14.02.2014 Views

American Coal Concert Series Launched - Coal News

American Coal Concert Series Launched - Coal News

American Coal Concert Series Launched - Coal News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

June 2010<br />

Administration is Using CWA to<br />

Dismantle <strong>Coal</strong> Industry<br />

The Obama Administration is using<br />

the Clean Water Act Section 404<br />

permitting process to dismantle<br />

the coal industry in the Appalachian<br />

region. This is one of the investigation<br />

findings of the Senate Environment and<br />

Public Works Committee Minority Staff<br />

Analysis released by Sen. James Inhofe<br />

(R-Okla) ranking member of the committee.<br />

The report says that after a thorough<br />

investigation of the 235 coal mining<br />

404 Permits that were under review by<br />

EPA as of May 11, 2009, the investigation<br />

found that their obstruction is having<br />

an deleterious effect on rural jobs,<br />

energy production, and small businesses<br />

in Appalachia.<br />

Since the initiation of the investigation,<br />

EPA issued 45 of the 235 permits,<br />

which allowed these projects to move<br />

forward. The investigation, which<br />

included gathering information from<br />

EPA, as well as conducting detailed<br />

interviews with permit applicants, found<br />

that the remaining 190 coal mining<br />

operations tied up at EPA are expected<br />

to produce over 2 billion tons of coal<br />

throughout the life of operations and<br />

support roughly 17,806 new and existing<br />

jobs, as well as 81 small businesses.<br />

To put this in perspective, unless EPA<br />

Senate Minority Report<br />

releases the remaining 190 permits,<br />

roughly 1 in every 4 coal mining jobs in<br />

the Appalachian region will be at risk of<br />

elimination, 81 small businesses will<br />

lose significant income and will be at<br />

risk of bankruptcy and over two years of<br />

America’s coal supply will be in jeopardy.<br />

These impacts hit especially hard<br />

in West Virginia and Kentucky, where<br />

the majority of the delayed mining operations<br />

are located. EPA’s actions, or lack<br />

thereof, will also impact other<br />

Appalachian states, including Ohio,<br />

Pennsylvania, Virginia, Tennessee, and<br />

Alabama, according to the report.<br />

If EPA continues to maintain its hold<br />

Types of Mining Blocked by Adminstration<br />

on Kentucky’s permits, the state will<br />

lose an estimated $127 million in tax<br />

revenue annually. In fiscal year 2008-<br />

2009, Kentucky’s coal industry generated<br />

$282 million in tax revenue for the<br />

state. West Virginia also greatly benefits<br />

from coal revenue. If EPA continues to<br />

maintain its hold on West Virginia 404<br />

Permits, the state will lose an estimated<br />

$217 million in tax revenue annually. In<br />

fiscal year 2009, the West Virginia coal<br />

industry generated $533 million in tax<br />

revenue for the state.<br />

Of particular note, is that the investigation<br />

also revealed the Obama<br />

Administration’s broader agenda to<br />

drastically curtail coal mining in<br />

Appalachia. For decades, the environmental<br />

community has politicized<br />

mountaintop mining by exaggerating its<br />

environmental impacts and stoking<br />

unfounded fear in mining communities.<br />

The investigation shows that the<br />

Administration is exploiting this fear as<br />

a means to block all coal mining operations<br />

in the Appalachian region.<br />

According to the report, the<br />

Administration’s public statements<br />

regarding their review of the 190 mining<br />

permits, including the June 2009<br />

Memorandum of Understanding<br />

between the White House and several<br />

federal agencies, and a variety of press<br />

statements throughout the course of<br />

2009, appear to address mountaintop<br />

mining only. The June 2009 press statement<br />

alone included sixteen references<br />

to “mountaintop mining” while only<br />

mentioning “surface mining” four times<br />

in that same statement. The investigation<br />

found that these statements are<br />

highly misleading. As shown in the figure,<br />

in blocking the 190 coal mining<br />

permits in Appalachia, the<br />

Administration only halted 19 actual<br />

mountaintop mining operations. The<br />

remaining 171 blocked mining operations<br />

included a range of surface,<br />

underground, and refuse operations.<br />

“The report confirms that EPA is<br />

threatening the highest paying jobs in<br />

the region at a time when federal, state,<br />

and local governments are all attempting<br />

to pull this country out of the worst<br />

economic recession in decades,” said<br />

NMA President and CEO Hal Quinn.<br />

“EPA’s policies undermine those efforts.<br />

<strong>Coal</strong> mining jobs are vital to the economic<br />

and social fabric of communities<br />

throughout Appalachia, and the lawful<br />

permits EPA continues to review are<br />

necessary for continued employment at<br />

nearly 200 operations throughout the<br />

region.”<br />

EPA Spruce No. 1 Hearing Draws Hundreds<br />

West Virginia Gov. Joe<br />

Manchin and Rep. Nick<br />

Rahall (D-WVa) strongly condemned<br />

EPA’s actions on the proposal<br />

by EPA to prohibit or restrict mining<br />

activities in streams associated with<br />

the Spruce No. 1 Mine in Logan<br />

County, West Virginia at a pre-hearing<br />

rally arranged by the Friends of <strong>Coal</strong><br />

and FACES of <strong>Coal</strong>.<br />

About 1,000 coal mining supporters<br />

participated in the EPA hearing in<br />

Charleston, West Virginia on the first<br />

Clean Water Act (CWA) permit the<br />

agency has ever proposed to fully<br />

revoke years after its issuance. The<br />

Spruce No. 1 permit for a surface mine<br />

in Logan County was issued in 2007<br />

after an extensive 10-year review,<br />

including preparation of an<br />

Environmental Impact Statement. EPA<br />

announced earlier this year that it was<br />

starting the process to suspend the<br />

permit.<br />

There were about 100 supporters<br />

who spoke at the hearing on the<br />

Spruce project, including local elected<br />

officials, education leaders, and community<br />

members representing churches,<br />

schools, small businesses, and<br />

others. About 40 opponents of the<br />

Spruce Permit, largely comprising<br />

EPA Panel Listen to Speakers<br />

environmental extremists, participated<br />

in the hearing.<br />

“Revoking this permit that was lawfully<br />

issued almost three years ago,<br />

with your agency’s blessing, after<br />

more than ten years of the most comprehensive<br />

environmental review,<br />

again by your agency, is as troublesome,<br />

unnecessary, and arrogant as<br />

anything we’ve ever seen in West<br />

Virginia,” said Bill Raney, President,<br />

West Virginia <strong>Coal</strong> Association. “I<br />

think if you dig deep and honestly<br />

answer the common working man’s<br />

definition of environmental justice,<br />

you’ll find this threat by EPA, your<br />

agency to revoke this permit without<br />

any reason, to be wrong.”<br />

John McDaniel of Arch <strong>Coal</strong> said his<br />

company cannot investigate in the<br />

Spruce mine if the EPA can reject the<br />

permit at any time. “We believe all of<br />

these issues were addressed long ago<br />

and are very disappointed.”<br />

“West Virginia has been implementing<br />

its version of the Clean Water<br />

Act for decades, issuing permits that<br />

contain some of the nation’s most<br />

stringent discharge limits to protect<br />

water quality standards, standards<br />

many states have chosen not even to<br />

adopt,” added Chris Hamilton, Senior<br />

VP, WVCA. “West Virginia’s implementation<br />

of its water quality standards in<br />

permitting programs was unchallenged<br />

by EPA for years, or until the<br />

federal agency sought to hijack the<br />

state’s primary responsibility for water<br />

quality protection by interpreting the<br />

state’s own water standards, and<br />

doing so in such a way that conflicts<br />

with the state’s own interpretation.”<br />

“This situation would be a laughable<br />

exercise in regulatory dysfunction if it<br />

were not so serious, that a federal<br />

agency would use state laws and regulations<br />

as a hammer to take a permit<br />

endorsed by that very state. The EPA<br />

would seek to avoid millions of hours<br />

of analysis and review by the Corps in<br />

the issuance of the project-specific<br />

EIA,” said Jason Bostic, VP, WVCA.<br />

“This is serious situation. Hundreds of<br />

jobs are at stake, millions of dollars of<br />

investment, millions of dollars in<br />

potential tax revenues, and the faith<br />

and participation of the communities<br />

in and around the Spruce mine. The<br />

very communities that EPA somehow<br />

thinks they are protecting by hijacking<br />

their ability to control their own destiny.”<br />

Logan County School<br />

Superintendent Wilma Zigmond drew<br />

applause when she told the panel that<br />

coal provides more than $7.5 million<br />

in property taxes for her district.<br />

“Consider the losses, both financial<br />

and emotional, and the impact this<br />

would have to Logan County School<br />

System. Remember coal keeps the<br />

lights on and our schools running.”<br />

Several speakers traveled a considerable<br />

distance to attend. Kentucky<br />

<strong>Coal</strong> Association Bill Bissett blasted<br />

the EPA. “Your director, Lisa Jackson,<br />

literally says I don’t care about the<br />

economic impact. It’s unfair and it’s<br />

wrong. It’s an injustice.”<br />

Bill Reid, Managing Editor, <strong>Coal</strong><br />

<strong>News</strong>, quoted EPA’s mission, “to protect<br />

human health and to safeguard<br />

the natural environment,” adding he<br />

said “if mines are closed, poverty,<br />

sickness, and mental health problems<br />

occur which is the very opposite of<br />

EPA’s mission, “to protect human<br />

health.” Reid raised point four of EPA’s<br />

purpose, which includes the words<br />

“economic growth.” “If mines are<br />

closed, this is hardly “economic<br />

growth” and it is once again exactly<br />

the opposite of EPA’s mission statement,”<br />

said Reid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!