IWMP-10 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY 

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT(DPR) 

IWMP-10 

Khanpur Block(Naroda) 

(2010-11) 

District Watershed Devlopment Unit, Panchmahal Page 1

INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGENT PROGRAMME 

Detail Project Report.(DPR) 

IWMP-10 (KHANPUR BLOCK) 

YEAR:2010-11 

Range Forest Office, Khanpur 

Project Implement Agency(PIA) 

Deputy Conservator of Forest Office, 

(Normal), Godhra 

Sponcored by : GSWMA, GANDHINAGAR & DWDU, PANCHMAHAL, GODHRA 

Supported by : PROJECT MANAGER & TECHNICAL EXPERT, DWDU (PMS) 

Coordination : M.D.T.s & W.D.T.s 


[Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency] 

Contents 

Table no.1: Basic project information .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 

Table no.2: Watershed information ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 

Table no.3: Weightage of the project .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 

Table no 4: Developmental Programmes running in the project area.. ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ...................................................................................................................................................................... 12 

Table no. 6: Swot Analysis of the project impleemnting agency:.…………………………………………………………………………………………..…. ..15 

Table-7: Details staffs of PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 

Tabel-8 : Land Use Pattern :………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………19 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 

3.1.2.E. Details Slopes of the project area: . ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 

Table no. 14: Land Ownership Details :…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 

Table no. 15: Area Agriculture .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 

Table no. 16: Irrigation facilities .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 


Table no. 17: Crop details of Karif Season: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 

Table no. 18: Livestock details of the Project IWMP-10............................................................................................................................................................................................. 34 

Table no. 19: Drinking water facilities prevailing in the project area .................................................................................................................................................................. 35 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 36 

Table no. 21: Demographic information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 

Table no. 23: Migration details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 

Table no. 24: Poverty ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 

Table no.27: Income Details (Rs.)........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 48 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and inputs in IWMP Projects .......................................................................................................................................................... 55 

Table no. 31: Details of PRA Activities Conducted in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................. 57 

Table no.32: Watershed Committee details .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 95 

Table no. 33: Self Help Group Details .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 107 

Table no. 34: User Group detail ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 111 

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................................................................................................................................... 115 

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment /land bascd activities in watershed works........................................................................................................................ 118 

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................... 197 

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .................................................. 200 


Table no.39: Details of activies related to livelihood production system and micro- enterprises. ....................................................................................................... 202 

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs)/Ugs in the project areas .................................................................................................. 282 

Table no. 41: Linkages Developed at village level ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 284 

Table no. 42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ......................................................................................................................... 286 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ...................................................................................................................................................................... 290 

Table no.44. Capacity Building Institution: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 292 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 292 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ............................................................................................................................................................... 293 

Table no. 47.1 Budget at a glance for the project ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 295 

Table no. 47.2Budget at a glance for the project in (Rs)......................................................................................................................................................................................... 296 

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget in (Rs.)................................................................................................................................................................................. 297 

Table no. 49: Village wise- gape in Fund Requirement ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 298 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ................................................................................................................................................................... 299 

Table no. 51: Expected Employment Generation in Project area: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 304 

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ............................................................................................................................................................................. 305 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) .................................................................................................................. 306 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 308 

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 309 

Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ........................................................................................................................................................... 310 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 313 

Table 58 gives the details of livestock in the project villages of the project IWMP-10. ............................................................................................................................. 314 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 316 


Table no. 60: Details of Monitoring system Proposed for the Project IWMP-10 .......................................................................................................................................... 331 

Maps : 

Maps : 1. Watershed Baseline Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 336 

Maps : 2. Geomorphology Map ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 337 

Maps : 3. Ground water Map ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 338 

Maps : 4. Lan use / Land Cover Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 339 

Maps : 5. River Water Body Map ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 340 

Maps : 6. Slope Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 341 

Maps : 7. Soil Map .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 342 

Action Plan Map 

Maps : 1. Dholkhakhra Action Plan Map ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 343 

Maps : 2. Kakari mahudi Action Plan Map ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 344 

Maps : 3. Rankali Action Plan Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 345 

Maps : 4. Nesada Action Plan Map .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 346 

Maps : 5. Morkhakhra Action Plan Map ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 347 

Maps : 6. Navagam Action Plan Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 348 

Maps : 7. Pandarvada Action Plan Map .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 349 

Maps : 8. Lavana Action Plan Map .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 350 

Maps : 9. Motipura Action Plan Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 351 

Maps : 10. Mena Action Plan Map ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 352 

Maps : 11. Ruzada Action Plan Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 353 

Maps : 12. Zer Action Plan Map ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 354 


Maps : 13. Hoseliyani muvadi Action Plan Map .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 355 

Maps : 14. Naroda Action Plan Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 356 

Maps : 15. Vadagam muvadi Action Plan Map ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 357 

Maps : 16. Badesara muvadi Action Plan Map ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 358 


CHAPTER – 1 

PROJECT BACKGROUND 


1. 1. Basic Project Information 

Panchmahal district is a part of Eastern Hilly Region of the state and sub-divided into two sub-micro regions namely, Mahi plain and Forested scrub 

zone, on the basis of topography, climate, soils and natural vegetation. It lies between the parallels of latitude 22°17" and 23°20" and the meridians of 

Longitude 73°22" and 74°2". 

The length of the district from north to south is about 128.7km and from east to west about 68.1 km. It is bounded on the north by the Sabarkantha 

district, on the east by Dahod district, on the south by Anand districts. Out of the total geographical area (552049 sq km), of the district, cultivable land 47 

percent and 22.50 percent land is under forest cover and its rank is 5 th in terms of area among the district of the state. The region covers the western part of 

the district and includes Lunawada, Santrampur, Godhra, Kalol, Shehera, and Halol talukas. Geographically, the rocks found in this region are alluvium, 

blown sand, etc., Deccan trap, Erinpurru Granite, Gneiss Aravalli and associated rocks. 

The project IWMP-10 consists of Fifteen villages of the Khanpur Block which falls on western part of the district Panchmahal. The villages are named 

dolatpura, kakrimhudi,vadhela,padedi(patapur),borvai,masadra,dhuleta,naroda,vadagam,ladna muvada,lavana,tejakui,mena,ruzada,khadodi The percentage 

of forest area of Vadhela,Borvai,Khadodi And Vadagam about 5 to 13 percent respectively, the villages, kakrimhudi,dhuleta,naroda, lavana,tejakui,mena 

having near about 35to 70 percent forest area of the total area of the villages. The villages are under the Range forest area of east zone of the Khanpur Block. 

Basic details like the census code, Gram Panchayat, Block, Total area, area to be treated in this project and the project cost of the Project IWMP-10 are 

furnished in the Table no. 1. 

Table no.1: Basic project information 

Sr. Name of Villages Gram Taluka District Total Area proposed to be Total project cost PIA 


No. the project 

Panchayats 

Area treated (Ha) (In Lakh) 

Name 

C2K Code 

(Ha) 

1 

Dolatpura 170010114550000 

122.79 122.79 14.735 

2 Kakari mahudi 170010114640000 

Khadodi 

125.15 125.15 

15.018 

3 Vadhela 170010114560000 Vadhela 290.13 290.13 34.816 

4 Padedi(patapur) 170010014620000 Madapur 34.69 34.69 4.163 

5 Borvai 170010114630000 Borvai 773.23 273.23 32.788 

6 Masadra 170010114760000 

147.31 147.31 

Bakor 

17.677 

7 Ladanna Muvada 170010114770000 245.32 245.32 29.438 


Khanpur Panchmahal 

8 Lavana 170010114890000 Lavana 551.97 551.97 66.236 

9 Tejakui 170010114910000 Babaliya 345.97 345.97 41.516 

10 Mena 170010114980000 Bhadarod 885.80 885.80 106.296 

11 Ruzada 170010114660000 Pandarvada 121.82 121.82 14.618 

12 Khadodi 170010114670000 Khadodi 352.71 352.71 42.325 

13 Dhuleta 170010114920000 Dhuleta 845.33 345.33 41.440 

14 Naroda 170010114930000 Naroda 1263.70 1263.70 151.644 

15 Vadagam 170010115050000 Vadagam 1230.68 730.68 87.682 

Dy.C F, 

(Normal) 

Godhara 

7336.60 5836.60 700.392 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project 

Project 

Name 


Village 

Weightage 

i ii iii iv v vi vii Viii ix x xi xii xiii Total 

Dolatpura 5 5 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 92.50 

Kakari mahudi 7.5 5 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 100.00 

Vadhela 7.5 3 5 10 5 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 15 95.5 

Padedi(patapur) 10 0 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 92.5 

Borvai 5 3 5 10 5 10 10 5 10 10 10 0 15 98.00 

District Watershed Devlopment Unit, Panchmahal Page 10

Masadra 5 0 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 92.5 

Ladanna 

Muvada 

5 3 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 95.5 

Lavana 7.5 3 5 10 5 10 10 5 10 10 5 0 15 95.5 

Tejakui 10 0 5 10 5 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 15 100.00 

Mena 7.5 0 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 95.00 

Ruzada 7.5 3 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 98.00 

Khadodi 5 0 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 92.5 

Dhuleta 7.5 3 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 10 0 15 103.0 

Naroda 2.5 3 5 10 5 10 10 7.5 10 10 5 0 15 93.00 

Vadagam 5 3 5 10 5 10 10 5 10 10 10 0 15 98.00 

Average 6.35 2.27 5.00 10.00 9.8 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.00 10.0 10.0 00.00 15.00 96.07 

Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed 

Sr. 

Maximum 

Criteria 

No 

score 

Ranges & scores 

i Poverty index (% of poor to 

population) 

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % 

(2.5) 

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) 

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower 

than minimum wages (5) 

Actual wages are equal to or 

higher than minimum wages 

(0) 

iv % of small and marginal farmers 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3) 

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 

vi Moisture index/ 

DPAP/ DDP Block 

15 -66.7 & below (15) 

DDP Block 

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) 

DPAP Block 

0 to -33.2 (0) 

Non DPAP/ DDP Block 

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % 

(Reject) 

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered 

(0) 


ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5) 

x Productivity potential of the land 15 Lands with low production & where 

productivity can be significantly 

enhanced with reasonable efforts (15) 

xi 

xii 

xiii 

Contiguity to another watershed that 

has already been developed/ treated 

Cluster approach in the plains (more 

than one contiguous microwatersheds 

in the project) 

Cluster approach in the hills (more 

than one contiguous microwatersheds 

in the project) 

10 Contiguous to previously treated 

watershed & contiguity within the 

microwatersheds in the project (10) 

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster 

(15) 

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster 

(15) 

Lands with moderate 

production & where 

productivity can be enhanced 

with reasonable efforts (10) 

Contiguity within the 

microwatersheds in the project 

but non contiguous to 

previously treated watershed 

(5) 

4 to 6 microwatersheds in 

cluster (10) 

3 to 5 microwatersheds in 

cluster (10) 

Lands with high production & 

where productivity can be 

marginally enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (5) 

Neither contiguous to previously 

treated watershed nor contiguity 

within the microwatersheds in 

the project (0) 

2 to 4 microwatersheds in cluster 

(5) 

2 to 3 microwatersheds in cluster 

(5) 

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 

Table no.3: Watershed information 

Sr. 

No 

Name of 

the Village 

Total Area of the 

Village (Ha) 

Treated area 

(Ha) 

Area 

Propos 

ed to 

be 

treate 

d in 

IWMP- 

10 

(Ha) 

Total Forest area of the 

Village (Ha) 

No. Of 

watersh 

eds to be 

treated 

Major Micro-watershed falls in 

the village 

1 Dolatpura 122.79 0.00 122.79 0.00 

5E1C4a2b 

Kakari 

6 

2 

125.15 0.00 125.15 62.43 5E1C4a2c 

mahudi 


3 Vadhela 290.13 0.00 290.13 20.14 5E1C4a2b 

4 

Padedi(pata 

pur) 

34.69 0.00 34.69 0.00 5E1C4a2b 

5 Borvai 773.23 500.00 273.23 37.02 5E1C4a2c 

6 Masadra 147.31 0.00 147.31 0.00 5E1C4a1f 

7 

Ladanna 

Muvada 

245.32 0.00 245.32 0.00 5E1C4a1e 

8 Lavana 551.97 0.00 551.97 170.14 5E1C4a1e 

9 Tejakui 345.97 0.00 345.97 240.39 5E1C4c2g 

10 Mena 885.80 0.00 885.80 444.96 5E1C4alf 

11 Ruzada 121.82 0.00 121.82 0.00 5E1C4alf 

12 Khadodi 352.71 0.00 352.71 20.99 5E1C4a2c 

13 Dhuleta 845.33 500.00 345.33 403.80 5E1C4c2g 

14 Naroda 1263.70 0.00 1263.70 463.62 5E1C4c2g 

15 Vadagam 1230.68 500.00 730.68 171.20 5E1C4c2e 

Total 7336.60 1500.00 

5836.6 

0 

2034.49 6 - 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: 

Sr. 

No. 

Name of the 

programme/sc 

heme 

Sponsoring 

agency 

Objectives of 

the 

programme/sc 

heme 

Year of 

commence 

ment 

No 

Villages covered 

Name 

Estimate 

d number 

of 

beneficiar 

ies 


1 B.R.G.F 

2 IAY 

3 N.R.E.G.A. 

4 SAY 

6 WASMO 

Government 

of India with 

World Bank 

Government 

of India 

Government 

of India 

Government 

of Gujarat 

Government 

of Gujarat 

Employment & 

Infrastructure 

Development of 

Social 


Employment 

Generation 

Development of 

Social 


2007 -08 15 All 165 

2007 -08 13 

Vadhela,Kakrimahudi,Lavana,Dolpura,masadra,Lada 

nmuvada,Dhuleta,Tejakui, Mena, 

Ruzada,,Khadodi,Naroda,Vadagam, 

2009-10 15 All 636 

2006-07 15 All 77 

Water Supply 2009-10 03 Borvai,Vadagam,Lavana 150 

128 


Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: 


Table no 5 gives the details of the area treated by the previous watershed schemes. It shows that the Hariyali Watershed project has covered 1500 ha of area 

of the village Borvai,Dhuleta And Vadagam all together. 

Project 

name 

Year 

started 


villages 

No. Of 

micro 

waters 

hed 

Watershed 

codes 

Area 

under 

treatment 

Funding 

source 

Nodal 

agency 

PIA 

Total 

cost 

(Rs.) 

Expenditur 

e incurred 

up to start 

of IWMP 

(Rs) 

% financial 

completion 

% physical 

completio 

n 

1 Borvai 2000-01 Borvai 1 5E1C4a2c 500 Ha Govt. DRDA MGP(NGO) 20.00 20.00 100 100 

2 Dhuleta 1995-96 Dhuleta 1 5E1C4c2g 500Ha Govt. DRDA MGP(NGO) 20.00 20.00 100 100 

3 Vadagam 2008-09 Vadagam 1 5E1C4c2e 500Ha Govt DRDA 

Taluka 

Panchayat 

30.00 10.00 33 26 


CHAPTER - 2 

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 


2.1 Project Implementing Agency 

The State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) approved the Forest Department as Project Implementing Agency (PIA) for the project sanctioned under the 

Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) at Panchmahal. 

2.2 About the Forest and Environment Department and its Objectives 

The Forests & Environment Department in the Government of Gujarat has environment wing and forest wing. The environment wing of the 

Department is the apex body in the Gujarat State for implementation of all the environment related matters including Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, 

which is an umbrella Act on environment in the country. The main mandate of the Department is to achieve the sustainable development in the State and 

introducing the sound environmental management practices. The Department has four executing agencies viz Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat 

Ecology Commission, Gujarat Institute of Desert Ecology and Gujarat Environmental Management Institute, for discharging its functions. 

2.3 Main Objective of the Department 

1. To Protect and Manage the forest for Sustainable Development 

2. To Increase the vegetative coverage up to 33 % through plantation and afforestation in outside of the forest area as per the forest Policy. 

3. To rehabitate the Legraded forest lands log carring out SMC works and afforestation work. 

4. To protect the wild life and to implement the wild life protection act. 

5. To take special measures for protection of the extinct animal 

6. To expedite forest settlement issues and dwellers' rights 

7. To utilize the JBIC fund for afforestation 

8. To increase network of JFMs and expand the coverage of Eco- clubs 

9. Development of new forests / eco based tourism spots 

10. To take actions with regard to Climate change and its awareness 


2.4 SWOT Analysis of the Forest Department: 

Strength: 

1. Presence of dedicated and experience staffs at all level (Field, 

Middle Management and High/ Officer Level) of the Forest 

Department. 

2. Presence of field/local level staffs at the project area. 

3. Regular visit of the RFO/ ACF to the forest area or project area 

4. Use of modern techniques in the field with proper technique 

5. Previous knowledge of convergence with various line 

departments. 

6. Prevailing accounting procedure of the Department. 

Weakness: 

1. Various schemes is being implemented by the department with 

limited human resources/ staffs 

2. Presence of Poor infrastructure at the field level. 

Opportunity: 

1. Proper Implementation of the Project 

2. Can easily identify and resolve the problems of the area. 

3. Proper Monitoring and guidance to the WDTs. 

4. Impact will be more visible due to proper implementation 

5. Proper planning and implementation of the convergence of the 

projects. 

6. Transparency in Accounting System 

Threat: 

1. Overloaded work may mislead the watershed project or may 

divert the vision at the time of implementation of the projects of 

IWMP. 

2. Can dissatisfy the team to work properly 

2.5 Details of Project Implementing Agency 


Table- 6 and 7 gives the details of the Project Implementing Agency of the IWMP-10 of the Khanpur Taluka of Panchmahal District. Table 7 with the address 

of the PIA where as the table 7.1 presented the staffs placed for that specific project with details of the staffs. 

Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

(i) Type of Department Forest Department 

(ii) Name of PIA Deputy Conservation of Forest, Normal 

(iii) Nodal Officer of the Project, PIA Sri. M.M.Bhabhor. 

1 IWMP-10 

(iv) Designation & Address R.F.O., Range Forest Office, Khanpur PMS 

(v) Telephone 02674-288048,288421 

(vi) Fax - 

(vii) E-mail - 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Sr. 

No. 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned 

1 Sri.Bhabhor m,m, 52 M 

Nodal Officer&Range 

Forest Officer 

Std-12 th 

Monthly 

remuneration 

30Year 08-08-2010 35000/- 

2 Sri.Damor Saburbhai .F 31 M W.D.T. Eng. Diploma Civil 11 Years 19-09-2011 12000/- 

3 Sri.Patel Vikasbhai .S 22 M W.D.T. Agri. BRS,M.S.W 1 Years 10-10-2011 8000/- 

4 Sri. Damor Laxmanbhai M. 36 M W.D.T. CM. B.R.S.Agri. 7 Years 02-08-2011 8000/- 


CHAPTER 3: 

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA 

Introduction: 

Chapter -3 gives the basic information of the project area. The chapter is broadly divided in to three major head; the first head deals with 


geographical information of the area and the last head deals with the Livilihood pattern of the area where as the middle head deals with the socio-economic 

condition of the project area. Brief discussions of these are discussed as under. 

3.1 Geographical / Geo-hydrological Features 

The climate of the district is characterized by a hot summer and dry in the non- rainy season. It also considered as a drought prone area as per NRAA. 

The winter seasons start from December to February followed by the hot season from March to May. The south-west monsoon season is from June to 

September and the post monsoon season from October to November. The details of geographical information like pattern of land uses, climatic condition, 

soil regimes, soil erosion and salinity and how the people harvesting the ground are descried briefly as under. 

3.1.1 Land use pattern: 

Table no.8 gives the details of the pattern of land uses in the project villages of the IWMP-10 which is in Khanpur Taluka. The total geographical area 

of the proposed village of IWMP-10 is 7336.60 hectors, in which one thousand Five hundrad hectors are being already treated by the previous watershed 

programme. 

Table No. 8: Land use pattern: 

Sr. 

No. 

Proj 

ect 

Nam 

e 

Names of 

villages 

Geogra 

phical 

Area of 

the 

village 

(ha) 

Forest 

Area 

(ha) 

% 

Area 

Agricult 

ural use 

(ha) 

% 

Rain fed 

area 

(ha) 

District Watershed Devlopment Unit, Panchmahal Page 22 

% 

Per 

m- 

ane 

nt 

past 

ures 

(ha) 

% 

Cultiv 

able 

(ha) 

% 

Noncultiva 

ble 

(ha) 

Wasteland 

1 IWMP Dolatpura 122.79 0 0 108.95 88.73 108.95 88.73 0.00 0.00 3.19 2.60 10.65 8.67 13.84 11.27 

2 -10 Kakari 125.15 62.43 49.88 57.59 46.02 57.59 46.02 0.00 0.00 1.61 1.29 3.52 2.81 5.13 4.10 

% 

Total 

Waste 

land 

(ha) 

%

mahudi 

3 Vadhela 290.13 20.14 6.94 213.00 73.42 213.00 73.42 0.00 0.00 19.13 6.59 37.86 13.05 56.99 19.64 

4 

Padedi(pa 

tapur) 

34.69 0 0.00 34.03 98.10 34.03 98.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 1.90 0.66 1.90 

5 Borvai 773.23 37.02 4.79 713.21 92.24 713.21 92.24 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.52 19.00 2.46 23.00 2.97 

6 Masadra 147.31 0 0.00 129.00 87.57 129.00 87.57 0.00 0.00 5.98 4.06 12.33 8.37 18.31 12.43 

7 

Ladanna 

Muvada 

245.32 0 0.00 194.00 79.08 194.00 79.08 0.00 0.00 36.32 14.81 15.00 6.11 51.32 20.92 

8 Lavana 551.97 170.14 30.82 339.00 61.42 339.00 61.42 0.00 0.00 23.98 4.34 18.85 3.42 42.83 7.76 

9 Tejakui 345.97 240.39 69.48 40.30 11.65 40.30 11.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.28 18.87 65.28 18.87 

10 Mena 885.80 444.96 50.23 306.00 34.55 306.00 34.55 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.45 130.84 14.77 134.84 15.22 

11 Ruzada 121.82 0 0.00 98.86 81.15 98.86 81.15 0.00 0.00 20.07 16.48 0.89 0.73 20.96 17.21 

12 Khadodi 352.71 20.99 5.95 312.16 88.50 312.16 88.50 0.00 0.00 7.07 2.00 12.50 3.54 19.57 5.55 

13 Dhuleta 845.33 403.80 47.77 347.60 41.12 347.60 41.12 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.83 86.92 10.28 93.92 11.11 

14 Naroda 1263.7 463.62 36.69 575.68 45.56 575.68 45.56 0.00 0.00 5.20 0.41 219.00 17.33 224.20 17.74 

15 Vadagam 1230.68 171.20 13.91 1049.68 85.29 1049.68 85.29 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.49 4.00 0.33 10.00 0.81 

Total 7336.60 2034.49 32.37 4519.06 71.90 4519.06 71.90 0 0 143.55 2.28 637.30 10.14 780.85 12.42 



Out of total geographical area avarege 32.37percent area covered by forest land in 

which the whole area of village Vadagam 13.91 percent forest, Borvai 4.79, Khadodi 5.95, 

kakarimahudi 49.88, Vadhela 6.94 , Lavana 30.82 , Tejakui 69.48 , Mena 50.23 , Dhuleta 

47.77 , Naroda 36.69 percent forest land covered by forest. Total area of agricultural use is 

4519.06ha i.e. 71.90 percent of the total area and mainly a Kharif crops are cultivated and 

some village cultivted Rabbi Crops also.Land of agriculture use i.e. .71.90 percent of the total 

geographical area comes under rain fed area. near about 12.42 % percent total wasteland in 

which 2.28 percent belongs to cultivable wasteland. Land use pattern are detailed in 

mention above table 8. 

3.1.2 Agro-Climate Condition: The agro-climatic condition of the project area is 

same as the district climatic condition. The climate of the district is characterized by a hot 

summer and dry in the non- rainy season. It also considered as a drought prone area as per 

NRAA. The winter seasons start from December to February followed by the hot season from 

March to May. The south-west monsoon season is from June to September and the post 

monsoon season from October to November. 

3.1.2. A. Soil Regimes 

Fig: 3.1: Soil Pattern of Panchmahal 

The soil pattern of the district shown in the fig. 3.1, which indicates the types of soil in the district are deep black, shallow black, grey brown and 

mixed red. The soil texture in the district is Black salt or mixed red and Brown salt, the area under deep black and grey brown is small. The district has 

undulating topography and hard rocky terrain (with altitude varying from 75 m to 300 m), with shallow medium black soil having low fertility. Soil depths 

vary from a few centimetres to 90 cm in most areas. The soil in the hilly areas is subjected to constant erosion due to lack of vegetation cover. The western 

parts comprising Kalol and parts of Halol, Godhra and Lunawada Taluka constitute a plain land. It is a part of the Mahi river basin. This part is mostly flat, 

punctuated at parts by isolated hills. The northern and eastern portion comprising mainly Lunawada, Santrampur and Jambughoda talukas are covered by 


hills and forests intercepted by plain cultivated lands and villages situated in the river valley. 

IWMP-10 watershed project falls under Madhya Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly shallow black soil. The depth of soil is moderate to 

deep about 60 to 90 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand and clay. Fifty percent of the total project area is dominated by the mixed red black 

soil. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area of project is moderate ranging from 1-20% slope. 

Details are tabled in table no. 9. 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: 

Sr. No. 

Project Name 

Name of the Agroclimatic 

zone covers 

project area 

1 IWMP-10 Madhaya Gujarat 

Names of the 

Major soil types 

Area in ha villages 

b) Area in 

a)Type 

ha 

122.79 Dolatpura 

108.95 

125.15 Kakari mahudi 57.59 

290.13 Vadhela 213.00 

34.69 Padedi(patapur) 34.03 

773.23 Borvai 713.21 

147.31 Masadra 129.00 

245.32 Ladanna Muvada 194.00 

551.97 Lavana 339.00 

semi roky,semi 

345.97 Tejakui lomy,semy black 40.30 

885.80 Mena 306.00 

121.82 Ruzada 98.86 

352.71 Khadodi 312.16 

845.33 Dhuleta 347.60 

1263.70 Naroda 575.68 

1230.68 Vadagam 1049.68 

Topography 

steep slope 


3.1.2.B. Flood and drought information: 

The project area has no previous experience of flood rather it has a great experience of drought. The drought used to found once in three year so it is 

called drought prone area. Table 10 gives the details of flood and drought information of the project villages. 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

Sr. No Name of Project Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 

Dolatpura Nil Once in3 Year 

2 Kakari mahudi Nil Once in3 Year 

3 Vadhela Nil Once in3 Year 

4 Padedi(patapur) Nil Once in3 Year 

5 Borvai Nil Once in3 Year 

6 Masadra Nil Once in3 Year 

7 Ladanna Muvada Nil Once in3 Year 


Lavana Nil Once in3 Year 

9 Tejakui Nil Once in3 Year 

10 Mena Nil Once in3 Year 

11 Ruzada Nil Once in3 Year 

12 Khadodi Nil Once in3 Year 

13 Dhuleta Nil Once in3 Year 

14 Naroda Nil Once in3 Year 

15 Vadagam Nil Once in3 Year 

3.1.2. C Soil erosion and soil salinity details: 

Decline in the soil quality due to sheet erosion is frightening the people of this area. There has a substantial reduction in the application of organic 

manure resulting in reduced in moisture retention capacity and porosity in the soils. Generally the organic carbon content too is very low. Lack of water 

conservation measures at the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration of environmental degradation and soil erosion. The detail soil 


erosion of the project villages are presented in the table no. 11.1 where as the table no 11.2 gives the detail of soil salinity. 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion 

Project Name 


Cause 

Type of erosion 

Water erosion 

Area affected 

(ha) 

Water erosion 

a Sheet 2077.27 

b Rill 4519.07 

c Gully 359.83 

d Ravenous 0 

Sub-Total 0 

Wind erosion 

Total 6956.17 

Run off 

(mm/ year) 

Average soil loss 

(Tonnes/ ha/ 

year) 

900.00 3 to 4 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Name of the Project Survey Number Soil pH 

Type of Salinity 

(Inherent/Ingress) 

IWMP-10 About 50% 8.30 Inherent 


3.1.2. D Details of Rainfall and Temperature 

The agriculture of the project area is completely dependent on rainfall of monsoon. The rainfall is suddenly decreased from 2007 onwards due to 

effect of the global warming which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is about 548 mm. 

Constant crop failure has become a common phenomenon in this area. Details are given in the table 12. 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: 

Name of project 

Year 

Average rainfall- last 5 years 

Max 

Temperature 

Min 

3.1.2.E. Details Slopes of the project area: 

2007 773 43.5 24 

2008 495 42.5 23 

2009 409 45 21 

2010 435 41 20 

2011 630 45 30 

The slope of the watershed was calculated based on topographic elevation (contours and spot height) from satellite maps. These maps will help in 

recommendation/implementation of suitable land management practices in association of other thematic information. The details are presented in the table 

no. 13. 

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief 

Village name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams 


Dolatpura 195-186 09 Main Mahi Streams 

Kakari mahudi 180-175 05 Main Mahi Streams 

Vadhela 200-182 18 Main Mahi Streams 

Padedi(patapur) 194-183 12 Main Mahi Streams 

Borvai 194-182 10 Main Mahi Streams 

Masadra 150-140 09 Main Mahi Streams 

Ladanna Muvada 161-153 07 Main Mahi Streams 

Lavana 174-161 12 Main Mahi Streams 

Tejakui 170-158 10 Main Mahi Streams 

Mena 125-110 10 Main Mahi Streams 

Ruzada 161-160 08 Main Mahi Streams 

Khadodi 162-159 07 

Dhuleta 146-143 07 

Naroda 131-124 09 

Vadagam 128-114 08 

Main Mahi Streams 




3.1.3. Land and Agriculture: 

People of this region are very poor. The average land holding of the project area is about one ha. The total net sown area is 4519.06 ha where 1775.07 ha 

area are cultivated 2 times in the total project area. The main crops under agriculture are Maize, Tur and paddy. Some of the farmers cultivated 

wheat,Funnal And Custere in the Rabi season if the irrigation is available to that farmer. The detail about the land ownership is given in the table 14; table 


15 shows the area of agriculture, 16 no table gives the details of the irrigation facilities available in the area. Only well is the mode of irrigation in this area, 

which is available for only two months. 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sr. 

Total owned land 

HHs giving land HHs taking land 

Village 

No. 

Gen OBC SC ST 

on lease on lease 

1 Dolatpura 18 12 17 0 0 0 

2 Kakari mahudi 8 5 12 0 0 0 

3 Vadhela 63 25 27 26 0 0 

4 Padedi(patapur) 06 04 8 0 0 0 

5 Borvai 36 245 6 10 0 0 

6 Masadra 28 05 0 11 0 0 

7 Ladanna Muvada 89 0 2 5 0 0 

8 Lavana 89 46 16 15 0 0 

9 Tejakui 18 22 0 0 0 0 

10 Mena 146 212 15 2 0 0 

11 Ruzada 35 0 0 0 0 0 

12 Khadodi 218 0 0 15 0 0 

13 Dhuleta 211 91 4 9 0 0 

14 Naroda 211 55 75 80 0 0 

15 Vadagam 192 242 70 42 0 0 

Total 1368 964 252 215 0 0 

Table no. 15: Area Agriculture 

Sr. No. Name of the Village Net sown area 


One time (ha) Two times (ha) Three times (ha) 

1 Dolatpura 

2 Kakari mahudi 

3 Vadhela 

4 Padedi(patapur) 

5 Borvai 

6 Masadra 

7 Ladanna Muvada 

8 Lavana 

9 Tejakui 

10 Mena 

11 Ruzada 

12 Khadodi 

13 Dhuleta 

14 Naroda 

15 Vadagam 

Total 


50.25 00 

57.59 

15.20 00 

213 

150.25 00 

34.03 

24.00 00 

713.21 

250.32 00 

129 

70.20 00 

194 

50.00 00 

339 

80.35 00 

40.3 

15.00 00 

306 

185.25 00 

98.86 

30.20 00 

312.16 

158.30 00 

347.6 

160.25 00 

575.68 

235.00 00 


300.50 00 

4519.06 1775.07 00 

Table no. 16: Irrigation facilities 

Sr. Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well 


No. 

Availability 

months 

Net area 

(ha) 

Gross area 

(ha) 

Availability 

months 

Net area 

(ha) 

Gross area 

(ha) 

Availability 

months 

Net area 

(ha) 

Gross 

area (ha) 

1 Dolatpura NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 15.00 15.00 

2 Kakari mahudi NA NA NA 3 10.00 10.00 3 8.00 8.00 

3 Vadhela NA NA NA 3 15.00 15.00 4 15.00 15.00 

4 Padedi(patapur) NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 4.00 4.00 

5 Borvai NA NA NA 2 8.00 8.00 3 10.00 10.00 

6 Masadra NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 12.00 12.00 

7 Ladanna Muvada NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 14.00 14.00 

8 Lavana NA NA NA 3 15.00 15.00 4 25.00 25.00 

9 Tejakui NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 5.00 5.00 

10 Mena 4 25.00 25.00 3 20.00 20.00 4 38.00 38.00 

11 Ruzada NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 12.00 12.00 

12 Khadodi NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 40.00 40.00 

13 Dhuleta 4 20.00 20.00 NA NA NA 3 22.00 22.00 

14 Naroda NA NA NA 2 10.00 10.00 4 28.00 28.00 

15 Vadagam 4 150.00 150.00 3 10.00 10.00 4 52.00 52.00 

3.1.4 Crop details: 

Main crop of this area are maize,Red grams (Tur), Paddy (Dangar) and wheat. Farmers prefer to cultivate maize in Karif season where wheat in Rabi 


season. Highest acres of land are used by the cultivation of Maize 2710.69 ha where the lowest contribution is from paddy in Karif season. Due to lack of 

water availability the people are not able to manipulate the land in the Zaid season. The details are given in the table 17 and 17.1. 

Table no. 17: Crop details of Karif Season: 

Sr. 

No. 

Kharif (Monsoon) 


Crop 

Crop 

Crop 1 

Maize 

Tur(Redgram) 

Project 

2 

3 

Paddy 

Villages Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production 

(ha) (Kg) (Kg/Ha) (ha) (Kg) (Kg/Ha) (ha) (Kg) 

1 Dolatpura 64.80 64800 1200 21.60 52700 850 22.55 45000 900 

2 Kakari mahudi 34.55 34550 1250 11.00 8500 850 12.00 9200 920 

3 Vadhela 127.80 39000 1300 42.60 60000 850 42.60 63900 850 

4 Padedi(patapur) 20.41 20000 1400 6.80 4000 800 5.00 3000 810 

5 Borvai 427.80 342000 1350 142.60 85000 830 130.00 78000 830 

6 Masadra 77.40 46500 1300 25.00 15000 800 25.80 15000 800 

Productivity 

(Kg/Ha) 

7 Ladanna Muvada 116.40 93000 1250 38.00 22800 800 39.00 300000 800 

8 Lavana 203.40 162700 1200 67.80 40600 850 65.00 350000 850 

9 Tejakui 24.18 19300 1200 8.00 48000 850 9.00 54000 800 

10 Mena 183.60 146800 1250 60.20 36720 800 58.00 348000 850 

11 Ruzada 

12 Khadodi 

13 Dhuleta 

14 Naroda 

15 Vadagam 

59.30 47448 1200 19.77 11800 800 20.00 13000 800 

187.29 149800 1300 62.43 37400 850 60.00 12000 820 

208.56 166800 1300 58.00 41000 850 60.00 13000 850 

345.40 276300 1300 115.00 69000 800 100.00 65000 900 

629.80 520000 1250 209.00 128000 800 195.00 150000 900 

Total 2710.69 3442576 1270 887.80 732435 825 843.95 713138 845 


Table no. 17.1: Crop details of Rabi Season 

Crop 1 

Wheat 

Rabi (Winter) 

Crop 

2 Funnel Seed Crop 3 Custered 

Sr. 

No. 


Project Village 

Area 

(ha) 

Production 

(kg) 

Productivity 

(Kg/Ha) 

Area 

(ha) 

Production 

(kg) 

Productivity 

(Kg/Ha) 

Area 

(ha) 

Production 

(kg) 

Productivity 

(Kg/Ha) 

1 Dolatpura 30.15 40000 1600 10.00 11000 1200 9.00 11700 1100 

1230 

1050 

2 Kakari mahudi 9.12 12000 1600 3.04 3648 

2.00 2700 

3 Vadhela 90.00 126000 1700 28.00 33600 1300 26.00 35100 1200 

1210 

1100 

4 Padedi(patapur) 14.40 25000 1600 4.80 5760 

3.00 3800 

5 Borvai 150.00 225000 1800 45.00 54000 1300 30.00 42000 1020 

6 Masadra 42.25 60000 1750 14.00 16100 1200 10.00 14500 950 

7 Ladanna Muvada 30.00 40000 1600 10.00 11750 1300 8.00 10800 1050 

8 Lavana 48.00 67200 1600 16.07 19284 1300 13.00 17900 1200 

9 Tejakui 9.00 10800 1300 3.00 3600 1200 2.00 2700 980 

10 Mena 100.00 1500000 1800 37.05 44460 1300 25.00 33750 1040 

11 Ruzada 18.00 25500 1600 5.00 6000 1250 4.00 5540 1030 

12 Khadodi 94.00 142000 1600 31.00 35650 1300 25.00 32000 1000 

13 Dhuleta 95.00 143500 1650 25.00 28900 1300 15.00 18000 1020 


14 Naroda 140.00 210000 1800 28.00 32900 1350 25.00 32500 1100 

15 Vadagam 180.00 252000 1800 50.00 60000 1300 40.00 55600 980 

Total 1049.92 1735518 1653 309.96 393339.2 1269 237.00 249798 1054 

3.1.5 Livestock details. 

The cluster villages have total of 7133 cows and 7072 numbers of buffaloes out of which majority are of local breed, 3810 goats and 5955 bullocks 

are present in the project area. Due saline water at a shallow depth and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture area for their animals. This leads 

to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. The productivity of the dairy animals is so low that there is no dairy 

cooperative in the village. 

Table no. 18: Livestock details of the Project IWMP-10 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Buffalo Cow Total Milk 

Goat 

No Milk No Milk (Buffalo+Cow) No Milk 

Sheep Bullock Hen 

1 Dolatpura 


220 42240 537 137472 179712 139 1877 0 302 256 

42 8064 140 35840 43904 99 1337 0 31 139 

3 Vadhela 445 85440 985 252160 337600 489 6602 0 368 828 

4 Padedi(patapur) 50 9600 30 7680 17280 49 662 0 35 80 

5 Borvai 208 39936 293 75008 114944 127 1715 0 670 60 

6 Masadra 110 21120 80 20480 41600 39 527 0 65 40 

7 Ladanna Muvada 150 28800 60 15360 44160 6 81 0 210 25 

8 Lavana 180 34560 70 17920 52480 235 3173 0 402 50 

9 Tejakui 90 17280 30 7680 24960 201 2714 0 130 25 

10 Mena 230 44160 190 48640 92800 116 1566 0 534 239 


11 Ruzada 80 15360 20 5120 20480 54 729 0 163 52 

12 Khadodi 400 76800 519 132864 209664 67 905 0 402 40 

13 Dhuleta 648 124416 1198 306688 431104 354 4779 0 743 91 

14 Naroda 1115 214080 1499 383744 597824 482 6507 0 942 262 

15 Vadagam 3104 595968 1482 379392 975360 1353 18266 0 958 2494 

IWMP-10 7072 1357824 7133 1826048 3183872 3810 51435 0 5955 4681 

3.1.6 Ground water, drinking water and CPR of the Project area: 

Table no.19 detailed about the drinking water available and the ground water table in project area. It was found that only hand pump and well were 

the main source of drinking water and it available only for 07 to 12 months. Table 20 gives the detail of the common property resources of the project area. 

Table no. 19: Drinking water facilities prevailing in the project area 

Sr. 

No. 

1 

Project Name 

Village 

Ground water table 

(mt) 

Source of drinking water 

Availability in 

months 

3 Vadhela 10 Handpump, Open Well 07 Moderate 

4 


Padedi(patapur) 12 Handpump, Open Well 09 Moderate 

Quality 

Dolatpura 9 Handpump, Open Well 09 Moderate 

2 Kakari mahudi 7 Handpump, Open Well 10 Moderate 

5 Borvai 10 Handpump, Open Well 10 

Moderate 

6 Masadra 7 Handpump, Open Well 10 Moderate 


7 Ladanna Muvada 7 Handpump, Open Well 10 Moderate 

Handpump, Open Well, 

Moderate 

8 Lavana 7 

12 

Water Works 

9 Tejakui 14 Handpump, Open Well 07 Moderate 

10 Mena 6 Handpump,Open Well 10 Moderate 

11 Ruzada 8 Handpump,Open Well 09 

12 Khadodi 8 Handpump, Open Well 10 

Moderate 

Moderate 

13 Dhuleta 11 Handpump, Open Well 10 Moderate 

14 Naroda 9 

15 Vadagam 9 

Handpump, Open Well, 

Water Works 

Handpump, Open 

Well,Water Works 

12 

12 

Moderate 

Moderate 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 

Sr. 

No. 


project 

Village 

1 IWMP-10 Dolatpura 

CPR 

Particulars 

Total Area (ha) 

Area owned/ In possession of 

Govt. 

(Specify PRI 

deptt.) 

Pvt. 

persons 

Any other 

(Pl. 

Specify) 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Pvt. 

persons 

Govt. 

(Specify 

deptt.) 

Pastures 

Orchards 

Village Woodlot 6.21.22 

Forest 0.00 0.00 

Village Ponds/ Tanks 

Community Buildings 

Weekly Markets 

Permanent markets 

Temples/ Places of worship 


PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. 

Specify)

2 IWMP-10 Kakari mahudi 

3 IWMP-10 Vadhela 

4 IWMP-10 Padedi(patapur) 

5 IWMP-10 Borvai 

Others (waste land/Gauchar ) 13.84 13.84 

Pastures 0.56.66 

Orchards 


Forest 62.43 62.43 






Others (waste land/Gauchar) 5.13 5.00 


Orchards 


Forest 20.14 20.14 







Pastures 

Orchards 

Village Woodlot 

Forest 0.00 0.00 







Pastures 

Orchards 


6 IWMP-10 Masadra 

7 IWMP-10 Ladanna Muvada 

8 IWMP-10 Lavana 


Forest 37.02 37.02 







Pastures 6.00 

Orchards 


Forest 0.00 0.00 







Pastures 

Orchards 

Village Woodlot 11.00 

Forest 0.00 0.00 







Pastures 

Orchards 


Forest 170.14 170.14 



9 IWMP-10 Tejakui 

10 IWMP-10 Mena 

11 IWMP-10 Ruzada 






Pastures 

Orchards 


Forest 240.39 240.39 







Pastures 7.09 

Orchards 


Forest 444.96 444.96 






Others (waste land/Gauchar) 134.84 100.00 


Orchards 


Forest 0.00 0.00 








Pastures 

Orchards 


Forest 20.99 20.99 

12 IWMP-10 Khadodi 







Pastures 35.00 

Orchards 


Forest 403.80 403.80 

13 IWMP-10 Dhuleta 







Pastures 7.65 

Orchards 


Forest 463.62 463.62 

14 IWMP-10 Naroda 







15 IWMP-10 Vadagam Pastures 


Orchards 


Forest 171.00 171.00 






Others (waste land/Gauchar) 10.00 10.00 

3.2 Socio-economic Profile of the project area 

3.2.1 Demographic Information: 

The project IWMP-10 consists of total Fifteen villages and the detail demographic information is given in the table no 21. There are 21069 persons in 

the project villages (From the door to door survey report), out of which 10805 male and 10264 female members. The sex ratio is 950 females per 1000 

males. SC And ST population is very less. 

Table no. 21: Demographic information 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

1 Dolatpura 

Population SC ST 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

424 211 213 0 0 0 0.00 107 60 47 25.24 

2 Kakari mahudi 285 140 145 0 0 0 0.00 58 34 24 20.35 


3 Vadhela 1029 532 497 37 21 16 3.60 0 0 0 0.00 

4 Padedi(patapur) 89 40 49 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 

5 Borvai 

6 Masadra 

2172 1108 1064 23 13 10 1.06 35 19 16 1.61 

214 109 105 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 

7 Ladanna Muvada 560 282 278 2 1 1 0.36 0 0 0 0.00 

8 Lavana 1204 645 559 1 1 0 0.08 1 1 0 0.08 

9 Tejakui 376 191 185 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 

10 Mena 1864 928 936 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 

11 Ruzada 411 212 199 1 1 0 0.24 0 0 0 0.00 

12 Khadodi 1163 611 552 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 

13 Dhuleta 2243 1147 1096 8 5 3 0.36 0 0 0 0.00 

14 Naroda 

15 Vadagam 

3300 1678 1622 2 1 1 0.06 23 12 11 0.70 

5735 2971 2764 70 38 32 1.22 9 6 3 0.16 

Total 21069 10805 10264 144 81 63 0.68 233 132 101 1.11 

3.2.2 Literacy Rate of the Project area: Male literacy (64.72 percent) is more than the Female literacy (35.28 percent) in the Project IWMP-10 

The total literacy rate of the project area is 47.34. Out of the total literacy the literacy above the age 14 is less i.e. near about 31.93 percent in which 

literacy below the age 14 is 68.07 percent. The students are not getting the higher study after the SSC due to unavailability of the high school in near 

distance. The details are presented in the table 22. 


Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Total 

Population 

Total No 


Literate 

Literacy 

% Male % Female % 

Literacy % 

above age 14 

Literacy % 

below age 

14 

1 Dolatpura 424 116 27.36 73 17.22 43 10.14 40.00 60.00 

2 Kakari mahudi 285 93 32.63 65 22.81 28 9.82 38.00 62.00 

3 Vadhela 1029 407 39.55 281 27.31 126 12.24 42.00 58.00 

4 Padedi(patapur) 89 41 46.07 28 31.46 13 14.61 39.00 61.00 

5 Borvai 2172 1175 54.10 731 33.66 444 20.44 30.00 70.00 

6 Masadra 214 106 49.53 69 32.24 37 17.29 35.00 65.00 

7 Ladanna Muvada 560 324 57.86 200 35.71 124 22.14 32.00 68.00 

8 Lavana 1204 487 40.45 348 28.90 139 11.54 30.00 70.00 

9 Tejakui 376 110 29.26 85 22.61 25 6.65 40.00 60.00 

10 Mena 1864 674 36.16 469 25.16 205 11.00 25.00 75.00 

11 Ruzada 411 184 44.77 113 27.49 71 17.27 35.00 65.00 

12 Khadodi 1163 776 66.72 438 37.66 338 29.06 20.00 80.00 

13 Dhuleta 2243 1089 48.55 713 31.79 376 16.76 28.00 72.00 

14 Naroda 3300 1680 50.91 1063 32.21 617 18.70 20.00 80.00 

15 Vadagam 5735 2713 47.31 1780 31.04 933 16.27 25.00 75.00 

IWMP-10 21069 9975 47.34 6456 64.72 3519 35.28 31.93 68.07 

3.2.3 Migration status: Table 23 shows the migration details of the project IWMP-10 

Table no. 23: Migration details 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Total 

population 

Migration 

Total Male Female 

Up to 3 

months 

Migration by months 

3-6 

months 

More 

thane6months 

Main reason for 

migration 

Income during 

migration / month 


1 Dolatpura 424 25 20 5 25 0 0 Employment 3000 


3000 

0 0 Employment 

285 13 10 3 13 

3 Vadhela 1029 34 24 10 34 0 0 Employment 3000 

4 Padedi(patapur) 89 53 40 13 53 0 0 Employment 3000 

5 Borvai 2172 189 164 25 189 0 0 Employment 3000 

6 Masadra 214 16 16 0 16 0 0 Employment 3000 

7 Ladanna Muvada 560 162 150 12 162 0 0 Employment 3000 

8 Lavana 1204 153 132 21 153 0 0 Employment 3000 

9 Tejakui 376 20 20 0 20 0 0 Employment 3000 

10 Mena 1864 82 82 0 82 0 0 Employment 3000 

11 Ruzada 411 15 15 0 15 0 0 Employment 3000 

12 Khadodi 1163 50 50 0 50 0 0 Employment 3000 

13 Dhuleta 2243 76 76 0 76 0 0 Employment 3000 

14 Naroda 3300 70 56 14 70 0 0 Employment 3000 

15 Vadagam 5735 188 143 45 188 0 0 Employment 3000 

IWMP-10 21069 1146 998 148 1146 0 0 - - 

3.2.4 Poverty: 42.63 percent i.e. 2234 households are belongs to BPL families, in which 605 are below 16 and 1629 households are above the 16 as per 

the Gujarat Government. The total no of landless household is 143 which is 2.73 percent of the total household. Details are given in table 24. 

Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sr.No. 

Village 

Total 

Household 

BPL 

0-16 16-20 Total 

% of BPL HH 

Total Land 

less HH 

% of land less 

HH 


1 Dolatpura 156 26 19 45 28.85 8 5.13 

2 Kakari mahudi 23 3 10 13 56.52 3 13.04 

3 Vadhela 231 10 114 124 53.68 10 4.33 

4 Padedi(patapur) 28 8 18 26 92.86 2 7.14 

5 Borvai 543 73 124 197 36.28 9 1.66 

6 Masadra 54 8 12 20 37.04 3 5.56 

7 Ladanna Muvada 140 12 36 48 34.29 6 4.29 

8 Lavana 302 67 110 177 58.61 0 0.00 

9 Tejakui 94 36 40 76 80.85 5 5.32 

10 Mena 466 91 171 262 56.22 10 2.15 

11 Ruzada 103 16 50 66 64.08 5 4.85 

12 Khadodi 291 18 51 69 23.71 10 3.44 

13 Dhuleta 560 47 290 337 60.18 0 0.00 

14 Naroda 825 47 78 125 15.15 5 0.61 

15 Vadagam 1430 143 509 652 45.59 0 0.00 

Total 5241 605 1629 2234 42.63 143 2.73 

3.2.5 Village Infrastructure: Table no 25 shows the infrastructure facilities available in the Villages. 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Pucca 

road to 

the village 

(Y/N) 

Schools 

LP UP HS 

Colleges 

(Number) 

Post 

Office 

(Distance) 

Banks 

(Number) 

Distance 

from 

nearest 

market 

yard 

Milk 

collection 

centre 

(Number) 

Milk 

cooperative 

(Number) 

Other 

cooperatives 

/ CBIs 

(Number) 

Any other 

institution 


1 Dolatpura Yes 1 1 - - - 25km - 1 - 

2 Kakari mahudi Yes 1 1 - - - 24 km 1 - - 

3 Vadhela Yes 1 1 - - 20 km - 1 - 

4 Padedi(patapur) Yes 1 1 - - - - 30 km - 1 - - 

5 Borvai Yes 1 1 - - - 35 km - 1 - 

6 Masadra Yes 1 1 - - - - 15 km - 1 - - 

7 

Ladanna 

Muvada 

Yes 1 1 - - 14 km 

- 

1 - 

8 Lavana Yes 1 1 - - - - 8 km - 1 - - 

9 Tejakui Yes 1 1 - - - - 12 km - 1 - - 

10 Mena Yes 1 1 - - - 10 km - 1 - 

11 Ruzada No 1 1 - - - 23 km - 1 - 

12 Khadodi Yes 1 1 - - 1 - 15 km - 1 - 

13 Dhuleta Yes 1 1 - - - - 9 km - 1 - - 

14 Naroda Yes 1 1 - - 5 km - 1 - 

15 Vadagam Yes 1 1 1 - 1 - 4 km - 1 - - 

Total - 15 15 1 - 2 - - 1 14 - - 

3.2.6 Assets and facilities: Table no 26 shows the facilities available in the project villages. 

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 

Sr. No. 

Village 

HHs with 

electricity 

HHs with 

safety 

latrines 

HHs with phones 

Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 

HHs with vehicle 

4- 

wheeler 

HHs 

with TV 

set 

HHs 

with 

cooking 

gas 

HHs 

with 

Drinking 

water 

1 Dolatpura 152 20 10 100 20 1 10 - - - 

HHs 

with 

freedge 


2 Kakari mahudi 23 - - 25 5 - 8 - - - 

3 Vadhela 230 25 5 200 30 1 10 - - 1 

4 Padedi(patapur) 28 - - 15 7 - 5 - - - 

5 Borvai 543 300 20 250 50 3 25 20 200 20 

6 Masadra 54 20 10 40 20 1 5 1 - 3 

7 Ladanna Muvada 140 50 5 120 80 1 2 20 150 5 

8 Lavana 302 40 5 150 70 2 4 10 - 6 

9 Tejakui 94 34 - 30 6 - 1 - - - 

10 Mena 462 150 20 200 50 2 30 25 10 10 

11 Ruzada 103 75 10 55 5 - 10 - - - 

12 Khadodi 291 150 25 150 70 4 40 40 150 15 

13 Dhuleta 560 250 25 250 25 3 15 20 100 15 

14 Naroda 825 500 20 520 45 7 30 20 150 15 

15 Vadagam 1400 570 30 600 80 10 50 50 300 40 

Total 5207 2184 185 2705 563 35 245 206 1060 130 

3.2.7 Income details: Mainly the 

People are depending on agriculture, Animal Husbandry,causal labour and others like service in private company and government offices. The Detail income 

from the respective field is presented in the table no.27. 

Table no.27: Income Details (Rs.) 

Sr.No. Name of Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total 

1 Dolatpura 1092000 936000 624000 10000 2662000 

2 Kakari mahudi 138000 92000 69000 5000 304000 


3 Vadhela 1848000 1155000 1155000 15000 4173000 

4 Padedi(patapur) 168000 56000 112000 5000 341000 

5 Borvai 3801000 1086000 1629000 20000 6536000 

6 Masadra 540000 162000 270000 20000 992000 

7 Ladanna Muvada 1680000 560000 700000 15000 2955000 

8 Lavana 3322000 966400 1510000 10000 5808400 

9 Tejakui 752000 235000 376000 15000 1378000 

10 Mena 4194000 1398000 2330000 50000 7972000 

11 Ruzada 721000 309000 309000 25000 1364000 

12 Khadodi 2328000 1746000 1164000 30000 5268000 

13 Dhuleta 4480000 2240000 2240000 40000 9000000 

14 Naroda 8250000 3300000 4125000 50000 15725000 

15 Vadagam 9333000 3111000 6222000 100000 18766000 

Total 42647000 17352400 22835000 410000 83244400 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 

Sr.No. 

Village 

Animal Fodder 

Fuel wood 

% sells Income % sells Income 

Total income 

1 Dolatpura 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

2 Kakari mahudi 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

3 Vadhela 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

4 Padedi(patapur) 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

5 Borvai 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

6 Masadra 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 


7 Ladanna Muvada 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

8 Lavana 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

9 Tejakui 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

10 Mena 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

11 Ruzada 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

12 Khadodi 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

13 Dhuleta 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

14 Naroda 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

15 Vadagam 0 Open grazing 0 For self - 

3.3 Livilihood patterns of the area: 

The villagers earn their Livilihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers. Another 

major occupation of the people was handicraft in two villages but now the people are decreasing from their traditional Livilihood and in present scenario 

the number of household depend on handicraft is 3. 

3.3.1. Occupation pattern: The detail occupational pattern of the Project IWMP-10 is on the table 29. 

Table no. 29: Livilihood pattern (Occupational Distribution) 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Total 

workforce 

Agriculture 

Animal 

husbandry 

(AH) 

Agriculture 

+ AH 

Casual 

labour Services Handicraft Others 


1 Dolatpura 111 47 30 77 22 6 0 6 

0 23 

2 Kakari mahudi 196 25 25 50 100 23 

3 Vadhela 575 140 100 240 255 40 0 40 

0 5 

4 Padedi(patapur) 58 18 15 33 15 5 

5 Borvai 852 297 250 547 225 40 0 40 

6 Masadra 104 44 30 74 20 5 0 5 

0 21 

7 Ladanna Muvada 273 96 75 171 60 21 

8 Lavana 430 166 142 308 80 21 0 21 

9 Tejakui 171 40 31 71 90 5 0 5 

10 Mena 660 375 145 520 76 32 0 32 

11 Ruzada 327 35 30 65 200 31 0 31 

12 Khadodi 463 233 117 350 75 19 0 19 

13 Dhuleta 739 315 195 510 125 52 0 52 

14 Naroda 992 421 315 736 210 23 0 23 

15 Vadagam 1320 546 360 906 310 52 0 52 

Total 7271 2798 1860 4658 1863 375 0 375 



3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: 

3.4.1 Introduction 

The purpose of this section is to provide comparative analysis of watershed area with reference to world, India, Gujarat and Panchmahal 

District. The term productivity means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land. 

Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop. 

Data made available by baseline survey (for all villages), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication, 2006 (For Gujarat and India) and 

final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture. The results show that productivity is important not only because we observe a strong 

relationship with profits but that watershed area that should be taken to improve the production. These results indicate that the watershed 

area comes under semi-arid region. So farmers are used to cultivate only in rain-fed areas. Mainly the farmers of this project area used to 

cultivate the crops like maize, paddy and red gram in the monsoon and wheat in the rabi season and in ZAID the farm lands are seen empty due 

to low water availability in the area. The comparative of the above main crops are given below in the graph. 

Crop-1: MAIZE: 

It was found in the survey that farmers are used to cultivate maize in the monsoon period in large manner. The productivity of the maize 

is just 30 percent in compare with the world maize productivity where as 60 percent in compare with the country maize productivity. The 

productivity of the district is as same as with the productivity of the country. So there is a scope of near about 40 percent increase of the 

productivity in this project area. The productivity is less due to the traditional practices and low quality of seed used in the farming. The 

comparative graph is given below: 



Crop-2: RED-GRAM (TUR): 

During the PRA and the survey, it was known that maximum lands are utilized to cultivate the red-gram (locally named Tur) after the 

land used by the maize. The productivity of the red-gram is good as compare to the productivity of the world but it’s less than the productivity 

of the state and district. Hence there is a little scope to increase the productivity through promoting the improved agriculture practices in the 

project area. The traditional practice i.e. unaware about the improved agricultural practices and low rain fall in the last three years in the 

farming area becomes the obstacle to increase the productivity. The comparative graph is given below: 


Crop-3: PADDY (DANGAR): 

Locally the paddy is named as dangar. The productivity is very low as compare to the world. The world productivity is 3033 kg/ha 

where as the productivity of the project area is only 845 kg/ ha. Paddy requires high rain water/ irrigation water to make the productivity 

substantial. The area lies under the low rain fed area. So the productivity of the area is low. The comparative graph is given below: 


Crop-4: WHEAT: 

Maximum land has been used in the cultivation of wheat in the winter (RABI) season. The productivity of the wheat is less as compare to 

the productivity of the world but it’s less than the productivity of the country and state. Hence there is a large scope to increase the productivity 

through promoting the improved agriculture practices in the project area. The traditional practice i.e. unaware about the improved agricultural 

practices and less use of irrigation facilities in the farming becomes the obstacle to increase the productivity. The comparative graph is given 

below: 


PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: 

After analysis all the information collected during PRA exercise and field to field survey, the main problems was identified such as follows: 

• Sudden decline of rainfall in the project area (near about 70 % decrease i.e. 773mm (2007) where as 409mm (2009) 

• Declining size of avg. land holdings (max. less than 2 acre ) 

• The agriculture pattern is highly vulnerable due to soil erosion and depletion of water table in the project area 

• Low production due to practices of traditional method of cultivation. 


CHAPTER 4: 

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES PLANNED 


Watershed Development Strategy 

Watershed is a geo-hydrological and biological unit draining through a common point called outlet. It is a dynamic system of living and non-living 

things. It simply described as development of physical and biological elements for sustainable and self-reliant interdependence. It is obvious that watershed 

development is the development of all the constituents of a watershed. Such a development can be achieved through a complete understanding of a system 

and sub-system of the watershed. Hence, the exploration of all the elements of a watershed becomes an important component of watershed planning so as to 

efficiently address the needs of all the dependants. 

Soil and water conservation remains the core activity. Soil conservation mainly means conserving and protecting the soil from wind or water 

erosion. It also means improving the microbial activities in the soil and making it "live." Water conservation will be achieved through both engineering and 

biological measures. In addition to soil and water conservation, watershed development project ought to address several issues for achieving sustainable 

development. Adoption of the following strategies can ensure sustainable watershed development. Scientific planning with participatory approach is only 

and one method to make the programme successful. 

4.1 Scientific Planning: 

i) Cluster Approach 

The project villages are selected to see the micro-watershed and this project follows the cluster approach mean near to another. The IWMP-10 

Project consists of six microwatersheds namely 5E1C4a2b, 5E1C4a2c, 5E1C4ale, 5E1C4alf, 5E1C4c2g and 5E1C4c2e as their respective codes. The project 

consists of fifteen villages named Dolatpura, Kakari mahudi, Vadhela, Padedi(patapur), Borvai, Masadra, Ladanna Muvada, Lavana, Tejakui, Mena, Ruzada, 

Khadodi, Dhuleta, Naroda and Vadagam . 


ii) Base line Survey/ Household survey: 

To understand the family dynamics of watershed community, household 

survey often play a key role in the process of planning. Community based information 

is assessed through PRA, which gives the family based information. Household survey 

includes the developing questionnaires and obtaining information for surveying the 

household from the villages. Census survey is adopted to collect the data in this 

project. 

Information gathered from the household survey, includes Demography, 

migration pattern, economic status, assets (domestic and agricultural), land 

ownership, land use, irrigation (water availability), crops and productions, food 

security, livestock etc which are already described in the chapter-3. 


iii. Secondary data 

The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data 

pertaining to social profile is also collected through Census reports. Secondary data 

related to different kinds of capital assets were collected from different departments 

of Government agencies such as Revenue Office, Primary Health Center, Regional 

Marketing Center, Regional Forest Center (Van Sanrakshan Samiti), District Rural 

development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme office, working on poverty 

alleviation, Village Panchyat, other NGOs and development societies etc. Climatic 

information like annual rainfall with weekly distribution, temperature of five year are 

collected from the Irrigation and Agriculture department of Godhra. 


) Technical/ Field to field Survey: To know the land classification, texture, erodobility and slope field to field survey was also carried out in the 

farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram Panchayat. It also includes the soil profiles, numbers of water harvesting structure in the area, 

crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. For the ridge –valley planning the field to field survey is 

carried on. 

While implementing the project it is necessary that the treatments are carried out starting form ridge and progressing towards the valley. This approach is 

followed with the following objectives 

Protect the upper reaches to avoid erosion and reduce runoff 

Avoid siltation of structures in the middle and lower catchments. 

Ensure the cost effectiveness of structures in the valley and 

Improve overall efficacy of the measures. 


iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This 

has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for 

any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete 

accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the 

physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated 

questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops, 

various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers. The whole process is documented in the village committee resister. 


Problems Identification 

After analysis all the information collected during PRA exercise and field to field 

survey, the main problems was identified such as fillows: 

Problem in drinking water facilities 

Low production due to practices of traditional method of cultivation 

Low milk production due to local/ non descript breed and less availability of 

fodder 

Low economic condition due to low production 

Soil Erosion from farm land 

Less cultivation of vegetables 

Lack of value addition practices 

Less availability of fodder 

Market (No nearby) 

Migration 

iv) Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning 


Remote sensing and GIS plays an important role in the study of natural resources and helps in planning water resources development. One of the 

greatest advantages of using remote sensing data for hydrological investigations and monitoring is its ability to generate information in spatial and temporal 

domain, which is very crucial for successful analysis, prediction and validation Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of 

watershed development. 

a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL 

Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR 

specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

b) Planning 

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil Depth, Soil 

Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water 

conservation structures available in the project area. This will be used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was 

used for identifying various location specific for soil and water conservation structures. 

c) Hydrological modelling 


Hydrology modelling technique was been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over 

cadastral map Hel to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally 

occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam. 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 

Sr. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

Yes 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of 

the Institute 

Baseline survey 

Yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

Yes 

Contour mapping 

Yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

Yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover 

Yes 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

Yes 

Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes 

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes 

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes 

Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map Yes 

2. Village boundaries Yes 

3. Drainage Yes 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 

5. Land use Yes 

6. Ground water status Yes 

7. Watershed boundaries Yes 

8. Activity Yes 


Crop simulation models # 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high 

speed soil nutrient analysis 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

Weather Station 

Yes 

(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides Yes 

2. Organic manures Yes 

3. Vermicompost Yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 

5. Water saving devices Yes 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 

7. Bio-fencing Yes 

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers - 

4.2. Institution Building 

The watershed development project has great potential and scope to empower socially disadvantage sections of the community. Considering the 

needs and priorities of these sections, special activities can be designed to reduce their drudgery. The can be involved in a skills up gradation programme. 

People's organizations hold the key in ensuring the right integration between sustainable development and social equity. Such organizations must have 

representations from representations from socially backward communities and women with separate special interest groups. Within group interactions 

across group interactions and representation in village level institutions provide a platform for the disadvantaged groups to become a part of mainstream 

development. It is also important to ensure that these groups obtain equal opportunities to access the resources developed at the community level. 

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area 


Sr. No 

Name of PRA 

Activities/FGD 

Date 

Numb 

er of 

Peopl 

e 

Prese 

nt 

 

Lessons Learnt/Understanding of Problems/Situation 

25.35% SC/ST Population (Malivad , Damor, Chamar,pagi,) 

 

Mostly Sperate house in your Farm Land. 

 

Main Festevals:- Holi, Diwali,Janmathmi 

 

Social 

Mapping 

High Expenditure on Social Occasions 

Sex Ratio – 1009 

Litreacy Rate –27.36% 

1.Dolatpura 

 

Resource 

Mapping 

3/10/2011 

to 


20 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Women have a Social Rules & Regulations 

Major Resources of Income in Agriculture & Animal Husbendury 

Drinking Water Sources from open wells & head pump 

Drinking Wate available for 09 Month but Some Faliyas have Problems for Drinking 

Water 

Villages Face Drinking Water Problems in Summer 

Av.Rain fall in Project area 548 mm 

Average Land Holding -1 Acre 

 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 

Irrigation Source 

‣ Open Well 

‣ River Pond 


‣ Average 10% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 

‣ No Irrigation Facilities in Summer 

‣ 09 mt Below Ground Water Table 

‣ Oil Machine use for Irrigation Facilities 

Agriculture 

‣ Major Crops Like Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat etc 

‣ Less use Machinary for Cultivation 

‣ Maximum Use local Varity of Agriculture Seed 

‣ Low Productivity of Crops 

‣ No Market Linkage 

‣ Un known About ModernTechnology 

‣ Thin Soil Depth Average 50 to 90 cm 

‣ No Moisture Conduct in Farm Because Farm have Slope & No Farm Bund 

‣ No Sufficent Trees on Farm Boundary Animal Husbandry 

‣ Poor Healthy Cattle 

‣ Low Milk Production (Average 3 to 4 Lt Per Day) 

‣ No Fodder & Feed available in Summer 

‣ No Develop At Technology 

‣ Less Madical Checkup & Vacination Camp for Cattle 


Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Less Vegetables Farming 

Villagers Interested in Horticulture, Floriculture & Vegatable Growing 

Village Women Interested in Vermi-compost, Nurserys, AH, & Small Micro 

Enterprize 

Project Areas Women have Social Rules & Regulation 

Women Demand for more Employment in Project Village 

Women Intereted in SHG 

88.73 % Rain Fed Area 

Agriculture in Monsoon & Ravi Season 

No Agriculture in Summer Season 

60% Maize , 20% Wheat, 20% Paddy,10% Tur, & Vegetable Crop in project Area 

Low Migration in half Winter & Summer 

Village Women Working in Agriculture & Home Wife in Morning Session then Free 

from Afternoon 

10 % Black Shadow Soil 

60 % Red & Brown (Goradu) Soil 

30% Soil Mix with stone soil 

10 to 18 % Flate to Modarate Slope 

Soil Erasion from Farm Land, & Forest Land 

Less Vegetative Cover 

20% SC/ST Population (Malivad , Damor, Khant,, Baria,pagi) 

 


2 Kakari 

mahudi 

 

Social 

Mapping 

10/10/2011 

to 


25 





 



Resource 

Mapping 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Drinking Wate available for 10 Month but Some Faliyas have Problems for Drinking 

Water 




50% Forest Area 

 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 10 to15% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 








Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 



‣ No Sufficent Trees on Farm Boundary 

Animal Husbandry 









Enterprize 




46. % Rain Fed Area 



60% Maize , 20% Wheat, 20% Paddy,10% Tur, & Vegetable Crop in project Area 










Less Vegetative Cove 

0.3% SC/ST Population (Malivad , Damor, Baria, Pagi,Harijan,Chamar) 



 

Social 

Mapping 


Sex Ratio – 934 


 


3.Vadhela 

 

Resource 

Mapping 


to 


31 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 




7% Forest Area 

 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 5 to 10% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 



Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

‣ 10 mt Below Ground Water Table 


Agriculture 




















Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Enterprize 




73 % Rain Fed Area 



65% Maize , 10% Wheat, 15% Paddy,10% Tur, & funnal, Vegetable Crop in project 

Area 










0.5 % SC/ST Population (Malivad , Meda, Damor,Pagi ) 

 

 



4.Padedi(pata 

pur) 

 

Social 

Mapping 




 

Resource 

Mapping 


to 


23 

 

 

 






Water 




 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 15 to 20% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 










Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 











Enterprize 







60% Maize , 10% Wheat, 20% Paddy,10% Tur, & Vegetable Crop in project Area 










5.Borvai Social 0.4%SC/STPopulation(Malivad,Dabhi,MedaDamor,Nayak 


Mapping 

,Vadi,Pagi,Patel,Joshi,Pandiya,Harijan Panchal,) 

 

 

 






 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 




5 % Forest Area 

 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 5 to10% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 


‣ 10 mt Below Ground Water Table 


Focused 

Group 

Discussion 


Agriculture 



















Enterprize 



6.Masadra 

 

 

 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Social 

Mapping 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
















0.2%SC/STPopulation(Malivad,Bariya,Damor,Chamar,Patel,Nayak,Chamar) 


 


 



To 


30 




 

Resource 

Mapping 

 

 

 

 




Water 



Transect 

Walk 



 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 15 to 20% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 












Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Social 

Mapping 









Enterprize 

















0.38%SC/STPopulation(Malivad,Damor,Joshi,Pandaya,Patel,Vania, 

Muslim,Harijan,Chamar,Panchal) 


M ostly Sperate house in your Farm Land. 


7.Ladanna 

Muvada 


to 


20 





 

 

Resource 

Mapping 

Transect 

Walk 

 

 

 




Water 




 

 

 

 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 

Agriculture 


‣ Average 10 to 15 % Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 





Focused 

Group 

Discussion 



















Enterprize 





Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Social 

Mapping 








15 % Black Shadow Soil 






1.00% SC/ST Population (Malivad , Damor,Patel,Bariya 

Chamar,Panchal,Nayak,Harijan ) 

 

 

 




8.Lavana 


to 


25 




 

Resource 

Mapping 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 






 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 5 to10% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 












Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Social 

Mapping 









Enterprize 

















0.00% SC/ST Population (Malivad , Damor,Bariya,Pagi,Khant,Nayak,Harijan ,Chamar) 



9.Tejakui 

 

 





 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

24/10/2011 46 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 





 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 15 to20% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 



Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 


















Enterprize 







Soil 

Mapping 

10.Mena Social 

Mapping 












54 3.00% SC/ST Population (Malivad , 

Damor,Paghi,Bariya,Vankar,Chamar,Nayak,Khant) 

 

 

 






 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 






Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 15 to25% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 

















11.Ruzada 

 

 

 

 

Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Social 

Mapping 




Enterprize 

















0.24% SC/ST,Mainour Population (Malivad , Damor,Bariya,Pagi,Meda,Rujada, etc) 


 






 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

1/11/2011 

to 

3/11/2011 

34 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 




 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 10 to 15% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 




Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

















Enterprize 









Soil 

Mapping 

12.Khadodi Social 

Mapping 










0.21% SC/ST,Mainour Population (Malivad , Damor,Bariya,pagi Meda 

,Patel,Pandiya,Joshi,Nayak,Harijan,etc) 

 

 



4/11/2011 

to 

5/11/2011 

27 




 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

Transect Observation 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 





. 


Walk 


‣ Open Well 

‣ River, Pond 

‣ Average 10 to 20 % Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 

















13.Dhuleta 

Focused 


Group 


Discussion 


Enterprize 




Seasonal 


Mapping 







Soil Mapping 10 % Black Shadow Soil 






Social 

0.38% SC/ST,Mainour Population (Malivad , 

Mapping 

Damor,Bariya,Chamar,Patel,Panchal,Rathod,Nayak,Vankar,Harijan etc) 

 

 







 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

8/11/2011 

to 

9/11/2011 

36 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 





 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 


‣ Average 5 to 10% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions 




Agriculture 



District Watershed Devlopment Unit, Panchmahal Page 100

Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

















Enterprize 









14.Naroda 

 

 

Soil 

Mapping 

Social 

Mapping 










0.75% SC/ST,Mainour Population (Malivad , 

Damor,Bariya,Patel,Rathod,Parjapati,Harijan,Nayak,Chamar,Pagi,Khant) 

 

 

 






 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

11/11/2011 

to 

12/11/2011 

25 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 





Transect Observation 


Walk 


‣ Open Well 






Agriculture 

















15.Vadagam 

 

 

 

 

Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 

Soil 

Mapping 

Social 

Mapping 




Enterprize 

















1.37%SC/ST,MainourPopulation(Maliva,Damor,Bariya,Meda,Khant,Patel,Nayak,Cha 

mar,Pateliya,Harijna,Parjapati,Vanakar) 

 







 


 

Resource 

Mapping 

14/11/2011 

to 

16/11/2011 

29 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Water 





 

Transect 

Walk 

Observation 


‣ Open Well 






Agriculture 



Focused 

Group 

Discussion 

Seasonal 

Mapping 


















Enterprize 







Educa-tional 

qualification 

 

Soil 

Mapping 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


60% Maize , 20% Wheat, 10% Paddy,10% Tur, & funnal, Vegetable Crop in project 

Area 










I) Watershed Committee (WC) 

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This committee 

is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who 

will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in the Project Villages of the IWMP-10 of Panchmahal. There are five watershed 

committee formed in the project. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT, MDT. The watershed committee has a pivotal role 

to play during and after the project implementation period. The registration process was completed and the details of the watershed committee as are 

follows. 

Table no.32: Watershed Committee details 

Sr. 

No. 

Names 

of WCs 

1 Khadodi 

Registration No 

and Date of 

Registration as 

a Society 

(dd/mm/ yyyy) 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ /PMS) 

DT- 

Designation M/F GEN OBC SC ST SF MF LF 

District Watershed Devlopment Unit, Panchmahal Page 107 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

12 th 

Function/s 

assigned# 

President M 1 1 1 

A, B, D, E, I 

std 

Secretary M 1 1 1 11 th A, B, C, D, E, H, I

2 Borvai 

3 Masadra 

4 

5 

6 

7 

Ladanna 

Muvada 

Ruzada 

Dhuleta 

Naroda 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ /PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ /PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ /PMS) 

DT- 

(F / /PMS) 

(GUJ/ /PMS) 

DT- 

std 

Member M 2 8 10 2 1 7 th std A, B, E, I 

Member F 1 1 1 4 th std A, B, E, I 

President M 

Secretary M 

Member M 

Member F 


Secretary M 1 1 1 

District Watershed Devlopment Unit, Panchmahal Page 108 

12 th 

std 

11 th 

std 

10 th 

A, B, D, E, I 

A, B, C, D, E, H, I 

Member M 3 4 7 2 5 

A, B, E, I 

std 

Member F 2 2 1 1 4 th std A, B, E, I 


12 th 

std 

11 th 

A, B, D, E, I 


std 

A, B, C, D, E, H, I 

Member M 5 1 2 8 2 6 8 th std A, B, E, I 


President M 1 1 1 10 th std A, B, D, E, I 

Secretary M 1 1 1 10 th std A, B, C, D, E, H, I 

Member M 6 2 8 1 7 6 th std A, B, E, I 

Member F 3 3 1 1 1 4 th std A, B, E, I 


12 th 

std 

11 th 

A, B, D, E, I 


A, B, C, D, E, H, I 

std 


Member F 1 1 1 3 1 2 4 th std A, B, E, I 


std 

A, B, D, E, I 

Secretary M 1 1 1 11 th A, B, C, D, E, H, I 

12 th

8 

Padedi 

Patapur 

9 Vadagam 

10 Vadhela 

11 Lavana 

12 Tejakui 

13 Mena 

(F/ 

/PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ 

/PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

(F/ /PMS) 

(GUJ/ 

/PMS) 

DT- 

std 




12 th 

std 

11 th 

A, B, D, E, I 


std 

A, B, C, D, E, H, I 

Member M 8 8 2 6 7 th std A, B, E, I 





Member F 1 1 1 3 1 2 4 th std A, B, E, I 






12 th 

std 

11 th 

A, B, D, E, I 


std 

A, B, C, D, E, H, I 





Member M 10 10 2 1 7 6 th std A, B, E, I 

Member F 1 1 1 4 th std A, B, E, I 

President M 

Secretary M 

Member M 

Member F 

# Only the latt 


er assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for ‘J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned 

A. PLA and PRA B. Planning 

C. Maintains of Accounts D. Signing of cheque and marking payments 

E. Supervision of construction activists F. Cost Estimation 

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed 

I. Social Audit J. Any other (Please specify). 

‣ Name of the Watershed Committe:khadodi Jarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ- 

Registration No Trust Act: F- 

/PMS 

/PMS 

Sr. No. Name of the Members Designation 

1 Trivedi Ramanbhai hirabhai President 

2 Trivedi Dilipbhai Someshvar Secretry 

3 

Trivedi Ramanbhai nathabhai 

Member 

4 M.M.Bhabhor(R.F.O) Member 

5 Damor Saybhabhai Chhaganbhai Member 

6 Damor lebabhai Mogabhai 

Member 

7 Damor Dhulabhai Pujabhai 

Member 

8 Damor Kanabhai Virabhai Member 

9 Damor Sobhanaben Somabhai Member 

10 Damor Bhurabhai Bhemabhai Member 

11 Damor Rameshbhai Jesingbhai Member 

District Watershed Devlopment Unit, Panchmahal Page 110

12 Damor Saburbhai F. (WDT) Member 

13 Patel Dhyabhai Manorbhai Member 

‣ Name of the Watershed Committes:vadhelaiJarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ- 

Registration No Trust Act: F- 

/PMS 

/PMS 


1 Damor Bhathibhai Javarabhai President 

2 Katara Babubhai Phulabhai Secretry 

3 Chmar Dhanabhai Kanabhai Member 


5 Damor Hathibhai Galabhai Member 

6 Damor Mohanbhai Somabhai Member 

7 Damor Ramanbhai Hirabhai Member 

8 Katara Arjanbhai Dhanabhai Member 

9 Chamar Lilaben Kanabhai 

Member 

10 Damor Gatubhai Rupabhai Member 

11 Damor Saburbhai F. (W.D.T) Member 


‣ Name of the Watershed Committes Padedi(patapur) Jarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ-2763/PMS 

Registration No Trust Act: F-2728/PMS 


1 Pagi JAvabhai Vagabhai President 

2 Pagi Vikrambhai Javabhai Secretry 

3 

Damor Khemabhai Gemabhai 

Member 


5 Damor Jesingbhai Nanabhai Member 

6 Pagi Maniben Ramanbhai 

Member 

7 Damor Lilaben Ravindrabhai Member 

8 Damor Kanabhai Ramabhai Member 

9 Pagi Savitaben Svarupbhai Member 

10 Damor Raysingbhai Ramabhai Member 

11 Damor Pujabhai Bhurabhai 

12 Pagi Bhurabhai Hajurbhai 

Member 

Member 

13 Damor saburbhai F.(W.D.T) Member 


‣ Name of the Watershed Committes: borvai Jarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ- /PMS 

Registration No Trust Act: F- /PMS 


1 President 

2 Wise President 

3 Secretry 

4 Member 

5 Member 

6 Member 

7 Member 

8 Member 

9 Member 

10 Member 

11 Member 

12 Member 

13 

Member 

11 Member 

12 Member 


13 Member 

‣ Name of the Watershed Committes: Vadagam Jarstrav Samiti 




1 Meda Mansingbhai Laxmanbhai President 

2 Josi Dilipbhai Jasvantbhai Secretary 

3 Josi Kusumben R. Member 


5 Patel Ambalal NAthabhai Member 

6 Meda Laxmanbhai Navabhai Member 

7 Pagi Chandubhai Amrabhai Member 

8 Pagi Savitaben Sukhabhai Member 

9 Solanki Rameshbhai nanabhai Member 

10 pateliya Savitaben Motibhai Member 

11 Pagi Chhaganbhai Hirabhai Member 

12 Pagi Sanabhai Pujabhai Member 



‣ Name of the Watershed Committes: Lavana Jarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ/2764/PMS 

Registration No Trust Act: F/2729/PMS 


1 Bamniya Jesingbhai Ramabhai President 

2 Panchal Nanabhai Dhirabhai Secretary 


4 Gosai Balvanpari Rampari Member 

5 Damor Kuberbhai Nanabhai Member 

6 Bamniya Hathibhai Bhurabhai Member 

7 Bamniya Baluben Koyabhai Member 

8 Pateliya Chanchiben Somabhai Member 

9 Damor Kailasben Ramabhai Member 

10 Machhar Hirabhai Dhulabhai Member 

11 Gosai Mangalpari Mohanpari Member 

12 Nat Jayntibhai Vajabhai Member 



‣ Name of the Watershed Committes: Dhuleta Jarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ/ /PMS 

Registration No Trust Act: F/ /PMS 


1 Machhar laxmanbhai Motibhai President 

2 Patel Kiritbhai Bhikhabhai Secretary 


4 Machhar Hajurbhai Masurbhai Member 

5 Patel Dharmeshbhai Bhikhabhai Member 

6 Machhar Mogabhai Jethabhai Member 

7 Machhar Bhartiben Shaileshbhai Member 

8 Gohil Sajjanba Arjunsinh Member 

9 Chamar Manjulaben Jethabhai Member 

10 Machhar Kalubhai Lalabhai Member 

11 MAchhar Savabhai Lalabhai Member 

12 Bariya khatubhai Pujabhai Member 



‣ Name of the Watershed Committes: Ladanna Muvada Jarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ/ PMS 



1 Patel Amrutbhai Jethabhai President 

2 Patel Bhupendrabhai Bhulabhai Secretary 


4 Patel Rameshbhai Khemabhai Member 

5 Patel Parmabhai Jivanbhai Member 

6 Patel Maheshbhai Khemabhai Member 

7 Chamar Bhikhabhai Lalabhai Member 

8 Patel Revaben Bhikhabhai Member 

9 Patel Kalubhai Jivanbhai Member 

10 Patel Nanabhai Virabhai Member 


12 Patel Ramilaben KAlubhai Member 


‣ Name of the Watershed Committes:Masadara Jarstrav Samiti 




1 Patel Khemabhai Somabhai President 

2 Patel Bhaveshkumar Bhikhabhai Secretary 


4 Patel Hirabhai Dhulabhai Member 

5 Khant Amrutbhai Hirabhai Member 

6 Patel Bhavanaben Subhashbhai Member 

7 Patel Ramilaben Gokalbhai Member 

8 Patel Naranbhai Ranchhodbhai Member 

9 Damor Ramanbhai Ramabhai Member 

10 Damor saburbhai F.(W.D.T) Member 


‣ Name of the Watershed Committes: Tejakui Jarstrav Samiti 




1 Machhar Dineshbhai Chhaganbhai President 

2 Machhar rameshbhai Galabhai Secretary 


4 Machhar Narsinhbhai Somabhai Member 

5 Machhar Somabhai Nathabhai Member 

6 Machhar Dhulabhai Bhurabhai Member 

7 Machhar Raysingbhai Kesrabhai Member 

8 machhar Santaben Ramanbhai Member 

9 Machhar Khatubhai Malabhai Member 

10 Machhar Bhemabhai ramabhai Member 

11 Machhar Pratapbhai Hirabhai Member 

12 Machhar Jayntibhai Manorbhai Member 


Name of the Watershed Committes: Naroda Jarstrav Samiti 





1 Machhar Masurbhai Hirabhai President 

2 Machhar babubhai Koyabhai Secretary 


4 Machhar Nanabhai pujabhai Member 

5 Patel Somabhai Kalubhai Member 

6 Machhar Somabhai Nathabhai Member 

7 machhar kalabhai Virabhai Member 

8 Machhar Udiben Lalabhai Member 

9 Vankar Parmabhai Ganeshbhai Member 

10 Patel Maniben Motibhai Member 

11 MAchhar Babubhai pratapbhai Member 

12 Machhar Hathibhai Ratnabhai Member 

13 

Damor saburbhai F.(W.D.T) 

Member 

Name of the Watershed Committes: Ruzda Jarstrav Samiti 

Registration No Society Act: GUJ/ 

/PMS 




1 Vanjara Arvindbhai Savjibhai President 

2 Vanjara Savjibhai Kodarbhai Wise President 

3 M.M.Bhabhor(R.F.O) Secretary 

4 Vanjara Javrabhai Purabhai Member 

5 Vanjara kuvrabhai Shakabhai Member 

6 Vanjara Bhemabhai Mangabhai Member 

7 Kharedi Mohanbhai Somabhai Member 

8 Vanjara Kevalbhai Galabbhai Member 

9 Vanjara Dharopati Savarupbhai Member 

10 Vanjara Gajaraben Savjibhai Member 

11 Vanjara Savitaben Bhemabhai Member 

12 Vanjara Amrabhai Vastabhai Member 

13 

Damor saburbhai F.(W.D.T) 

Member 

‣ Name of the Watershed Committes: Mena Jarstrav Samiti 





1 President 

2 Wise President 

3 Secretry 

4 Member 

5 Member 

6 Member 

7 Member 

8 Member 

9 Member 

10 Member 

11 Member 

12 Member 

13 Member 

11 Member 

12 Member 

13 Member 

ii) Self Help Group 

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self help group 


initiative especially for women help uplift their Livilihood. Generally self help group include landless and marginal sized farm women, BPL household, SC/ST 

women. 

‣ SHG initiative in this watershed was being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogenous communities of wo 

men based on their live hood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major problems identified are: 

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution. 

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders 

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structures. 

d) Lack of small micro-loans without collaterals and high interest rates. 

e) Lack of knowledge on credit, thrift activity and banking. 

With a view point of these problems it was planned to organize these women to into a group consisting of 12 to 20 in each groups and it was also 

proposed to have 5 groups per village will be formed. 

It was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some Livilihood activities which will 

promote women empowerment this included padiya patara, Garments making, Chock Production, and Vermicompost activates with forward and backward 

linkage. This will ultimately lead into better human development in the village. 

Table no. 33: Self Help Group Details 

Sr. 

No. 

Name of Village 

With only 

Men 

Total no. of formed SHGs 

With only 

Women 

With 

both 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 


(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 

Dolatpura 

1 1 2 

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 2 Total 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(i) SF 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 0 0 


0 1 1 (iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

0 1 1 Total 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 0 0 

3 Vadhela 

1 2 3 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 11 21 33 11 21 33 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 2 3 Total 11 21 33 11 21 33 0 0 0 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

4 

Padedi(patapur) 

0 1 1 

(ii) SF 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

0 1 1 Total 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 0 0 


5 Borvai 

1 1 2 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 2 Total 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

6 Masadra 

1 1 2 

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 2 Total 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


2 2 

4 

(ii) SF 22 22 44 22 22 44 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

2 2 4 Total 22 22 44 22 22 44 0 0 0 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

8 Lavana 

2 4 6 

(ii) SF 22 44 66 22 44 66 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

2 4 6 Total 22 44 66 22 44 66 0 0 0 


9 Tejakui 

1 1 2 

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 2 Total 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(i) landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


4 2 6 

(ii)SF 44 22 66 44 22 66 0 0 0 

(iii)MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv)LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

4 2 6 Total 44 22 66 44 22 66 0 0 0 

(i) landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

11 Ruzada 

1 1 2 

(ii)SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(iii)MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv)LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 2 Total 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(i) landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

12 Khadodi 

1 1 2 

(ii)SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 

(iii)MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv)LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 2 Total 11 11 22 11 11 22 0 0 0 


13 Dhuleta 

3 2 5 

(i) landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii)SF 33 22 55 33 22 55 0 0 0 

(iii)MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv)LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

3 2 5 Total 33 22 55 33 22 55 0 0 0 

(i) landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

14 Naroda 

4 3 7 

(ii)SF 44 33 77 44 33 77 0 0 0 

(iii)MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv)LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

4 3 7 Total 44 33 77 44 33 77 0 0 0 

(i) landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

15 Vadagam 

2 3 5 

(ii)SF 22 33 55 22 33 55 0 0 0 

(iii)MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv)LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

2 3 5 Total 22 33 55 22 33 55 0 0 0 

(iii) User Groups 


These are homogeneous groups of persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity or asset 

on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their members. Some of the points which were considered while forming a user group in the 

villages of the IWMP-10 project are: 

1. In case of a check dam, Land Leveling, Farm Bunding, Roof Well Recharge, Kitchen Garden, Demonstration Plot, Contour Trench, Soil Bund, etc all the 

beneficiaries of the individual and community activities where involved as user group members. 

2. In case of Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members. 

3. In case of a Check wall and Gully Plug all the beneficiaries of the individual check dam where involved as user group members. 

4. Membership was on voluntary and democratic. 

Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members. It was 

decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. 

Table no. 34: User Group detail 

Sr. No. 

1 

No. of SC/ST in No. of BPL in 

Total no. of UGs 

No. of members 

Name of Village 

each category each category 

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Dolatpura 8 0 6 14 

(ii) SF 98 10 108 20 5 25 10 3 13 

(iii) MF 26 3 29 6 0 6 8 0 8 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


Total 8 0 6 14 124 13 137 26 5 31 18 3 21 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 105 8 113 16 5 21 23 2 25 

Kakari mahudi 11 1 5 17 

2 

(iii) MF 10 0 10 3 0 3 2 0 2 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 11 1 5 17 115 8 123 19 5 24 25 2 27 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

3 Vadhela 19 1 9 29 

(ii) SF 185 21 206 59 8 67 45 7 52 

(iii) MF 23 3 26 11 2 13 3 0 3 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

0 Total 19 1 9 29 208 24 232 70 10 80 48 7 55 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 30 4 34 0 0 0 12 0 12 

Padedi(patapur) 5 0 3 8 

4 

(iii) MF 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 5 0 3 8 34 5 39 0 0 0 12 0 12 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 200 20 220 78 5 83 87 9 96 

Borvai 22 2 8 32 

5 

(iii) MF 13 4 17 8 1 9 3 0 3 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 22 2 8 32 213 24 237 86 6 92 90 9 99 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 122 14 136 0 0 0 88 7 95 

Masadra 11 0 8 19 

6 

(iii) MF 14 3 17 0 0 0 4 0 4 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 11 0 8 19 136 17 153 0 0 0 92 7 99 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 107 16 123 0 0 0 57 5 62 

Ladanna Muvada 10 1 8 19 

7 

(iii) MF 16 2 18 0 0 0 3 0 3 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 10 1 8 19 123 18 141 0 0 0 60 5 65 

08 Lavana 25 1 12 38 (i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 


(ii) SF 361 46 407 9 2 11 117 15 132 

(iii) MF 36 9 45 2 0 2 13 0 13 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 25 1 12 38 397 55 452 11 2 13 130 15 145 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 200 21 241 0 0 0 87 11 98 

Tejakui 19 1 5 25 

9 

(iii) MF 14 5 19 0 0 0 9 0 9 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 19 1 5 25 214 26 260 0 0 0 96 11 107 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 533 66 599 0 0 0 85 5 90 

Mena 41 3 15 59 


(iii) MF 66 19 85 0 0 0 8 0 8 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 41 3 15 59 599 85 684 0 0 0 92 5 98 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 131 19 150 1 0 1 45 6 51 

Ruzada 9 1 8 18 

11 

(iii) MF 11 2 13 0 0 0 3 0 3 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 9 1 8 18 142 21 163 1 0 1 48 6 54 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 256 39 295 0 0 0 65 14 79 

Khadodi 21 2 9 32 

12 

(iii) MF 28 7 35 0 0 0 8 0 8 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 21 2 9 32 284 46 330 0 0 0 73 14 87 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 151 27 178 4 0 4 77 18 95 

Dhuleta 14 1 8 23 

13 

(iii) MF 18 6 24 0 0 0 6 2 8 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 14 1 8 23 169 33 202 4 0 4 83 20 103 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

14 Naroda 53 2 22 77 (ii) SF 792 86 878 11 2 13 95 24 119 

(iii) MF 74 19 93 8 1 9 26 5 29 


(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 53 2 22 77 866 105 977 19 3 22 121 29 148 

015 

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) SF 409 39 448 31 1 32 168 25 193 

Vadagam 38 3 8 49 

(iii) MF 85 21 106 10 2 12 27 8 35 

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 38 3 8 49 494 60 554 41 3 44 195 33 228 

Table No. 34.1: The following types of groups were planned to be formed in the villages of the IWMP-10 watershed 

Sr. No. Name of User Group Major Task 

1 Animal Husbandry Group 

Bringing of new AH technology 

Management of New Cattle and their improvement 

2 Gully Plug Equitable sharing of Soil Management 

3 Land Levelling Equitable sharing of soil Management 

4 Farm bund Group 

5 Check Wall 

Equitable sharing of resources 

Assuring of proper work 

Equitable sharing of soil and Water Management 

Development of community land for fodder development 

6 Rain Roof Well Recharge Equitable sharing of Water Management to up ground water table 

7 Check Dam 

Equitable sharing of Water Management to up ground water table and Built up water 

Storage Capacity 

8 Afforastation Develop Forest area and Fuel Material 


9 Horticulture Increase Livilihood 

10 Kitchen Garden Purpose of Livilihood 

11 Demonstration Plot Demo to Village People Modern Agriculture system and High Production 

12 Fodder Bank Bringing of More Fodder available in Village for village animal and their improvement. 

13 Floriculture Improve and purpose of Livilihood 

14 Vegetable Farming Improve modern technology and purpose of Livilihood 

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-10 

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) 

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of watershed 

Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed 

committee regarding the EPA activity; the total amounts i.e. 4 percent of the total amount was conveyed to the committee and finalize the EPA for the 

villages. After the discussion of the need of the villages, the guidelines for the EPA were considered and the following EPA were planned for the 

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Project 

Name 

Names of Villages 

Amount 

earmarked for 

EPA (Rs) 

Entry Point Activities 

planned 

No. of unit 

Planed 

Estimated cost 

(Rs) 

Expected outcome 

IWMP- 


Dolatpura 0.59 

Kakari mahudi 0.60 

Vadhela 1.39 

Cause Way 1 0.60 Connectivity to other Faliya 

Total 1 0.60 


Total 1 0.60 


Total 2 1.39 


Padedi(patapur) 0.17 

Borvai 1.31 

Masadra 0.71 

Ladanna Muvada 1.18 

Lavana 2.65 

Tejakui 1.66 

Mena 4.25 

Ruzada 0.58 

Khadodi 1.69 

Dhuleta 1.66 

Mandir Chotro 1 0.17 Villege infastature &Communitydev. 

Total 1 0.17 

Check Dem Repering 1 1.31 Water stroge capecity upgread 

Total 1 1.31 

Protecation Wall 1 0.71 Soil & Moisture consrvation 

Total 1 0.71 


Total 1 1.18 

Cause Way 1 1.10 Connectivity to other Faliya 

Water Tank 1 1.54 

Total 2 2.64 

Check Dem 1 1.66 

Easily Availability of Drinking Water for 

cattle Facility 

Water harvesting & Water stroge 

capecity upgread 

Total 1 1.66 

Wire pol fancing 880Rmt 3.00 Proction From Wild Animal 


Total 4.25 

Nala Plug 1 0.58 


cattle 

Total 1 0.58 


Total 1 1.69 

Cause Way 1 1.10 Connectivity to other Faliya 


Total 2 1.65 



Naroda 6.07 

Check Dem 3 5.36 

Water harvesting & Water stroge 

capecity upgread 

Total 4 6.07 


Motor no-3 3 1.14 


cattle Facility 


200 mt Pipe Line 1 0.38 Easily Availability of Drinking Water 

Vadagam 3.51 

Total 5 3.51 

Table no.36 : Details of ridge line treatmant/ land based Activities in watershed works . 

Type of treatment 

Type of land 

Executi 

ng 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 

Village 


structures 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Draina 

ge line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Commun 

ity 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify 

) 

No. 


units 

(No. 

/ 

cu.m. 

/ 

rmt) 

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) 

M W O T 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completion 

(mm/yyyy 

) 

1 Dolatpura Gully Plug Yes Yes Forest UG 8 72000 48000 0 120000 18 Month 


Check Wall Yes Yes Forest UG 2 156000 104000 0 260000 18manth 

Mini Check 

Wall 

Land 

Leveling 

Yes Yes Yes UG 5 180000 120000 0 300000 18month 

Yes Yes UG 9 0 81000 0 81000 12 month 

Stone Bund Yes Yes Forest UG 165 0 51150 0 51150 12 month 

Afforstatio 

n 

Yes Yes Forest UG 1 7800 5200 0 13000 18month 

Total 415800 409350 0 825150 

Gully Plug Yes Yes Forest UG 9 81000 54000 0 135000 18 Month 



Mini Check 

Wall 

Land 

Leveling 

Yes Yes Yes UG 4 144000 96000 0 240000 12 month 

Yes Yes UG 9 0 81000 0 81000 18month 

Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 1430 0 60060 0 60060 18month 

Afforstatio 

n 

Yes Yes Forest UG 1 7800 5200 0 13000 12 month 

Stragrded 

Trenches 



Contour 

Trenches 


Total 388800 452260 0 841060 

Gully Plug Yes Yes Forest UG 11 99000 66000 0 165000 18 Month 

Check Wall Yes Yes Forest UG 3 234000 156000 0 390000 18manth 

Mini Check 

Wall 

Land 

Leveling 


Yes Yes UG 12 0 108000 0 108000 18month 

Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 200 0 8400 0 8400 18month 

3 Vadhela 

Afforstatio 

n 


Stragrded 

Trenches 


Contour 

Trenches 


Stone Bund Yes Yes Forest UG 100 18600 12400 0 31000 12 month 

Total 683400 626300 0 1309700 


4 

Padedi(patapur 

) 


Land 

Leveling 

Yes Yes UG 5 0 45000 0 45000 18manth 

Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 205 0 8610 0 8610 12 month 


Total 95694 117406 0 213100 



5 Borvai 

Mini Check 

Wall 

Land 

Leveling 


Yes Yes UG 12 0 108000 0 108000 12 month 

Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 250 0 10500 0 10500 12 month 

Afforstatio 

n 

Yes Yes Forest UG 1.44 11232 7488 18720 18month 

Stragrded 

Trenches 

Yes Yes Forest UG 566 0 28300 28300 18month 


Contour 

Trenches 

Yes Yes Forest UG 520 0 26000 26000 18month 

Protecation 

wall 


Total 794232 702288 0 1496520 

Gully Plug Yes Yes Forest UG 10 90000 60000 0 150000 18 Month 


6 Masadra 

Mini Check 

Wall 

Land 

Leveling 



Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 350 0 14700 14700 18month 

Afforstatio 

n 

Yes Yes Forest UG 1.1 8580 5720 0 14300 18 month 

Total 356580 333420 0 690000 


7 

Ladanna 

Muvada 


Mini Check 

Wall 



Land 

Leveling 

Yes Yes UG 10 0 90000 0 90000 12 month 

Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 110 0 4620 0 4620 12 month 

Afforstatio 

n 

Yes Yes Forest UG 1.85 14430 9620 0 24050 18month 

Total 566430 472240 0 1038670 



Mini Check 

Wall 

Land 

Leveling 



8 Lavana 

Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 500 0 21000 0 21000 12 month 

Afforstatio 

n 

Yes Yes Forest UG 2 15600 10400 0 26000 18month 

Stragrded 

Trenches 

Yes Yes Forest UG 1800 0 90000 0 90000 18manth 

Contour 

Trenches 



Protecation 

wall 



Total 1122102 1027068 0 2149170 



Mini Check 

Wall 

Land 

Leveling 



9 Tejakui 

Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 212 0 8904 0 8904 18 Month 

Afforstatio 

n 

Yes Yes Forest UG 2 15600 10400 0 26000 18manth 

Stragrded 

Trenches 


Contour 

Trenches 

Protecation 

wall 





Total 891600 743304 0 1634904 

Gully Plug Yes Yes Forest UG 34 306000 204000 0 510000 18 Month 

Mini Check 

Wall 

Yes Yes Yes UG 21 756000 504000 0 1260000 18manth 

Check Wall Yes Yes Forest UG 6 468000 312000 0 780000 12 month 

Protecation 

wall 

Afforstatio 

n 





Gabian 

Stracture 

Yes Yes Forest UG 2 60000 40000 0 100000 12 month 

Contour 

Trenches 


Stragrded 

Trenches 


Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 600 0 25200 0 25200 13 month 


Land 

Leveling 


Total 2243280 1779320 0 4022600 

Gully Plug Yes Yes Forest UG 7 63000 42000 0 105000 18 Month 

Mini Check 

Wall 


11 Ruzada 


Afforstatio 

n 



Land 

Leveling 


Total UG 154 430608 368072 0 798680 


Mini Check 

Wall 


12 Khadodi 


Protecation 

wall 

Afforstatio 

n 


Yes Yes Forest UG 2 15600 10400 0 26000 13 month 


Contour 

Trenches 


Stragrded 

Trenches 



Land 

Leveling 


Total 966600 783590 0 1750190 


Mini Check 

Wall 


Check Wall Yes Yes Forest UG 2 156000 104000 0 260000 12 month 

13 Dhuleta 

Protecation 

wall 

Afforstatio 

n 


Yes Yes Forest UG 2 15600 10400 0 26000 13 month 

Stone Bund Yes Yes Forest UG 1500 279000 186000 0 465000 18month 

Contour 

Trenches 



Stragrded 

Trenches 


Farm Bund Yes Yes UG 110 0 4620 0 4620 13 month 

Land 

Leveling 


Total 891600 739020 0 1630620 


Mini Check 

Wall 



14 Naroda 

Protecation 

wall 

Afforstatio 

n 




Gabian 

Stracture 

Yes Yes Forest UG 2 60000 40000 0 100000 12 month 

Contour 

Trenches 



Stragrded 

Trenches 



Land 

Leveling 


Total 2953500 2248622 0 5202122 


Mini Check 

Wall 



15 Vadagam 

Protecation 

wall 

Afforstatio 

n 



Stone Bund Yes Yes Forest UG 500 93000 62000 0 155000 18month 

Gabian 

Stracture 

Yes Yes Forest UG 2 60000 40000 100000 18month 

Contour 

Trenches 



Stragrded 

Trenches 



Land 

Leveling 


Total 1792890 1477326 0 3270216 

Table No.36.1 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Dolatpura 

Sr. No Measure NO Unit Rate (Rs) Net Expense(Rs) IWMP Fund Convergence Strategy 

1 Ridge Treatment 

Stone bunding 165 Rmt 310.00 51150.00 51150.00 

2 Land development 0.00 0.00 

Land Leveling 9 Ha 9000.00 81000.00 81000.00 

Afforastation 1 Ha 13000.00 13000.00 13000.00 

3 Drainage Treatment 0.00 0.00 

4 Surface water recharging 

5 Other Works Of Convergence 

Gully plug 8 NO 15000.00 120000.00 120000.00 

Check wall 2 NO 130000.00 260000.00 260000.00 

Nalaplug 5 NO 60000.00 300000.00 300000.00 

Protection Wall 1 NO 200000.00 200000.00 0 200000(MGNREGA) 


Total 1025150.00 825150.00 200000.00 

Table No.36.2 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Kakari mahudi 

Sr. No Measure NO Unit Rate (Rs) Net Expense(Rs) IWMP Fund 


Stragded Trench 500 Rmt 50.00 25000.00 25000.00 

Contour Trench 540 Rmt 50.00 27000.00 27000.00 


Farm Bunding 1430 Rmt 42.00 60060.00 60060.00 




Gully plug 9 NO 15000.00 135000.00 135000.00 

Check wall 2 NO 130000.00 260000.00 260000.00 

Nalaplug 4 NO 60000.00 240000.00 240000.00 


5 Other Works Of 

Convergence 

Convergence 

Strategy 



Total 1066060.00 841060.00 225000.00 

Table No.36.3 - Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Vadhela 



Stone bunding 100 Rmt 310.00 31000.00 31000.00 





Land Leveling 12 Ha 9000.00 108000.00 108000.00 



Gully plug 11 NO 15000.00 165000.00 165000.00 

Check wall 3 NO 130000.00 390000.00 390000.00 

Nalaplug 9 NO 60000.00 540000.00 540000.00 

4 Surface water 

recharging 0.00 0.00 

Check Dam 2 NO 300000.00 600000.00 600000.00 

5 Ground water recharging 



Convergence 

Rain Roof Well 

Recharge 4 NO 10000.00 40000.00 40000.00 

Pond Lift Irrigation 

1 NO 500000.00 500000.00 0 500000.00(BRGF) 

Total 2449700.00 1949700.00 500000.00 

Table No.36.4 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Padedi (Patapur) 





Farm Bunding 205 Rmt 42.00 8610.00 8610.00 

Land Leveling 5 Ha 9000.00 45000.00 45000.00 


Gully plug 9 NO 15000.00 135000.00 135000.00 

4 Ground water 





Convergence 0.00 

Check Dam 

Dicilting 1 NO 65000.00 65000.00 0 65000.00(MGNREGA) 

Total 298100.00 233100.00 65000.00 


Table No.36.5 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Borvai 







Farm Bunding 250 Rmt 42.00 10500.00 10500.00 


Afforastation 1.44 Ha 13000.00 18720.00 18720.00 

Protection Wall 1 NO 300000.00 300000.00 300000.00 


Gully plug 13 NO 15000.00 195000.00 195000.00 

Check wall 3 NO 130000.00 390000.00 390000.00 

Nalaplug 7 NO 60000.00 420000.00 420000.00 

Gabion St. 0 NO 50000.00 0.00 0.00 

4 Ground water recharging 0.00 0.00 




Check Dam 1 NO 300000.00 300000.00 300000.00 


Convergence 

Check Dam 2 NO 300000.00 600000.00 0 600000(MGNREGA) 

Total 2436520 1836520.00 600000.00 


Table No.36.6 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Masadra 



2 Land development 

3 Drainage Treatment 


recharging 


Convergence 

Farm Bund 350 Rmt 42.00 14700.00 14700.00 


Afforastation 1.10 Ha 13000.00 14300.00 14300.00 

Gully plug 10 NO 15000.00 150000.00 150000.00 

Check wall 1 NO 130000.00 130000.00 130000.00 

Nalaplug 5 NO 60000.00 300000.00 300000.00 

Check Dam 1 NO 300000.00 300000.00 300000.00 

Protection Wall 1 NO 270000.00 270000.00 0 270000.00(BRGF) 

Total 1260000.00 990000.00 270000.00 


Table No.36.7 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Ladna muvada 




Farm Bunding 110 Rmt 42.00 4620.00 4620.00 

Land Leveling 10 Ha 9000.00 90000.00 90000.00 



Gully plug 16 NO 15000.00 240000.00 240000.00 

Check wall 2 NO 130000.00 260000.00 260000.00 

Nalaplug 7 NO 60000.00 420000.00 420000.00 



Check Dam 2 NO 300000.00 600000.00 600000.00 



Convergence 


Recharge 1 NO 10000.00 10000.00 10000.00 


Protection Wall 1 NO 150000.00 150000.00 0 150000.00(MGNREGA) 

Total 2098670.00 1648670.00 450000.00 

Table No.36.8 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Lavana 








Farm Bunding 500 Rmt 42.00 21000.00 21000.00 





Gully plug 20 NO 15000.00 300000.00 300000.00 

Check wall 4 NO 130000.00 520000.00 520000.00 

Nalaplug 11 NO 60000.00 660000.00 660000.00 





Check Dam 5 NO 300000.00 1500000.00 1500000.00 


Convergence 


Total 4159170 3709170.00 450000.00 

Table No.36.9 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Tejakui 













Gully plug 9 NO 15000.00 135000.00 135000.00 

Check wall 2 NO 130000.00 260000.00 260000.00 

Nalaplug 5 NO 60000.00 300000.00 300000.00 





Check Dam 2 NO 300000.00 600000.00 600000.00 


C.C Road 1 NO 300000.00 300000.00 0 300000.00(BRGF) 


Total 2946904.00 2324904.00 622000.00 

Table No.36.10 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Mena 













Gully plug 34 NO 15000.00 510000.00 510000.00 

Check wall 6 NO 130000.00 780000.00 780000.00 

Nalaplug 21 NO 60000.00 1260000.00 1260000.00 

Gabion St. 2 NO 50000.00 100000.00 100000.00 






Convergence 

Check Dam 6 NO 300000.00 1800000.00 1800000.00 

Check Dam 2 NO 300000.00 600000.00 0.00 600000(MGNREGA) 

Protection Wall 5 NO 204000.00 1020000.00 0.00 1020000(MGNREGA) 

Total 7572600 5952600.00 1620000.00 

Table No.36.11 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Ruzada 









Gully plug 7 NO 15000.00 105000.00 105000.00 

Check wall 2 NO 130000.00 260000.00 260000.00 

Nalaplug 5 NO 60000.00 300000.00 300000.00 



Convergence 





Table No.36.12 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Khadodi 












Gully plug 15 NO 15000.00 225000.00 225000.00 

Check wall 4 NO 130000.00 520000.00 520000.00 

Nalaplug 9 NO 60000.00 540000.00 540000.00 





Check Dam 2 NO 300000.00 600000.00 600000.00 


Check Dam 1 NO 300000.00 300000.00 300000.00(BRGF) 


. 

Total 3005190.00 2370190.00 635000.00 

Table No.36.13 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Dhuleta 








Farm Bunding 110 Rmt 42.00 4620.00 4620.00 





Gully plug 9 NO 15000.00 135000.00 135000.00 

Check wall 2 NO 130000.00 260000.00 260000.00 

Nalaplug 5 NO 60000.00 300000.00 300000.00 





Check Dam 2 NO 300000.00 600000.00 600000.00 


C.C Road 1 NO 300000.00 300000.00 300000.00(BRGF) 

Protection Wall 1 NO 321000.00 321000.00 0 321000(MGNREGA) 

Total 2941620.00 2320620.00 621000.00 

able No.36.14 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Naroda 













Gully plug 33 NO 15000.00 495000.00 495000.00 

Check wall 12 NO 130000.00 1560000.00 1560000.00 

Nalaplug 23 NO 60000.00 1380000.00 1380000.00 






Check Dam 10 NO 300000.00 3000000.00 3000000.00 

Pond Renovation 

with waste wear 1 NO 150000.00 150000.00 150000.00 


Panchwati 1 NO 800000.00 800000.00 0 800000(BRGF) 

Pond Lift Irrigation 

1 NO 1200000.00 1200000.00 0 1200000(BRGF) 

Protection Wall 1 NO 275000.00 275000.00 0 275000(MGNRG) 


Table No.36.15 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Vadagam 













Gully plug 28 NO 15000.00 420000.00 420000.00 

Check wall 6 NO 130000.00 780000.00 780000.00 

Nalaplug 15 NO 60000.00 900000.00 900000.00 






Check Dam 5 NO 300000.00 1500000.00 1500000.00 



Protection Wall 5 NO 204000.00 1020000.00 0 1020000(MGNREGA) 

Total 6230216.00 4910216.00 1320000.00 

Gully Plug: 


Feasibility of the Structure in Project Villages is: 

 

 

 

 

 

Villages has much Moderate slopes 

Gullies are present in this project area 

The region has shallow soil depth. 

It is a more permanent structure if well maintained 

It is self stabilizing 

Technical Specification of the Gully Plug: Table no36.16 gives the technical specification of Gully Plug of project villages under the project 

IWMP-10. 

Table No.36.16 (a) -Technical Specification of Gully Plug 

Particulars Value Units 

Top width of Gully Plug 0.60 Meter 

Bottom width of Gully Plug 0.60 Meter 

Depth above ground level 1.00 Meter 

Depth of Foundation 0.90 Meter 

Cross section of Gully Plug 0.99 Sq. Meter 

Proposed Area 0.5 Ha 

Cost Estimation of Gully Plug of Village: The costs are estimated as per the SOR rate of R & B, Panchmahl. The detail cost of gully Plug is as under. 


Table No 36.17 (b) - Cost Estimation of Gully Plug 

Sr. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Description Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) 

Amount 

(Rs) 

Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 

2.81 Cmt 64.9 182.37 

Providing and laying c.c. 1:4:8 ………….. etc comp 

0.47 Cmt 2295 1078.65 

Providing UCR masonary ……………… in fdn & Pli. 

5.65 Cmt 2047 11565.55 


0.31 Cmt 3208 994.48 

Providing 12mm plastering on ....... in c.m. 1:3 etc comp. 

15.2 Smt 65.2 991.04 

Prodiding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 

1 No 211.8 211.80 

Total 15023.89 

Say Estimate cost of one Gully Plug 

15000.00 

Remarks 

3.00 to 4.00 

Meter 

average 

Length of 

one Gully 

Plug 

Nala Plug 

Feasibility of the Structure in Project Villages are: 

Villages has much Moderate slopes 

Nalla are mostly seen in the project area. 

To control the erosion 


The region has shallow soil depth. 

It is a more permanent structure if well maintained 

Technical Specification of the Check wall Type-1: 

Two types of Check wall are proposed to see the location and the area of the villages. The types are different in the total unit cost. The cost of 

type one is Rs. 60,000.00 where the other type has cost of Rs.1, 30,000.00 

Table No.36.18 (a) -Technical Details of Check wall 


Top width of Nala Plug 0.50 Meter 

Bottom width of Nala Plug 1.20 Meter 

Depth above ground level 1.10 Meter 

Depth of Foundation 1.15 Meter 

Cross section of Nala Plug 0.93 Sq. Meter 

Unit cost 1.00 Ha 

Table No 36.18 (b) - Cost Estimation of Check wall type -1 

Sr. 

Amount 


No. 

(Rs) 

Remarks 

1 Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 16.85 Cmt 64.90 1093.57 6.00 to 8.00 

2 Providing and laying c.c. 1:4:8 ………….. etc comp 6.74 Cmt 2295.00 15468.30 

Meter 

3 Providing UCR masonary 1:6 ………… in fdn & Pli. 18.85 Cmt 2047.00 38585.95 average 

4 Providing and laying c.c. 1:2:4 ………….. etc comp 0.77 Cmt 3208.00 2470.16 Length of 

5 Providing 12mm plastering on ....... in c.m. 1:3 etc comp.. 34.16 Smt 65.20 2227.23 one Nala 

6 Prodiding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 1.00 No 211.80 211.80 

Plug 


Total 60057.01 

Estimate cost of one Nala Plug 60000.00 

Table No 36.19 (c) - Cost Estimation of Check wall type-2 

Sr. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 


Cmt 

Amount 

(Rs) 

51.53 

64.90 3344.30 


Cmt 

17.40 

2295.00 39933.00 

Providing UCR masonary 1:6 ………… in fdn & Pli. 

Cmt 

37.90 

2047.00 77581.30 


Cmt 

1.71 

3208.00 5485.68 

Providing 12mm plastering on ....... in c.m. 1:3 etc comp.. 

Smt 

52.50 

65.20 3423.00 

Prodiding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 

No 

1.00 

211.80 211.80 

Total 

129979.08 

Estimate cost of one Nala Plug 130000.00 

Remarks 

9.00 to 

10.00 Meter 

average 

Length of 

one Nala 

Plug 


Contour Trenches 

U/S 

0.70 mt 

Plantation & Fodder 

D/S 

GL 

GL 

0.60 mt 

0.30 mt 


Table No. 36.20 (a) -Technical Details of Contour Trenches 


Trench Top Width 0.70 Meter 

Trench Bottam Width 0.30 Meter 

Trench Depth 0.60 Meter 

Table No. 36.20 (b) Estimation of Contour Trenches 

Sr. 

No. 

Description 

Unit 

Length Width Depth Quantity Rate (Rs) 

(Mt.) (Mt.) (Mt.) (Cum) 

Amount 

(Rs) 

1 Earth Work 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/ trench up to 1.5 

meter depth. Compaction of bottom, correction of sides, 

refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of 

remaining soil up to 50 mtr. 

a) In ordinary/ soft soil 

b) In hard soil 

Cmt 1 .00 

0.70+0.30 

2 

0.60 0.30 64.90 19.47 

c) Fragmented rock 

d) ordinary rock 

2 Vegetative Work 

Supply of Stylo/ Dhaman Seed, Ketki 4 gm/ Meter in two 

lines and plantation cost (L.S.) 

1.00 1.00 mt 10.50 10.50 


Total 29.97 

Say Unit cost per RMT 30.00 

Staggered Trenches 

Plantation & Fodder 

U/S 

D/S 

GL 

GL 

0.45 mt 

0.60 mt 


Table No. 36.21 (a) -Technical Details of Staggered Trenches 


Trench Length 2.50 Meter 

Trench Width 0.60 Meter 

Trench Depth 0.45 Meter 

Table No. 36.21 (b) - Cost Estimation of Staggered Trenches 

Sr. 

No 

Description 

Nos 

Length Width Depth Quantity 

(Mt.) (Mt.) (Mt.) (Cum) 

Rate 

(Rs) 

Amount 

(Rs) 

1 Earth Work 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/ trench up to 1.5 

meter depth. Compaction of bottom, correction of sides, 

refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of 

remaining soil up to 50 meter. 

In ordinary/ soft soil 

In hard soil 1 2.30 0.60 0.45 0.675 64.90 40.30 

Fragmented rock 

ordinary rock 

2 Vegetative Work 

Supply of Stylo/ Dhaman Seed, Ketki 4 gm/ Meter in two 1 1Nos 9.50 9.50 


lines and plantation cost (L.S.) 

Total 

Unit cost of the Staggered trenches 

49.80Rs 

50.00 Rs 

Land Leveling 

Table No. 36.22(a) -Technical details of Land Leveling 


Average Cutting Length 50.00 Meter 

Average Cutting Width 20.00 Meter 

Average Cutting Depth 

0.15 Meter 

Total Average Cutting Area 150.00 Cmt 

Table No. 36.22 (b) - Cost Estimation of Land Leveling 

1 

Sr. 

No. 


Amount 

(Rs) 

Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 138.50 Cmt 64.90 8988.65 

Total 

Say Estimate cost of Land Leveling 

8988.65 

9000.00 Rs/Ha 

Remarks 


1:1 

Farm Bund 

U/S 

0.30 m t 

D/S 

1:1 

0.60 mt 

GL 

1.50 m t 

GL 

Table No. 36.23 (a) -Technical details of Farm Bund 


Structure Length 1.00 Meter 

Structure Height 0.60 Meter 

Upstream Slope 1 : 1 

Downstream Slope 1 : 1 

Bund Top Width 0.30 Meter 


Structure Base Width 1.50 Meter 

Structure Cross Section 0.54 Smt 

Table No. 36.23(b) Estimation of Farm Bund 

1 

Sr. 

No. 

Amount 


(Rs) 

General Work 1.5 Smt 3.00 4.50 

Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm Deep 

Remarks 

2 

Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 0.54 Cmt 64.90 35.05 

3 Vegatative Work 

Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge 

Supply of Style/ Damon @ 4 gm /mt in (single line) 

- Gm - 2.50 

Say Estimate cost of Farm Bund 

Total 

42.05 

42.0 Rs/rmt 


Check Dam 

Three types of check dams are proposed as per the location i.e. as per varies of length in the check dam in respective location. The 

details survey numbers with the respective villages and the technical details are furnished below. 

a. Location of the check dams of the project IWMP-10 

Table No. 36.24 (a) Location of the Check dams of the project IWMP-10, Panchmahal. 

Sr. 

No 

1 


Village 

Name of Structure 

GPS Co-ordinates 

Survey No 

proposed 

North 

East 

Check dam-1 23'24.936" 73'39.187" 

2 Vadhela 

Check dam-2 12 23'24.838" 73'39.213" 

3 

Check dam-1 156 23'18.999" 73'34.064" 

4 Check dam-2 102 23'19.366" 73'34.145" 

5 Project Lavana 

Check dam-3 130 23'19.322" 73'34.132" 

Name 

6 Check dam-4 23'19.947" 73'33.870" 

7 Check dam-5 20 23'19.864" 73'34.742" 

Remarks 

8 Masadra Check dam-1 23'21.356" 73'34.505" 

9 

Ladanna 

Check dam-1 72 23'20.558" 73'34.285" 

10 Muvada 

Check dam-2 23'21.360" 73'34.551" 

11 

Check dam-1 23'18.392" 73'32.340" 

Tejakui 


Check dam-2 23'18.248" 73'32.359" 

13 Mena Check dam-1 23'17.489" 73'40.005" 


14 Check dam-2 23'17.427" 73'40.031" 

15 Check dam-3 23'17.700" 73'40.621" 

16 Check dam-4 23'17.742" 73'40.616" 

17 Check dam-5 23'17.650" 73'40.740" 

18 Check dam-6 23'17.651" 73'40.580" 

19 

Check dam-1 23'23.265" 73'36.676" 

Khadodi 

20 Check dam-2 23’23.371" 73'37.772" 

21 

Check dam-1 124 23'16.789" 73'33.922" 

Dhuleta 

22 Check dam-2 125 23'16.844" 73'33.022" 

23 

Check dam-1 326/p 23'17.917" 73'34.842" 

24 Check dam-2 326/p 23'17.949" 73'34.810" 

25 Check dam-3 304 23'17.083" 73'33.983" 

26 Check dam-4 298 23'16.984" 73'34.122" 

27 Check dam-5 314 23'17.928" 73'33.945" 

Naroda 

28 Check dam-6 182 23'17.107" 73'34.490" 

29 Check dam-7 182 23'17.128" 73'34.440" 

30 Check dam-8 323 23'17.640" 73'33.760" 

31 Check dam-9 433 23'17.960" 73'34.833" 

32 Check dam-10 23'18.877" 73'34.211" 

33 

Check dam-1 23'16.276" 73'36.749" 

34 Vadagam 

Check dam-2 23'16.331" 73'36.989" 

35 Check dam-3 226 23'16.315" 73'36.995" 


36 Check dam-4 226 23'16.331" 73'36.875" 

37 Check dam-5 226 23'16.290" 73'36.851" 

38 Borvai Check dam-1 131 23'24.459" 73'39.238" 

b. 42Technical details and cost estimates of different check dams 

Check Dam - 1 

Table No. 36.24 (b) -Technical Details of Check Dam type-1 


Top width of Body Wall 1.00 Meter 

Bottom width of Body Wall 2.50 Meter 

Top Width of Key Wall 1.00 Meter 

Top Width of Toe Wall 0.45 Meter 

Total Height of Check Dam (From G.L.) 1.30 Meter 

Total Heigth of Check Dam 3.20 Meter 

Total Length Check Dam 23.20 Meter 

Table No. 36.24(c) - Cost Estimation of Check Dam type-1 

Sr No Description Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) Amount(Rs) Remarks 

1 Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard soil 125.63 Cmt 64.90 8153.39 

2 Excavation for fdn ………………………....Hard Murram 0.00 Cmt 92.70 0.00 


3 Excavation for fdn ………………………...Soft Rocks 0.00 Cmt 135.90 0.00 


5 Providing UCR masonary 1 : 6…………… in fdn & Pli. 94.15 Cmt 2047.00 192725.05 


7 Providing 12 mm plastering on .... in c.m. 1:3 etc comp. 94.08 Smt 65.20 6134.02 

8 Prodiding and fixing Name Plate ……… etc comp. 1.00 Nos 211.80 211.80 

Total 299977.84 

Estimate cost of one Check Dam 300000.00 

Afforestation 

Table no. 36.25: -Technical details of Afforestation 

Particulars Value Unit 

Plants Name Ardusa, Sevan,Bamboo, Neem, Saadar, Sisam,Teek - 

Plant To Plant Spacing 3.30 Meter 

Row to Row Spacing 3.30 Meter 

Pit Length 0.45 Meter 

Pit Width 0.45 Meter 

Pit Depth 0.45 Meter 

Gap Filling/ Mortality 25 Percent 

Table no. 36.26-Cost Estimation for Plantation activity 

Sr. 

No 

Description 

No 

Length 

(m) 

Width(m) Depth(m) Unit Quantity Rate Amount 

1 

Digging of pits for plants in Loose 

Soil 

1000 0.45 0.45 0.45 Cmt 91.13 64.90 5914.34 

2 Plants saplings for plantation in 1250 - - - Nos 1250 2.00 2500.00 


Govt. pasture area sapling not 

less than 30 cm height with 

Mortality /Gap Filling (Ave 20 to 

25 %) 

3 

Transportation of plants from 

nursery to camp site up to plants 

1250 - - - Nos 1250 0.50 625.00 

4 Loading and Uploading of plants 1250 - - - Nos 1250 0.50 812.50 

5 Cost of fertilizer application 1250 - - - Nos 1250 2.00 2500.00 

6 

Weeding and Hoeing two times 

(Twice in year) 

1250 - - - Nos 1250 0.50 625.00 

Total Cost 12976.84 

Say unit cost per planting in 1.00 Ha 

13000 per Ha 

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: 

The physical treatments are to be carried on during the watershed development work phase. While implementing the project it is necessary that the 

treatments are carried out starting form ridge and progressing towards the valley. This approach is followed with the following objectives 

Protect the upper reaches to avoid erosion and reduce runoff 

Avoid siltation of structures in the middle and lower catchments. 

Ensure the cost effectiveness of structures in the valley and 

Improve overall efficacy of the measures. 

Mainly the watershed development works are divided into three stages such as ridge area treatments, Slope treatment, Plains or flat level (Area 

treatment) and Drainage line treatments, Different treatments are planned for each village to see the geographical and socio economic condition of that 


specific area. The details are briefly described below: 

A. Ridge Area Treatment Plans 

For the ridge area treatment of project villages area following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the villagers, watershed committee, 

Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest. 

1. Gully Plug 

2. Nala Plug 

3. Contour Trenches 

4. Protection Trenches 

5. Ring Bund 

B. Slope Treatment 

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water 

conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labor intensive, will involve more of manual labour, so, funds from National Rural 

Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. 

Following structures are been proposed in these areas 

a. Land Leveling 

b. Afforestation 


c. Earthen Bund 

C. Plains or Flat Level Treatment: 

These are at field level of farmers where farmers are operating at a very high labour intensive way. These generally field bunding, crop pattern 

alteration. The prime aim is to conserve the rain in the field. In this area stone bunding is not feasible due to unavailability of stone in the local area. So in the 

plain or flat level treatment the two things are proposed as under. 

1.Farm Bund 

2. Afforastation/ Plantation 

D. Water conservation Structures and activity: The activities are generally taken in the bottom area/ valley region of the watershed area. 

The structures will help in the storage of the water which increase the soil moisture and watertable of the area. Land can be irrigated through theses 

structures. The proposed structures are as follows: 

A) Rain Roof Well Recharge 

B) Check Dam 

Details of the physical structure and Livilihood for SHG activities proposed in the project IWMP-10, Panchmahal 

Physical Structure 

As per the survey and the interaction with villagers of I.W.M.P – 10 Projects it was found that Percolation tank and farm pond is not the suit table 

structure under surface water recharge structure. Farm pond is nor feasible due to small land holding of the farmers of the neither project area where as 

percolation tank is nor possible due to low slope. 


The Check dams are proposed in the Nalla (Kotar) and Gully Plug and Nala Plug are also proposed to product the soil and water from run off. These 

Structures also helps in surface water recharging. The Details of the check dam and other structures are detailed below:- 

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Sr. 

No. 

Village name 

1 Dolatpura 

2 

3 

4 

Kakari mahudi 

Vadhela 


5 Borvai 

Type of structures 

No. 

Augmentation/ repair of existing 

structures 

Area to be 

irrigated (ha) 

Storage Estimated 

capacity cost (Rs) 

Proposed target 

Construction of new structures 

Total target 


No. 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

(Cmt) 

Estimated 

cost (Rs) 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

(Cmt) 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Estimated 

cost (Rs) 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 2 8 6000 6.00 8 6000 6.00 

Total - - - 2 8 6000 6.00 8 6000 6.00 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 1 4 3000 3.00 4 3000 3.00 

Total - - - - 1 4 3000 3.00 4 3000 3.00

6 

Masadra 

7 

Ladanna Muvada 

8 Lavana 

9 

Tejakui 


Mena 

11 

Ruzada 

12 

Khadodi 

13 Dhuleta 

14 Naroda 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 1 4 3000 3.00 4 3000 3.00 

Total - - - - 1 4 3000 3.00 4 3000 3.00 

(ii) Pond - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 2 7 5000 6.00 7 5000 6.00 

Total - - - - 2 7 5000 6.00 7 5000 6.00 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 5 18 6000 15.0 18 6000 15.0 

Total - - - - 5 18 6000 15.0 18 6000 15.0 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - 2 6 6000 6.00 6 6000 6.00 

Total - - - - 2 2 6000 6.00 2 6000 6.00 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 6 22 18000 18.00 22 18000 18.00 

Total - - - - 6 22 18000 18.00 22 18000 18.00 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 2 5 5000 6.00 5 5000 6.00 

Total - - - - 2 5 5000 6.00 5 5000 6.00 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 2 5 6000 6.00 5 6000 6.00 

Total - - - - 2 5 6000 6.00 5 6000 6.00 

(ii) Pond - - - - 1 5 10000 1.50 5 10000 1.50 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 10 35 30000 30.00 35 30000 30.00 


15 Vadagam 

Total - - - - 11 40 40000 31.50 40 40000 31.50 

(ii) Pond - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(iv) Check dam - - - - 5 18 18000 15.00 18 18000 15.00 

Total - - - - 5 18 18000 15.00 18 18000 15.00 

The house holds of the area are made up of mud with the file roofs. It also found during the survey well area found near to the houses. So it was 

planed that the rain water can be collected form the roof and recharged the well for the Sustainable development of area. So the proposed rain roof well 

recharge structure helps to increase the wae level as well as table in the project area 

The details Structure proposed in the project I.W.M.P-10 are as follows 

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in 

lakh Rs.) 

Sr. 

No. 

Name of Villages 

1 Vadhela 

2 


Type of structures 

Augmentation/ repair of 

existing recharging structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost (Rs) 

(ha) 

Proposed target 

Construction of new recharging 

structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost (Rs) 

(ha) 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost (Rs) 

Rain roof well Recharge - - - 4 4.00 0.40 4.00 0.40 

Total for the village - - - 4 4.00 0.40 4.00 0.40 



Borvai Rain roof well Recharge - - - 4 3.00 0.40 3.00 0.40 


3 Total for the village - - - 4 3.00 0.40 3.00 0.40 


Rain roof well Recharge - - - 1 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.10 

Total for the village - - - 1 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.10 


Lavana 

5 


6 Tejakui 




Mena 

7 


8 Ruzada 



9 Khadodi 



10 Dhuleta 



11 Naroda 



12 Vadagam 

Rain roof well Recharge - - - 14 10.00 1.40 10.00 1.40 

Total for the village - - - 14 10.00 1.40 10.00 1.40 

Table no.39 : Details of activities related to livelihood,production system and micro-enterprises 

Sr. 

No. 

Name of village Name of activity Type of land Executing 

agency 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 


(i) Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

Nursery - Yes - SHG 0.5 12 months 

Sprayer Pump to UG (in 

Nursery) 

- Yes - SHG 0.05 

1 Dolatpura 

Animal Medical Camp & 

Vaccination Camp 

Promotion of high Yielding 

varisties 

- Yes - UG/ Others 0.4 24 months 

Yes UG/ Others 0.39 24 Months 

kitchan gardan Yes UG 0.28 12 Months 

Poultry Farming Yes Others / L.L. 0.12 06 Months 

Vermicompost to shg Yes SHG 0.51 12 Months 

Total 2.8 

2 Kakari mahudi Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.49 12 months 

Promotion of Fodder green 

kit 

Yes - - Others 0.24 

Horticulture wadi Yes - - UG 0.30 





varisties 


Yes UG/ Others 0.16 24 Months 



Vermicompost Yes Others 1.00 12 Months 

Total 2.86 

3 Vadhela Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.73 12 months 

4 Padedi(Patapur) 

Promotion of Fodder green Yes - - Others 0.6 24 months 

kit 

Horticulture wadi Yes - - UG 0.90 24 months 




Promotion of high Yielding Yes UG/ Others 0.27 24 Months 

varisties 



Vermicompost TO SHG Yes Others 1.02 12 Months 

Floor Mile Yes SHG 1.25 24 Months 

Vegetable Nursery Yes SHG 0.50 12 Months 


Nursery) 

Animal Medical Camp & Vaccination 

Camp 

Yes SHG 0.05 12 Months 

Total 6.62 

- Yes - UG/ 

Others 

Promotion of high Yielding varisties Yes UG/ 

Others 

0.10 24 months 

0.10 24 Months 



Poultry Farming Yes Others / 0.06 06 Months 

L.L. 

Vermicompost Yes SHG 0.20 12 Months 

Horticulture wadi Yes UG 0.15 24 Months 

Total 0.79 

5 Borvai Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 1.18 12 months 

Promotion of Fodder green kit Yes - - Others 0.50 24 months 



- Yes - UG/ 

0.30 24 months 

Camp 

Others 

Promotion of high Yielding varisties Yes UG/ 

0.30 24 Months 

Others 



L.L. 


Floor Mill Yes SHG 1.25 24 Months 


Sprayer Pump to UG (in Nursery) Yes SHG 0.05 12 Months 

Vegetable growing Yes UG 0.25 24 Months 

Total 6.23 

6 Masadra Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.46 12 months 




- Yes - UG/ 


Camp 

Others 

Promotion of high Yielding varisties Yes UG/ 0.27 24 Months 


Others 



L.L. 

Vermicompost To Shg Yes SHG 0.51 24 Months 


Sprayer Pump to UG (in Nursery) Yes SHG 0.05 12 Months 

Total 3.35 

7 Ladanna Muvada Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.25 12 months 




- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 



L.L. 






Nursery) 

Cattle feed Store to SHG Yes SHG 0.70 24 Months 

Fodar Bank Dev. Yes SHG 1.21 24 Months 

Total 5.59 

Lavana Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.88 12 months 





- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 



L.L. 


Vermicompost TO SHG Yes SHG 1.02 24 Months 




Nursery) 


9 

Tejakui 

collaction of forest product 

(indra jav) & processing unit 

Soji & pulse procesing 

to SHG 

SHG 0.50 24 Months 

Yes 


fishary to SHG Yes SHG 0.70 

Bamboo work to SHG Yes SHG 0.50 

Total 12.58 

Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.76 12 months 



Animal Medical Camp & - Yes - UG/ 0.40 24 months 


Dhuleta 


Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 


Papaya Wadi Yes UG 0.45 24 Months 



fishary to SHG Yes SHG 1.00 24 Months 




Nursery) 


Total 7.89 

Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.86 12 months 




- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 


leather work to SHG Yes SHG 0.50 24 Months 




diamond policing unit to SHG Yes SHG 2.00 24 Months 

Poultry Farming Yes UG 0.20 24 Months 



Total 7.87 

11 Ruzada Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.23 12 months 


- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 



L.L. 

Vermicompost to shg Yes SHG 0.51 12 Months 



Total 2.78 

12 Khadodi Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 1.01 12 months 




- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 







Sprayer Pump to UG (in Yes SHG 0.05 12 Months 


Nursery) 


Total 8.04 

13 Mena Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 0.94 12 months 




- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 



L.L. 





Yes SHG 0.10 12 Months 

Nursery) 



collaction of forest product 

(indra jav) & processing unit 

Yes 





fioriculture Yes UG 0.40 24 Months 

Total 20.20 


14 Naroda Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 2.01 12 months 




- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 



L.L. 





Yes SHG 0.10 12 Months 

Nursery) 


custard oil & cattle feed 


proccesing unit 

Yes 



Cattle feed Store to SHG Yes 1.00 24 Months 



Total 28.81 

15 Vadagam Demonstration Plot Yes - - Others 1.28 12 months 



Horticulture Nursery Yes - SHG 1.66 24 months 



- Yes - UG/ 



Others 


Yes 

UG/ 


varisties 

Others 







Nursery) 






Total 16.66 

Table No 39.1. Summary of Livilihood, Production, Micro Enter Prize and others agriculture allied activities 

proposed in the Dolatpura 

Dolatpura 

Sr No 

Proposed Activities 

Rate(Rs) Unit/Nos Net Expence 


Agricultural Development 

Crop Demosstration 

1 Maize, Red Gram, Paddy,, Castor, 5000 5 25000.00 

Ginger & Turmeric etc 15000 2 30000.00 

2 Vegetable Nursery (Green House) and Promotion of 55000 1 55000.00 

A 

B 

Promosin of Improved agriculture Practices 0.00 

1 kitchan gardan 2500 7 17500.00 

Organic Farming 

0.00 

2 Vermi Compost to SHG 51000 1 51000.00 

Agro-processing Unit 

0.00 

Agricultural Allied Activities 

0.00 

1 Paultry Farming to individuals 2000 6 12000.00 

2 Minor Irrigation 50000 1 50000.00 

Improvement of Livestock 

Dairy Development 0.00 

1 Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 10000 4 40000.00 

Total 332 279500.00 

Table No 39.2 . Summary of Livilihood, Production, Micro Enter Prize and others agriculture allied activities 

proposed in the Kakari mahudi 

0.00 

Sr No 


Kakrimahudi 





1 Maize, Red Gram, Paddy,casture 5000 5 25000.00 

2 vegetable Demosstration 8000 3 24000.00 


A 

B 

1 Horticulture wadi 15000 2 30000.00 


0.00 

2 Vermi Compost 10000 10 100000.00 


0.00 


0.00 





0.00 


Milk Production 

0.00 

1 Fodder Development 2000 12 24000.00 

C Minor Activities 0.00 

Total 285600.00 



proposed in the :Vadhela 

Sr No 

Vadhela 



Major Activities 





4 Vegetable Nursery 50000 1 50000.00 

5 Sprayer Pump to UG (in Nursery) 5000 1 5000.00 


A 


2 kitchen garden 2500 10 25000.00 


0.00 

2 Vermi Compost to SHG 51000 2 102000.00 


0.00 


B 

1 Floor mill to SHG 125000 1 125000.00 


0.00 





0.00 



0.00 



Total 661650.00 


proposed in the : Padedi(Patapur) 

Sr No 

Padedi(Patapur) 





1 Maize, Red Gram, Paddy 5000 2 10000.00 


A 




B 


2 Vermi Compost 10000 2 20000.00 


0.00 




0.00 

1 Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 10400 1 10400.00 

0.00 

Total 78900.00 


proposed in the :Borvai 

Sr No 




Borvai 




2 Ginger & Turmeric Demosstration 15000 3 45000.00 




A 



2 Papaiya wadi 20000 2 40000.00 

B 

3 Floury Culture 17000 3 34000.00 


0.00 



0.00 



0.00 




0.00 



0.00 



Total 622900.00 

Table No 39. 6 . Summary of Livilihood, Production, Micro Enter Prize and others agriculture allied activities 

proposed in the :Masadra 


Sr No 

Masadra 






1 Maize, Red Gram, casture 5000 6 30000 

2 vegetable Demosstration 8000 2 16000 




A 

B 

2 Kichan Graden 2500 11 27500.00 


0.00 

2 Vermi Compost to SHG 50800 1 50800.00 


0.00 


0.00 




0.00 



0.00 




Total 335300.00 


proposed in the :Ladanna muvada 

Sr No 



Ladanna muvada 






A 



3 Minor Lift Irrigation 50000 1 50000.00 


0.00 



0.00 



0.00 



B 



0.00 


120500.00 

1 Fodar Bank Dev. 120500 1 


0.00 

1 Cattle feed Store to SHG 70000 1 70000.00 


Total 558500.00 


proposed in the :Lavana 

Sr No 




Lavana 





4 Vegetable Nursery 55000 2 110000.00 


A 

1 Horticulture wadi 15000 10 150000.00 



3 Vegetable growing 21000 2 42000.00 


0.00 


2 Vermi Compost to SHG 51000 2 102000.00 


0.00 

B 

1 collaction of forest product (indra jav) & processing unit 50000 1 50000.00 

2 Flour & pulse procesing to SHG 120000 1 120000.00 


0.00 


2 fishary to SHG 101250 1 101250.00 

3 Bamboo work to SHG 50000 1 50000.00 

4 Minor Lift Irrigation 50000 1 50000.00 



0.00 



0.00 

1 Fodder Development 2000 50 100000.00 

Total 1258250.00 


proposed in the :Tejakui 

Sr No Proposed Activities Tejakui 






1 Maize, Paddy,wheat 5000 6 30000.00 


3 Gingar Demosstration 15000 2 30000.00 



A 

B 



3 Vegetable growing 21000 5 105000.00 

4 Papaya wadi 15000 3 45000.00 


0.00 


1 Vermi Compost to SHG 51500 2 103000.00 


0.00 


0.00 




0.00 




0.00 


Total 788950.00 

Table No 39.10 . Summary of Livilihood, Production, Micro Enter Prize and others agriculture allied activities 

proposed in the :Mena 

Sr 

No Proposed Activities Rate(Rs) Unit/Nos Net Expence 




1 Maize, Red Gram, Paddy,wheat 5000 8 40000.00 


3 Ginger & Turmeric 15000 2 30000.00 


Promosin of Improved agriculture Practices 

A 

1 Horticulture wadi 15000 10 150000.00 

2 kitchan gardan 2500 40 100000.00 


4 floriculture 20000 2 40000.00 

5 papaya wadi 15000 6 90000.00 


B 



2 Vermi Compost to SHG 110000 2 220000.00 


0.00 

1 collaction of forest product(indra jav) & processing unit 100000 1 100000.00 


0.00 






0.00 

1 

Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination 

etc 20000 6 120000.00 

2 Minor Lift Irrigation 55000 2 110000.00 


0.00 

1 Cattle feed Store to SHG 100000 1 100000.00 

2 Fodder Development 2000 100 200000.00 

C Micro Enterprise 0.00 


0.00 

Total 2019800.00 


proposed in the : Ruzada 

Sr No Proposed Activities Ruzada





1 Maize, Paddy,wheat 5000 3 15000.00 



A 

B 


2 kitchan gardan 2500 10 25000.00 


0.00 


2 Vermi Compost Individuals 10000 3 30000.00 


0.00 


0.00 






0.00 




0.00 

Total 277750.00


proposed in the :Khadodi 

Sr No 




Khadodi 



1 Maize, Paddy,casture,funnal 5000 8 40000.00 





A 




4 papaya wadi 15000 3 45000.00 


0.00 

2 Vermi Compost 10000 10 100000.00 



B 





0.00 


2 Cattle Feed Store 96000 1 96000.00 


0.00 



1 Faraskhana to SHG 100000 1 100000.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Total 704000.00 


proposed in the : Dhuleta 

Sr No 




Dhuleta 



1 Maize, Paddy,Funnel,wheat 5000 8 40000.00 



A 



B 




0.00 


2 Vermi Compost to SHG 51000 1 51000.00 


0.00 


0.00 

1 Paultry Farming to individuals 2000 10 20000.00 


3 leather work to SHG 50000 1 50000.00 



0.00 



0.00 

1 Cattle feed Store to SHG 70000 1 70000.00 



1 diamond policing unit to SHG 200000 1 200000.00 

Total 787000.00 


proposed in the : Naroda 


Sr No 





Naroda 


1 Maize, Red Gram, Paddy,Funnel,wheat,custar 5000 12 60000.00 



4 Vegetable Nursery 55000 2 110000.00 


A 



3 Vegetable growing 21000 10 210000.00 

4 fioriculture 20000 7 140000.00 

5 papaya wadi 15000 6 90000.00 


0.00 


2 Vermi Compost to SHG 100000 2 200000.00 


0.00 


0.00 



B 

2 Castor proccesing unit 300000 1 300000.00 




0.00 

1 Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 20000 6 120000.00 


0.00 

1 Cattle feed Store to SHG 216500.00 1 216500.00 

2 Fodder Development 2000 107 214000.00 



Total 2881500.00 


proposed in the : Vadagam 

Sr No 




Vadagam 



1 Maize, Paddy,Funnel,wheat,custar 5000 10 50000.00 




A 

5 Horticulture Nursery with low cost green house to SHG 165600 1 165600.00 



B 




4 fioriculture 20000 5 100000.00 

5 papaya wadi 15000 5 75000.00 


0.00 


2 Vermi Compost to SHG 100000 1 100000.00 


0.00 


0.00 




0.00 



0.00 

1 Cattle Feed Store SHG 172000 1 172000.00 




Total 1665600.00 


4.3.3.2 (a) Details of Demonstration Plot Proposed in the Project: 

The soil moisture conservation activities help in increase the soil moisture of the project area. Hence the vegetable cultivation are planned to 

demonstrate in the project area as a improved agriculture practice. Vegetables like Ginger & Turmeric, Garlic, Tomato and Onion should be incorporated in 

the cultivation practice of the people so that they can get the maximum benefit of the produce. There is a big market in the near to the project are named 

Godhra and the total vegetable can be consumed in one day. 

Selection Criteria of the beneficiaries under the demonstration: 

1. The beneficiaries should have good land (Minimum 1 ha) and in which 0.20 ha with irrigation facilities. 

2. The famer should be laborious and has previous knowledge of the respective vegetable cultivation. 

3. He should ready to give the contribution as per the common guideline 2008 for IWMP. 

4. He should ready to says peoples & other visitors about Demonstration Plot 

The detail cost estimation of demonstration plot (area 0.20 ha) is given as under. 

4.3.3.2 (b) Details of Selection Criteria and Cost Estimate of Kitchen Garden Demostration Proposed in the Project: 

Kitchen garden will help the poor people to take their diet regularly so that the health status of the people will improve their health for daily 

consumption because of people generally women are animia affected and the extra produce can increase their daily income. 

Selection Criteria for the beneficiaries of the kitchen garden: 

1. Selection of vegetable should be determine by the community and discussion with the KVK,vegalpur 

2. The farmer/ beneficiaries should be below poverty line (BPL) SC, STor Small farmer. 

3. The beneficiaries should have land near their house or adjoining field with Irrigation Facilities. 

4. The farmer should be selected by the watershed committee members. 

5. The famer should have previous knowledge of the respective vegetable cultivation. 

6. He should ready to give the contribution as per the guideline 


The detail cost estimation of kitchen garden demostration. 

Cost Estimation for Kitchen Garden 

Sr. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate (Rs) Total Amount (Rs) 

1 Tillage Hours 1 450 450.00 

2 Seeds cost of vegetables ( 1 kg) nos 1 250 250.00 

3 Phosphatic Culture(Packets) nos 1 15 15.00 

4 Castor Cake Kg 25 7 175.00 

5 Cost of Fertilizer (DAP) Kg 10 11 110.00 

6 Cost of Fertilizer (Urea) Kg 30 6 180.00 

8 Pesticide (Endo / Roger)(ml) lt 0.25 500 125.00 

10 Irrigation Nos 5 90 450.00 

11 Drip Irrigation set nos 1 600 600.00 

12 Documentation 1 150 150.00 

Total 2505.00 


Say 2500.00 

4.3.3.2 (c) Details of Horticulture Plantation Proposed in the Project: 

For the sustainable income of the marginal and small land holding farmers, Agro-horti- forestry activity is planned. 

Selection Criteria for the beneficiaries of the Horticulture Plantation: 

The beneficiaries should have land of minimum 1 ha. 

The farmer should be selected by the PRA & FGD 

The famer should be laborious and has previous knowledge of horticulture plantation. 

He should ready to give the contribution as per the common guideline 2008 for IWMP. 

The detail technical, cost estimation and the income from Horticulture Plantation is given as under. 

Technical Details of Horticulture Plantation Activities 

Particulars Value Unit 

Plant to Plant Spacing 8.00 Meter 

Row to Row Spacing 8.00 Meter 

Pit Length 1.00 Meter 

Pit Width 1.00 Meter 

Pit Depth 1.00 Meter 

No. of Plants 35.00 Nos 

Plantation Area 0.20 Ha 

Cost Estimation for Horticulture Plantation (0.20 Ha) 

Sr No. Particular Quantity Rate Amount 

1 Pits excavation cost 44.20 Cmt 60.00 2652.00 

2 Organic Manure / Vermicompost 1200 Kg 4.00 4800.00 


3 Grafted Sample and Plants(Mango) (with 20% Casulity) 40 Nos 50.00 2000.00 

4 Live Fencing Plant 90 Nos 5.00 450.00 

5 Fungicide (Tricoderma) 2 Kg 500.00 1000.00 

6 Inter Vegetable Growing for four times 0.5 Kg 1500.00 750.00 

7 Weeding and Irrigation - 2300.00 

8 Transporting Cost - 500.00 

9 Documentation Cost - 500.00 

10 Total Cost - 14952.00 

Say 15000.00 

The revenue is calculated consider the minimum rate of the vegetable and produces of horticulture plant. The detail revenue is detailed below. 

Revenue and return Details of Horticulture Plantation 

Minimum 

Sr No Particulars 

Rate 

Average Production 

1st Year 2nd year 3rd Year 4th Year 

Total Income 

1 Income from Intercrop 25 Rs. 25 X 50 Kg Rs. 25 X 60 Kg Rs. 25 X 70 Kg Rs. 25 X 70 Kg 6250 

2 

Income from Horti Culture ( 

30 Mango plant starts 

production from 4th year of 

the plantation and minimum 

production 10 kg/ plant) 

30 Rs. 30 X 300 Kg Rs. 30 X 600 Kg Rs. 30 X 450 Kg Rs. 30 X 900 Kg 67500 

For the sustainable income of the marginal and small land holding farmers, Horticulture wadi activity is planned.. 


4.3.4.1 (d) Details of FloricultureProposed in the Project: 

Selection Criteria for the beneficiaries of the Rose Wadi: 



The famer should be laborious. 


The cost estimation and the income of Floricultureare given as under. 

Cost Estimation for Floriculture(0.20 Ha) 


1 Seeds, Drafted Sample and Plants 2000 Nos 7.00 14000.00 

2 Tillage and Pits excavation cost - - 500.00 

3 Bio Fertilizer (10 Bag) 500 Kg 4.00 2000.00 

4 Bio Pesticide (Neem Oil 1500 PPM) 1 Lt 500.00 500.00 

5 Fungicide (Tricoderma) 1 Kg 500.00 500.00 

6 Weeding and Irrigation - 2000.00 

7 Transporting Cost - 500.00 

8 Documentation Cost - 500.00 

Total Cost - 20500.00 

Revenue and return Details of Floriculture 

Sr No 

Particulars 


(Kg) 

Rate 

Total Income 


1 Production of Rose (1st Year) 250.00 120.00 30000.00 

2 Production of Rose (2nd Year) 325.00 120.00 39000.00 

3 Production of Rose (3rd Year) 375.00 120.00 45000.00 

Total 114000.00 

Average income per years 38000.00 

Expenditure of Rose Wadi 6000.00 

Net Annually Income 32000.00 

4.3.4.1 (e) Details of Papaya Wadi Proposed in the Project: 

Selection Criteria for the beneficiaries of the Papaya Wadi: 



The famer should be laborious. 


The cost estimation and the income of Papaya Wadi are given as under. 

Cost Estimation for Papaya Wadi (0.10 Ha) 


1 Seeds & Plants with Casulity 1000 Nos 10 10000 

2 Bio Fertilizer (10 Bag) 500 Kg 4 2000 

3 Bio Pesticide (Neem Oil 1500 PPM) 1 Lt 500 500 

4 Fungicide (Tricoderma) 1 Kg 500 500 

5 Weeding and Irrigation - 500 


6 Transporting Cost - 1000 

7 Documentation Cost - 500 

Total Cost - 15000 

Revenue and return Details of Papaya Wadi 

Sr No 

Particulars 


(Kg) 

Rate 

Total Income 

1 Production of Papaya 30000 3.00 90000 

Total 90000 

Average income per years 90000 

Expenditure of Papaya Wadi 5000 

Net Annually Income 85000 

4.3.3.2 (e) Specific Livelihood interventions for land less: 

Animal husbandry like poultry and dairy farming are planned for the landless families resides in the project area of IWMP-5, 

panchmahal. The landless family will get benefit from these activities. The training will be given by the DWDU. 

Objectives of poultry farming: 

To develop a support enterprise for rural Population. 

Introduction of Poultry rearing as sustainable livelihood for the landless farmer. 

Short term income for land less, small, marginal farmer during off season. 

Selection Criteria for the beneficiaries: 

The beneficiaries should be land less or small or marginal. 


The beneficiaries should be selected by the PRA & FGD. 

He/she should have previous knowledge of respective farming. 


Cost Estimate of poultry farming 

Sr No. Particular Quantity Rate Amount Remarks 

1 Cost of Boiler of 20 days 20 Nos 75.00 1500.00 

2 

Food, Water and others for Boiler Feed (Recurring 

cost) 

250.00 250 

3 Vaccination 50.00 50 

4 Drinker & Feeder=Rs200/-(One time expenditure) 200.00 200 

5 Training for management of poultry farming - - 

Total Cost - 2000.00 

Expenditure from livelihood 

Training 

Points to remember Selection of breed: 

Selection of breed should be determined by the community and discussion with the KVK Vejalpur. 

Vanraj breed/ (local with hybrid) breed/ can be reared as backyard poultry. 

The breed has short gestation period. 

Highly disease resistance, sturdy breeds. 

Meat tastes & appearance should like deshi bird. 

Good Egg laying capacity should minimum (140 per annum) 

Housing for the poultry farming: 


Low cost poultry house was constructed by the participants as suggested in the training programme. 

Proper ventilation & lighting was considered for optimum growth & to reduce mortality. 

On an average1 Sq ft space was maintain for a bird. More than that size causes loss of energy which affects FCR (Feed Conversion Ratio) 

and less than 1 sq ft can cause diseases. 

After care: 

Vaccines were provided from the project in time as per suggestion of expert. 

Proper follow up for timely management of water and feeding. 

Feeding Management should be proper by the specific instrument. 

Minimum 2 kg of feed required in order to gain 1kg of body weight in 45 days. 

Marketing; 

The birds were ready for sale after 2 months. 

Average body weight was 1.5 to 2 kg during these two months. 

Then it was sold in villages & nearby markets as the demand is very high. 

Average rate was Rs. 120/- per kg body weight of birds. 

Source of marketing – Urban, Rural, individual & self consumption. 

4.3.3.2 (f) Specific Livilihood interventions for Self Help Group (SHG): 

Selection Criteria for the beneficiaries: 

1. The beneficiaries should be land less 

2. The beneficiaries should be selected by the watershed committee members. 


3. He/she should have previous knowledge of respective farming. 

4. He should ready to give the contribution as per the common guideline 2008 for IWMP 

‣ Cost estimation and Revenue Details of Farashkhana Set for SHG 

Sr. No. Particulars Unit Amount (Rs) 

1 

Permanent Budget investment 

1.1 Chair 100 27500 

1.2 Cloth 250 27500 

1.3 Gate 1 10000 

1.4 Green Nate 1 10000 

1.5 pole-100 nos 50 5000 

1.6 Chori sat 1 20000 

Total Budget investment 100000 

2 Recuring Expenditure (Instrument's Repair, maintenance) 5000 

3 Yearly Income (Per One Order in Ceremony Rs.4000.00 ) 

(1 Order in Rs.4000.00 x 15 Order in 

one year minimum) 

60000 

Yearly Income 

1 Yearly Income 60000 

2 Expenditure 5000 

Net Income Per Year per SHG 65000 

‣ Cost estimation and Revenue Details of Fishery Cultivation by SHG 


Sr. No. Particulars Unit Amount 

Permanent Budget investment 

1.1 Machinery & Other’s 

1 

‣ Fiber Boat 1 35000.00 

‣ Fish ring Net 1 10000.00 

‣ Pond Rent (Yearly) 20000.00 

2 Current Budget investment, Seed of Rav, Katla & Nagri 30000.00 

3 Food for Fish 15000.00 

4 Cleaning ness of Pond, Seed Growing & Harvesting of Fish 15000.00 

5 Transportation & Packing 5000.00 

Total Budget investment 130000.00 

5 

Production Expenditure & Recuring expenditure (Seed, Food, Maintenace Expence & Machinery 

Expance) 

45000.00 

6 Employment 

Seasonal Employment (11 Persons * 30 Days * 110 Rs) 36300.00 

Total Yearly Expenditure 81300.00 

6 

Selling 

(Fish Production – 1500 * 100 Rs) 

150000.00 

Total Yearly Selling Income 150000.00 

Yearly Net Income 


1 Selling of production Rs.150000.00 

2 Production Expenditure Rs.81300.00 

Net Yearly Income 

Rs.68700.00 

‣ Cost estimation and Revenue Details of Processing Unit of Dal Mill By SHGs. 

Sr. No. Particulars Unit Amount (Rs.) 

1 

Permanent Budget investment 0 

1.1 Room rent for Project 1 4000.00 

1.2 Machine & Other instrument 1 30000.00 

1.3 Electric City Bill (4 Month) 4000.00 

Total Budget investment 38000.00 

2 Production Expenditure 38000.00 

Total Expenditure 38000.00 

Total Income for Dal Mile 

3 3.1 5000 kg. Dal x 30 Days x Rs.2/- per kg. (Flooring Charges) for 1 Month 

3.2 in 3 Month ( 3 x 30,000/-) 

90000.00 

Total Selling Income ( 3 Month) 90000.00 

Net Income 

1 Total Income for Dal Rs.90000.00 

2 Expenditure Rs.38000.00 

Net Income (3 Month) 

Rs.52000.00 


Production System-1: Fodder bank for IWMP-10 

There is one fodder bank planned in Ladan Na Muvada village of the project IWMP-10. The fodder bank ensures fodder availability of 

the respective village and adjoining villages which in turn reduces the distressed migration of the people resulting in sustainable livelihood 

opportunities and ensures the proper management of natural resource in the project area. Fodder will be cultivated in 8 ha Land of the village. 

The area of the Ladan Na Muvada the fodder is cultivated in the Gouchhar land to pay the amount Rs. 500.00/ Month to the gram Panchyat. 

Objective of a fodder bank: 

1. To organize the distribution of fodder during drought and scarce situation. 

2. To establish and maintain village fodder farm in the project villages. 

3. To ensure the fodder security through natural resource management. 

Primary problem of the project 

Project village comes under totally rain fed agriculture because of this average migration percentage is 25%. Soil is very suitable for 

fodder crop mainly Dhaman, Hathai but due the scarcity of irrigation water, farmers used to take one crop throughout the year. Majority of 

farmers collect the fodder and leaves of trees from forest area when the fodder is not available in his farm. So fodder bank can play an 

important role to reduce this problem. 

Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when 

supply is higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher 


prices during the months of scarcity. 

Feasibility of Fodder Bank: 

A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in Project watershed area. The number and type of cattle as well as the 

fodder production capacity of the village was collect during these surveys. In focused group discussion several factors like the various types of 

fodder available locally, the quantity of fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the size of fodder bank, the amount of investment required to 

operate a fodder bank etc were discussed with the farmers, User group and Watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and 

towards that, the sale price of fodder should cover operating costs and losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member 

of operating fodder bank. 

The detail model and cost benefit analyses of two villages are described as under. Model of Ladan Na Muvada is detailed in the Table no. 42.9 

(b) 

Table No.39.16 (a) -Primary Model for A Fodder Bank of Ladan Na Muvada village 

A 

Total Dairy farmers 75 

No. cattle to be catered by one fodder bank 200 

Total 200 

Fodder requirement per day (10 kg dry fodder for adult) 200*10 =2000 kg 

Fodder requirement for 100 days 

100*2000 kg = 200000 kg say = 2000 Quintal 

Fodder come from Community land 

8 Ha * 250 Q = 2000 Q 

Cost of cultivation for fodder production (Form table No. 60000 Rs 

42.6 (a 1)) 

Remaining requirement for Another days 

Self Crop Farming 


B 

Total Cost 

Area development for fodder bank Land required 

(preferably land will be allotted by Gram Panchyat @ 

Rs.500 per month) 

60000/- Rs 

12 Month * 500 Rs = 6000 Rs 

C Protection Trenches (1090 Nos * 50) Protect Fodder Purpose 54500 Rs 

D Total Cost for Fodder bank (A+B+C) 120500 Rs 

Table No.39.16 (b) -Cost of Cultivation for fodder production 

Cost Detail 

Cost for tillage 

Cost for seed 

Cost for fertilizer 

Cost for irrigation 

Depreciation cost L.S. (15% to 20%) 

Total cost for 10 hec 

Unit Cost 

4.5 Hour * 8 Ha * 500 Rs = 18000 Rs 

15 kg * 8 Ha * 250 = 30000 Rs 

6000 Rs 

3000 Rs 

3000 Rs 

60000 Rs 

Table No.39.16 (c) -Revenue and return Details 

Sr. No Return Details Cost (in Rs) 

1 Cost of fodder per kg 120500 Rs/200000 Kg = 0.60 Rs/Kg 

2 Selling Price of Fodder 1.00 Rs/kg 

3 Net selling Price 200000 kg * 1.00 Rs = Rs 200000.00 

4 Net Profit 2,00,000.00 Rs 

Technical Support/Assistance: 

To ensure proper technical support for fodder bank and smooth functioning of activities the required technical assistance may be taken 

from Forest Department, Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVS), Dept. of Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU. 


Advantages: 

The importance of a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in 

the village especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:- 

It will reduce migration during drought condition. 

Farmers can purchase and sale of fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these transactions at 

the city market. 

It can reduce in overall market prices of fodder during the lean season. 

Ensure availability of fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices. 

Reduced distress sale of cattle due to non –availability and / or non-affordability of fodder. 

Higher incomes for the poor as cattle will have enough fodder for good milk production even during the lean season 

Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase and storage of fodder. 

Vermicompost unit for Project IWMP-10, Panchmahal 

Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer; so, by the use of vermicompost we can reduce use of chemical fertilizer. 

Vermicompost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water 

and nutrient holding capacities of soil. 

At present, the animal waste is not used by the villagers as agricultural input. If the farmers are given training about the preparation, utilization and 

the benefit of using vermicompost/ organic farming in the field, the farmers aware about the productivity of their land can increase with the use of this 

compost. The activity is planned for the SHG and the interested farmers of the project area. The Details of the cost estimation and the revenue of one vermi 

compost unit are detailed below: 

Cost Estimation for Vermi Compost Units 

Sr. No. Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs) Total Amount (Rs) 

1 Cons. of compost pit cost (3.00*1.50*0.45 mt) 2 Bad 1300.00 2600.00 

2 Vermi (Ascenia Fatida) 9 kg 300.00 2700.00 


3 Green Net (90 %) 30 Smt 50/Smt 1500.00 

4 Iron Pipe 60 Feet 20/feet 1200.00 

5 Organic Fertilizer (3000 Kg + Tree Leaf) 3000 Kg 500 1500.00 

6 Labour Exp. 500.00 500.00 

Total 10000.00 

Say 10000.00 

Revenue and return Details of Vermi Compost 

Sr. No. Particulars Production Rate (Rs) Total Income (Rs) 

1 Vermi Compost (1st Qurter) 4 Ton 1500.00 6000.00 

2 Vermi Compost (2nd Qurter) 5 Ton 1500.00 7500.00 

3 Vermi Compost (3rd Qurter) 5 Ton 1500.00 7500.00 

4 Vermi Compost (4th Qurter) 5 Ton 1500.00 7500.00 

5 Verms - - 3000.00 

Total 31500.00 

Cost of Raw Material and Fym 10000.00 

Net Yearly Income 21500.00 

Table no. 40: Activities related to Livilihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 

Sr. No. 

1 


Villages 

Dolatpura 

Major activities of the SHGs 

Name of activity 

No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity 

(Nos) 

per SHG (Rs) 

Vegetable Nursery 1 

Vermi Compost 1 

2 Vadhela 

Vegetable Nursery 

1 


3 Borvai 

4 Masadra 


Vermi Compost 

2 

Floor mill 

1 


1 

Floor mill 1 


1 

Vermi Compost 

1 


Floor mill 

1 

Cattle feed Store 

1 

Fodar Bank Dev. 

1 



6 Lavana 

7 Tejakui 

collaction of forest product (indra 

1 

jav) & processing unit 

Soji & pulse procesing to SHG 1 

fishary to SHG 1 

Bamboo work to SHG 1 



fishary 1 




8 Mena 

fishary 1 

Floor mill 1 

Cattle feed Store 1 

9 Ruzada 

10 Khadodi 

11 Dhuleta 

12 Naroda 

Vermi Compost 

Vermi Compost 


Faraskhana 

Vermi Compost 

fishary 1 

leather work 1 


1 

diamond policing unit 



custard oil & cattle feed proccesing 

unit 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 


Floor mill to SHG 1 

Cattle feed Store to SHG 

1 



Horticulture Nursery with low cost 

green house to SHG 

1 

1 

1 

13 Vadagam 

Vermi Compost 

1 

Floor mill 

1 


1 

Table No: - 41 Linkages developed at village level. 

Sr. No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with 

1 

Dolatpura 


Backward linkage 

Local Village Farmers 

Vermi Compost 






2 

Vadhela Vermi Compost 



Floor mill 


Village Level 



Backward Linkage 

3 Borvai 

Floor mill Backward linkage Village Level 

Outcome 

(Av. Annual Income in Rs) 


4 Masadra 


Vermi Compost 









Floor mill 


Fodar Bank Dev. 


Forward & Backward 

Linkage 

Forward Linkage 

Village Level 



Vermi Compost 






6 Lavana 

collaction of forest 

product (indra jav) & 

processing unit 

Soji & pulse procesing 

to SHG 

fishary 

Bamboo work 

Vermi Compost 


Linkage 


Linkage 


Linkage 


Linkage 


Village Level & 


Vermi Compost 



7 

Tejakui 



Local Village Farmers, 

fishary 



Vermi Compost 






8 Mena 

fishary 

Floor mill 


Linkage 


Village Level 

9 

Ruzada 


Vermi Compost 


Linkage 




Vermi Compost 



10 Khadodi 




Faraskhana 

Vermi Compost 


Linkage 


Village Level& 


11 Dhuleta 

fishary 

leather work 



Vermi Compost 


Linkage 


Linkage 


Linkage 


Linkage 




12 Naroda 



Local Village Farmers, 

custard oil & cattle 



13 Vdagam 

feed proccesing unit 

Floor mill to SHG Backward linkage Village Level 

Cattle feed Store to 



SHG 

Linkage 



Horticulture Nursery 

with low cost green 

house to SHG 

Vermi Compost 

Floor mill 



Linkage 



Linkage 




Linkage 


Project Villege 


Village Level 

Table no. 42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

Sr. 

No 

. 


village 

1 Dolatpura 


structure/ 

work 

(i) 

Ridg 

e 

area 

(R) 

Type of treatment 

(ii) 

Drainag 

e line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Lan 

d 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Privat 

e 

Type of land 

(ii) 

Communit 

y 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify 

) 

Executin 

g agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

Are 

a 

(ha) 

No. of 

plants 

Target 

Estimate 

d cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completio 

n (mm/ 

yyyy) 

Veg.Nurser 

y raising 

Yes SHG 0.10 25000 0.50 24 month 

Total 0.10 2500 0.50 



3 Vadhela 

4 

Padedi(patapur 

) 

5 Borvai 

6 Masadra 

7 

Ladanna 

Muvada 

8 Lavana 

0 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

Yes UG 0.40 72 0.30 24 month 

Total 0.40 72 0.30 

Veg.Nurser 

24 month 

Yes SHG 0.10 25000 0.50 

y raising 

Horticultur 

24 month 

Yes UG 0.60 216 0.90 

e Wadi 

Total 0.70 

2521 

6 

1.40 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

Yes UG 0.20 36 0.15 24 month 

Total 0.20 36 0.15 

Veg.Nurser 


24 month 

y raising 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

Yes UG 0.40 72 0.30 

Total 0.50 

Veg.Nurser 

y raising 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

24 month 


2507 

2 

0.80 


Yes UG 0.40 72 0.30 

Total 0.50 

Veg.Nurser 

y raising 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

2507 

2 

0.80 


Yes UG 0.40 72 0.30 

Total 0.50 

Veg.Nurser 

y raising 

2507 

2 

0.80 

Yes SHG 0.20 50000 1.00 

24 month 

24 month 

24 month 

24 month 

24 month

9 Tejakui 


12 Khadodi 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

Yes UG 2.00 360 1.50 

Total 2.20 

Veg.Nurser 

y raising 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

Papaya 

Wadi 

24 month 


5036 

0 

2.50 


Yes UG 0.40 72 0.30 

Yes UG 0.30 3000 0.45 

Total 0.80 

2807 

2 

1.25 

24 month 

24 month 

24 month 

Veg.Nurser 

24 month 

Yes SHG 0.20 50000 1.00 

y raising 

Horticultur 

24 month 

Yes UG 2.00 360 1.50 

e Wadi 

Papaya 

24 month 

Yes UG 0.60 6000 0.90 

Wadi 

floriculture Yes UG 0.40 4000 0.40 24 month 

Total 3.20 

6036 

0 

3.80 

Veg.Nurser 

y raising 

Horticultur 

e Wadi 

Papaya 

Wadi 


Yes UG 0.60 108 0.45 

Yes UG 0.30 3000 0.45 

Total 1.00 

2810 

8 

1.40 

24 month 

24 month 

24 month 

Horticultur 

13 Dhuleta e Wadi 

Yes UG 0.40 72 0.30 24 month 

Total 0.40 72 0.30 

14 Naroda Veg.Nurser Yes SHG 0.20 50000 1.00 24 month

15 Vadagam 

y raising 

Horticultur 

24 month 

Yes UG 4.00 720 3.00 

e Wadi 

Papaya 

24 month 

Yes UG 1.00 6000 1.50 

Wadi 

floriculture Yes UG 1.40 14000 2.00 24 month 

Total 6.60 

7072 

0 

7.50 

Veg.Nurser 

24 month 


y raising 

Horticultur 

24 month 

Yes UG 1.60 288 1.20 

e Wadi 

Papaya 

24 month 

Yes UG 1.50 5000 0.75 

Wadi 

floriculture Yes UG 1.00 10000 1.00 24 month 

Total 4.20 

4028 

8 

3.45 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

Target 

Sr. No. 

Name(s) of 

the villages 

CPR particulars 

Activity proposed 

Target area 

under the 

activity (ha) 

Estimated 

expenditure (Rs.) 

Expected no. of beneficiaries 


1 Dolatpura Gauchar 

2 

Kakari 

mahudi 

Forest/ Gauchar 

3 Vadhela Forest 

4 Borvai Forest/ Gauchar 

5 Masadra Gauchar 

6 

Gully Plug, Nala Plug, 

Stone Bund 13.84 7.58 23 


Stone Bund 68.43 7.41 27 


Stone Bund 77.14 16.49 55 


Stone Bund 60.02 12.25 49 


Stone Bund 18.00 7.65 27 

Ladanna 

Muvada Gauchar Fooder Bank 51.00 4.70 28 

7 Lavana Gauchar 


Stone Bund 212.14 12.00 51 

8 Tejakui Forest/ Gauchar 


Stone Bund, Contur trench 305.39 10.00 39 

9 Mena Forest/ Gauchar 


Stone Bund, Contur trench 544.96 35.00 65 

10 Ruzada Gauchar 



11 Khadodi Forest/ Gauchar 



12 Dhuleta Forest/ Gauchar 




13 Naroda Forest/ Gauchar 



14 Vadagam Forest/ Gauchar 



Total for project 2699.33 237.38 649 

4.4. Capacity Building: 

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience 

needed to solve problems and implement change. 

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the 

conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to 

human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of 

stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects. 

Scope of capacity building at Project Village 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative Land Use Plan 

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation 

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices 

Fodder development and Management 

Afforestation 

Meteorological Information 


Dairy Development and Management 

Rural Craft 

Income Generation Activities 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: 

Sr. 

No. 


Training 

Institute 

1 KVK,Vejalpur 

2 

3 

Anand Agriculture 

University,Anand 

Sad guru 

foundation 

Full Address with 

contact no., website & 

e-mail 

At-Vejalpur,Ta-Kalol,Di- 

Panchmahals 

Khetiwadi Campus 

At-Ananad Di-Anand 

At-Chosala 

Ta&Di-Dahod 

Type of 

Institute 

Govt. 

Govt. 

NGO 

Horticulture 

and Livilihood 

Agriculture and 

Animal 

Husbandry 

Capacity 

Building of 

Watershed 

Stake holders 

Livilihood 

Promotion 

Area(s) of 

specialization$ 

Accreditation 

details 

Reference 

Year 

Trainings 


trainings 

assigned 


trainees to 

be trained 

Lachhakdi, Dharmpur, 

4 BAIF- Dhurva 

NGO 

Vasda, 

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) 

$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/ 

Livilihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify) 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: 

Sr. No. State Project Stakeholders 

Total no. of No. of persons to be 

No. of training 

persons 

trained 

programmes 

PIA 5 5 6 

1 Gujrat 

WDTs 7 6 10 

UGs 20 Group (may 200 (May Increase) 10 

Estimated cost (Lakhs) 

35.02 


increase) 

SHGs 

20 Group (may 

increase) 

200 (May Increase) 10 

WCs 60 60 15 

GPs 

10 (2 per person 

per GP) 

10 10 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: 

Sr. 

No. 

Particulars 

Total no. 

Rate per 

unit 

Executing agency 

1 Street play (Bhavai) 10 3500 PIA and DWDU, Khanpur 35000 

2 

3 

Campaigning for community mobilisation 

(twice per year per project for three year) 

Pamphlets and posters ( 1500 per one 

campaign and two time per year) 

6 2000 PIA and DWDU, Khanpur 12000 

18000 5 PIA and DWDU, , Khanpur 90000 

4 Banners, Hoardings - - PIA and DWDU, , Khanpur 15000 

Estimated 

expenditure 

(Rs.) 

Outcomes 

(may quantify, 

wherever possible) 

Awareness for the 

importance of watershed 

project 

5 Wall Painting at 3 community places 15 3000 PIA and DWDU, , Khanpur 45000 


CHAPTER-5 


BUDGET 

Table no. 47.1 Budget at a glance for the project 

Budget component 

% of 

the 

Budget 

Dolatpura 

Kakari 

mahudi 

Vadhela Padeedi(patapura) Borvai Masadra 

Ladana 

muvada 

Net Project Cost 100 14.735 15.018 34.816 4.163 32.788 17.677 29.48 66.236 

-Administrative Costs 10 1.473 1.502 3.482 0.416 3.279 1.768 2.944 6.24 

-Monitoring 1 0.147 0.150 0.348 0.041 0.328 0.177 0.294 0.662 

-Evaluation 1 0.147 0.150 0.348 0.041 0.328 0.177 0.294 0.662 

Preparatory phase: 

-Entry point activities 4 0.59 0.60 1.39 0.17 1.31 0.71 1.18 2.65 

-Institution and capacity building 5 0.737 0.751 1.741 0.208 1.639 0.884 1.472 3.312 

-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1 0.147 0.150 0.348 0.042 0.328 0.177 0.294 0.662 

Watershed Works Phase: 

-Watershed Development works, 56 8.251 8.410 19.497 2.331 18.361 9.899 16.486 37.092 


Lavana

-Livilihood activities for the asset less 

persons, 

-Production system and micro 

enterprises 

09 0.326 1.352 3.133 0.375 2.951 1.591 2.649 5.961 

10 1.502 1.502 3.482 0.416 3.279 1.768 2.944 6.624 

Consolidation Phase 3 0.45 0.451 1.044 0.125 0.984 0.530 0.883 1.987 

Total 100 

Table no. 47.2Budget at a glance for the project in (Rs) 

Budget component 

% of the 

Budget 

Tejakui Mena Ruzada Khadodi Dhuleta Naroda Vadagam Total 

Net Project Cost 100 41.516 106.296 14.618 42.325 41.440 151.644 87.682 700.392 

-Administrative Costs 10 4.152 10.630 1.462 4.233 4.144 15.164 8.768 70.039 

-Monitoring 1 0.415 1.063 0.146 0.423 0.414 1.516 0.877 7.004 

-Evaluation 1 0.415 1.063 0.146 0.423 0.414 1.516 0.877 7.004 

Preparatory phase: 

-Entry point activities 4 1.66 4.25 0.58 1.69 1.66 6.07 3.51 28.02 

-Institution and capacity building 5 2.076 5.315 0.731 2.116 2.072 7.582 4.384 35.020 

-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1 0.145 1.063 0.146 0.423 0.414 1.516 0.887 7.004 

Watershed Works Phase: 

-Watershed Development works, 56 23.249 59.526 8.186 23.702 23.206 84.921 49.102 392.220 

-Livilihood activities for the asset less 

persons, 

09 3.736 9.567 1.316 3.809 3.730 13.648 7.891 63.035 


-Production system and micro 

enterprises 

10 4.152 10.630 1.162 4.233 4.144 15.164 8.768 70.039 

Consolidation Phase 03 1.245 3.189 0.439 1.270 1.243 4.549 2.630 21.012 

Total 100 41.516 106.296 14.618 42.325 41.440 151.644 87.682 700.392 

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget in (Rs.) 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

EPA 

Institution 

and CB 

DPR 

Watershed 

Development 

Work 

Activity 

Livilihood 

for asset 

less 

Production 

system and 

Micro 

enterprises 

Consolidation 

1 Dolatpura 58939.20 73674.00 14734.80 825148.80 132613.20 147348.00 44204.40 2770142.40 

2 Kakari mahudi 60072.00 75090.00 15018.00 841008.00 135162.00 150180.00 45054.00 2823384.00 

3 Vadhela 139262.40 174078.00 34815.60 1949673.60 313340.40 348156.00 104446.80 6545332.80 

4 Padedi(patapur) 16651.20 20814.00 4162.80 233116.80 37465.20 41628.00 12488.40 782606.40 

5 Borvai 131150.40 163938.00 32787.60 1836105.60 295088.40 327876.00 98362.80 6164068.80 

6 Masadra 70708.80 88386.00 17677.20 989923.20 159094.80 176772.00 53031.60 3323313.60 

7 Ladanna Muvada 117753.60 147192.00 29438.40 1648550.40 264945.60 294384.00 88315.20 5534419.20 

8 Lavana 264945.60 331182.00 66236.40 3709238.40 596127.60 662364.00 198709.20 12452443.20 

9 Tejakui 166065.60 207582.00 41516.40 2324918.40 373647.60 415164.00 124549.20 7805083.20 

10 Mena 425184.00 531480.00 106296.00 5952576.00 956664.00 1062960.00 318888.00 19983648.00 

11 Ruzada 58473.60 73092.00 14618.40 818630.40 131565.60 146184.00 43855.20 2748259.20 

12 Khadodi 

169300.80 211626.00 42325.20 2370211.20 380926.80 423252.00 126975.60 7957137.60 

13 Dhuleta 165758.40 207198.00 41439.60 2320617.60 372956.40 414396.00 124318.80 7790644.80 


Total

14 Naroda 606576.00 758220.00 151644.00 8492064.00 1364796.00 1516440.00 454932.00 28509072.00 

15 Vadagam 350726.40 438408.00 87681.60 4910169.60 789134.40 876816.00 263044.80 16484140.80 

Total 2801568.00 3501960.00 700392.00 39221952.00 6303528.00 7003920.00 2101176.00 131673696.00 

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Total cost requirement (Rs) 

Total funds available under IWMP 

(Rs) 

Gap in funds requirement (Rs) 

1 Dolatpura 1305110.00 1105110.00 200000.00 

2 Kakari mahudi 1351350.00 1126350.00 225000.00 

3 Vadhela 3111170.00 2611170.00 500000.00 

4 Padedi(patapur) 377210.00 312210.00 65000.00 

5 Borvai 2459070.00 2459070.00 600000.00 

6 Masadra 1595790.00 1325790.00 270000.00 

7 Ladanna Muvada 2657880.00 2207880.00 450000.00 

8 Lavana 4967730.00 4967730.00 450000.00 

9 Tejakui 3735730.00 3113730.00 622000.00 

10 Mena 7972200.00 7972200.00 1620000.00 

11 Ruzada 1316380.00 1096380.00 220000.00 

12 Khadodi 3809390.00 3174390.00 635000.00 

13 Dhuleta 3728970.00 3107970.00 621000.00 

14 Naroda 11948300.00 11373300.00 2275000.00 


15 Vadagam 7896120.00 6576120.00 1320000.00 

Total 58232400.00 52529400.00 5703000 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP-10 with other Schemes 

Sr. No. Village 

1 Dolatpura 


3 Vadhela 


5 Borvai 

6 Masadra 

Phase/Type of work 

Soil&moisture Consevation 


Irrigation Fecilitiy 

Activity to be 

carried out 

Fund made 

available to 

IWMP due to 

convergence 

(Rs. in lakh) 

Scheme with 

which 

convergence 

took place 

Protection wall 200000.00 MGNREGA 

Total 200000.00 


Total 225000.00 

Pond lift Irrigation 500000.00 BRGF 

Total 500000.00 

Water Convertion 

Check dem 

Dicilting 

65000.00 MGNREGA 

Total 65000.00 

Water Convertion Check Dam 300000.00 

MGNREGA 

Water Convertion Check Dam 300000.00 


Total 600000.00 

MGNREGA 

Protection wall 270000.00 BRGF 

Reference 

no. of 

activity/ 

task/ 

structure in 

DPR 

Level at which 

decision for 

convergence 

was taken 

Taluka 

Panchayat level 

Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 




8 Lavana 

9 Tejakui 


11 

Mena 

Ruzada 



Total 270000.00 


Check dam 300000.00 MGNREGA 

Total 450000.00 

Soil&moisture Consevation Protection Wall 225000.00 

Soil&moisture Consevation Protection Wall 225000.00 

Village infrasture 










Total 450000.00 

MGNREGA 

MGNREGA 

CC Road 300000.00 BRGF 


Total 622000.00 

Check Dam 

300000.00 MGNREGA 

Check Dam 

300000.00 MGNREGA 


Protection wall 



Protection Wall 

204000.00 

204000.00 

204000.00 

204000.00 

Total 1620000.00 

MGNREGA 

MGNREGA 

MGNREGA 

MGNREGA 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 



12 

13 

Khadodi 

Dhuleta 

14 Naroda 

15 Vadagam 






Irrigation Fecilitiy 









Total 220000.00 

Check dam 300000.00 BRGF 


Total 635000.00 

C.C Road 300000.00 BRGF 

Protection wall 321000.00 MGNREGA 

Total 621000.00 


Pond lift Irrigation 1200000.00 BRGF 

Panchvati 800000.00 BRGF 

Total 2275000.00 








Total 1320000.00 

Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 


Taluka 



Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects 

S. No. 

Name of Private 

Sector Partner 

Agency 

a)MoU 

Type of agreement signed 

b)Contract 

c) Any other (pl. 

specify) 

Financial contribution 

IWMP 

Private sector 

Partnership 

Interventions 

Expected 

Outcomes 

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Comments 


CHAPTER - 6 

EXPECTED OUTCOMES 


6.1 Expected Outcomes 

This project is a need based project which aims to increase the individual income, to generate self employment and to increase the agricultural 

productivity in the five project villages of khanpur block under the IWMP.10 This project will be focused on multi approach activities which create an 

employment opportunity in their native villages for sustaining their income and check the migration, which became a key to defeat the present problems. 

Project will not only focus on create employment opportunity but also it focus on the sustainable use of natural resources by using latest appropriate 

technology and strengthening the local leaders through capacity building and training, which ultimately ensure the sustainable Livilihood of the people of 

the Godhra Village. The detail expected outcome are detailed below. 

6.1.1 Employment 

This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions of the people. Employment opportunities will be generated for the people 

through different soil and water conservation activities and Livilihood activities. Self employment would be created by providing the people with cash 

support in the form of direct Livilihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development. The details of expected employment 

generation are on the table no.6.1 after the project implement of the watershed project without any obstacle. 

Table no. 52: Expected Employment Generation in Project area: 

Sr. 

No. 


Villages 

Wage employment 

Self employment 

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 


1 Dolatpura 0 476 1189 713 2378 0 14 3 7 

2 Kakari mahudi 0 526 1314 788 2628 0 12 2 6 

3 Vadhela 151 0 3373 1510 5035 17 0 18 15 50 

24 

20 

7 

0 14 4 8 

26 

40 

0 12 16 12 

17 0 45 26 88 

4 Padedi(patapur) 0 0 480 206 686 0 0 5 2 

0 0 11 5 

5 Borvai 48 143 3154 1434 4779 15 16 2 14 48 

15 16 39 30 100 

6 Masadra 0 0 1844 790 2634 0 0 18 8 26 0 0 36 16 52 

Ladanna 

41 

44 

7 Muvada 12 0 2885 1242 4140 2 0 27 12 

2 0 29 13 

8 Lavana 76 76 6470 2838 9459 1 1 64 28 95 1 1 113 49 164 

9 Tejakui 0 0 4001 1715 5715 0 0 40 17 57 

0 0 67 29 96 

10 Mena 0 0 10170 4359 14529 0 0 102 44 145 0 0 49 21 70 

11 Ruzada 43 0 1455 642 2140 1 0 14 6 21 

1 0 23 10 34 

12 Khadodi 0 0 4167 1786 5953 0 0 42 18 60 

0 0 23 10 33 

13 Dhuleta 199 0 3785 1708 5692 6 0 34 17 57 6 0 42 21 69 

14 Naroda 120 1404 12513 6016 20052 2 19 119 60 201 

2 19 104 53 178 

15 Vadagam 1208 181 7064 3623 12076 35 8 42 36 121 35 8 17 26 86 

Total 1857 2805 63865 29369 97895 79 70 532 292 973 79 70 617.5 328.5 1095 

15 

6.1.2 Expected Migration Checked 

Watershed development works can - 

1. Generate new opportunities in local area through the physical treatments of the watershed activities, 

2. Increase the production of agriculture produces through adopting updated/ new techniques, 


3. The number of crop cultivation will increase as the ground water level available to the farmers in the winter and summer season i.e. the farmers will 

able to take second and third crop in their agriculture land. 

Hence the Watershed development increased demands for labour. This will lead to decrease in the number of seasonal migration from the area. 

Table no. 53: seasonal migration from Project area 

Sr. No. Names of villages 

No. of persons migrating 

No. of days per year of migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

1 Dolatpura 25 9 

30 

2 Kakari mahudi 13 4 30 

3 Vadhela 34 10 30 

4 Padedi(patapur) 53 15 30 

5 Borvai 189 35 30 

6 Masadra 16 6 30 

7 Ladanna Muvada 162 30 30 

8 Lavana 153 29 30 

90 

9 Tejakui 20 5 30 

10 Mena 82 20 30 

11 Ruzada 15 4 30 

12 Khadodi 50 13 30 

13 Dhuleta 76 18 30 

14 Naroda 70 17 30 

15 Vadagam 188 34 30 

Total 1146 249 30 

6.1.3 Ground water table 

In the presence scenario the ground water level varies from 06 mt. to 12 mt. from village to village. The groundwater has gone down due to rapid 

urbanization and maximum ground water harvesting without any sustainable measure. The watershed activity helps in ground water recharging in this project 

and expected that the level gone up and reach at 3 to 5 mt. The details are presented as under. 


Table no. 54: Average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 

Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level 

Expected Increase/decrease 

(Post- Project) 

Open wells 9 4 

1 Dolatpura 

Bore wells NA NA 

Others (specify) - _ 


2 


Kakari mahudi 


Open wells 10 3 

3 


Vadhela 




4 



Open wells 10 4 

5 


Borvai 



6 Masadra 








8 Lavana 




9 


Tejakui 




11 

Ruzada 

12 

Khadodi 

13 Dhuleta 

14 

Naroda 

15 Vadagam 



















6.1.4: Drinking water 

The two villages in the project area totally depend upon hand pump and well for drinking and other domestic activities but the availability 

of water is only 7 to10 months at maximum. The activities of watershed and the linkage with the WASMO will increase the ground water table so 

that the expected status of drinking water will increase. Comparative status of drinking water between pre-project and expected post project are 

furnished as under. 

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water 

Sr. No. 

Names of Villages 

Availability of drinking water 

Quality of drinking water 

(no. of months in a year) 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

1 Dolatpura 9 11 Not Poteble Poteble 


2 Kakari mahudi 10 11 Not Poteble Poteble 

3 Vadhela 7 10 Not Poteble Poteble 

4 Padedi(patapur) 9 11 Not Poteble Poteble 

5 Borvai 10 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

6 Masadra 10 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

7 Ladanna Muvada 10 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

8 Lavana 12 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

9 Tejakui 7 10 Not Poteble Poteble 

10 Mena 10 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

11 Ruzada 9 11 Not Poteble Poteble 

12 Khadodi 10 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

13 Dhuleta 10 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

14 Naroda 12 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

15 Vadagam 12 12 Not Poteble Poteble 

6.1. 5: Expected Crops Yield. 

Due to additional availability of water farmers of the project area will be able to crops in their available land during winter seasons. Even after 

taking rainy season and post-rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables in summer also. The productivity will also 

increase due to the use of updated techniques. The 

Table no. 56: crop area and yield in the project area. 

Sr. 

no. 

Name of village 

Name of crops 

Area (ha) 

Pre-project 

Average Yield (Qtl) 

per (ha) 

Expected Post-project 

Area (ha) 

Average Yield per 

ha (qtl) 

1 Dolatpura Maize 150.00 1.20 155.00 1.40 


2 

3 

4 

5 

Kakari mahudi 

Vadhela 


Borvai 

Paddy 50.00 0.90 55.00 1.20 

Tur 21.60 0.85 24.60 1.10 

Wheat 30.15 1.6 35.15 1.80 

Fennel Seed 10.00 1.3 


1.50 

12.00 

Custered 9.00 1.5 10.00 1.70 

Maize 34.55 1.25 35.55 1.40 

Paddy 12 0.92 14.00 1.20 


Wheat 9.21 1.6 10.21 1.80 

Fennel Seed 3.04 1.3 5.04 1.50 

Custered 2.00 1.5 4.00 1.70 

Maize 127.80 1.3 137.80 1.40 

Paddy 42.60 0.85 46.60 1.20 


Wheat 90.00 1.70 95.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 28.00 1.30 30.00 1.50 

Custered 26.00 1.5 28.00 1.70 

Maize 20.41 1.40 22.41 1.40 

Paddy 5.00 0.81 7.00 1.20 


Wheat 14.40 1.70 17.40 1.80 

Fennel Seed 4.8 1.3 6.8 1.50 

Custered 3.00 1.50 7.00 1.70 

Maize 478.00 1.35 485.00 1.40 

Paddy 130.00 0.83 136.00 1.20 


6 

7 

8 

9 

Masadra 


Lavana 

Tejakui 


Wheat 150.00 1.80 160.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 45.00 1.30 47.00 1.50 

Custered 30.00 1.50 32.00 1.70 

Maize 77.40 1.30 79.40 1.40 

Paddy 25.80 0.80 27.80 1.20 


Wheat 142.25 1.75 149.25 1.80 

Fennel Seed 14.00 1.30 17.00 1.50 

Custered 10.00 1.50 12.00 1.70 

Maize 116.40 1.25 119.40 1.40 

Paddy 39.00 0.80 42.00 1.20 


Wheat 30.00 1.60 35.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 10.00 1.30 11.00 1.50 

Custered 8.00 1.50 13.00 1.70 

Maize 203.40 1.20 205.40 1.40 

Paddy 65.00 0.85 68.00 1.20 


Wheat 

48.00 

1.60 

50.00 

1.80 

Fennel Seed 16.07 1.30 18.07 1.50 

Custered 13.00 1.30 15.00 1.70 

Maize 24.18 1.20 26.18 1.40 

Paddy 9.00 0.82 10.00 1.20 


Wheat 9.00 1.40 10.00 1.80 



11 

12 

13 

Mena 

Ruzada 

Khadodi 

Dhuleta 

Fennel Seed 3.00 1.30 4.00 1.50 

Custered 2.00 1.50 3.00 1.70 

Maize 183.60 1.25 188.60 1.40 

Paddy 58.00 0.85 60.00 1.20 


Wheat 100.00 1.80 103.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 37.05 1.30 39.05 1.50 

Custered 25.00 1.50 27.00 1.70 

Maize 59.30 1.20 63.30 1.40 

Paddy 20.00 0.80 24.00 1.20 


Wheat 18.00 1.60 20.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 5.00 1.30 7.00 1.50 

Custered 4.00 1.50 6.00 1.70 

Maize 187.29 1.30 189.29 1.40 

Paddy 60.00 0.82 64.00 1.20 


Wheat 94.00 1.60 97.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 31.00 1.30 33.00 1.50 

Custered 25.00 1.50 26.00 1.70 

Maize 208.56 1.30 214.56 1.40 

Paddy 60.00 0.85 62.00 1.20 

Wheat 95.00 1.65 98.00 1.80 


Fennel Seed 25.00 1.30 27.00 1.50 

Custered 15.00 1.50 17.00 1.70 


14 

15 

Naroda 

Vadagam 

Maize 345.40 1.30 348.40 1.40 

Paddy 100.00 0.90 104.00 1.20 


Wheat 140.00 1.80 145.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 28.00 1.30 31.00 1.50 

Custered 25.00 1.50 27.00 1.70 

Maize 629.80 1.25 632.80 1.40 

Paddy 195.00 0.90 198.00 1.20 


Wheat 180.00 1.80 186.00 1.80 

Fennel Seed 50.00 1.30 56.00 1.50 

Custered 40.00 1.50 45.00 1.70 

Table No.57 : Area under horticultur 

Sr.no. No. of Village Existing area under horticulture(ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be 

covered through IWMP (ha) 

1 Dolatpura 


3 Vadhela 


5 Borvai 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0.00 

0.40 

1.20 

0.20 

0.40 


6 Masadra 


8 Lavana 

9 Tejakui 


11 Ruzada 

12 Khadodi 

13 Dhuleta 

14 Naroda 

15 Vadagam 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0.40 

0.40 

2.00 

0.40 

2.00 

0.00 

0.60 

0.40 

4.00 

1.60 

6.1.7 Vegetative cover 


The watershed activities would increase the forest and vegetative cover to protect the soil from erosion. Following tables detail the proposed area 

for forest and vegetative development. 

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover 

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed (ha) 

1 Dolatpura 2.00 1.00 

2 Kakari mahudi 67.43 1.00 

3 Vadhela 25.14 1.00 

4 Padedi(patapur) 2.00 0.00 

5 Borvai 42.12 1.44 

6 Masadra 3.00 1.10 

7 Ladanna Muvada 1.54 1.85 

8 Lavana 175.14 2.00 

9 Tejakui 245.39 2.00 

10 Mena 450.96 2.6 

11 Ruzada 1.98 1.00 

12 Khadodi 25.99 2.00 

13 Dhuleta 408.80 2.00 

14 Naroda 468.82 2.5 

15 Vadagam 176.10 2.55 

6.1.8 Livestock 

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention 

in kgs. and income in Rs./day) 

Sr. Name of 

Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 

Type of Animal 

Remarks 

No. Village 

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income 

1 

Dolatpura 

Milch-animals 

Cow 537 4 104 542 7 182 


2 

Kakari mahudi 

3 

Vadhela 


5 

Borvai 

6 

Masadra 

7 


8 

Lavana 

9 Tejakui 

Buffalo 220 3 96 246 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 42 3 96 47 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 445 3 96 452 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 50 3 96 54 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 208 3 96 212 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 110 3 96 120 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 150 3 96 162 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 180 3 96 185 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 90 3 96 97 5 160 

Milch-animals 

Mena 



Buffalo 230 3 96 241 5 160 

11 Milch-animals 


Ruzada 

12 

Khadodi 

13 

Dhuleta 

14 

Naroda 

15 Vadagam 


Buffalo 80 3 96 87 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 400 3 96 409 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 648 3 96 662 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 1115 3 96 1123 5 160 

Milch-animals 


Buffalo 3104 3 96 1123 5 160 

6.1.9 Backward-Forward linkages 

The sustainable Livilihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired 

results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. The details are given as under. 


Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 

Sr. 

No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) 

During the 

project (no.) 

Post-project (no.) 

Backward linkages 0 0 0 

Seed certification 0 0 0 

Seed supply system 0 0 0 

Fertilizer supply system 0 0 0 

Pesticide supply system 0 0 0 

Credit institutions 0 Bank-1 Bank-1 

Water supply 0 0 0 

Extension services 0 KVK KVK 

Nurseries 0 0 0 

Tools/machinery suppliers 0 0 0 

Price Support system 0 0 0 

Labour 0 0 0 

1 

Any other (please specify) 0 0 0 


Forward linkages 0 0 0 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 0 0 0 

Storage (including cold storage) 0 0 0 

Road network 0 0 0 

Transport facilities 0 0 0 

Markets / Mandis 0 0 0 

Agro and other Industries 0 0 0 

Milk and other collection centres 0 0 0 

Labour 0 0 0 

Any other (please specify) 0 (Varmi Compost) (Varmi Compost) 



2 











Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 












3 




Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 






4 









Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 


5 Backward linkages 0 0 0 












Labour 0 0 0 












Labour 0 0 0 







6 








Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 



7 












Labour 0 0 0 












Labour 0 0 0 







8 








Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 




9 







Extension services 0 Kvk Kvk 




Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 










Extension services 0 kvk Kvk 






Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 






11 









Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 


12 Backward linkages 0 0 0 












Labour 0 0 0 












Labour 0 








13 







Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 




14 











Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 












15 




Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 






16 









Labour 0 0 0 











Labour 0 0 0 


Logical Framework Analysis of the project IWMP-10 of Panchmahal 

PROJECT STRUCTURE 

EXPECTED RESULT 

PERFORMANCE VARIABLE 

INDICATOR 

MEANS OF 

VERIFICATION 

RISK/ 

ASSUMPTIONS 

GOAL: 

IMPACT: 

To ensure sustainable 

livilihood of the 20 percent 

* The income of 300 families will 

increased 

* Annual income of households 

* Impact assessment 

study 


of the people of the total 

area through the natural 

resources management 

under Integrated 

Watershed Management 

Pprogramme within 5-7 

year. 

OBJECTIVE-1: 

To ensure better income 

through natural resource 

management 

Activity for Objective-1: 

1. Watershed development 

Works 

2. Water resource 

development 

* Living standard will improve 

* 30 percent seasonal 

unemployment will be checked 

* Availability of water for 

irrigation in the non rainy season. 

OUTCOMES: 

* Agriculture income will increase 

* Total agriculture production will 

increase 

Soil moisture content will increase 

Outputs: 

* Water level will increase 

* People will start growing 

vegetables and new crops for the 

commercial purpose 

* Annual expenditure and saving of 

households. 

* Number of household goods 

owned by households 

* Number of people migrating for 

employment opportunity 

* Number of times the people 

cultivating the farm 

* Quantity increases in total 

agricultural production 

*Clear growth of vegetation cover in 

the project area. 

* Number farmers are cultivating 

the crops in Rabi. 

* Number of watershed physical 

structure presents in the project 

area 

* Number and Quantity of new crops 

cultivated for commercial purpose 

in the project area 

* Number of households having drip 

irrigation system of their houses 

* Evaluation report 

* Compare between 

baseline survey and 

evaluation report 

* Physical observation 

* Physical Varification 

and FGD with farmers 


study 

* Evaluation report 

* Discussion with 

Villagers/Farmers 

* Trend analysis of 

crop cultivation 

* Physical verification 

* Discussion with 

Villagers/Farmers 

* Physical verification 

3. Promotion of improved * People will start practicing * Number of people migrating for * Observations 

Natural disaster 

(Drought) 

Political Intervention 

Maintenance of the 

Structure after the 

project completion 


agricultural Practices through 

crop demonistration and 

distribution of improved 

seeds. 

OBJECTIVE-2: 

To create an opportunity 

for self employment for 

land less and marginal 

farmers 


1. Promotion of Animal 

husbandry like Goat rearing, 

Poultry Farming 

2. Training on improvement 

entrepreneurial skill. 

3. Facilitate for milk 

production as an income 

generating activity (Livestock 

development) 

OBJECTIVE-3: 

To strengthen local self 

governance through 

stimulating local leaders 

and forming grass root 

peoples’ organization 

improved technology in the 

cultivation 

OUTCOMES 

* Migration will comfort 

* People will open new microenterprise 

(Poultry farming, Rose 

cultivation and other Livilihood 

activities) 

* Unemployment will decrease 

Outputs: 

* People will set-up their microenterprise 

on animal husbandry 

* People will acquire knowledge 

and understand management of 

set-up micro enterprise 

* People will accept the dairy, 

Goatry and poultry farming as an 

income generation activity 

OUTCOMES: 

* Presence of strong and dynamic 

local governance 


* Number of people migrating for 


* Number of people engaged in 

poultry farming and other Livilihood 

activities. 

* Number of people involved in self 

employment activities 

* Number of people showing their 

interest to set-up micro industry 

* Number of small enterprise set-up 

* Number of household practicing 

livestock development as an 

economic development activity 

* Number of meetings initiated by 

the local leaders. 


study 

* Physical verification/ 

Photographs 

* FGDs and PRA 

* Observations 


study 


study 


study 

* People participation and * Number of peoples’ organization * Evaluation report, 

* Interest of the 

People. 


epresentation will increase present in the grass root level FGD, Observations 


Outputs: 

1. Awareness and training to 

the local leaders 

2. Formation of peoples 

organization in the grass root 

level 

* Quality of local leaders will 

improve and use of more 

democratic method of decision 

making. 

* Local leaders will take interest to 

understand the programmes and 

schemes and utilize for the benefit 

of the village. 

* There will be proper 

management of available 

resources by the people's 

organisation 

* There will be proper 

implementation of the projects 

* Participation of deprived section 

will increase 

* Representation of local people 

will increase 

* Number of case resolved within 

the locality. 

* Number of schemes utilize for the 

benefit of the villages. 

* Activities of the watershed is 

implementing smoothly without any 

hindrance 

* Number of deprived/ poor people 

participated in the meeting of Gram 

Sabha 

* Number of participants represent 

in the project meeting. 

* Observations 

* FGDs and PRA 


CHAPTER 7 

Quality and Sustainability Issues 

Introduction: Chapter-7 deals with the plan in which the activities of watershed IWMP-10 Project of Panchmahal maintain the quality and renders the 

project sustainable. In details the chapter describes that the proper and regular monitoring and evaluation of the project can trimming down the improper 

implementation of activities so that the quality can be controlled at the right time. The chapter extends with the appropriate post-project techniques for 

project sustainability and research and documentation for maintaining the records, locate the loop falls in implementing and follow up the project with a 

new and suitable adaptation for the area development. 

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation: 


To control the activities at the stage of implementing proper plans has formed for monitoring and Evaluation. Project monitoring is one of the 

important components in watershed development programmes. The broad objectives of a watershed project demand good monitoring framework. A 

monitoring framework is suggested which within the capacity of watershed development teams and watershed committees. No great deal of training, 

human resources or instruments are expected to be employed. The monitoring should actually assist the project team to provide a guideline for 

improvement in the activities and output the project. Selection of an appropriate measure for the given area and ensuring the quality of project measures to 

be given great attention at the time of monitoring. 

Three Ties of Monitoring: Three tiers of monitoring are planned – 

1. First Tire (Monitoring of activities): This is carried out by the head of local PO’s along with part time workers to monitor the implementation of all 

activities as per the action plan. The monitoring also aims at ensuring that the quality of work is as per the guidelines prescribed for each activity. 

2. Second Tire (Monitoring of outputs): To check the outputs of the activities, project coordinators along with the part time workers monitors as per 

the logical frame work. The indicators are selected considering the broad objectives of the project. One can adopt or modify these as per requirement 

at the time of implementation. The output level indicators needs to be devised by the project team based on the outcome level indicators on. Outputs 

need to be monitored frequently, may be once in a quarter/ six months 

3. Third Tire (Monitoring of Outcomes): 

Project reviewing committee along with the project co-ordinator will monitor the overall outcomes of the objectives as per the log frame. The outcomes 

level monitoring may start in the second year and continue on an annual basis. Most of the information can be available from the sets of output level 

indicators. Participatory methods should be used at the time of monitoring the activities. 

The methods of collecting samples data for the monitoring activities should be clearly documented in the monitoring report. The detail of the monitoring 

system is presented in the table as under. 

Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP-10 


Tiers of 

Monitoring 

First tier 

Second Tier 

Third Tier 

Basis of 

monitoring 

Immediate result 

basis 

Monitoring of 

Outputs 

Monitoring of 

Outcomes 

Frequency of 

monitoring 

Orientation of the 

Indicator 

Monitoring by 

Regular Monthly Monitoring Activity oriented Local People organisations 

Regular monitoring 

(Quarterly, half yearly and 

annually ) 

Annually but monitoring start 

from second year onwards? 

Objective oriented 

Goal Oriented 

Internal project team (WDT, PIA, MDT, Experts 

and PM) 

1. Specified monitoring team formed by DWDU, 

2. External Monitoring team by GSWMA 

Apart from the above mentioned monitoring system, there are a Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project 

in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The 

system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. 

Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to 

ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from 

the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already 

treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite 

imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment 

and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of 

the project. 

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias 

WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the 

project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT 

equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then 

transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. 


Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time. 

Evaluation: The project will be evaluated by the external agency after the project completion to see the impact of the project in the area. The external 

agency should use the monitoring tool specified in the DPR of the project and should consider the assumptions and risk mentioned in the DPR because these 

are the factors which may be an obstacle in the implementation of the project. The agency will be decided by the State Nodal Agency (GSWMA) at the time of 

the evaluation. The evaluation will be evaluate that the goal is achieved or not after the implementation of the project. 

7.2 Plans for Post-Project Management/Sustainability Approach: 

Watershed development project can bPPe rendered sustainable through an appropriate combination of environmental balance, community 

participation and institutionalization of 

process. So the detail plans for the post project management are described as under: 

7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures 

The measures taken up will be long lasting. Along with engineering measures, efforts will also be made to establish forest cover in the upper 

catchment areas and on the slopes. The downstream area will have prolonged stream flows. The stream banks should also be vegetated to create a buffer 

between land and water bodies. Such vegetation helps in stabilizing streams, enhancing recharge and improving the riparian habitat. 

An including species of trees and grasses will be selected for developing a vegetative cover at the time of implementation of IWMP-5 project of 

Panchmahal. The diversity of vegetative measures is the key to sustainability. Combination of shallow and deep-rooted plants, fast and slow growing plants, 

productive and medical plants and herbs will be encouraged. The vegetation created will ultimately help to recharge the rainwater, use the soil moisture 

optimally and provide direct and indirect benefits to the community and environment as a whole. 

Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed. Optimum use of water and increased use of organic fertilizers is the 

key to conserve the precious land source. Water overuse and excessive fertilization leads to permanent damage of lands and groundwater. 

It is important to maintain soil quality through crop management. Crop diversity and crop rotation helps in improving the micro flora and fauna 

present in the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystems relationship. 


7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management 

During the planning phase the local people’s participation were involved and it is planned that the involvement during implementation and post 

project maintenance will enhance the impact of project and maintain the structures. However, participation without empowerment does not help in 

achieving sustainable development. So People will be made aware of different concepts and options for their Livilihood and natural resource management. 

Local wisdom is important in understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human behaviour and its economic / ecological 

implications. The interests of a community will be created and maintained by adopting the measures in such a manner that they provide immediate, medium 

term and long term benefits to the community. 

7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management 

A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation of benefit sharing and maintenance of the resources. This 

usually includes small user groups for different resources / assets as well as village level organizations. In-built system and mechanisms will be developed 

for qualitative growth and dynamisms of the organizations. The community organizations should be linked to other Government and Non Government 

institutes of interest. The potential people’s organizations were formed in the project area include Watershed level Organization and Users Groups. 

Watershed level Committee 

Watershed level organization is established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, coordination, management and 

maintenance are possible through this representative body. This clearly implies representation from different sections of the community – landholders and 

landless, upper reach and lower reach, men and women, lower and upper castes, Gram Panchayat and other existing political or non political organizations. 

User Groups 

The other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas of interest in the project area named user groups. These 

include, depending upon necessity, Self Help Groups of women and men, User Groups for common assets, Natural Clubs, etc. The capacities of different 

groups will be developed time to time for effective functioning of these groups. A mechanism will be developed to ensure continuity, both in learning, 

functioning and actions that from responsibilities of such groups during the implementation project activities. 



CHAPTER - 8 

MAPS 


CERTIFICATE 

This is to Certfy that the area Covered under the IWMP - 10 Project does not 

overlap with works of similar nature under any other scheme and there is no 

duplication of Central / State/ External Assistance to the Project. 

Nodal officer 

& 

Range Forest officer 

IWMP-10 Khanpur

IWMP-10 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?