Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom 90 democratization, it would follow the Soviet Union's lead and disappear. The Tibetans and the Uighurs would take their autonomy, and the breakup of China would follow. Elites accepted the discourse of the party. Most of the intellectuals, most economic elites, most political elites agreed that it was necessary to put aside disagreements and for everyone to work for the development of China, to make it a strong country. This became clear after 1992, after Deng Xiaoping's trip to the south. The economic development triggered by the new policy, which was really impressive under Jiang Zemin, had various consequences. One was development of huge inequalities, which started to worry the leadership during the 10 years from 1992 to 2002. The elites improved their living standards, they improved their symbolic position also. They enjoyed larger freedom of expression, as long as it was not in public. But most of the working people, whom the Communist Party supposedly represented - the workers, the peasants, the laid-off workers (xiagang) and the migrant workers (mingong), who are the artisans of the Chinese miracle - were left out, and intellectuals didn't care about that, except for a very small minority. So, on the one hand, the elites - the managers, the entrepreneurs and the intelligentsia - supported the party, while, on the other hand, the working people, deprived of access to any channel of expression, were completely marginalized. The situation was becoming so dangerous that the leadership realized it had to do something because it threatened the cardinal principle that stability overrides everything else (wending yadao yiqie). To maintain stability, it was necessary to give something to the marginalized; and this happened in the early 21st Century. After 2003, when Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao came to power, the government decided to make a few concessions to society, giving more latitude to the media and using the rhetoric of law, while continuing to prevent the emergence of autonomous organizations. For the Communist Party, the growing inequalities were not a social problem. They were not a political problem. The government told people that if they had complaints they should go to the courts. The official media emphasized that Chinese citizens had rights, human rights, and were entitled to defend them, but these were not guaranteed by an independent judiciary. And what happened is that Chinese citizens who were victims of abuse by cadres seized on this rhetoric and tried to advance their rights by using the law. They "took the fraud at its own word" (jiaxi zhenchang). But what had been conceived by the authorities as a way to prevent social discontent from manifesting itself had the opposite effect. Part of the intelligentsia, especially legal specialists, lawyers and journalists, became interested in the claims of the people and tried to give a voice to the voiceless - to the peasants, farmers and workers deprived of their rights. What happened then, of course, was that the authorities cracked down on lawyers and on human rights activists.
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom 91 The situation now - we must face it - is quite bad for human rights, and quite bad for the marginalized, who have fewer possibilities than before to make their complaints heard. A good image on the international scene, as I said, is a very important element of the legitimacy of the Communist Party. It keeps telling its people that it is the only political force that can restore China’s rightful place in the international community. This is why the Olympic torch relay was so important to the leaders; when they chose to make it visit the major countries, they conceived it as a way to show the world the rise of a strong, harmonious and modern China. When the riots happened in Lhasa, triggering a host of protests during the relay, the Chinese leaders were confronted by a contradiction. What could they do? They couldn't back down. They couldn't make concessions in response to the demonstrations because they feared that would have been a show of weakness. So what did they do? They chose to reinforce their legitimacy inside the country through the mobilization of nationalism, which can be strong in the emerging middle classes, at the risk of damaging China's positive image internationally. This is where we stand now. But the situation is not so simple for the party leaders. We were confronted with similar events in 1999, with the bombing by NATO of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, with the anti-Japanese demonstrations in Beijing and Shanghai in 2005. Every time, after discontent had been vented, the authorities said it was time to change the rhetoric, to "transform anger into strength," to turn this energy toward development of the country and in the present case, for example, to work hard to organize successful Olympics. Why? Because the success of the present leadership is based on globalization and, if it mobilizes extreme nationalism for too long, it risks opening itself up to accusations of selling out the country by opening the doors to multinational companies. The nationalists could accuse the leadership of responsibility for the humiliation of the nation. So this is why, in a way, I’m quite optimistic. I think this outbreak of nationalism will pass, sooner than many people think.
Page 1 and 2:
Beijing Olympics 2008 : Winning Pre
Page 3 and 4:
Beijing Olympics 2008: Championing
Page 5 and 6:
6. How does China deal with foreign
Page 7 and 8:
Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Pres
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42: Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Pres
Page 91: Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Pres
Page 129: Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Pres
show all

Beijing Olympics 2008: Winning Press Freedom - World Press ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?