14.02.2014 Views

American Coal Concert Series Launched - Coal News

American Coal Concert Series Launched - Coal News

American Coal Concert Series Launched - Coal News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2<br />

June 2010<br />

<strong>Coal</strong> <strong>News</strong><br />

Sen. Rockefeller<br />

Outlines Safety<br />

Legislation<br />

Sen. J. Rockefeller (D-WVa)<br />

has announced his broad outlines<br />

for mine safety improvements<br />

and has described his<br />

“new legislative approaches”<br />

including adding workplace safety<br />

enforcement and accountability<br />

standards through MSHA and<br />

OSHA. His approach also<br />

includes: streamlining the<br />

Pattern of Violation rules and<br />

regulations so that repeat<br />

offenders are subject to additional<br />

oversight and enforcement;<br />

reducing the appeals<br />

backlog at the Federal Mine<br />

Safety and Health Review<br />

Commission; improving whistleblower<br />

protections; and increasing<br />

fines and penalties for companies<br />

that “routinely violate<br />

safety laws and regulations.”<br />

Rockefeller has also introduced<br />

an amendment to the<br />

financial reform legislation now<br />

on the Senate floor that would<br />

require publicly traded mining<br />

companies to include “critical<br />

mine safety information” in their<br />

annual and quarterly filings with<br />

the Securities and Exchange<br />

Commission (SEC). The Senate<br />

Appropriations Committee has<br />

conducted a hearing to review<br />

current safety resources of federal<br />

agencies including MSHA and<br />

the Senate Committee on Health<br />

Education Labor and Pensions<br />

has held hearings on the safety<br />

enforcement authority at MSHA<br />

and OSHA.<br />

Funds Approved<br />

for FMSHRC<br />

The Senate Appropriations<br />

Committee has approved $22<br />

million in additional funding to<br />

reduce the backlog in the number<br />

of mine safety citation appeals<br />

pending before the Federal Mine<br />

Safety and Health Revision<br />

Commission (FMSHRC). Of the<br />

funding, $18.2 million is for the<br />

Solicitor of Labor and MSHA, and<br />

$3.8 million is for the FMSHRC.<br />

The new funding will be available<br />

for twelve months as part of the<br />

FY 2010 Supplemental<br />

Appropriations bill. House staff<br />

are reporting that members<br />

believe the Senate funding is too<br />

low and will include more dollars<br />

in their version.<br />

House Members<br />

Condemn EPA’s<br />

Actions on <strong>Coal</strong><br />

Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) joined<br />

by twenty-two other members of<br />

the House of Representatives,<br />

both Republicans and Democrats<br />

representing districts in fourteen<br />

states throughout the U.S., is<br />

condemning the EPA for delays in<br />

coal mine permitting and for<br />

guidance on CWA permits in<br />

Appalachian mines that relies on<br />

conductivity as a sole measure of<br />

stream impairment. The group<br />

called upon EPA Administrator<br />

Lisa Jackson to withdraw recently<br />

implemented rules that have<br />

“caused significant barriers and<br />

delays in issuing job creating<br />

coal mining permits throughout<br />

the region.”<br />

The group, from both parties,<br />

characterized EPA’s new rules on<br />

surface mining as the<br />

Administration’s “latest tactic in<br />

its war against Appalachian<br />

<strong>Coal</strong>” and pointedly said EPA has<br />

“crossed the line” and is putting<br />

80,000 jobs in jeopardy. The letter<br />

asks EPA to “immediately<br />

withdraw policies that jeopardize<br />

mining and mining families<br />

throughout Appalachia” and<br />

points to EPA’s preemption of<br />

federally approved state water<br />

quality programs.<br />

Analysis Finds<br />

Fault with Study<br />

of Appalachian<br />

<strong>Coal</strong> Community<br />

Health<br />

An analysis commissioned by<br />

NMA has found factual discrepancies<br />

and methodical flaws in<br />

studies published by Dr. Michael<br />

Hendryx and others, contending<br />

that increased mortality in<br />

Appalachian communities was<br />

due to high rates of coal production<br />

in the area. The analysis was<br />

completed by Jonathan Borak,<br />

MD, Clinical Professor,<br />

Epidemiology and Medicine at<br />

Yale University; and Kathryn<br />

Salipante Zaidel, MEM.<br />

In their review of eight peerreviewed<br />

journal articles<br />

authored by Dr. Hendryx, they<br />

noted the complete omission of<br />

obesity, diabetes, and alcohol<br />

consumption from the Hendryx<br />

analyses as important factors<br />

that could influence health and<br />

mortality rates in Appalachia.<br />

Borak also pointed to Hendryx’s<br />

finding of high mortality rates in<br />

Appalachian counties with high<br />

levels of coal mining, but not<br />

among coal miners and not in<br />

other coal mining areas. All the<br />

observation led Hendryx to propose<br />

that his findings of excess<br />

death might be related to the<br />

unique “topography and population<br />

centers characteristic of<br />

Appalachia,” Borak and Zaidel<br />

concluded. “These results also<br />

suggest that coal mining is not<br />

the reason for excess deaths.”<br />

Hendryx has been a popular<br />

witness before state and federal<br />

legislative and regulatory bodies,<br />

including congressional hearings,<br />

and his studies have also<br />

received widespread attention in<br />

West Virginia media. NMA Senior<br />

VP for Regulatory Affairs, Bruce<br />

Watzman, said, “Dr. Borak’s findings<br />

are important to the entire<br />

mining community. They raise<br />

fundamental questions about the<br />

conclusions reached by Dr.<br />

Hendryx and their relevance to<br />

any assessment of the overall<br />

contributions of mining in<br />

Appalachia.”<br />

NMA <strong>Coal</strong><br />

Forecast<br />

Updated<br />

NMA’s Economics <strong>Coal</strong><br />

Subcommittee is forecasting that<br />

domestic coal consumption will<br />

rebound from 2009 levels,<br />

increasing 5.5% in 2010, based<br />

on the Subcommittee’s update of<br />

the 2010 forecast. Due to reduction<br />

of high coal stockpiles by<br />

utilities, total demand for mined<br />

coal is expected to increase by<br />

only 0.9%, as total U.S. production<br />

is expected to be down 0.7%<br />

from 2009 with production from<br />

Eastern coalfields down 2.9%.<br />

The forecast indicates that<br />

total domestic coal consumption<br />

will be 1.008 billion tons for<br />

electricity, including electric<br />

power, commercial, and industrial<br />

sectors. Domestic coking coal<br />

consumption is expected to be<br />

up 24.2% to 27 million tons, and<br />

total exports will be up 26.9% to<br />

75 million tons in 2010, with<br />

exports of met coal to Canada<br />

and overseas making up the<br />

lion’s share of exports at 57 million<br />

tons. The NMA<br />

Subcommittee expects the economy<br />

to grow at about 3% in 2010.<br />

Top Challenges<br />

Ranked by<br />

Mining<br />

Executives<br />

As surveyed, mining executives<br />

from 113 North <strong>American</strong> metals<br />

and minerals companies and<br />

ranked their top five challenges.<br />

“Ensuring workplace safety” was<br />

listed by 71% of the respondents<br />

as their top challenge. This was<br />

followed by “improving performance<br />

and operational effectiveness”<br />

which 67% identified as a<br />

top challenge. Other items on the<br />

list were “managing capital projects”<br />

which was ranked by 46%,<br />

“recruiting and retaining a<br />

skilled workforce” ranked by<br />

38%, and “addressing environmental<br />

concerns” ranked as a<br />

top challenge by 37%.<br />

The coal companies in the<br />

group ranked their number one<br />

obstacle to organic growth as<br />

“decline in market demand” plus<br />

all companies surveyed said the<br />

number one obstacle to organic<br />

growth is “complying with government<br />

regulations” which was<br />

identified by 42% of the respondents.<br />

Some 87% of respondents<br />

said they were pursuing an<br />

aggressive cost control strategy<br />

as their top way to maintain profitability<br />

in the current economy.<br />

Senate Climate<br />

Proposal<br />

Unveiled<br />

Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass) and<br />

Joe Lieberman (I-Conn) have<br />

unveiled their version of climate<br />

legislation, the “<strong>American</strong> Power<br />

Act”. According to a summary of<br />

the proposal, the bill will call for<br />

a 17% cut in emissions of greenhouse<br />

gases (GHGs) below the<br />

2005 level by 2020 and an 80%<br />

reduction by 2050. Emissions<br />

limits would apply differently<br />

and, according to various timetables<br />

for various industry sectors,<br />

begin with powerplants in 2013.<br />

The measure directs much of the<br />

revenue generated to rebates<br />

and other assistance for consumers<br />

and businesses impacted<br />

by higher electricity costs, to<br />

fund various programs that would<br />

be mandated by the proposal,<br />

and for debt reduction.<br />

Two billion dollars in annual<br />

funding for research and development<br />

of carbon capture and<br />

storage technologies would be<br />

funded by a special assessment<br />

on electric utilities for all fossil<br />

fuel-based electricity sold to customers.<br />

In addition to falling<br />

under the cap-and-trade provisions<br />

for utilities, coal-based<br />

power plants permitted in 2009,<br />

or thereafter, would be subject to<br />

a performance standard. That<br />

provision also outlines a process<br />

for accelerating retirements of<br />

coal-based plants to accelerate<br />

reductions in GHGs and other air<br />

pollutants.<br />

NMA has expressed its concern<br />

that the legislation will have a<br />

devastating impact on coal mining<br />

jobs and production over the<br />

next two decades, because the<br />

targets and timetables proposed<br />

for emissions reductions are not<br />

aligned with the expected<br />

deployment of carbon capture<br />

and storage technology. Further,<br />

the legislation will be harmful to<br />

trade exposed energy intensive<br />

industries, such as minerals and<br />

metals mining. If Sens. Kerry and<br />

Lieberman are unable to get sixty<br />

votes for their climate change<br />

bill, the Senate will likely act on a<br />

smaller energy bill instead,<br />

according to Majority Leader<br />

Harry Reid (D-Nev).<br />

Carbon Curbs<br />

Will Devastate<br />

<strong>Coal</strong> Mining<br />

Employment<br />

According to the<br />

Congressional Budget Office<br />

(CBO), after reviewing three economic<br />

impact studies of climate<br />

change policies, controls on carbon<br />

dioxide and other greenhouse<br />

gas emissions will be<br />

especially putative for coal mining<br />

employment. The impact of<br />

these policies on overall employment<br />

over the next few decades<br />

would be modest, but the impact<br />

on coal-based employment<br />

would be substantial, said CBO.<br />

Summarizing studies by<br />

Resources for the Future, Charles<br />

River Associates and the<br />

Brooking’s Institution, CBO projects<br />

coal mining employment will<br />

decline 10-18 percent by 2015<br />

and by more than a third by<br />

2025. Among the fossil fuels targeted<br />

for emissions reduction,”<br />

CBO said. “<strong>Coal</strong> mining would<br />

probably see the largest percentage<br />

decline in employment,”<br />

reflecting coal’s higher greenhouse<br />

gas content and its widespread<br />

use in electricity generation.”<br />

The review found that hard<br />

rock mining would likely suffer<br />

“relatively small” employment<br />

declines over the same period.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!