purposes from the user's perspective as if something is wrong with the site or<br />

it doesn't exist.<br />

China also employs Internet protocol blocking, which affects the way the actual numbers<br />

are programmed into the routers, and key word filtering in the urls. There are rumors also<br />

of scanning for key words in the body of the text. As far as we know, that has not yet<br />

happened, but the way we are testing now will enable us to find out. Technical filtering is<br />

combined with extensive legal mechanisms - laws that prescribe and restrain what can be<br />

done on line. Most of these have the intent of devolving responsibility down to the user<br />

level, whether that is the actual user or the Internet service provider.<br />

The Western search engines that operate in China, including Google, Microsoft and Yahoo,<br />

try to be accommodating to the Internet censorship regime by de-indexing search results,<br />

removing results from queries. The Internet telephony service Skype uses a similar<br />

filtering system on its chat service.<br />

Lastly, there are social controls. Self-discipline pacts, where telecommunications operators<br />

agree that they will cooperate with the regime, are an extension of the climate of self-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!