Detailed Project Report - Commissionerate of Rural Development ...

NANA 

SUKAAMBA 

IWMP-5 

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 

District Watershed Development Unit | Narmada

1.1 Project Background ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 

Table no.1: Basic project information ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 

Table no.3: Watershed information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Project area ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ............................................................................................................................................................... 18 

2.1. Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 

2.2 About Project Implementing Agency, Rajpipla (Narmada)........................................................................................................................................................ 21 

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 

Table no. 6: PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 

3.1.1 Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 

8: Land use pattern: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 

3.1.2 Soil and topography: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28 

District Watershed Development unit Narmada Page 2

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 

Table no.12: Climatic conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30 

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31 

Table no. 16: Irrigation .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 

Table no. 17: Crop details: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 

3.1.4 Livestock: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 

Table no. 18: Livestock .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 

Table no. 19 : Drinking water ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 37 

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 

3.2.1 Demographic Status: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38 

Table no. 21: Demographic information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 

Migration Pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 


Infrastructure facilities: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 41 

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42 

3.3. Livelihood pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43 

Table no. 27: Per capita Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 

Dependence on Common Property Resource ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 44 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 45 

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: .................................................................. 46 

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. 

The Nana Sukaamba project area ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 51 

Watershed Activities ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54 

4.1. Scientific Planning: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 54 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................................... 59 

4.2. Institution building ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details[dediyapada] ................................................................................................................................................................................ 61 

Table no. 31.1 Watershed Committee details [Timbapada] ............................................................................................................................................................................. 62 

Table no. 31.2 Watershed Committee details [Gajargota]................................................................................................................................................................................. 63 

Table no. 31.3 Watershed Committee details [Pipla].......................................................................................................................................................................................... 64 

Table no. 31.4 Watershed Committee details [Bor] ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 65 


Table no. 31.5 Watershed Committee details [Ghantoli] ................................................................................................................................................................................... 66 

Table no. 31.6 Watershed Committee details [Rakhaskundi].......................................................................................................................................................................... 67 

Table no. 31.7 Watershed Committee details [Nana Sukaamba] .................................................................................................................................................................... 68 

Table no. 31.8 Watershed Committee details [Navagam (Dedi)] ................................................................................................................................................................... 69 

Table no. 31.9 Watershed Committee details [Nivalda].................................................................................................................................................................................... 70 

Table no. 31.10 Watershed Committee details [Besna] ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 71 

Table no. 31.11 Watershed Committee details [Bogaj] ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 

Table no. 32: SHG details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 73 

Table no. 32: SHG details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 73 

User Group: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 75 

Table no. 33: UG detail ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 75 

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP 1 (Nanasukaamba) .................................................................................................................................................... 76 

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 76 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................................................... 76 

Table no.34.1: Convergence under entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .................................................................................... 78 

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................................................... 85 

Table no. 36 .1:.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 90 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ........................................................................................................ 93 


Table no. 38.2: Animal husbandry .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 96 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target ............................................................................................................................................. 97 

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*........................................................................................................................................................... 97 

Table No. 40.1: Technical Specification of stone bund (Pipla village: Survey no.174,173,96,146,152,15,95,101,118,126) ................................................... 98 

Table No. 40.2: Technical Details of Continuous Contour Trenches (CCT) in Gajargota (Survey no.(C.N)137,91) .................................................................... 98 

Table No 40.3 Quantity Calculation: CCT ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 99 

Table no 40.5: Quantity Calculation of Continous Contour trench ............................................................................................................................................................. 100 

Nala banding ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 101 

Table no 40.6: Technical details of Nala banding on Survey no. (137,91) (Village Gajarghota) .................................................................................................... 101 

Table no 40.7: Quantity details of Nala banding on Survey no. (137,91) (Village Gajarghota) .................................................................................................... 101 

Table no 40.8: Technical details of Check dam no.1 on survey no. 179 (village: Pipla)...................................................................................................................... 102 

Table no 40.9: Quantity Calculation of Check dam on survey no. 179 (village: Pipla) ........................................................................................................................ 102 

Table no 40.10: Technical details of check dam No. 2 on Survey no.235 (Village:Nivalda) .............................................................................................................. 103 

Table no 40.11: Quantity Calculation of Check dam No. 2 on Survey no.235 (Village:Nivalda) ...................................................................................................... 103 

Table no 40.12: Technical details of check dam No. 3 on Survey no.(CN)235 (Village:Bore) .......................................................................................................... 104 

Table no 40.13: Quantity Calculation of Check dam No. 3 on Survey no.(CN)235 (Village:Bore) .................................................................................................. 104 

Table no 40.14: Technical details of Gabion structure survey no.91, 96,112,120,129,177 (Village: Bogaj) .............................................................................. 105 

Table no 40.15: Quantity Calculation of Gabion structure Compartment no: 437 (Village: Olgam) .............................................................................................. 106 

Table no 40.16: Technical details of Check wall on Survey no. 12, 20, 21, 23, 38(Village: Rakaskundi) ..................................................................................... 106 


Table no 40.17: Quantity Calculation of Check wall Survey no. 12, 20, 21, 23, 38(Village: Rakaskundi) .................................................................................... 107 

Table No. 40.18: Technical Details of Check wall No2 on Survey no.130, 204,177,184 (Village: Ghatoli) .................................................................................. 107 

Table No. 40.19, Quantity Excavation for Check wall No2 on Survey no. 130,204,177,184 (Village: Ghatoli) .......................................................................... 108 

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ................................................................................................................... 108 

Table No. 41.1: Technical Details of Afforestation Activities ........................................................................................................................................................................ 108 

Table No. 41.2: Cost Estimation for afforestation .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 110 

activity ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 111 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 111 

Production System-1: Cement pole making (Primary model for cement pole making) ..................................................................................................................... 112 

Table no: 34.1, Cost of Cement pole making ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 113 

Table No. 34.1.2 Total cost for 500 cement pole ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 114 

Table No. 34.1.3, Revenue and return Details. .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 114 

Table No. 35.3, Revenue and return Details. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 116 

Production system: 3 Vegetable (Bottle guard) Production .............................................................................................................................................................................. 117 

Advantage of vegetable production: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 117 

Limitation of vegetable production: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 118 

Table no: 36.1, Cost of cultivation for bottle guard production ................................................................................................................................................................... 119 

Table No. 36.2. Initial investment for fodder bank ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 119 

Table No. 36.3, Revenue and return Details. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 119 


Production System - 4: Vermicompost unit for Nanasukaamba ...................................................................................................................................................................... 120 

Table: 37.1: Model for A Vermi-compost Unit ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 123 

Table No.37.2: Returns from vermicomposting ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 123 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ............................................................................................................................................................... 124 

4.4. Capacity Building: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 124 

Table: 37.3 Model for A poly house ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 126 

Table No.37.4: Returns from polyhouse ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 128 

Table No.37.4: Modal for mandap decoration ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 129 

Table No.37.5: Modal for Nursery raising ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 131 

Table No.37.6: Revenue and return detail of nursery ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 132 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 133 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 134 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ....................................................................................................................................................... 134 

Budgeting .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 136 

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 136 

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP ....................................................................................................................................................... 137 

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 138 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP (Watershed development work) with other Schemes ......................................................................................... 139 

Table no.50.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP (Livelihood& Production system) with other Schemes ................................................................................... 144 


6.1 Expected Outcomes..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 151 

6.1.1 Employment .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 151 

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 151 

6.1.2. Migration ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 152 

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ..................................................................................................................................................................... 152 

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ........................................................................................................... 154 

Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 154 

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 154 

6.1.5 Crops ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155 

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................... 156 

6.1.6 Horticulture ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 156 

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 156 

1.7 Vegetative cover ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 157 

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 157 

6.1.8 Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 158 

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ...... 158 

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 159 

Logical Framework Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 160 

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 166 


7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 166 

7.2 Plans For Project management: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 167 

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 167 

7.4 User Charges:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 167 

8.Maps..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................189 


CHAPTER -1 

PROJECT BACKGROUND 


1.1 Project Background 

Nanasukaamba (IWMP-5) project is located in Dadiyapada Taluka, Narmada District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of Seven microwatersheds 

with 5D1A5c1d, 5D1A5c1f, 5D1A5c1h, 5D1A5c2c, 5D1A5cle, 5D1A5c1g, 5D1A5c1j being their respective codes. The watershed includes 

Fourteen village of 

Nanasukaamba,Timbapada,Dadiyapada,Nivalda,Ghankhater,Katankhadi,Bore,Bogaj,Ghantoli,Kismor,Navgam(Dediyapada),Rakaskundi,Pipla,Basana. 

The total project area of the watershed is about 4854 Ha, of which 4854 Ha has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed 

Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10. 

Table no.1: Basic project information 

Sl 

No. 

Name of 

the 

project 

Name 

Villages 

Census 

code 

Gram 

Panchayats 

Taluka District Area of 

the 

project 

Area 

proposed 

to be 

treated 

Total 

project 

cost(Rs. 

in lakh) 

PIA 

1 

Nana 

Sukaamba 

01532800 Mota Sukaamba Dediyapada Narmada 1956 179.10 ha 2014920 

2 

Timbapada 

01527500 Dediyapada Dediyapada Narmada 

238.30 

ha 

2859600 

3 

Nana 

Sukaamba 

Dediyapada 

01536100 Dediyapada Dediyapada Narmada 582.70 ha 6992400 

Forest 

Departmentr,Narmada 

4 

Nivalda 

01534800 Nivalda Dediyapada Narmada 595.20 ha 7142400 

5 Gajargota 01535900 Ghatoli Dediyapada Narmada 549.60ha 6595200 


6 

Katakankhadi 

01536800 Ghatoli Dediyapada Narmada 222.40ha 2668800 

7 

Bore 


8 

Bogaj 

01536500 Kolivada Dediyapada Narmada 81.90ha 5182800 

9 

Ghatoli 


10 

Kismor 


11 

Navagam(Dedi) 

01537100 Navagam[Dedi] Dediyapada Narmada 386.80ha 4641600 

12 

Rakaskundi 

01532600 

Ghatoli 

Dediyapada Narmada 149.70ha 1796400 

13 

Pipala 

01529100 Besana Dediyapada Narmada 552.20ha 6626400 

14 

Besana 

01525900 

Besana 

Dediyapada Narmada 626.40ha 7516800 


1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme 

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual 

wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in 

the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, 

Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Nanasukaamba Watershed project 

as given in table no. 2. 

The total number of families under BPL is 2693 (79%), which is less than 80 per cent of the total households of the village. Hence a score of 7.5 

is allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is 100 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 10 was allotted. More than 60 per 

cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite 

rank of 5, 3 and 5 are allotted respectively. 

The soil type is black cotton and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Cluster approach 

was followed taking into consideration ten micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5038.1 Ha. All the parameters taken together give a cumulative 

score of 107.5 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below). 

Table no. 2: Weightage of the project 

Project 

name 

IWMP 5 


type 

other 

Weightage 

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii 

7.5 10 5 5 3 10 10 7 10 10 15 15 NA 


S. 

Maximum 

Criteria 

No. 

score 

Ranges & scores 

I Poverty index (% of poor to 

population) 

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 

% (2.5) 

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) 

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are 

significantly lower than 

minimum wages (5) 

Actual wages are equal 

to or higher than 

minimum wages (0) 

iv % of small and marginal 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3) 

farmers 

V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 

vi Moisture index/ 

DPAP/ DDP Block 

15 -66.7 & below (15) 

DDP Block 

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) 

DPAP Block 

0 to -33.2 (0) 

Non DPAP/ DDP Block 

vii Area under rain-fed 

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 

agriculture 

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village 

(7.5) 

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % 

(10) 

X Productivity potential of 

the land 

xi 

Contiguity to another 

watershed that has already 

been developed/ treated 

15 Lands with low 

production & where 

productivity can be 

significantly enhanced 

with reasonable efforts 

(15) 

10 Contiguous to previously 

treated watershed & 

contiguity within the 

microwatersheds in the 

Lands with moderate 



enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (10) 

Contiguity within the 

microwatersheds in the 

project but non 

contiguous to 

Partially covered (5) 

Low- less than 10 % of 

TGA (5) 

Lands with high 



marginally enhanced 

with reasonable 

efforts (5) 

Neither contiguous to 

previously treated 

watershed nor 

contiguity within the 

% (Reject) 

Fully 

covered 

(0) 


xii 

xiii 

Cluster approach in the 

plains (more than one 

contiguous microwatersheds 

in the project) 

Cluster approach in the 

hills (more than one 

contiguous microwatersheds 

in the project) 

project (10) 

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds 

in cluster (15) 

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds 


previously treated 

watershed (5) 

4 to 6 microwatersheds 


3 to 5 microwatersheds 


microwatersheds in 

the project (0) 

2 to 4 


cluster (5) 

2 to 3 


cluster (5) 

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 

Table no.3: Watershed information 

Name of the project No. of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order 

IWMP -5 7 

5D1A5c1d, 5D1A5c1f, 

5D1A5c1h, 5D1A5c2c, 

5D1A5c1e, 5D1A5c1g, 5D1A5c1j, 

Mini Watershed 


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Project area 

This Nanasukaamba project has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are Mahatma Gandhi National Rural 

Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS),Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY), Indira Awas Yojana 

(IAY) and Sardar Awas Yojana (SAY). 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: 

S 

no 

Name of the 

programme/scheme 

1 MGNREGS 

2 IAY 

Sponsoring 

agency 

Rural 

Development 

Dept. 

Rural 


Dept. 

Objectives of the 

programme/scheme 

Year of commencement 

Villages 

covered 

Estimated 

number of 

beneficiaries 

Employment 2009 12 1260Household 

Housing 2004-05 11 220 

3 TSC Central Govt. Toylet 2006-07 11 1178 


Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area 

In project area IWMP is the first watershed programme. 

S. 

N 

o 


name 

Year 

started 

1 - - 

2 - - 

3 - - 

4 - - 

5 - - 

6 - - 


villages 

No. Of 

micro 

watershed 

Watershed 

codes 

Area 

under 

treatment 

Funding 

source 

Nodal 

agency 

PIA 

Total cost 

Expenditure 

incurred up 

to start of 

IWMP 

% financial 

completion 

% physical 

completion 

Nana 

Sukaamba - - - - - - - - - - 

Timbapada 

Dediyapada 

Nivalda 

Gajargota 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 

Katakankha 

di - - - - - - - - - - 

7 - - 

8 - - 

9 - - 

10 - - 

Bore 

Bogaj 

Ghatoli 

Kismor 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 


11 - - 

Navagam 

(Dedi) - - - - - - - - - - 

12 - - 

13 - - 

14 - - 

Rakaskundi 

Pipala 

Besana 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 

- - - - - - - - - - 


CHAPTER – 2 

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 


2.1. Project Implementing Agency 

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the 

State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation 

of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments, 

Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for Nanasukaamba watershed Project is 

Line Department Rajpipla (Narmada). 

2.2 About Project Implementing Agency, Rajpipla (Narmada) 

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 

PIA of the Nana sukaamba project is Rajpipla East Forestry Division. The Deputy Conservator of Forest (DCF) is the head of division. PIA has 

dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Range Forest Officer (Nodal officer) and a watershed development team of civil engineer, 

agriculture expert and community mobiliser, Data Entry Operator, surveyor, and accountant. The objective of the PIA is supervising, planning, 

implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities at project level as per 

guidelines. This also submits the documents at the district level. The DWDU, Narmada is not working as a PIA for any IWMP projects. 

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: 

Strength: 

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team 

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency. 


(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, South Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity building and 

technical guidance 

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar, 

(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee 

Weakness: 

(1) Lack of permanent staff. 

(2) Total project area is Tribal 

Opportunities: 

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of 

programmes 

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP 

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS 

Threats: 

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact 

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning 

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people 

(4) Low literacy rate in the project are 

Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

1 

IWMP-5 

Nana sukaamba Project 

(i) Type of organization PIA (Project Implementing Agency) 

(ii) Name of organization East forest division Rajpipla 

(iii) Designation & Address DFO East division Vadiya palace 

(iv) Telephone 224647 

(v) Fax 220896 


(vi) E-mail dcfrajpiplaeast@gmail.com 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Monthly 

S. 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned remuneration 

no 

(Rs) 

1. Dr.Shashi Kumar 31 M DFO PhD (Horticulture) 2 Monitoring 50000.00 

2. D.T Patel 50 M RFO Bsc (Agriculture) 25 Project officer 43000.00 

3. 

Vasava Ishwar 35 M WDT(Agriculture) BRS(Agri) 10Years Agriculture 

8000.00 


4. 

Mimla 33 F WDT(Community 

BRS 6Years Community 8000.00 

Mob.) 

Mobilization 

5. Vasava Indravardan 28 M WDT (Surveyor) ITI (Surveyor) 7 Survey 6.0 

7. Bankar Sachin 23 M WDT.Eng Diploma Civil 1 Years Technical 80000 


CHAPTER – 3 

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA 


3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 

3.1.1 Land use pattern: 

The net geographical area of Nanasukaamba watershed is about 4854 ha out of which 55% is forest area. About 26% of land is under 

agriculture which is rain-fed and irrigated; mainly Rabi and kharib crops are taken. About 14% of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 

80 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable. The watershed consists of bamboo which is a main livelihood source in project area. 

8: Land use pattern: 

S. No. 

Names of 

villages 

Geographical Area 

of the village (ha) 

Forest Area 

(ha) 

Land under 

agricultural use 

(ha) 

Rain-fed 

area (ha) 

Permanent 

pastures (ha) 

Cultivable 

(ha) 

Wasteland 

Non-cultivable 

(ha) 

1 Nana 

Sukaamba 

Timbapada 

2 

Dediyapada 

3 

Nivalda 

4 

Katakankhadi 

5 

Bore 

6 

Bogaj 

7 

Ghatoli 

8 

Kismor 

9 

429.10 171.50 204.00 194.00 0.00 36.70 16.90 

238.30 - 177.20 163.20 0.00 17.80 43.20 

582.70 - 265.00 228.00 0.00 77.80 240.00 

595.20 16.00 350.40 350.40 0.00 212.40 16.50 

549.60 222.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

360.50 360.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

431.90 16.70 318.00 318.00 0.00 71.70 

25.50 

736.20 305.70 269.70 269.70 0.00 27.20 134.00 

93.00 93.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 


10 

Navagam(Dedi) 

386.80 31.90 303.10 303.10 0.00 6.00 45.80 

11 

Rakhskundi 

149.70 20.90 95.10 85.10 0.00 11.70 22.00 

12 

Pipala 

552.20 149.00 400.10 400.10 0.00 3.00 0.00 

13 

Besansa 

626.40 191.80 400.10 400.10 0.00 26.20 8.40 

14 Gajargota 549.60 200 

3.1.2 Soil and topography: 

Nanasukaamba watershed project (IWMP5) falls under South Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly deep black and clay. The soil is brown to 

black in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm.The annual rainfall is 1100 mm. The predominant texture of soil is 

loamy and clay. The soil fertility is average with low contain of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 

0-15% slope. 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: 

S. No. 

Name of the Agro-climatic zone 

covers project area 

Area in ha 

Names of the 

villages 

a)Type 

Major soil types 

b) Area in ha 

Topography 

1 

179.10 Nana Sukaamba Black Cotton soil 1456 

Black Cotton soil 

South Gujarat Agro climatic 

2 238.30 Timbapada 

zone 


3 582.70 Dediyapada 

Flat to moderate 

slope 


4 595.20 Nivalda 

5 222.40 Katkankhadi 

6 360.50 Bore 

7 81.90 Bogaj 

8 236.20 Ghatoli 

9 93.00 Kismor 

10 386.80 Navagam(Dedi) 

11 149.70 Rakhskundi 

12 552.20 Pipala 

13 626.40 Besana 

14 549.60 Gajargota 













Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

S.No Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 Nana Sukaamba Nil Once in 5 Years 

2 Timbapada Nil 

Once in 5 Years 

3 Dediyapada Nil 

4 Nivalda Nil 

5 Katkankhadi Nil 

6 Bore Nil 

7 Bogaj Nil 

8 Ghatoli Nil 

9 Kismor Nil 

10 Navagam(Dedi) Nil 

11 Rakhskundi Nil 

12 Pipala Nil 

13 Besana Nil 

14 Gajargota Nil 

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion 

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) 

Water erosion 

Run off 

(mm/ year) 













Average soil loss (Tonnes/ 

ha/ year) 

a Sheet 1553 50-60% - 


Rill 1942 

c Gully 388 

Sub-Total 3883 

Wind erosion 0 NA 

Total 3883 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Name of the project Survey Number Soil pH 

Type of Salinity 

(Inherent/Ingress) 

Nana Sukaamba 7.4 Inherent 

Table no.12: Climatic conditions 

Sl. No. Year Rainfall (in mm) 

Temperature (˚C) 

Highest intensity of Rainfall (mm 

Max. 

Min. 

in a day) 

1 2004 1130.25 42 27 200 

2 2005 1178.00 42.5 27 190 

3 2006 1604.00 43 28 210 

4 2007 1389.50 44 27.5 200 

5 2008 1146.25 43 28 180 

6 2009 822.25 44 27 210 

The average rainfall of this area is about 1100 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 200 mm within span of a day. This 

uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year. 


Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 

Project name Elevation(MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams 

Nana Sukaamba 171.4meters 0-20 % Dhamankhadi,Karjan 

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: 

The average land holding is about 0.37 ha ranging from 0.150 to 0.720 ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to 

migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Rice 

(paddy), Sorghum, Cotton, Pigonpea and Wheat. Farmers take crops according to mansoon. The land conservation measures such as Check dams and 

farm bunds in the area will help them to increase cropping intensity of project area. 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

S No 

Village 

Nana sukaamba 

1 

Dadiyapada 

2 

Nivalda 

3 

Gajargota 

4 

Katankhadi (Ujjad) 

5 

Bore 

6 

Bogaj 

7 

Ghatoli 

8 

Kismor 

9 

Navagam(Dadiyapada) 

10 

Total owned land (in ha) 

Gen OBC SC ST 

0 0 0 169.18 

0 0 0 186 

0 0 0 106.8 

0 0 0 95.6 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 18.2 

0 0 0 148.4 

0 0 0 2.4 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 169.18 


11 

12 

13 

14 

Rakaskundi 

Pipla 

Basana 

Timbapada 

0 0 0 38.15 

0 0 0 24.6 

0 0 0 162.64 

0 0 0 54.84 

Table no. 15: Agriculture 

S.No Village Net sown area(ha) 

One time Two times Three times 

1 

Nana sukaamba 

282.8 20.8 

2 

Dadiyapada 

173 19 

3 

Nivalda 

92 11.4 9.2 

4 

Gajargota 

109.8 85.3 

5 


0 0 

6 

Bore 

16.5 2.2 

7 

Bogaj 

178.12 22.0 

8 

Ghatoli 

2 0 

9 

Kismor 

0 0 0 

10 


282.8 20.8 

11 

Rakaskundi 

216.81 18.72 4.89 

12 

Pipla 

23.60 15.2 


13 

14 

Basana 

Timbapada 

178.04 15.74 

26.5 22.2 

Table no. 16: Irrigation 

S 

No 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

Village 

Nana sukaamba 

Dadiyapada 

Nivalda 

Gajargota 


Bore 

Bogaj 

Ghatoli 

Kismor 


Rakaskundi 

Pipla 

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well 

Availability 

Gross Availability 

Gross Availability 

Net area 

Net area 

Net area 

months 

area months 

area months 

Gross 

area 

0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Months 20 hec 40 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Months 120 hec 120 ha 

0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Months 40 hec 50 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Months 60 ha 60 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Months 45 ha 60 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Months 24 hec 40 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Months 80 ha 80 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Months 95 ha 120 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Months 40 ha 60 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Months 20 ha 20 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Months 64 ha 70 hec 

0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Months 65 ha 70 hec 


13 

14 

Basana 

Timbapada 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Table no. 17: Crop details: 

S.No Village Kharif (Monsoon) 

Cotton 

Area 

Production Productivity 

Area (ha) 

(ha) 

(000’kg) 

(kg/ha) 

Nana sukaamba 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

Dadiyapada 

Nivalda 

Gajargota 


Bore 

Bogaj 

Ghatoli 

Kismor 


Rakaskundi 

Pipla 

Basana 

Rice 

Production 

(000’kg) 

Productivity 

(kg/ha) 

282.8 356 316 169.18 256 325 

125 95 123 76 96 115 

94 157 245 89 145 241 

59.2 165 189 66.3 158 176 

0 0 0 0 0 0 

14 56 75 9.5 46 59 

152.8 251 235 140.6 234 221 

2.5 15 6 2 12 4 

0 0 0 0 0 0 

142.5 259 105 136.2 221 103 

275 323 303 153 236 213 

21 89 115 18.5 76 102 

111.2 196 202 110.2 199 216 


14 

Timbapada 

32 96 110 26 84 96 

Sl no Village Rabi (Winter) 

Paddy 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

Nana sukaamba 

Dadiyapada 

Nivalda 

Gajargota 


Bore 

Bogaj 

Ghatoli 

Kismor 


Rakaskundi 

Juvar 

Area (ha) Production (000’kg) Productivity (kg/ha) Area (ha) Production (kg) 

Productivity 

(kg/ha) 

75.5 139 210 59 189 256 

9.6 85 82 8.9 79 69 

46 131 140 38 121 139 

52.2 140 129 46 132 119 

0 0 0 0 0 0 

5.5 26 16 0 0 0 

146.3 249 239 139 238 220 

3 18 9 2.3 14 8.9 

0 0 0 0 0 0 

121.88 215 126 115.5 194.5 115 

225 213 209 215 202 199 


12 

13 

14 

Pipla 

Basana 

Timbapada 

10.1 100 85 9 96 75 

99.6 197 119 89 182 115 

15 116 95 12 99 84 

3.1.4 Livestock: 

The Nanasukaamba project area has 853 cows, 459 buffaloes, 1659 bullocks, 186 goats and 20 sheep. Majority of Vasava, Tadvi, and Patel community 

depends on Cows and Buffalos rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. 

Sl 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Village Buffalo(Lit/annum) Cow(Lit/annum) 

Total Milk 

(Buffalo+Cow) 

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others 

No milk No Milk (Lit/annum) No Milk Camel 

Nana sukaamba 

37 280 145 457 737 4 0 0 278 0 88 

Dadiyapada 

53 100 36 70 170 40 26 1 120 0 6 

Nivalda 

114 246 132 129 375 6 0 0 76 0 69 

Gajargota 

35 185 95 126 311 24 15 0 255 0 39 


0 0 

0 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Bore 

2 25 16 45 70 0 0 0 8 0 7 

Bogaj 

56 98 160 187 285 50 35 10 278 0 83 

Ghatoli 

1 15 3 36 51 4 0 0 21 0 13 


9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

Kismor 


Rakaskundi 

Pipla 

Basana 

Timbapada 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

37 157 145 464 621 4 0 0 278 0 88 

17 105 27 150 255 24 30 0 52 0 22 

4 35 5 39 74 0 0 0 29 0 7 

60 520 66 345 865 30 25 0 208 0 45 

43 23 0 0 15 56 0 36 

Table no. 19 : Drinking water 

Sl no Village Ground water table (m) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality 

1 Nana Sukaamba 13 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

2 Timbapada 11 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

3 Dediyapada 14 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

4 Nivalda 13 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

5 Katkankhadi 12 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

6 Bore 09 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

7 Bogaj 14 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

8 Ghatoli 11 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

9 Kismor 09 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

10 Navagam(Dedi) 12 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

11 Rakhskundi 15 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

12 Pipala 13 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

13 Besana 09 Well,Handpump 12 Good 

14 Gajargota 11 Well,Handpump 12 Good 


S. 

No. 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 


project 

Nanasukaamba 

CPR 

Particulars 

Wasteland/ degraded land 

Pastures 

Orchards 

Village Woodlot 

Forest 

Village Ponds/ Tanks 

Community Buildings 

Weekly Markets 

Permanent markets 

Temples/ Places of worship 

Others (Pl. specify) 

Total Area (ha) 

Area owned/ In possession of 

Govt. 

Any other 

Pvt. persons (Specify PRI 

(Pl. Specify) 

dept.) 

Dediyapada 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Pvt. 

persons 

Govt. 

(Specify 

dept.) 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. Specify) 


3.2. Socio-Economic Profile 

3.2.1 Demographic Status: 

Nanasukaamba watershed project has a total of 3396 households with a population of 21762 (as per base-line survey) out of which 11317 are 

male and 10503 female. Nanasukaamba project has 100% ST population. The sex ratio is 985 female to 1000 male. There are 2693 BPL families. The 

average family size is 6. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 56 per cent; male literacy rate is 66 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate 

is as low as 45 per cent (of total female population). 102 people are graduate in project area. The major castes in the project area are vasava and talvi 

(ST). Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry. 

Table no. 21: Demographic information 

S no Village Population Population SC ST 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female 

1. 

Nana 

Sukaamba 

971 487 484 971 0 0 971 487 484 

2. Timbapada 707 365 342 707 0 0 707 365 342 

3. Dediyapada 8475 4533 3942 8475 375 187 4.4 4341 2384 1957 

4. Nivalda 2260 1169 1091 2260 2260 1169 1091 

5. Katkankhadi UJJl UJJl UJJl UJJl UJJl UJJl Ujjl UJJl UJJl UJJl 

6. Bore 66 37 29 66 0 0 66 37 29 

7. Bogaj 1090 577 571 1090 0 0 

1090 

577 571 

8. Ghatoli 1846 945 901 1846 0 0 1846 945 901 

9. Kismor UJJl UJJl UJJl UJJl UJJl UJJl Ujjl UJJl UJJl UJJl 

10. Navagam(Dedi) 2003 1025 978 2003 0 0 2003 1025 978 

11. Rakhskundi 539 257 282 539 0 0 539 257 282 

12. Pipala 967 487 480 967 0 0 967 487 480 

13. Besana 1353 

680 

673 1353 0 0 1353 

680 

673 

14. Gajargota 1485 755 730 1485 0 0 1485 755 730 


Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sl no 

Village 

Literacy 

Total % Male % Female % 

1 Nana Sukaamba 352 249 103 

2 Timbapada 426 267 159 

3 Dediyapada 5831 3426 2405 

4 Nivalda 1471 850 621 

5 Katkankhadi - - - 

6 Bore 33 23 10 

7 Bogaj 567 370 197 

8 Ghatoli 745 506 239 

9 Kismor - - - 

10 Navagam(Dedi) 899 595 304 

11 Rakhskundi 201 130 71 

12 Pipala 479 308 171 

13 Besana 479 320 159 

14 Gajargota 652 408 244 

Migration Pattern: 

People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Surat, Baroda, and Ahamdabad as daily wagers, agricultural labours and 

construction workers. 

Table no. 23: Migration details 

Sl no 

Village 

Total 

population 

Migration 

Total Male Female 

1 Nana Sukaamba 971 68 50 18 

2 Timbapada 707 49 30 19 

Up to 3 

months 

Migration by months 

3-6 months 

More than 6 

months 

Main reason 

for migration 

Income 

during 

migration / 

month 

Rs 

3000/month 

Rs 

3000/month 

3 Dediyapada 8475 593 300 193 Rs 


3000/month 

4 Nivalda 2260 158 102 56 

Rs 

2000/month 

5 Katkankhadi UJJl - 

Rs 

3000/month 

6 Bore 66 5 4 1 

Rs 

4000/month 

7 Bogaj 1090 76 61 25 

Rs 

4500/month 

8 Ghatoli 1846 129 103 26 

Rs 

3000/month 

9 Kismor UJJl - 

Rs 

5000/month 

10 Navagam(Dedi) 2003 140 104 36 

Rs 

5000/month 

11 Rakhskundi 539 38 22 16 

Rs 

2000/month 

12 Pipala 967 

68 40 28 Rs 

4000/month 

13 Besana 1353 

95 72 23 Rs 

5000/month 

14 Gajargota 1485 

44 32 12 Rs 

4000/month 

Table no. 24: Poverty 

S no 

Village 

Total BPL 

Household 

BPL 

0-16 16-20 Total 

1 

Nana 

Sukaamba 

184 120 64 

2 Timbapada 82 50 32 

3 Dediyapada 830 652 178 

4 Nivalda 190 162 28 

5 Katkankhadi Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl 

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 


6 Bore 15 05 10 

7 Bogaj 201 174 27 

8 Ghatoli 323 294 29 

9 Kismor Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl 

10 Navagam(Dedi) 161 50 111 

11 Rakhskundi 94 40 54 

12 Pipala 221 125 96 

13 Besana 159 24 135 

14 Gajargota 233 21 212 

15 

Infrastructure facilities: 

Nanasukaamba watershed is well connected with Dediyapada Taluka with pucca roads. The mostly villages have electricity connectivity. Nearly 75 per 

cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. All village has a primary school with all facilities like computers. For middle and 

higher secondary education, the students have to go to Dediyapada Taluka which is about 14 kilometres away. This also contributes to lower 

education level of the people. 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

S 

no 

Village 

Pucca 

road 

to the 

village 

(Y/N) 

Schools 

LP UP HS 

Colleges 

(Number) 

Post 

Office 

(Distance) 

Banks 

(Number) 

Distance 

from 

nearest 

market 

yard 

Milk 

collection 

centre 

(Number) 

Milk 

cooperative 

(Number) 

Other 

cooperatives 

/ CBIs 

(Number) 

Any other 

institution 

1 

Nana 

Sukaamba 

Y Y N N N 7 km N 7 km N N N - 

2 Timbapada Y Y Y N N 2 km N 2 km N N N - 

3 Dediyapada Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 km Y Y N - 

4 Nivalda Y Y Y Y N 2 km N 2 km Y Y N - 

5 Katkankhadi Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl 


6 Bore Y N N N N 8 km Y 8 km N N N - 

7 Bogaj Y Y N N N 9 Km N 9 km N N N - 

8 Ghatoli Y Y Y N N 10 km N 10 km N N N - 

9 Kismor Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl Ujjl 

10 Navagam(Dedi) Y Y N N N 4 km N 4 km N N N - 

11 Rakhskundi Y Y N N N 7 km N 7 km N N N - 

12 Pipala Y Y N N N 5 km N 5 km N N N - 

13 Besana Y Y N N N 4 km N 4 km N N N - 

14 Gajargota Y Y N N N 10 km N 10 km N N N - 

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 

Sl 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

Village 

Nana sukaamba 

Dadiyapada 

Nivalda 

Gajargota 


Bore 

Bogaj 

Ghatoli 

Kismor (Ujjad) 

HHs with 

electricity 

HHs with 

safety 

latrines 

HHs with phones 

HHs with vehicle 

Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler 

HHs with 

TV set 

HHs with 

cooking 

gas 

HHs with 

Drinking 

water 

263 14 N 16 23 N 26 N 23 5 

280 145 N 140 35 5 125 4 N 15 

272 156 N 155 33 5 165 N N 30 

289 N N N N N N N N N 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

20 N N 4 4 N 5 N N 1 

225 N N 21 6 2 9 N N 2 

31 N N N 1 N 1 N N N 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

HHs 

with 

fridge 


10 

11 

12 

13 

14 


Rakaskundi 

Pipla 

Basana 

Timbapada 

240 13 N 25 29 2 22 N N 1 

91 N N 1 3 1 4 N N N 

143 N N N N N N N N N 

116 N N 17 4 2 4 N N N 

85 N N 10 7 3 7 N N N 

3.3. Livelihood pattern: 

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in 

Rajpipla, Baroda, and Baruch and as agriculture labour in other parts of the state. Another major occupation of the people is Basket making and leaf 

plates making using the raw material which they collect from the community land or forest. 

Table no. 27: Per capita Income 

S No Village Agriculture (in Rs.) Animal husbandry Casual labour Others (in Rs.) Total (in Rs.) 

(in Rs.) 

(In Rs.) 

1 Nana sukaamba 4450 484 3400 1000 9320 

2 Dadiyapada 4320 508 1456 1843 8127 

3 Nivalda 5320 1020 1846 1914 10100 

4 Gajargota 4940 1008 2140 2450 10538 

5 Katankhadi (Ujjad) 3945 903 2643 2189 9671 


6 Bore 3120 432 2002 2358 7912 

7 Bogaj 4234 1121 1656 1478 11189 

8 Ghatoli 3214 406 1123 1678 6421 

9 Kismor (Ujjad) 4636 1209 2176 1456 9477 

10 Navagam(Dadiyapada) 2145 904 1485 1524 6057 

11 Rakaskundi 4342 1026 6263 0 11631 

12 Pipla 5256 826 1320 2140 9542 

13 Basana 00 00 Ujjal 00 00 

14 Timbapada 00 00 Ujjal 00 00 

Dependence on Common Property Resource 

Nanasukaamba watershed has more forest area. So people use bamboo for basket making and most of villagers collect gum from forest area. 

Project area has sufficient grazing land and community land. 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 

Sl no 

1 

Village 

Nana sukaamba 

Bidi making 

Mahua making 

% sells Income (Rs) % sells Income 

Total income (Rs) 

2 

Dadiyapada 

3 

Nivalda 


4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

Gajargota 


Bore 

Bogaj 

Ghatoli 



Rakaskundi 

Pipla 

Basana 

Timbapada 

Sl 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Village 

Nana sukaamba 

Dadiyapada 

Nivalda 

Gajargota 

Total 

workforce 

Agriculture 

Animal 

husbandry 

(AH) 

Agriculture + 

AH 

Casual 

labour 

Services 

Handicraft 

210 78 52 50 42 01 0 

400 350 200 250 450 100 0 

315 247 133 130 17 16 0 

310 133 174 130 189 06 0 


5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 


Bore 

Bogaj 

Ghatoli 



Rakaskundi 

Pipla 

Basana 

Timbapada 

370 134 110 108 74 06 0 

228 138 113 110 42 09 0 

75 29 28 26 05 08 0 

35 08 31 08 49 01 0 

54 20 33 20 17 01 0 

115 37 45 32 36 01 0 

228 138 113 110 42 09 0 

75 29 28 26 05 08 0 

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: 

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of 

land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.” 

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for Nana sukaamba Project), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and 

India), and Dept. of Agriculture (for Narmada). The results indicate that Nana Sukaamba project has low productivity compared to world, India, 

Gujarat and Narmada. The productivity is low not only because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but 

also due lack to of source of irrigation and scarcity of rain. 


Farmers mainly grow cotton, wheat, Rice, Rice. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. In case of low rainfall they go for sorghum, 

castor, and pearl millet. 

The world productivity of cotton is 526 kg/ha. In India productivity of 764 kg/ha. Gujarat productivity of about 633 kg/ha. Narmada district has very 

good productivity700 kg /ha. The Nana Sukaamba project area has only 400 kg/ha productivity. It is low compare to district, State, India and world. 

The world and India productivity of Rice are 2800 kg,2100 kg per hectare respectively.Gujarat is a major Rice producing state in India with the 

productivity of 1673kg/ha.Rice productivity of Narmada is 1305 kg/ha and Nana Sukaamba village has very poor productivity with 350Kg/ha. 


The world and India productivity of Wheat are 2717 kg,2700 kg per hectare respectively.Gujarat is a major Wheat producing state in India 

with the productivity of 2423kg/ha.Wheat productivity of Narmada is 2067 kg/ha and Nana Sukaamba village has very poor productivity with 620 

Kg/ha. 


The world and India productivity of Groundnut are 1554 kg,1150 kg per hectare respectively.Gujarat is a major Groundnut producing state in 

India with the productivity of 1367kg/ha.Groundnut productivity of Narmada is 1343 kg/ha and Nana Sukaamba project has very poor productivity 

with 510 Kg/ha. 


The world and India productivity of Sorghum are 1554 kg,1150 kg per hectare respectively.Gujarat is a major Sorghum producing state in 

India with the productivity of 1367kg/ha.Sorghum productivity of Narmada is 1343 kg/ha and Nana Sukaamba project has very poor productivity 

with 420 Kg/ha. 


The Nana Sukaamba project area has low productivity because of the following reasons: 

i) Full dependence on monsoon: 

Nana Sukaamba Project is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,80% 

of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or 

failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate. 

ii) 

Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: 

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times 

they don’t get fertilizer at the right time. 


iii) 

Traditional farming methods: 

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple 

cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low 

productivity. 

iv) 

Lack of adequate farm machinery: 

Even today a large number of farmers in Nana Sukaamba use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill. 

So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices. 

v) Lack of finances for farmers: 

In Nana Sukaamba most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and 

other inputs. 

vi) 

Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: 

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land 

productivity. In Nana Sukaamba, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated 

condition. But in Nana Sukaamba 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Nana Sukaamba mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers 

especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land. 

vii) 

Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders 

at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage 

facilities. 


CHAPTER – 4 

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES 


Watershed Activities 

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These 

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of 

migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The 

common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. 

4.1. Scientific Planning: 

i) Cluster Approach 

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Nanasukaamba 

Project consists of ten- watersheds namely5D1A6d1f, 5D1A6d1a, 5D1A6c3b, 5D1A6d1d, 5D1A6d1b, D1A6b3b as their respective codes. 

Further Nanasukaamba watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely Nanasukaamba, chikda, Nanasukaamba, 

Khopi Projects this gives an element of continuation of the programme. 

ii) Base line Survey 

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark 

for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which 

involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey 

includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the 

demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption 

rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits 

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the 

area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. 


iii) 

Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 

Figure:1 Social mapping 


Figure:2 Transect walk for ground truth 


Figure: 3 Village mapping 


The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the 

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge 

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal 

activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season 

calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the 

villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local 

vegetations (apt for afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers 

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning 

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, 

Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage 

according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

b) Planning 

An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil 

Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to 

identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical 

interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures. 

c) Hydrological modelling 


Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid 

over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which 

generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam. 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used 

Whether scientific criteria was 

used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

Yes 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the 

Institute 

Baseline survey 

Yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

Yes 

Contour mapping 

Yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

Yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes 

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes 

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes 

Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map Yes 

2. Village boundaries Yes 

3. Drainage Yes 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 

5. Land use Yes 

6. Ground water status Yes 

7. Watershed boundaries Yes 

8. Activity Yes 


Crop simulation models # 

No 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high 

speed soil nutrient analysis 

No 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

No 

Weather Station 

(B) Inputs 

No 

1. Bio-pesticides No 

2. Organic manures Yes 

3. Vermicompost Yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 

5. Water saving devices Yes 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 

7. Bio-fencing Yes 

8. Nutrient budgeting No 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No 

Any other (please specify) 

4.2. Institution building 

i) Watershed Committee (WC) 

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This 

committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with 

the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in Nanasukaamba project villagewise. Capacity 

building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT. 

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period. 


Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details[dediyapada] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 

Date of 

Registration 

as a Society Name Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF 

Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Bhadurbhai 

Rupsingbhai President M 1 

VasavaSanjaybhai 

Rayajibhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 

3 Member F 1 1 1 

Vasava Sitaben 

4 

Veersingbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava 

Jamnaben 

5 

Gangarambhai Member F 1 

Vasava Saviben 

6 

Mahendrbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Huniyabhai 

7 

Hadiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Abhesingbhai 

8 

Deepsingbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Raysingbhai 

9 

Nanjibhai Member M 

Vasava 

Fetasingbhai 

10 

11 

Dediyapada 

Watershed 

committee 

Hera Member 

Secretary 

F 

M 


Table no. 31.1 Watershed Committee details [Timbapada] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Narasinhbhai 

Govindbhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Baratbhai 

Narasing Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava 

Anandiben 

4 

Viththalbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava 

Rekhaben 

5 

Fulsinhbhai Member F 1 

Vasava 

Urmilaben 

6 

Satishbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Amarsinhbhai 

7 

Fatesinhbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Arvindbhai 

8 

Bhailal Member M 

Vasava 

Shanubhai 

9 

Ramsinh Member M 

Vasava 

10 

11 

Mahendrabhai 

Timbapada 

Huniyabhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member 

Secretary 

F 

M 


Table no. 31.2 Watershed Committee details [Gajargota] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Dipsingbhai 

Gambhirbhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Ramsingbhai 

Dhediyabhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava Puspaben 

4 

Harisingbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava Resmaben 

5 

Mukeshbhai Member F 1 

Vasava Ratanbhai 

6 

Tuliyabhai Member M 

Vasava Jayntibhai 

7 

Kalidasbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Gambhirbhai 

8 

Fatesingbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Rameshbhai 

9 

Somabhai Member M 

Vasava 

10 

11 

Narsingbhai 

Gajargota 

Hirabhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member 

Secretary 

F 

M 


Table no. 31.3 Watershed Committee details [Pipla] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava Vinodbhai 

Bhayjibhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Manojbhai 

Parsingbhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 

3 Member M 1 1 1 

Vasava 

Surnandaben 

4 

Naginbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava Aashaben 

5 

Manojbhai Member F 1 

Vasava Isverbhai 

6 

Tuliyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Sursingbhai 

7 

Janiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Ramsingbhai 

8 

Damaniyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Gamiyabhai 

9 

Aatiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

10 

11 

Tuliyabhai 

Pipla 

Oliyabhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member 

Secretary 

M 

M 


Table no. 31.4 Watershed Committee details [Bor] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava Jesingbhai 

Nagriyabhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Kuvarjibhai 

Limjibhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava Surtaben 

4 

Kashirambhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava Ritaben 

5 

Govindbhai Member F 1 

Vasava 

Ratilalbhai 

6 

Narsingbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Rajendrabhai 

7 

Gulsingbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Rameshbhai 

8 

Narsingbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Chunilalbhai 

9 

Govindbhai Member M 

Vasava 

10 

11 

Ramilaben 

Bor 

Govindbhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member 

Secretary 

M 

M 


Table no. 31.5 Watershed Committee details [Ghantoli] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Amsingbhai 

Nagariyabhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Maganbhai 

Hidabhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava Vastiben 

4 

Karansingbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava 

Champaben 

5 

Ramjibhai Member F 1 

Vasava 

Manilalbhai 

6 

Pohnabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Rameshbhai 

7 

Shantilalbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Damaniyabhai 

8 

Dedhiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Parsingbhai 

9 

Chhedalbhai Member M 

Vasava 

10 

11 

Gamiyabhai 

Ghantoli 

Virlabhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member 

Secretary 

M 

M 


Table no. 31.6 Watershed Committee details [Rakhaskundi] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Gurajibhai 

Narsingbhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Jagdishbhai 

Shantilalbhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava 

Savitaben 

4 

Rupsingbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava Revaben 

5 

Bahadurbhai Member F 1 

Vasava Keluben 

6 

Ratilalbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Amarsingbhai 

7 

Nanabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Ramsingbhai 

8 

Sapatiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Dipsingbhai 

9 

Nanderiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

10 

11 

Fatesingbhai 

Rakhaskundi 

Okaliyabhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member 

Secretary 

M 

M 


Table no. 31.7 Watershed Committee details [Nana Sukaamba] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Amsingbhai 

Vestabhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Narsingbhai 

Debabhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava Kuntaben 

4 

Dalsukhbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava 

Samsheriben 

5 

Maganbhai Member F 1 

Vasava Kuntaben 

6 

Harisingbhai Member M 

Vasava Punabhai 

7 

Nagariyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Parsingbhai 

8 

Gimbabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Raysingbhai 

9 

Ramjibhai Member M 

Vasava 

NanaSuka 

Narsingbhai 

10 Amba 

Ratilalbhai Member M 

Watershed 

11 committee 

Secretary M 


Table no. 31.8 Watershed Committee details [Navagam (Dedi)] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Amsingbhai 

Naykabhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Fatesingbhai 

Dheriyabhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava 

Parvatiben 

4 

Mahendrabhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava Lilaben 

5 

Amsingbhai Member F 1 

Vasava 

Premilaben 

6 

Amsingbhai Member F 

Vasava 

Dhanjibhai 

7 

Kotiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Dineshbhai 

8 

Dheliyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Harishbhai 

9 

Ramabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Navagam 

Champaben 

10 {Dedi} 

Somjibhai Member M 

Watershed 

11 committee 


Table no. 31.9 Watershed Committee details [Nivalda] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava Shantilal 

Butalbhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Dharmsingbhai 

Ramsingbhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava Babitaben 

4 

Ratanbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava 

Damaniyabhai 

5 

Mansingbhai Member M 1 

Vasava 

Mineshbhai 

6 

Bharjibhai Member M 

Vasava 

Dineshbhai 

7 

Amsingbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Margiyabhai 

8 

Ubdiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Ramsingbhai 

9 

Margiyabhai Member M 

10 

Nivalda 

Watershed 

committee 

Vasava 

Narsinhbhai 

Vagdiyabhai Member M 


Table no. 31.10 Watershed Committee details [Besna] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava Singabhai 

Kathudiyabhai President M 1 

Vasava Jesingbhai 

Devjibhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava Dhaniben 

4 

Gambhirbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava Jethabhai 

5 

Mirabhai Member M 1 

Vasava 

Kashiyabhai 

6 

Pohnabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Rajendrabhai 

7 

Hirabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Bharjibhai 

8 

Oliyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

Rajeshbhai 

9 

Oliyabhai Member M 

10 

11 

Vasava Arjunbhai 

Besna 

Huniyabhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member M 


Table no. 31.11 Watershed Committee details [Bogaj] 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 


WCs 


Registration 


Under 

progress 

Vasava 

Hadiyabhai 

Nanjibhai President M 1 

Vasava 

Ganeshbhai 

Rayjibhai Secretary M 1 1 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 


Vasava 

Vidhyaben 

4 

Arvindbhai Member F 1 1 

Vasava 

Jasvantaben 

5 

Gambhirbhai Member F 1 

Vasava 

Jyotsanaben 

6 

Mukeshbhai Member F 

Vasava Isverbhai 

7 

Muljibhai Member M 

Vsasava 

Ravindrabhai 

8 

Amsingbhai Member M 

Vasava 

Gambhirbhai 

9 

Mithiyabhai Member M 

Vasava 

10 

11 

Shankarbhai 

Bogaj 

Sursingbhai 

Watershed 

committee 

Member M 


Table no. 32: SHG details 

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially 

for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. 

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the 

following observations: 

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution. 

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders 

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people 

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking. 

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like AKRSP, it was planned to have some capacity building training 

regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment. 

S. No. 

Table no. 32: SHG details 

With 

only 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

With only 

Women 

With 

both 

Total 

members 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 


Men 

1 0 25 0 270 

(i) Landless 50 50 50 50 

(ii) SF 110 110 110 110 

(iii) MF 85 85 85 85 

(iv) LF 25 25 25 25 

Total 0 25 0 270 270 270 270 270 


User Group: 

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user 

charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. 

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. 

Table no. 33: UG detail 

No. of SC/ST in each No. of BPL in each 

Total no. of UGs 

No. of members 

S. No. 

category 

category 

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i)Landless 40 15 60 40 15 60 

1 210 70 280 

(ii) SF 100 23 128 100 23 128 

(iii) MF 45 20 75 45 20 75 

(iv) LF 25 5 40 25 5 40 

Total 210 70 280 210 70 280 210 70 280 


4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP 5 (Nanasukaamba) 

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) 

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain 

important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development 

Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 23.30 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent 

of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them 

that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument 

of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities. 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. No. Names of Villages Amount earmarked for EPA Entry Point Activities planned 

Estimated cost(Rs. in 

Lakh) 

1 Nana sukaamba 0.86 Hand pump repairing (3) 0.15 

Desilting Of Check Dam 0.15 

Fencing with plantation& shade in Smashan 1.0 

2 Timbapada 1.14 Hand pump repairing (5) 0.25 

Protection wall (30m) 0.80 

Fencing Of Anganvadi 0.50 

600 mt. Pipeline for drinking water 0.50 

3 Dadiyapada 2.80 

4 Nivalalda 2.86 

Pipeline Repairing for Drinking Water (800 Mt) 1.50 

3 HP Single phase motor (New) 0.30 

Water Stand (New) 0.40 

Computer training for youth with surrounding villages (60) 0.60 

Two animal water trough Repairing 0.25 

Protection wall (60 m) 1.5 


5 Gajarghota 2.64 

6 Bore 1.73 

7 Ghatoli {1.13+0.45} = 1.58 

8 Bogaj {1.07+0.39} = 1.46 

9 Rakaskundi 0.72 

10 Pipla 2.65 

Fencing in aaganvadi with plantation 0.30 

Filter plant in school 0.31 

Demonstration of mineral mixture 0.31 

Hand pump repairing (5) 0.25 

Well Recharge & Desilting (Community) 0.25 



Computer training for youth (50) 0.50 

Books for school library 0.09 

One animal water trough Repairing 0.10 


Animal health camp 0.20 

Demonstration Of Mineral mixture 0.50 

Electric Motor And Pipeline repairing 0.20 


Books and Almari for school 0.18 

Anganvadi Fencing, Plantation & Repairing 1.20 


Pipeline (New) & Electric Motor Repairing 0.50 

Fencing and Shade in shamshan 0.50 

Animal health camp with mineral mixture demonstration 0.40 

Fencing in school 0.30 

Well recharge (10) 0.80 


Fencing &plantation in shamshan 0.35 

One animal water trough Repairing 0.10 

Well recharge (10) 0.80 

Pipeline Repairing 0.10 

Protection wall (30m) 0.80 

200 mt. pipeline 0.20 


Fencing and plantation in aaganvadi 0.50 



Fencing And Plantation In Shamasan 0.65 

Water Filter Plant In School 0.35 

Demonstration of nursery with drip 1.5 

11 Basana 3.01 


Deeping of Pond 1.50 

Bore Electrical motor repairing 0.10 

Shade & Plantation in shamshan 0.50 

12 Navagam 1.86 Protection wall (50 m) 1.5 

Animal health camp with mineral mixture 0.40 

Filter plant in school with sintex tank 0.50 

Bore Electrical motor repairing 0.10 

13 Kishmor 

Fund Transfer in 

Ghatoli 

UZZAD 

14 Katankhadi 

Fund Transfer in 

Bogaj 

UZZAD 

Table no.34.1: Convergence under entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. No. Village 

Activity to be 

carried out 

Fund made 

available to IWMP 

due to 

convergence (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Scheme with 

which 

convergence took 

place 

Reference no. of 

activity/ task/ 

structure in DPR 

Level at which 

decision for 

convergence was 

taken 


1. Nana sukaamba 

Hand pump 

repairing (3) 

0.44 NAREGA Fencing with 

plantation& shade 

in Smashan 

District level 

Desilting Of Check 

Dam 

Fencing with 

plantation& shade 

in Smashan 





2. Timbapada Hand pump 

repairing (5) 

Protection wall 

(30m) 

Fencing Of 

Anganvadi 

600 mt. Pipeline 

for drinking water 

3. Dadiyapada Pipeline Repairing 

for Drinking Water 

(800 Mt) 

3 HP Single phase 

motor (New) 

Water Stand (New) 

Computer training 

for youth with 

surrounding 

villages (60) 

0.91 NAREGA Protection Wall District level 



0 District level 






4. Nivalalda Two animal water 

trough Repairing 

Protection wall (60 

m) 

Fencing in 

aaganvadi with 

plantation 

Filter plant in 

school 

Demonstration of 

mineral mixture 

Hand pump 

repairing (5) 

Well Recharge & 

Desilting 

(Community) 

5. Gajarghota Protection wall (30 

m) 

Hand pump 

repairing (5) 

Computer training 

for youth (50) 

Books for school 

library 

One animal water 



Dam 

Animal health 

camp 

Demonstration Of 

Mineral mixture 

6. Bore Electric Motor And 

Pipeline repairing 

0.31 WASMO Filter plant i school District level 





0.00 District level 









Hand pump 

repairing (3) 

Books and Almari 

for school 

Anganvadi Fencing, 

Plantation & 

Repairing 

7. Ghatoli Protection wall (80 

m) 

Pipeline (New) & 

Electric Motor 

Repairing 

Fencing and Shade 

in shamshan 

8. Bogaj Animal health 

camp with mineral 

mixture 

demonstration 

Fencing in school 

Well recharge (10) 

Hand pump 

repairing (5) 

9. Rakaskundi Fencing 

&plantation in 

shamshan 

One animal water 


Well recharge (10) 

Pipeline Repairing 



0.92 NAREGA Protection wall District level 




0.29 NAREGA Well Recharge District level 



0.63 NAREGA Well Recharge District level 





10. Pipla 

Protection wall 

(30m) 

200 mt. pipeline 

Hand pump 

repairing (6) 

Fencing and 

plantation in 

aaganvadi 


Dam 

Fencing And 

Plantation In 

Shamasan 

Water Filter Plant 

In School 

11. Basana Demonstration of 

nursery with drip 

Hand pump 

repairing (5) 

Deeping of Pond 

Bore Electrical 

motor repairing 

0.35 WASMO Water filter plant in 

school 








0.34 NAREGA Deeping of pond District level 





12. Navagam 

Shade & Plantation 

in shamshan 

Protection wall (50 

m) 

Animal health 

camp with mineral 

mixture 

1.14 WASMO Filter plant in District level 

school with syntax 

tank 

NAREGA Protection Wall District level 



Filter plant in 

school with sintex 

tank 

Bore Electrical 

motor repairing 





4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: 

Figure: 3 Biophysical and site selection 


Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be 

approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. 

Ridge Area Treatment Plans: 

It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in 

Nanasukaamba watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Nanasukaamba watershed following structure are been Proposed after interaction between 

the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest. 

1. Stone Banding 

2. Continuous Contour Trenches (CCT) 

3. Check dam 

4. Gabion structure 

5. Nala banding 

6. Percolation tank 

1. Stone Bunding 

A bund constructed out of stone along the contour or across the stream is called as stone wall. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and 

where basically stone of radius 100-150 mm is available. It helps in: 

· Control of erosion by reducing the slope of the cultivated land 

· Increasing the infiltration of rainwater 

S. 

No. 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Proposed target 

Village name Type of structures 

Construction of new structures 

Total target 


1 Nana Sukaamba 

No. 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity(lit) 

Estimated 

cost(in lakh) 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost(in lakh) 

(i) Continuous contour trench 

(CCT) 

1500 1.5 1.5 

(ii) Check dam (1)(Repairing) 1 6 12000 1.0 6 12000 1.0 

(iii) Farm banding and Land 

levelling 

20 10000 4.0 20 10000 4.0 

(iv)Pond deeping 1 15 12000 1.5 15 12000 1.5 

(v) Check wall (8) 8 20 20000 4.0 20 20000 4.0 

(vi) Nala banding 20 20 15000 1.0 20 15000 1.0 

Total 1530 81 69000 13 81 69000 13 

2. Timbapada (i)Check dam 1 15 20000 7.0 1 15 20000 

(ii)Check wall 6 12 30000 2.0 6 12 30000 

(iii)Gabion structure 7 8.5 10000 3.5 7 8.5 10000 

(iv) Farm banding &Land 

levelling 

4.0 

Total 14 35.5 60000 16.5 35.5 60000 16.5 

3. Dadiyapada (i) Check dam 2 20 20000 17.0 20 20000 17.0 

(ii) Continuous contour 

trench 

4000 5000 1.0 5000 1.0 

(iii)Check wall 10 40 16000 5.0 40 16000 5.0 


levelling 

8.0 8.0 

(v) Deeping of pond 1 10 20000 2.0 10 20000 2.0 

(vi)Repairing of Check dam 3 30 30000 6.0 30 30000 6.0 

(vii)Gabion structure 15 30 20000 7.0 30 20000 7.0 

Total 4031 130 111000 46 130 111000 46 


4. Nivalda (i)Check dam 1 20 15000 15.0 20 15000 15.0 

(ii) Check wall 13 25 30000 8.0 25 30000 8.0 

(iii) Gabion structure 13 20 20000 7.0 20 20000 7.0 


levelling 

3.0 3.0 

(v) Stone banding 14 15 15000 1.0 15 15000 1.0 

(vi) Continuous contour 

trench 

7000 2.0 2.0 

Total 7041 80 80000 36 80 80000 36 

5. Gajargota (i) Continuous contour trench 15000 3.0 3.0 

(ii)Nala banding 

2000 

CMT 

15 10000 2.4 15 10000 2.4 

(iii)Check dam 1 20 30000 10.0 20 30000 10.0 

(iv)Check dam repairing 3.0 25 20000 7.0 25 20000 7.0 

(V)Check wall 7 15 40000 4.0 15 40000 4.0 

(vi) Gabion structure 8.0 5 30000 5.0 5 30000 5.0 

(vii) ) Farm banding &Land 

levelling 

4.0 4.0 

Total 15019 80 130000 35.4 80 130000 35.4 

6. Bore (i)Check dam 1 25 40000 25.0 25 40000 25.0 

(ii) Check wall 2 8 20000 1.0 8 20000 1.0 

(iii)CCT & Bottling 2000 4.0 4.0 

(iv)Nala banding 1500CMT 2.0 2.0 

(v)Farm banding Land 

levelling 

2.0 2.0 

Total 2003 33 60000 34 33 60000 34 

7. Ghatoli (i) Continuous contour trench 10000 2.0 2.0 

(ii)Village pond 1 20 50000 6.0 20 50000 6.0 

(iii) Farm banding Land 

levelling 

8 4.0 4.0 


(iv)Check wall 3 15 15000 6.0 15 15000 6.0 

Total 10012 35 20000 18.0 35 20000 18.0 

8. Bogaj (i) Continuous contour trench 1000 1.0 1.0 

(ii)Check wall 8 20 50000 4.0 20 50000 4.0 

(iii)Well recharge structure 4 15 30000 1.0 15 30000 1.0 

(iv)Gabion structure 6 10 20000 3.0 10 20000 3.0 

(v) Farm banding &Land 

levelling with border 

2.0 2.0 

plantation 

(vi)Stone banding 7 7 15000 0.50 7 15000 0.50 

Total 1025 52 115000 11.5 52 115000 11.5 

9. Rakaskundi (i) CCT & Bamboo plantation 1000 2.0 2.0 

(ii)Check wall 7 20 70000 3.0 20 70000 3.0 

(iii) Gabion structure 5 15 30000 3.0 15 30000 3.0 

(iv) Well recharge structure 5 20 50000 1.0 20 50000 1.0 

(v) Farm banding &Land 

levelling 

3.0 3.0 

Total 1017 55 150000 12.0 55 150000 12.0 

10. Pipla (i)Continuous contour trench 20000 2.0 2.0 

(ii)Check dam 1 15 30000 20.0 15 30000 20.0 

(iii)Check wall 7 20 40000 5.0 20 40000 5.0 

(iv)Farm banding &Land 

levelling 

5.0 5.0 5.0 

(v) Stone banding 47 25 50000 2.5 25 50000 2.5 

(vi) Gabion structure 10 25 50000 3.5 25 50000 3.5 

Total 20070 85 170000 38 85 170000 38 

11. Basana (i) CCT & Bottling 10000 5.0 5.0 

(ii) Check dam 1 20 25000 20.0 20 25000 20.0 

(iii) Check wall 13 40 100000 7.0 40 100000 7.0 



(v)Farm banding and land 

levelling 

4.0 4.0 

Total 10034 90 245000 41 90 245000 41 

12. Navagam (i)CCT 5000 1.0 1.0 

(ii)Check dam repairing 4 35 80000 10.0 35 80000 10.0 

(iii)Check dam 1 20 30000 17.0 20 30000 17.0 


(v) Check wall 7 15 80000 3.5 15 80000 3.5 

(vi)Stone banding 19 5 70000 2.0 5 70000 2.0 

(vii)Farm banding & Land 

levelling 

2.0 2.0 

Total 5038 85 310000 38 85 310000 38 

13. Kismor (i)Stone banding 11 5 8000 1.0 5 8000 1.0 

(ii)Check wall 7 15 15000 3.5 15 15000 3.5 

(iii)Check dam repairing 2 30 40000 5.0 30 40000 5.0 

Total 20 50 63000 9.5 50 63000 9.5 

14. Katankhadi (i)CCT 10000 1.0 1.0 

(ii) Check dam repairing 5 80000 20 5.0 80000 20 5.0 

(iii)Check wall 6 60000 15 3.0 60000 15 3.0 


(v)Stone banding 10 40000 5 0.50 40000 5 0.50 

Total 10034 260000 50 16 260000 50 16 

A forestation will be done on 10 hectare in Nivalda village (Cost: 7.0 Lakh) 


Table no. 36 .1: 

S. No. Village name Type of structures` 

Survey name 

1 Nana Sukaamba (i) Continuous contour trench (CCT) Compartment no.74 

(ii) Check dam (1)(Repairing) 112/10 

(iii) Farm banding and Land levelling 72,73,76,75,68,29,37,32 

(iv)Pond deeping 

Near 2 survey no 

(v) Check wall (8) 86/3,89,90,28,22,C.N 75 

(vi) Nala banding 77,70,53 

2. Timbapada (i)Check dam 83 

(ii)Check wall 62,63,37,41 

(iii)Gabion structure 63,52,3/1,84/3,18,4/3 

(iv) Farm banding &Land levelling 62,65 

3. Dadiyapada (i) Check dam 104,223 

(ii) Continuous contour trench CN 20 

(iii)Check wall 

104,108,133/1,132,127,91/2,75/b,63,244,74 

(iv) Farm banding &Land levelling 136,152,106,132,128 

(v) Deeping of pond 

Sn 

(vi)Repairing of Check dam 104,223 

(vii)Gabion structure 

156,158,153,152,108,131,127,128,93,85,244,74,117b 

4. Nivalda (i)Check dam 235 

(ii) Check wall 158,171,178,184,21,103,105,71,62,122 

(iii) Gabion structure 170,225,183,102,185,215,88,99,70,74,61 


(iv) Farm banding &Land levelling 158,139,170,171,178,225,184 

(v) Stone banding 184,186,213,135,130,137,99,98,116,9,120,121,122 

(vi) Continuous contour trench 

SN 

5. Gajargota (i) Continuous contour trench 137,91 


Sn 

(iii)Check dam 

Sn 

(iv)Check dam repairing 20,23 

(V)Check wall 180,163,21,62,11,70,145, 

(vi) Gabion structure 179,164,19,68,146,96,108,114 

(vii) ) Farm banding &Land levelling 

42,171,152,148/b,158,160,87,176,173 

6. Bore (i)Check dam Cn345 

(ii) Check wall 

Cn345,346 

(iii)CCT & Bottling 

Cn345,346 

(iv)Nala banding 

Cn345,346 

(v)Farm banding Land levelling 

Cn345,346 

7. Ghatoli (i) Continuous contour trench 137,56 

(ii)Village pond 

Cn 

(iii) Farm banding Land levelling 25,34,146,169,165,172,163,152,148 

(iv)Check wall 130,204,177,184 

8. Bogaj (i) Continuous contour trench 6/1b 

(ii)Check wall 80,96,112,26,28,38,6/1 

(iii)Well recharge structure 120,93,72,12/3 

(iv)Gabion structure 91,96,112,120,129,177 

(v) Farm banding &Land levelling with border 

plantation 

140,76,44,16,35 


(vi)Stone banding 83,97,117,21,27,32 

9. Rakaskundi (i) CCT & Bamboo plantation 53 

(ii)Check wall 12,20,21,23,38 

(iii) Gabion structure 37,26,25,24,22,20, 

(iv) Well recharge structure 23,45,29,15,54 

(v) Farm banding &Land levelling 51,55,41,11,9 

10. Pipla (i)Continuous contour trench Cn 

(ii)Check dam 179 

(iii)Check wall 104,106,93,318, 

(iv)Farm banding &Land levelling 83,114,137,90,163 

(v) Stone banding 174,173,96,146,152,15,95,101,118,126 

(vi) Gabion structure 97,147,179,174, 

11. Basana (i) CCT & Bottling Cn 

(ii) Check dam 320 

(iii) Check wall 39,12/12,181/1 

(iv)Gabion structure 39,43,173,76,174/1,174/2,62,12/17,144/1 

(v)Farm banding and land levelling 103,108,123,154,28,132,141 

12. Navagam (i)CCT Cn 

(ii)Check dam repairing 72,205,29,11 

(iii)Check dam 46 

(iv)Gabion structure 49,77,179,154,183,122,161 

(v) Check wall 161,86,79,46,29,120,28 

(vi)Stone banding 135,139,124,88,28,29,25,20,30,45,49 

(vii)Farm banding & Land levelling 86,101,179,159,1,177,184 

13. Kismor (i)Stone banding CN.347 


(ii)Check wall CN. 347 

(iii)Check dam repairing CN. 347 

14. Katankhadi (i)CCT 

CN. 348 

(ii) Check dam repairing 

CN. 348 


CN. 348 

(iv)Gabion structure 

CN. 348 

(v)Stone banding 

CN. 348 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 

S. No. 


Villages 

Name of activity 

Major activities of the SHGs 

No. of SHGs involved 

Average estimate cost per SHG(in 

Rs. Approx) 

Structure Crimper For 

Vegetable Production 

2 UG 1.00 


Agarbatti Making Unit 1 SHG 0.30 

Paddy Thrasing Machine 1 UG 0.75 

Instrument for catering 1 UG 0.89 

Vegetable production(1hec) 1 UG 2.00 

Mandap decoration system 1 UG 1.50 

2 Timbapada Floor meal 0.50 

Vegetable Production 1.58 

Musical Instrument For 

Bhajan Mandal 

1.00 

Poly House –Vegetable 

Poduction 

7.00 

Plantation of Grafted mango 1.50 


3 Dediyapada Poultry farm 2.00 

Vermi composting Unit 1 SHG 3.00 

Fruit Orchard 4.00 

Zerox and internet center 1.0 

Cement Article 1.50 

4 Tea& Nasta center 1 SHG 1.00 

Nivalda Vegetable Production 3.00 



2.00 

Fruit Orchard With Fancing 4.00 

Nursery Raising 2.00 

Detergent Powder Making 

Unit 

1.00 

Leaf plates production 0.75 

5. Gajargota Tea & Nasta center 1.00 

Papaiya With Drip 

Irrigation( 1 Ha.) 

3.00 


Bamboo Plantation with 

Fancing & Drip Irrigation 

1.50 




2.00 

Vermi composting Unit 2.00 

Rice thrashing machine 0.50 

Cement Article 1.50 

6 Bore Animal Unit 1.50 

Oil extraction unit 1.00 

Vegetable Production with 

Drip & Irrigation 

5.00 


Mandap decoration 1.5 

7 Ghatoli Sieving machine (3) 0.50 

Detergent Powder & Shop 0.50 


Making Unit 

Agarbatti Making Unit 0.30 


Bamboo Plantation ( 2 Ha) 2.00 

Papad Making Unit 1.00 

8 Bogaj Floor meal Machine unit 0.50 



Fish Production 1.50 

Nursery Raising 1.50 

9 Rakhaskundi Plantation of Grafted mango 1.00 

Floor meal Machine unit 0.50 



10 Pipala Animal Unit 3.00 


Floor meal Machine unit 1.00 

Detergent Powder Making 

Unit 

0.50 


Pickle making unit 0.50 

Medicine Plantation with 

Drip Irrigation 

4.50 

Fish Production 1.00 

11 Besana Floor meal Machine unit 1.00 


Vegetable Production with 


3.00 



Fruit Orchard With Fancing 

& Drip Irrigation 

4.50 

Rice thrashing & Floor meal 

unit 

1.00 


12 Navagam Vegetable Production 2.00 

Mandap Decoration System 1.50 



13 

Kishmor Uzzad Fund Transfer in Ghatoli 

14 

Katankhadi Uzzad Fund Transfer in Bogaj 

Table no. 38.2: Animal husbandry 

Sr.No Village Animal unit (Cow/ Buffaloes) 

1 Nana Sukaamba 2.40 

2 Timbapada 2.50 

3 Dediyapada 1.50 

4 Nivalda 2.38 

5 Katkankhadi 

6 Bore 1.5 

7 Bogaj 3.0 

8 Ghatoli 3.0 

9 Kismor 

10 Navagam(Dedi) 3.0 

11 Rakhskundi 1.0 

12 Pipala 3.0 

13 Besana 3.0 

14 Gajargota 1.50 


Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target 

S. 

No. 



Ridge area 

treatment 

Nursery 

raising 

Land 

development 

Crop 

demonstrations 

(in 

(in (in (in 

ha) (in lakh) ha) lakh) ha) 

Nanasukaamba 50 40 

Fodder Land 

development 

(in 

lakh) (in ha) (in lakh) (in ha) (in lakh) 

Total Estimated cost (Rs. 

In lakhs) 

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* 

S. No. Project name Name of structures 

Continuous Contour 

trench(CCT) 

Staggered continuous trench 

Type of treatment 

(ii) Drainage 

(i) Ridge 

area (R) 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

Type of land 

(iii) Others 

(ii) 

Community 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others (pl. 

specify) 

Target 

No. of units Estimated cost (Rs. in 

(No./ cu.m./ lakh) 

rmt) 

86500RM 

T 

0 RMT 

M W O T 

Expected 

month & year 

of completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

Nanasukaam 

ba 

(IWMP5) 

Stone banding 108 

Gabion structure 109 

Check wall 90 

Check dam 10 

Percolation Tank 0 

Nala bunding 

4000 CMT 


Total 

Table No. 40.1: Technical Specification of stone bund (Pipla village: Survey no.174,173,96,146,152,15,95,101,118,126) 

Particulars Value Units 

Top width of bund 47 1200m 

Bottom width of Bund 1m. 

Depth above ground level 

1.5m. 

Depth of Foundation m. 

Cross section of bund 

sq. M 

Proposed Area 

ha. 

Table No. 40.2: Technical Details of Continuous Contour Trenches (CCT) in Gajargota (Survey no.(C.N)137,91) 


Trench Length m. 

Trench Width 15000RMT M 

Trench Depth m. 

No. Of Trenches Per ha. 

1000nos. 

Proposed Area 

ha. 


Table No 40.3 Quantity Calculation: CCT 

S. 

No. Description Unit 

1 Layout of Contour Lines 

2 General Work 

Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 

3 Earth Work 

N 

Lengt 

h 

Widt 

h 

Dept 

h 

Quanti 

ty 

o. (M.) (M.) (M..) (Cum) 

Met 

er 5.5 1 1.5 7.5 

Met 

er 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/trench upto 1.5 meter depth. Compaction of bottom, 

correction of sides, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of remaining soil upto 50mr. 

a) In ordinary/soft soil 

b) In hard soil/clay/murrum 

c) Fragmented rock 

d) ordinary rock 

4 Vegetative Work 

Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge 

Cu. 

m. 

Cu. 

m. 

Cu. 

m. 

Cu. 

m. 

Cu. 

m. 

Met 

er 


5 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman Seed @ 10 gm/Meter in two lines Kg 

Overseeding of grasses in between two furrows including seed treatement and pallet making etc. 

6 complete @ 10 kg/ha 

Kg 

Table No 40.4: Technical Details of Continuous Contour trench (Village: Pipla) 


Trench Length m. 

Trench Width 20000RMT M 

Trench Depth m. 

No. Of Trenches Per ha. 

1000nos. 

Proposed Area 

ha. 

Table no 40.5: Quantity Calculation of Continous Contour trench 

S. 

No. Description Unit 

1 Layout of Contour Lines 


Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 

3 Earth Work 

N 

Lengt 

h 

Widt 

h 

Dept 

h 

Quanti 

ty 

o. (M.) (M.) (M..) (Cum) 

Met 

er 5.5 1 1.5 7.5 

Met 

er 

Earth work in excavation in foundation/trench upto 1.5 meter depth. Compaction of bottom, Cu. 

correction of sides, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of remaining soil upto 50mr. m. 

Cu. 

a) In ordinary/soft soil 

m. 

Cu. 

b) In hard soil/clay/murrum 

m. 

c) Fragmented rock Cu. 


d) ordinary rock 

4 Vegetative Work 

Met 

Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge 

er 

5 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman Seed @ 10 gm/Meter in two lines Kg 

6 

Overseeding of grasses in between two furrows including seed treatement and pallet making etc. 

complete @ 10 kg/ha 

m. 

Cu. 

m. 

Kg 

Nala banding 

Table no 40.6: Technical details of Nala banding on Survey no. (137,91) (Village Gajarghota) 


Structure Length 

2000 cmt 

Structure Height 

1m 

Upstream Slope - 

Downstream Slope - 

Bund Top Width 

M 

Structure Base Width 

M 

Structure Cross Section 

Sqm 

Table no 40.7: Quantity details of Nala banding on Survey no. (137,91) (Village Gajarghota) 

S. No. Description Unit No. of Structures Length (M.) (SqM.) Cross Section (Cu. M.) 



Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 10 to 20 cm deep M 2000cmt 

2 Works 

Construction Nala band 

Cum 

a) ordinary soil Cum 

b) hard soil Cum 

Table no 40.8: Technical details of Check dam no.1 on survey no. 179 (village: Pipla) 



30 m 


4 m 




M 


M 


Sqm 

Table no 40.9: Quantity Calculation of Check dam on survey no. 179 (village: Pipla) 

S. No. Description Unit No. of Structures Length (M.) (SqM..) Cross Section (Cu. M.) 

1 General Work 1 30 

Clearing vegetation 

M 

2 Dam Work 


Construction of Check dam Cum 



Table no 40.10: Technical details of check dam No. 2 on Survey no.235 (Village:Nivalda) 



20 m 


2 M 




M 


M 


Sqm 

Table no 40.11: Quantity Calculation of Check dam No. 2 on Survey no.235 (Village:Nivalda) 



Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep 

M 

2 Earth Work 

Construction of Check dam up to 2.5 m height 

Cum 




Table no 40.12: Technical details of check dam No. 3 on Survey no.(CN)235 (Village:Bore) 



32 m 


2 M 




M 


M 


Sqm 

Table no 40.13: Quantity Calculation of Check dam No. 3 on Survey no.(CN)235 (Village:Bore) 



Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep 

M 

2 Earth Work 

Construction of Check dam up to 2.5 m height 

Cum 




Table no 40.14: Technical details of Gabion structure survey no.91, 96,112,120,129,177 (Village: Bogaj) 



60m 

Structure Height 1.5m 




M 


M 


Sqm 


Table no 40.15: Quantity Calculation of Gabion structure Compartment no: 437 (Village: Olgam) 

S. No. Description Unit No. of Structures Length (M.) (SqM...) Cross Section (Cu. M.) 


Clearing bushes and clear surface and make a stone surface M 

2 Pond Work 

Construction of Village pond with stone,bricks,and cement Cum 



Table no 40.16: Technical details of Check wall on Survey no. 12, 20, 21, 23, 38(Village: Rakaskundi) 



8m 


1m 




M 


M 


Sqm 


Table no 40.17: Quantity Calculation of Check wall Survey no. 12, 20, 21, 23, 38(Village: Rakaskundi) 



Clearing bushes 

M 

2 Earth Work 

Construction of Check wall (dry of moist) excavation Cum 



Table No. 40.18: Technical Details of Check wall No2 on Survey no.130, 204,177,184 (Village: Ghatoli) 

Particulars 

Value 

Wall Length 15M. 

Width 5M. 

Total Wall Length For Proposed Area M. 

Top Width 

1.5M. 

Side Slope 

Height M. 

Base Width M. 

Cross-Section of Check wall 

SqM. 


Table No. 40.19, Quantity Excavation for Check wall No2 on Survey no. 130,204,177,184 (Village: Ghatoli) 

Sr. 

No 

Description Unit Quantity 


Clearing bushes and dig 

M 

2 Earth Work 

Construction of of Check wall 

Cum 



S. 

No. 

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

Name of village 

Name of structure/ 

work 

Type of treatment 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 

Type of land 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 

No. of 

plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Afforestation UG 3000 25 

Plantation/Grass 

Seeding(SCT,BCT) 

Fodder 

Nursery raising UG 20 35 

Total 500 UG 20 3000 60 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Table No. 41.1: Technical Details of Afforestation Activities 

Particulars 

Crop Name 

Plant To Plant Spacing 

Value 

Ailanthus 

10M 


Row to Row Spacing 

3M 

Pit Length 

2M 

Pit Width 

M 

Pit Depth 

1M 

No. of Plants 

Nos. 

Plantation Area 

ha. 

No. of Plants per ha 

Nos. 

Gap Filling % 


Table No. 41.2: Cost Estimation for afforestation 


activity 

S. 

Description No. Lengt Width Depth Unit Quantity Rate Amount 

No. 

h (m.) (m.) (m.) 

1 Digging of pits for plants in Ordinary murum 1 1 1 Cum 

2 

Plants samplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area, sampling 

not less than 30 cm. height 

Nos. 

3 Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site up to 5Km Nos. 

4 Loading and unloading of plants Nos. 

5 

Rehandling of plants from camp site to actual planting site upto 

200m. 

Nos. 

6 Cost of fertiliser & insecticides incl. application Nos. 

7 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year) Nos. 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities 

In animal husbandry PIA will provide 70 improved animal breed for landless farmers. Farmers will contribute 20% of total cost. 

S. 

No. 

Name of Project Name of activity Type of land 

Executing 

agency 

Target 


Nanasukaamba 

(i) Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Crop demonstration 

Backyard poultry 

Small ruminants 

Animal Husbandry 70 Unit UG 

Animal camp 

Composting 

Animal Nutrient 

Vegetable production 

Total of Livelihood intervention 

Fodder bank (Grass+bamboo) 

Vermicomposting 

Cement pole making 

Leaf plates making 

Milk collection centre 

SHG revolving fund 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & year 

of 

completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

Total of the Production system intervention 

Production System-1: Cement pole making (Primary model for cement pole making) 

In project area demand of cement pole is very huge because most of people made house with cement pole.So we have taken a production system for 

cement pole.Two SHG will be required for cement pole production. 


Table no: 34.1, Cost of Cement pole making 

Cost Detail 

A. Fixed cost 

-Cost for machinery 50,000 

-Water supply tank and facilities 

50,000 Rs 

Total fixed cost 1,00000 

B.Variable Cost 

-Sand requirement 55 kg (1 pole) 

20Rs 

-Concrete requirement 20 kg for one pole (1pole) 

140 Rs 

-Iron (6mm) requirement 10 kg with banding wire (1 pole) 

380 Rs 

-Cement requirement (1 pole) 

125 RS 

-Oil requirement for one pole (250 gm) 

10 Rs 

-Labour charges (2 mandays) 

150 Rs 

Total variable cost 815 

C. Depreciation cost (5%) 5000 

Unit cost 


Table No. 34.1.2 Total cost for 500 cement pole 

D. Total Cost for 500 cement pole making 

Rs 815*1 cement pole=815 

815 Rs*500 cement pole=407500+5000=412500 

Table No. 34.1.3, Revenue and return Details. 

S. No Return Details Cost (in Rs.) 

1 Cost of 500 Cement pole 815*500+5000=412500 

2. Cost for one pole 412500/500=825 

3. selling price for 1 cement pole Rs. 1010 Rs 

4. Net selling price Rs.1010 Rs*500=505000 

5. Net profit (Net selling price –total cost) 505000 Rs-412500=92500 Rs 

Production System: 2 Leaf plates making (Primary model for leaf plates making) 

The dona-pattal-making machine will be provided the group. They will be making dona-pattal manually. Use of machine will be improved quality and 

increased sale in the market. 

MATERIALS 

Paper, Dried Banana leaves, Dried Bauhinia Vahili leaves (Hindi: Kachnar), Areca leaf sheath, Dried Butea Frondoza leaves (Hindi: Palash). 

WORKING 


The dry leaves are washed and softened by soaking in water for 10 to 30 minutes the length of time depends on the type of leaves 6E their dryness) and again 

dried until they become pliable. The correct point of dryness is reached when the leaf does not crack when folded to 180 degrees, across the grain. All parts 

of the leaf, more than 3 mm thick are cut off. The energy regulator is set to maintain the male die temperature at about 150 0 C. 

The leaf of adequate size is symmetrically placed on the base plate above the die-opening and the foot pedal is pressed down. As it lowers, the holding plates 

keep the leaf in position. 

The pedal is lowered further holding the leaf/leaves in this position for a short period (5-10 seconds for a thin leaf and 20-30 seconds for materials like areca 

sheath), not only dries and sets the leaf in the shape of the die but also destroys the surface micro-organisms, thus making it hygienic. 

By pressing the pedal with a jerk, the cutter incorporated in the machine trims the edges of the leaves. When the pressure on the pedal is withdrawn, the leaf 

cup is ready and could be lifted out by hand. Instead of one leaf, a combination of leaves and paper (or a polythene sheet) can be fed into the machine 

without any change in the procedure. 

When using thicker and stiffer materials like areca sheath, the pressure on the holding plates may have to be increased by placing weight-blocks, above the 

stopper bushes of the plate studs. An operator using this machine can therefore produce 250 to 300 cups/dishes per hour from thin leaves or their 

combinations and about 100 cups/dishes from thicker material. A team of one skilled and one unskilled worker can earn about Rs.60 per day. 

Table 35.1: Production system for Leaf plates (Dona-Pattals) 

Cost Detail 

A. Fixed cost 

-Cost for machinery 

20,000 Rs 

- Total fixed cost 20,000 Rs 

B.Variable Cost 

Unit cost 

-Cost for leaf for 100 leaf plates 

-Cost for cotton bundle for 100 leaf plates 

-Electricity cost for 100 leaf plates 

-Labour charges for 100 leaf plates 

-Transportation cost for 100 leaf plates 

-Packaging cost for 100 leaf plates 

15Rs 

10 Rs 

5 Rs 

15 RS 

2 Rs 

2 Rs 


Total cost for 100 leaf plates 49 

C. Depreciation cost (5%) 1000 

Table 35.2 

D. Maximum production in a day (500 leaf plates) Cost 245 Rs 

E. Production in 300 days (500*300) 150000 73500 RS 

Table No. 35.3, Revenue and return Details. 


1 Total Cost of 150000 Leaf plates (73500+C) 73500+1000=74500RS 

2. selling price for 150000 Leaf plates(750 Rs/1000 leaf plates) Rs. 112500 

4. Net selling price Rs.112500 

5. Net profit (Net selling price –total cost) 112500-74500= 38000 Rs 

Technical Support/Assistance: 

To ensure proper technical support for leaf plates making and smooth functioning of activities the required technical assistance may be taken from 

Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVS), Dept. of Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU. 

Advantages: 

The importance of a Leaf plates can be well understood. The Leaf platess will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in the village 

especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:- 

‣ Raw material locally available 


‣ It will reduce migration during drought condition. 

‣ Farmers can purchase and sale of Leaf plates at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these transactions at the 

city market. 

‣ It can reduce in overall market prices of Leaf plates during the marriage season. 

‣ Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase of leaf plates. 

Production system: 3 Vegetable (Bottle guard) Production 

Advantage of vegetable production: 

Vegetables produce more biomass per unit area and fetch more prices per unit production so are more economical to grow. 

As vegetables are generally short duration crops, these are suitable for mixed, companion and intercropping. For example, some of the varieties of 

okra, radish, brinjal, chilli, and tomato are ready for harvesting within 45 to 60 days after sowing/ planting. This results in high cropping intensity and 

higher income per unit area. 

In Narmada, a big portion of farmers falls in marginal categories. Vegetable growing is suitable for small and marginal farmers. 

A number of vegetables can be grown successfully as intercrop along with trees. Crop suitable for growing at early stages of planting of orchard are 

potato, okra, tomato, brinjal, sweet potato, peas and onion etc. For later stages crops that can be taken are Chilli, Palak and ginger. This way a farmer 

gets more profit from his forest plantation. 

Because of involvement of labour, it is source of intensive employment. 


Limitation of vegetable production: 

Adopting vegetable growing as business has some limitations also. These limitations are: 

As vegetables are perishable in nature, they need either very quick disposal (which causes glut in season) or proper processing (which is still lacking 

in our country). India is worlds' second largest producer but 35% of produce is lost due to poor post harvest management. 

Vegetables have very specific handling and storing requirements if their quality and freshness has to be maintained. Moreover, each product 

needs to be stored at specified temperature and humidity levels. Single chamber potato stores are not capable of sufficing such requirements. 

Multi-chamber, multi-product cold stores are more suited for storing horticulture produce. Realizing the need, the national horticulture board 

has brought out a number of schemes that promote multi- product multi-chamber cold stores. The board not only provides grants for creation 

of new cold stores, but also for expansion and modernization of the existing ones. Cold stores, coupled with cold chain infrastructure would 

provide the much-needed boost to the sector. Cold chains too are an essential part of managing transfer of both the raw material as well as the 

processed products from one place to another. Cold stores without the support of adequate cold chain infrastructure lose their significance as 

the quality of even a well-preserved raw material or processed product will deteriorate if not handle properly while transporting. Today cold 

chains are required right from the farm gate till the end product reaches the consumer. Other infrastructure issues like roads, power and 

transportation etc. also need to be addressed to prevent post harvest losses of vegetables. 

Processing could have been an excellent remedy, but only 2% of produce is processed. Present vegetable and fruit processing industry is 

extremely decentralized. Around 70% of total processing unit fall under cottage industry. India's share in international food trade is a 

minuscule 1.5%. 

Marketing of vegetables is not very well organized in our country. It is dominated by more numbers of retailers and the price received by 

farmers is very less. 

Proper techniques of packaging in vegetable are still lacking. An overview of status of packaging in our country shows that about 30 per cent of 

the marketable vegetables perish due to improper post harvest management. 

Sufficient quantity of HYVS is not available. 

Lack of knowledge among farmers regarding scientific cultivation practices of vegetables. 


Table no: 36.1, Cost of cultivation for bottle guard production 

Cost Detail 

Unit cost 

1. Cost for tillage 4.5 hour*4 hec*500 Rs= 9000Rs 

2. Cost for seed 4 kg seed *4 hec *1500= 24000Rs 

3. Cost for fertilizer 12,000 Rs 

4. Cost for irrigation 5,000 Rs 

5. Depreciation cost of C1. (5%) 10000 Rs 

6.Harvesting cost 

5000Rs 

Total cost 4 hec Rs. 65,000 

Table No. 36.2. Initial investment for fodder bank 

A. 

Total Cost for bottle guard production (For 1 year) Table 

no.34.2 

Rs. 60,000 

B. C1.Fencing + Drip system + Small shed + Other tools. Rs.300000 

C. 

Required labour for production unit management 

(3 person @2000 per month for each) 

Rs.60,000 

D. Total initial cost Rs.420000 

Table No. 36.3, Revenue and return Details. 


1 Cost of bottle guard Per Kg 

= 360000/52000 

6.92 Rs/kg 

2. Selling Price of bottle guard Rs 10 /Kg 

3. Net selling Price Rs. 520000 

4. Net Profit Rs 160000 


Production System - 4: Vermicompost unit for Nanasukaamba 

One of the important occupations of the villagers is animal husbandry. At present, the animal waste is not used by the villagers as agricultural input. If 

the farmers start realising the benefits of compost and vermicompost in particular, the productivity of their land can increase manifold. As part of 

direct livelihood support, the villagers (mainly land less) are going to receive cows, buffaloes and small ruminants. These animals in turn are going to 

produce more waste, which can be used to prepare vermicompost. 

It is planned that a vermicompost unit by another SHG would be supported by the project. The SHG members, with the help of hired manpower, can 

collect animal-dung. They would process this dung to prepare vermicompost and sell it to the farmers in the village or outside, as per demand. 

The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers of 1.5 m wide and 0.9 

m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m 3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at 

about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 - 30 o C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume 

the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for 

the plants. 

About The Worms 

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms feed 

on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermicomposting units are ideally suited to locations / units with 

generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lays one egg capsule 

(containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under optimum 

growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' 

which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed. 

Use 


Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer; so, by the use of vermicompost we can reduce use of chemical fertilizer. 

Vermicompost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in 

water and nutrient holding capacities of soil. 

Components of a commercial unit 

Sheds 

Nana suka amba has high temperature in summer; so, a shed structure is needed for the vermicompost unit. It can be made by the use of concrete 

pillars. While designing the sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds for easy movement of the labourers attending to the filling and 

harvesting the beds. 

Vermi-beds 

Scientific bed side is 75 cm - 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The whole bed area should be above the 

ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The 

proper bed width should not be more that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre of the bed. 

Land 

About 125 square meter of land will be required to set up a vermin compost production unit in Nana suka amba village. It should have at least 2-3 

sheds each of about 180-200 sq.ft. It should have a good watering arrangement and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential 

for vermicompost production. 

Seed Stock 

This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m 3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year. 


Fencing 

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length of the periphery 

of the farm. 

Water Supply System 

50% moisture content has to be maintained all the time. Water for the purpose would come from a well nearby. 

Machinery 

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermi-sheds, 

loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary implements and the 

machinery have to be included in the project cost. 

Estimate for a vermicompost unit: 

 

Requirement of nitrogen for 1 hectare Bottle guard production=70 kg. 

1.6% N available in vermin compost . 

 

 

 

 

70 kg N fulfil by the use of 70/1.6*100= 4375 kg vermicompost (4.3 ton). 

Need of vermicompost to fulfill the requirement of nitrogen for 4 hectare 4.3*4 =17.2 (17 ton). 

25 kg phosphorus required for 1 hectare Bottle guard production. 

Requirement of phosphorus for 4 hectare fodder production 4*25=100 kg. 


One compost cycle need 45 days so we need 8 cycle for 64 ton vermin compost production. 

Table: 37.1: Model for A Vermi-compost Unit 

S. No Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 

1 Wooden ballies (3 m long) 20 50 1000 

2 Wooden (4 m long) 25 60 1500 

3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 25 3125 

4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies & mats 20 Kg 50 1000 

5 Labour charges for erection of sheds 20 100 2000 

6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets, 2500 

7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 2000 2000 

8 Cow dung 8 ton 800 6400 

9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 24 kg 80 1920 

10 

Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung 

and worms 

18 bed 250 4500 

11 Miscellaneous 

Total cost 

25945 Rs. 

Cost for 8 cycles 

Rs.207560 

Table No.37.2: Returns from vermicomposting 

Benefits 

1. Sale of vermin compost of 64 tones @ Rs.3800/- per ton 64*3800=243200 Rs 

2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 50 per kg 320*50=16000 Rs 


Total 

Net benefit 

Rs/-259200 

259200-207560=51640 Rs/- 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

Target 

S. No. 

Name(s) of the 


CPR particulars 

Activity proposed 

Target area under the 

activity (ha) 

Estimated expenditure 

(Rs.) 

Expected no. of 

beneficiaries 

1 Nanasukaamba Waste land 

4.4. Capacity Building: 

Grass+bamboo 

production,Vegetable 

production,Mango 

grafting plantation 

168 64 1150 household 

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and 

experience needed to solve problems and implement change. 

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the 

conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to 

human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve 

participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects. 

Scope of capacity building at Nanasukaamba project area 

 

 

 

Alternative Land Use Plan 

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation 

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices 


Vegetable production and Management 

Afforestation 

Meteorological Information 

Dairy Development and Management 

Rural Craft 

Income Generation Activities 

o Stiching 

o Food Processing 

o Post Harvest management practices 

Production System: 5 Flower productions in poly house 

Why Greenhouses or poly house 

1. Socio-economic consideration 

As a profession, agriculture is not attractive for the educated youth, which is partly due to the drudgeries associated with field work. To motivate the 

educated youth agriculture has to be developed to be a remunerative and drudgery-less industry as competitive as any other industry using agro 

technologies like greenhouse. Then only a sense of pride will be associated with agriculture. This is especially true for the NEH region where 

percentage of literacy among 

2. Geographical consideration 

The topography of NEH region is not uniform. Some of the areas are inaccessible as well as inhospitable where normal cultivation is not possible. To 

cater the needs of the population in the inaccessible areas greenhouse cultivation could be an answer. There is very good and sustainable demand for 

fresh vegetables around the cities and towns. 

5.1 Benefits of green house technology: 

The benefits which can be derived from the green house cultivation are as follows: 

1. Environment control allows raising plants anywhere in the world at any time of the year i.e. crops could be grown under the inclement climatic 

conditions when it would not be otherwise possible to grow crops under the open field conditions. 


2. The crop yields are at the maximum level per unit area, per unit volume and per unit input basis. 

3. The control of the microcosm allows the production of higher quality products which are free from insect attack, pathogens and chemical residue. 

4. High value and high quality crops could be grown for export markets. 

5. Income from the small and the marginal land holdings maintained by the farmer can be increased by producing crops meant for the export markets. 

6. It can be used to generate self employment for the educated rural youth in the farm sector. 

5.2 Market Identification: 

In India, floriculture is being viewed as a high growth industry. Commercial floriculture is becoming important from the export angle. Anthurium is an 

important floricultural crop in the international cut flower trade. There is a vast market potential for the high quality anthurium flowers and a 

vegetable produced under polyhouses.Devmogra is a local market for cut flowers. 

Table: 37.3 Model for A poly house 

ABSTRACT 

QTY ITEM RATE PER AMOUNT 

15.00cmt Item no 1 Excavation for foundation in 60 Cmt 900 

hard murrum up to 1.50 mt depth including 

sorting out and disposting the excavated 

stuff with 50 mt lead and lift etc complete. 

(SOR P 35/11b) 

3 item no 2 Providing and laying C C 1:4:8 in 1784 5352 

foundation using 40mm size brick bats aggregate 

including ramming curing etc compted 

I.8.5.3.3 a 


12 Item no 3 Providing and fixing cement 2738 32856 

concrete 1:2:4 using 20mm size stone 

aggregate including curing finishing excluding 

the cost of form work for mass concrete 

foundation.(SOR P 39/I 10A) 

R,MT Item no 4 Providing and fixing galvanized mild 

steel tube medium grade of following nominal 

dia meter including fitting clamps etc complate 

(SOR P 13/1171 ) 

425 20MM 118 R.mt 50150 

300 25MM 169 50700 

550 32MM 213 117150 

325 40MM 256 83200 

315 50MM 330 103950 

205 65MM 413 84665 

171.00 

Kg Item no 5 steel work welded in built up section 57 Kg 9747 

and framed work including cutting hosting 

fixing in position and applying a priming coat 

of read lead paint etc coplete. 

(SOR P 69/12A) 

8.00 

Sq.mt Item no 6 Providing and fixing alumnium 1250 Smt 17978 

section door with 50 x 40 mm rectangular pipe 

frame with 40x40 mm rectangular shutter door 

section in vertical and top bottom and middle 

horizontal frame including 4 mm thick 

transparent glass shutter with fittinfs etc. M R 

45.40 

Smt Item no 7 providing and fixing 40Cm wide GI 396 Smt 17978 

plain Sheet for Gutter of approved quality 

including fixing and placing in position with 


necessary fitting and accessories in line and 

level as directed . M R 

2000.00 

Smt Item no 8 Providing and fixing 200 Micron U V 72.8 Smt 145600 

S Plastic films of approved ISI quality including 

fittings tightening and fixing in line and level 

as directed M R 

1500.00 

Smt Item no 9 Providing and fixing AGRO NET of 20 Smt 30000 

approved quality including fitting and tightening 

in line and level . With all fitting etc complete. 

M R 

800.00 

Rmt Item no 10 Providing and fixing Aluminium 78 R.mt 62400 

Gripper for fitting of plastic sheet with all 

necessary fitting etc complete. M R 

Total Rs 812626 

Table No.37.4: Returns from polyhouse 

B. Cost of equipments & implements 

S.no Items Cost 

Spades, forks, knives, 

1 Khurpis, secateurs etc. 4000 

2 Water pipes, water canes,buckets, etc. 3500 

3 Sprayers 5000 

Total - B 12500 


C.Goat proof fencing (For 0.5 acre plot,650 running feet) Rs 20000 

D.Cost of flower 

production 

S.no Items Cost 

1 Cost of plantation material 10000 

2 Labour charges for maintinance 5000 

3 Application of manure & fertilizer 10000 

4 Cost of sowing 2000 

5 Watering 10000 

6 Interculture 5000 

7 Plant protection 10000 

8 Transportation cost 10000 

9 Cost of micro irrigation 50000 

Total-D 112000 

Total initial cost=812626+12500+20000+112000=957126 

Total flower production=150000*5=750000 

Net profit=750000-384500=365500 

Livelihood intervention 6: Mandap decoration 

Table No.37.4: Modal for mandap decoration 

Mandap decoration 

S.no 

Item 

1 Stage with chair 30000 Rs 

2 Cloth for mandap (20*30) 7000 Rs 


3 Jool for decoration (100 ') 2500 Rs 

4 Decoration items 10000 Rs 

5 Bamboo (35) 3500Rs 

6 generator machine 35000 Rs 

7 Mike set with stand and DVD player(Speaker) 30000Rs 

8 Tubelight(10) 2000Rs 

9 Wire for electrical work 2000 Rs 

10 Gate 15000Rs 

11 Joomer (10 nag) 15000Rs 

12 Colouring buld and series 2000Rs 

13 Binding material 1000Rs 

B.Variable 

cost 

S.no Item Cost 

1 Transporatation cost 25000Rs 

2 Labour charges 10000Rs 

3 Maintinance cost 10000Rs 

Total 

cost:A+B 

200000 Rs 

Total benefit 4000*100 400000Rs 

Net profit 400000-200000 200000Rs 

Production System: 7. Nursery raising 


Almost all vegetables crops are propagated by seeds, except a few like sweet potatoes, asparagus, garlic, potato, which does better if propagated 

vegetatively. Among the vegetable crops which are propagated by seeds, most of them like cucurbits, beans, peas, radish, turnip, carrots and leafy 

vegetables are sown directly in the fields. Other vegetables like cabbage, cauliflower, tomato, onion, chilli etc. are first sown in nursery-beds where 

seedlings are raised and then transplanted. A nursery could be considered as a location where plants are cared for during the early stages of growth, 

providing optimum conditions for germination and subsequent growth, until they are strong enough to be planted out in their permanent place. 

Importance/Advantages of nursery raising in vegetable production 

1: It is convenient to look after the tender seedlings. 

2: Eliminates the problem of emergence in difficult soils. 

3: Weed control easy 

4: Can achieve close to 100% plant population 

5: Shorter cropping cycle therefore can get earlier planting and harvest 

6: Reduced field management costs 

7: More uniform crop possible 

8: Higher yield possible 

9: More optimal use of expensive hybrid seeds. 

Factors to be considered for raising nursery 

1: Location of the nursery 

2: Near the farm house 

3: Well exposed to the sun but protected against severe heat 

4: Well protected against animal damage, strong winds. 

Table No.37.5: Modal for Nursery raising 

Sr. Item wise details of work Labour Materials Total 

1 Collection of seeds,soil,FYM,water, 7180 680 7860 

nursery channel and fertilizer 

2 Cost of poly pots 0 5000 5000 

3 Preparation of nursery beds,filling of polypots 8000 0 8000 


Sowing of seeds etc. 

4 Watering,Weeding,Shifting,Fertilizer,Insecticide 10000 1200 11200 

application etc.Nov.To March 

5 Watering,Weeding,Shifting,Fertilizer,Insecticide 7000 1000 8000 

application etc.April To July 

6 Grafting charges 20000 5000 25000 

7 Transporation 3000 8000 11000 

8 Overhead 5000 0 5000 

T0tal 60180 20700 81060 

Table No.37.6: Revenue and return detail of nursery 

B. Cost of equipments & implements 

S.no Items 

Cost 

1 

Spades, forks, knives, 

Khurpis, secateurs etc. 4000 

2 Water pipes, water canes,buckets, etc. 3500 

3 Sprayers 5000 

Total - D 12500 

C.Goat proof fencing (For 0.5 acre plot,650 

running feet) Rs 20000 

D. Supervision-cum sales man (2200 Rs/month) Rs 26500 

E. Cost for green house for .5 acre (650 running 

feet) Rs 60000 


Total cost=2,000,00 Rs 

Selling price=12000 seedling*30=360000 Rs 

Net profit=3,600,00-200000=1,60000 Rs 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: 

S. No. 

1 

2 

Name of the 

Training 

Institute 

Krishi 

Kendra 

Vigyan 

Full Address with 

contact no., website 

& e-mail 

Dediyapada,Narmada 

Type of 

Institute# 

Research 

Institutes 

Navsari Agril. 

University Navsari University 

3 AKRSP Baruch NGO 

4 BISAG Gandhinagar 

Space 

application 

Area(s) of 

specialization$ 

Agriculture/ 

Horticulture/ 

Animal 

Husbandry 

Agriculture/ 

Horticulture/ 

Animal 

Husbandry 

Capacity 

Building 

Remote 

Sensing 

Accreditation 

details 

Reference Year 

Trainings 


trainings 

assigned 

No. of trainees 

to be trained 

GoI 2012-2014 3 350 

GoI 2012-2014 3 180 

Society Reg. 

Act 

2011-2012 2 350 

GoG 2010-2015 3 10 


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: 

S. No. Project Project Stakeholders 

Total no. of 

persons 


persons 

to be 

trained 

No. of training 

programmes 

Estimated cost(in lakh) 

PIA 5 5 4 35000 

WDTs 3 3 4 20400 


UGs 600 600 1 550000 

SHGs 450 450 1 585000 

WCs 16 16 1 257812 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: 

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) 

1 Street plays Local Drama Groups 15000 

2 Video shows Forest Department, Narmada 15000 

3 Pamphlets and posters Forest Department, Narmada 10000 

4 Banners, Hoardings Forest Department, Narmada 15000 

Outcome 

(may quantify, wherever possible) 

Awareness for the importance of 

watershed project 


CHAPTER – 5 

BUDGETING 


Budgeting 

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and done accordingly in 

table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds. 

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance 

Net Project Cost 

Budget Component 

Cost requirement 

58248000 

-Administrative Costs 5824800 

-Monitoring 582480 

-Evaluation 582480 

Preparatory phase: 

-Entry point activities 2329920 

-Institution and capacity building 2912400 

-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 582480 

Watershed Works Phase: 

-Watershed Development works, 29124000 


-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 5824800 

-Production system and micro enterprises 7572240 

Consolidation Phase 2912400 

Total 58248000 

Sl 

no 

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP 

Village 

Activity 

EPA Institution and CB DPR Watershed 

development 

Work 

Livelihood 

for asset 

less 

Production 

system and 

Microenterprises 

Consolidation 

1 Nana Sukaamba 85968 107460 21492 1074600 214920 279396 107460 1891296 

2 Timbapada 114384 142980 28596 142980 285960 371748 142980 1229628 

3 Dediyapada 279696 349620 69924 3496200 699240 909012 349620 6153312 

4 Nivalda 285696 357120 71424 3571200 714240 928512 357120 6285312 

5 Katkankhadi 106750 133440 26688 1334400 266880 346944 133440 2348552 

6 Bore 173040 216300 43260 2163000 432600 562380 216300 3806880 

7 Bogaj 49312 49140 9828 491400 98280 127764 49140 874864 

8 Ghatoli 113376 141720 28344 1417200 283440 368472 141720 2494272 

9 Kismor 44640 55800 11160 558000 111600 145080 55800 982080 

District Watershed Development unit Narmada Page 137 

Total

10 Navagam(Dedi) 185664 232080 46416 2320800 464160 603408 232080 4084608 

11 Rakhskundi 71856 89820 17964 898200 179640 233532 89820 1580832 

12 Pipala 265056 331320 66264 3313200 662640 861432 331320 5831232 

13 Besana 300672 375840 75168 3758400 751680 977184 375840 6614784 

14 Gajargota 106752 133440 26688 1334400 266880 346944 133440 2348544 

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 

S. No. Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under 

IWMP 

1 

Nana Sukaamba 

2164000 

1655000 

2 

Timbapada 

2513000 

2202000 

3 

6880000 

Dediyapada 

5384000 

4 

6260000 

Nivalda 

5500000 

5 

Katkankhadi 

1600000 (Only for watershed) 

1334000 

6 

4573000 

Bore 

3331000 

7 

2400000 

Bogaj 

1477000 

8 

2980000 

Ghatoli 

2484000 

9 

950000(Only for watershed) 

Kismor 

558000 

10 

5200000 

Navagam(Dedi) 

3575000 

11 

Rakhskundi 

1885000 

1383000 

12 

5650000 

Pipala 

5102000 

Gap in funds requirement 

509000 

311000 

1496000 

760000 

266000 

1242000 

698000 

496000 

392000 

1625500 

502000 

548000 


13 

14 

Besana 

Gajargota 

6184000 

5390000 

5787000 

5079000 311000 

397000 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP (Watershed development work) with other Schemes 




carried out 

(i) Continuous 

contour trench 

(CCT) 

(ii) Check dam 

(1)(Repairing) 

(iii) Farm banding 

and Land levelling 

(iv)Pond deeping 

(v) Check wall (8) 

(vi) Nala banding 

Fund made 


due to 


in lakh) 

Scheme with 

which 


place 





decision for 


taken 

2.25 NREGA District level 







2. Timbapada 

(i)Check dam 

(ii)Check wall 

(iii)Gabion 

structure 

(iv) Farm banding 

&Land levelling 


NREGA 





3. Dadiyapada 

4. Nivalda 

5. Gajargota 

(i) Check dam 

(ii) Continuous 





(v) Deeping of 

pond 

(vi)Repairing of 

Check dam 

(vii)Gabion 

structure 

(i)Check dam 


(iii) Gabion 

structure 



(v) Stone banding 

(vi) Continuous 








NREGA 









NREGA 









6. Bore 


(iv)Check dam 

repairing 

(V)Check wall 

(vi) Gabion 

structure 

(vii) ) Farm 

banding &Land 

levelling 

(i)Check dam 


(iii)CCT & Bottling 

(iv)Nala banding 

(v)Farm banding 

Land levelling 









NREGA 





7. 

Ghatoli 



(ii)Village pond 

(iii) Farm banding 

Land levelling 

(iv)Check wall 



NREGA 











8. 

Bogaj 

(iii)Well recharge 

structure 

(iv)Gabion 

structure 

(v) Farm banding 


with border 

plantation 

(vi)Stone banding 

NREGA 






(i) CCT & Bamboo 

plantation 




9. 

Rakaskundi 

(iii) Gabion 

structure 

(iv) Well recharge 

structure 

(v) Farm banding 






10. Pipla 

(i)Continuous 


(ii)Check dam 






(iv)Farm banding 


(v) Stone banding 



(vi) Gabion 

structure 



(i) CCT & Bottling 


11. 

Basana 


(iii) Check wall 



(iv)Gabion 

structure 

(v)Farm banding 

and land levelling 




12. Navagam 

(i)CCT 

(ii)Check dam 

repairing 


(iv)Gabion 

structure 

(v) Check wall 

(vi)Stone banding 

(vii)Farm banding 

& Land levelling 

13. Kismor (i)Stone banding 










14. Katankhadi 



repairing 

(i)CCT 


repairing 


(iv)Gabion 

structure 

(v)Stone banding 








Table no.50.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP (Livelihood& Production system) with other Schemes 



carried out 

1. Nana Sukaamba Structure Crimper 

For Vegetable 

Production 

Agarbatti Making 

Unit 

Paddy Thrasing 

Machine 

Instrument for 

catering 

Fund made 


due to 


in lakh) 

Scheme with 

which 


place 

2.40 Agriculture 

department 





decision for 


taken 






Vegetable 

production(1hec) 

2. Timbapada Mandap decoration 

system 

Floor meal 




Vegetable 

Production 

Musical Instrument 

For Bhajan Mandal 

3. Dediyapada Poly House – 

Vegetable 

Poduction 

Plantation of 

Grafted mango 

Poultry farm 

Vermi composting 

Unit 

Fruit Orchard 

3.92 National 

horticulture 

mission 








4. Nivalda 

Zerox and internet 

center 

Cement Article 

Tea& Nasta center 

Vegetable 

Production 

Structure Crimper 

For Vegetable 

Production 







Fruit Orchard With 

Fancing 

Nursery Raising 

Detergent Powder 

Making Unit 

5. Gajargota Leaf plates 

production 

Tea & Nasta center 

0.58 National bamboo 

mission 






6. Bore 

Papaiya With Drip 

Irrigation( 1 Ha.) 


Grafted mango 

Bamboo Plantation 

with Fancing & 

Drip Irrigation 

Vegetable 

Production 

Structure Crimper 

For Vegetable 

Production 


Unit 

Rice thrashing 

machine 

Cement Article 

Animal Unit 


department 










Oil extraction unit 



7. Ghatoli 

8. Bogaj 

Vegetable 

Production with 



Unit 

Mandap decoration 

Sieving machine 

(3) 


& Shop Making 

Unit 

Agarbatti Making 

Unit 


Grafted mango 

Bamboo Plantation 

( 2 Ha) 

Papad Making Unit 

Floor meal 

Machine unit 

Vegetable 

Production 


machine 

Fish Production 

0.21 National bamboo 

mission 


department 














9. Rakhaskundi 

Nursery Raising 


Grafted mango 

1.37 National 

horticulture 




Floor meal 

Machine unit 

Vegetable 

Production 

10. Pipala Vermi composting 

Unit 

Animal Unit 

Vegetable 

Production 

Floor meal 

Machine unit 


Making Unit 


Grafted mango 

Pickle making unit 

mission 


department 










11. Besana 

Medicine 

Plantation with 


Fish Production 

Floor meal 

Machine unit 


machine 

Vegetable 

Production with 



Grafted mango 

0.21 National 

horticulture 

mission 









Unit 

Fruit Orchard With 

Fancing & Drip 

Irrigation 

12. Navagam Rice thrashing & 

Floor meal unit 

Vegetable 

Production 

Mandap 

Decoration System 


Grafted mango 


Unit 

0.32 National 

horticulture 

mission 









CHAPTER - 6 

EXPECTED OUTCOMES 


6.1 Expected Outcomes 

6.1.1 Employment 

The project plans for cre Employment has always been a problem in the Project area. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, 

animal husbandry and casual labour work. However, rain fall being average and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, 

which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not 

keep them engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it. 

ation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging people in watershed physical 

works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment would be created by providing the people with 

cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development. 

S. 

NO. 

1 

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area 


Villages 

Wage employment 

Self employment 

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 

Nana 

Sukaamba 0 6797 0 3195 6797 0 971 0 456 971 0 194 0 91 194 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Timbapada 

Dadiyapada 

Nivalda 

Gankhatre 

0 4893 56 2326 4949 0 699 8 332 707 0 140 2 66 141 

2625 30387 26313 27883 59325 375 4341 3759 3983 8475 75 865 752 797 1695 

0 14588 1232 7435 15820 0 2084 176 1062 2260 0 417 35 212 452 

28 4319 56 2069 4403 4 617 8 296 629 1 123 2 59 126 


6 

Katkankhadi 

0 1246 0 586 1246 0 178 0 84 178 0 36 0 17 36 

7 

Bore 

0 462 0 217 462 0 66 0 31 66 0 13 0 6 13 

8 

Bogaj 

0 7455 175 3586 7630 0 1065 25 512 1090 0 213 5 102 218 

9 

Ghotoli 

112 12600 210 6073 12922 16 1800 30 868 1846 3 360 6 174 369 

10 

Kismore 

0 2037 0 957 2037 0 291 0 137 291 0 58 0 27 58 

11 Navgam 0 13937 84 6590 14021 0 1991 12 941 2003 0 398 2 188 401 

12 

Rakaskundi 

0 3773 0 1773 3773 0 539 0 253 539 0 108 0 51 108 

13 

Pipla 

0 6755 14 3181 6769 0 965 2 454 967 0 193 0 91 193 

14 

Basana 

0 9443 28 4451 9471 0 1349 4 636 1353 0 270 1 127 271 

6.1.2. Migration 

On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half 

of the year for wage labour. In project area more than 60 percent area comes under forest and people collect grass and fodder from forest but it is not 

sufficient. So people migrate in Surat,Baruch,Baroda Etc 

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area. 

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area 

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

1 Nana Sukaamba 68 54 90 30 


2 

Timbapada 

49 40 120 60 

3 

Dadiyapada 

593 475 60 00 

4 

Nivalda 

158 127 90 30 

5 

Gankhatre 

44 35 120 60 

6 

Katkankhadi 

12 10 80 30 

7 

Bore 

5 4 120 60 

8 

Bogaj 

76 61 60 30 

9 

Ghotoli 

129 103 80 30 

10 

Kismore 

20 16 90 30 

11 Navgam 140 112 120 60 

12 

Rakaskundi 

38 30 150 60 

13 

Pipla 

68 54 90 30 

14 

Basana 

95 76 90 30 

6.1.3 Ground water table 

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over the years. 

Presently it stands at 28 m. 


Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table depth from 28 m in the pre-project level to 25 

m in the post project period. 

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 

S. No. Nanasukaamba Project Sources Pre-Project level 

Expected Increase/decrease 

(Post- Project) 

Open wells 13 m -4 


Bore wells NA NA 

Others (specify) - - 

Drinking water 

There is not a big problem of drinking water in project area. But quality of drinking water is not satisfactory. 

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve. 

S. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water 


Villages 

Nana Sukaamba 

Timbapada 

Dadiyapada 

4 Nivalda 

Availability of drinking water 

Quality of drinking water 

(no. of months in a year) 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

7-8 Months 12 Months Potable 

Potable 

Comments 


Gankhatre 

5 

Katkankhadi 

6 

Bore 

7 

Bogaj 

8 

Ghotoli 

9 

Kismore 

10 

11 Navgam 

Rakaskundi 

12 

Pipla 

13 

Basana 

14 

Nana Sukaamba 

15 

Timbapada 

16 

6.1.5 Crops 

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. Soil moisture will be increased and rain water also 

help percolate sweet water underground. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can 

take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken. 


Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area 

Pre-project 

Expected Post-project 

Name of Project 

Name of crops 

Area 

(ha) 

Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. 

Area 

(ha) 

Average Yield per ha 

(qtl) 

Nanasukaamba 

Kharif 

Rice 3.5 7 

Cotton 3.2 6 

Sorghum 4 8 

Rabi 

Wheat 6 11 

Zaid 

Sorghum (fodder) 120 220 (fodder) 

Village total 

Project total 

6.1.6 Horticulture 

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) 

1 

2 

3 

Nana Sukaamba 

Timbapada 

Dadiyapada 

4 Nivalda 

Area under horticulture proposed to be 

covered through IWMP 


Gankhatre 

5 

Katkankhadi 

6 

Bore 

7 

Bogaj 

8 

Ghotoli 

9 

Kismore 

10 

11 Navgam 

Rakaskundi 

12 

Pipla 

13 

Basana 

14 

1.7 Vegetative cover 

There is Maximum area under tree cover. The project has more than 60 percent forest area. Trees like Teak and eucalyptus are seen just here and 

there. It is planned that more than 50 ha land to be covered under new plantation. 

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed 

1 

Nana Sukaamba 

2 

Timbapada 


Dadiyapada 

3 

Nivalda 

4 

Gankhatre 

5 

Katkankhadi 

6 

Bore 

7 

Bogaj 

8 

Ghotoli 

9 

Kismore 

10 

11 Navgam 

Rakaskundi 

12 

Pipla 

13 

Basana 

14 

6.1.8 Livestock 

The Project has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats. The interventions like provision of good quality 

cows and buffaloes, the establishment of fodder bank (Agro forestry) and other such related activities would spur up the dairy development in the 

Project. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them. 

S. No. 

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) 


project 

Type of Animal 

Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income 

Remarks 


1 Nanasukaamba 

Milch-animals 

Cow(per animal/day) 853 3.5 50 1200 7 70 

Buffalo(per animal/day) 459 2.5 45 900 6 60 

Draught Purpose animals 

Camel 00 - 

Animals for other purpose 1659 

Goat (Meat: Rs/kg) 186 110 100 500 105 

Sheep (Meat: Rs/kg)) 00 

Linkages The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the 

desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. 

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.) 

Backward linkages 

Seed certification 

Seed supply system 3 3 

Fertilizer supply system 

Pesticide supply system 

Credit institutions - Bank-2 Bank-2 

Water supply 

1 Nanasukaamba 

Extension services KVK KVK 

Nurseries 4 4 

Tools/machinery suppliers - 

Price Support system 

Labour 


Forward linkages 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 

Storage (including cold storage) 


Logical Framework Analysis 

Road network 

Transport facilities 

Markets / Mandis 

Collective marketing 

system 

Leaf plates/Papad 

Agro and other Industries 

making/Vegetable 

production, Cement 

1 

articles making etc 

Milk and other collection centres Milk collection centre-6 6 

Labour 


Fodder 

bank(Grass+Bamboo) 

5 

Vermi-compost unit-1 7 

Animal vitamins (170) 

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact 

Village 

Institution 

Formation 

Strengthening 

Village 

Institutions 

§ Formation of Watershed Committee, 

User Group 

§ Organise training and awareness 

programme for Village institutions 

§ One Watershed 

Committee each village 

§ Number of User group 

depending on the coverage of 

particular intervention 

§ awareness camps to be 

organised. 

§ Project can be 

implemented and managed 

in a democratic and 

participatory way ensuring 

equity. 

§ Quality of 

management of common 

resources improved. 

Collective marketing 

system 

Animal vitamins 

(700 lt) 

§ Unity and 

prosperity in the 

village management. 

§ People's 

Participation and 

positive perception 

towards the 

programme 

§ Capacity building workshops and 

exposure visits User Group and Watershed 

Committee 

§ trainings and exposure 

visits UGs and WCs to be held 

§ Quality of 

distribution of benefits 

between people improved. 


§ Failitating and monitoring the 

functioning of UGs and WCs 

§ Strengthen linkages between UGs and 

WCs and Panchayat Institutions. 

§ Gender sensitisation of UGs and WCs 

to increase inclusiveness of samuh decisionmaking. 

§ Sensitise village communities to 

involve children and youth in development. 

§ Capacity building 

workshops to be organised 

§ 1 Federations of UGs 

and WC to be formed. 

§ Increased awareness 

amongst women about 

village resources. 

§ Women 

participation enhanced in 

decision-making of GVCs. 

§ Involvement of 

youth and children in 

village development 

increased. 

Fund 

Management 

§ Improve management and utilisation 

of UGs and WCs. 

§ UGs and WCs operating 

bank account and managing 

resources on their own 

§ Purpose, frequency 

and volume of use of the 

fund enhanced. 

Ecological 

Restoration 

§ Prepare communities to explore 

other sources of income for UGs and WCs. 

§ Protection, treatment and 

regeneration of common and private lands 

§ Common and private 

lands to be brought under new 

plantations and agro-hortiforestry 

like Neem, Adusa, 

prosopis, Banyan and Peepul 

§ Volume of funds 

generated for UGs and WCs 

from other sources of 

income increased. 

§ Fodder availability 

from common and private 

lands increased. 

§ Better 

Ecological order in 

the area 

§ Protection, treatment and 

regeneration of forest lands 

§ Forest lands to be 

brought under new 

plantations and protection 

§ Accessibility to 

common and forest lands 

increased with removal of 

encroachments and 

resolution of conflicts. 

§ Increase in the 

proportion of 

households having 

more security of 

fodder 


§ Plantation of fruits and forest species § Trainings, exposure 

visits and meetings to be 

organised for communities, 

village volunteers and staff 

§ Reduction in 

drudgery of fodder 

and fuel collection, 

especially women 

§ Impart trainings, conduct meetings 

and organise exposure visits for 

communities, village volunteers and staff to 

effectively plan, execute and monitor 

activities 

§ Identification and promotion of nontimber 

forest produce based income 

generation activities 

§ Income generation 

intervention promoted 

Rainfed Area 


§ Treatment of land through improved 

soil and moisture conservation practices on 

watershed basis 

§ Land to be brought 

under improved soil moisture 

conservation practices 

§ Improved 

productivity of treated land 

§ Increase in 

proportion of 

households having 

more security of food 

§ Promotion of good agricultural 

practices- horticulture, improved crop and 

vegetable 

§ Good agricultural 

practices to be promoted 

§ Increased 

availability of water in 

wells 

§ Organic farming to be 

promoted 

§ Fodder banksto be 

established 

§ Increase in annual 

agriculture production 

§ Farmers adopt 

organic farming practices 


contribution of 

agricultural income 

to the household 

income 

§ Promotion of organic farming 

practices 

§ Agriculture based 

livelihood income generation 

activities to be promoted 

§ Fodder security of 

farmers enhanced. 


§ Formation of Fodder banks to 

increase fodder security and promote dairy 

development among communities 

§ Water harvesting 

structures to be constructed 

§ Increase availability 

of water for 9 to 12 months 

§ Identification and promotion of agriproduce 

based income generation activities 

like grading, processing and packaging. 

§ Drip Irrigation facilities 

to be distributed among 

farmers 

§ Increased 

availability of water for 

livestock 

§ Promotion of better Irrigation 

practices like drip irrigation 

§ Impart trainings, conduct meetings 

and organise exposure visits of 

communities, village volunteers and staff to 

effectively plan, execute and monitor 

activities 

§ Approx 15000 person 

days of employment to be 

generated 

§ Trainings, exposure 

visits and meetings to be 

organized for communities, 

village volunteers and staff 

§ Availability of 

irrigation water established 

§ Farmers take two 

crops in a year 


agricultural productivity of 

land 

§ Availability of 

drinking water enhanced 

Women’s 

Socio-political 

and economic 

empowerment 

§ Formation & Strengthening of 

women’s SHG groups 

§ Women’s SHG groups to 

be formed 

§ Enhanced capacities 

of leaders of women's 

group in taking initiatives 

to solve problems at 

different levels. 

§ Position of 

women in household, 

community, society 

(politically, socially 

and economically) as 

perceived by women 

and community at 

large 


§ Capacity building of womenfolk § Federation of Women’s 

SHGs to be formed 

§ Capacity building of SHG leaders and 

accountants 

§ Linking SHGs with external financial 

institutions 

§ Trainings to be 

conducted for preparation of 

woollen products from sheep 

and goats 

§ Improved access to 

credit for livelihood 

purposes. 

§ Increased household 

income. 

§ Performance 

enhancement of 

SHGs in terms of 

participation, 

decision-making, 

leadership and fund 

management. 

§ Equality & 

Equity in gender 

relations at home 

(decision making, 

expenditure, 

children’s education, 

health) 


CHAPTER -7 

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES 


7 Quality and Sustainability Issues 

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system 

would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all 

of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use 

classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield 

etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the 

DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical 

works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various 

years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan 

corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the 

project. 

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias 

WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the 

project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The 

WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are 

then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by 

the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent 

periods of time. 


7.2 Plans For Project management: 

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village 

level institutes.In Nana suka amba , watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of 

assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A 

proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during 

post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project. 

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: 

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes 

mainly fund the following: 

7.4 User Charges: 

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the 

formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC) 

shall maintain the records of the following. 


CHAPTER -8 

MAPS

Detailed Project Report - Commissionerate of Rural Development ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?