Untitled - Irish Stock Exchange
Untitled - Irish Stock Exchange
Untitled - Irish Stock Exchange
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
which can lead to significant fluctuations in value of mortgage-backed securities; (4) risk that any default in the<br />
underlying mortgage payments may force the sale of such underlying mortgage or mortgaged property for less than<br />
market value; and (5) decline in the market value of the security, whether resulting from changes in interest rates on<br />
the underlying mortgage collateral or other factors.<br />
The Issuer may from to time acquire other asset-backed securities. Asset-backed securities involve certain<br />
risks in addition to those presented by mortgage-backed securities, including the following: (1) often, these<br />
securities do not have the benefit of the same security interest in the underlying collateral as mortgage-backed<br />
securities and are more likely to be dependent solely on the obligor's ability to pay; (2) credit card receivables (and<br />
other collateral assets) are generally unsecured, and the debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state and<br />
Federal consumer credit laws, many of which give debtors the right to set off certain amounts owed on the credit<br />
cards, thereby reducing the balance due; and (3) most issuers of automobile receivables permit the servicers to retain<br />
possession of the underlying contracts. If the servicer were to sell these contracts to another party, there is a risk that<br />
the purchaser would acquire an interest superior to that of the holders of the related automobile receivables. In<br />
addition, because of the large number of vehicles involved in a typical issuance and technical requirements under<br />
state laws, the trustee for the holders of the automobile receivables may not have an effective security interest in all<br />
of the obligations backing such receivables. There is a risk that recoveries on repossessed collateral may not, in<br />
some cases, be able to support payment of amounts due on these securities.<br />
The Issuer may from time to time acquire collateral debt obligations ("CDO Securities") which may be<br />
backed by a combination of investment grade debt securities, high-yield debt securities, loans, structured finance<br />
securities, synthetic securities and/or other financial assets, and which may also have been acquired by the Issuer<br />
through direct investment. CDO Securities are limited recourse obligations of the issuer thereof payable solely from<br />
the underlying collateral owned by the issuer or proceeds thereof. Consequently, holders of CDO Securities must<br />
rely solely on distributions on the collateral underlying such CDO Securities or the proceeds of sale thereof for<br />
payment. In the event of poor performance of such securities, loans or other assets backing such CDO Securities,<br />
collections on the portfolio would be doubly affected as not only will the collections on the relevant securities, loans<br />
and other assets be reduced, it is also likely that the poor performance of such securities, loans and other assets will<br />
have an adverse impact on the value of the related CDO Security thereby leading to reduced income and capital<br />
returns by the Issuer from each such related CDO Security.<br />
CDO Securities generally present risks similar to those of the other types of assets in which the Issuer may<br />
invest, including those presented by the mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities described<br />
above, and, in fact, such risks may be of greater significance in the case of CDO Securities. Moreover, investing in<br />
CDO Securities may entail additional structural and legal risks. In addition, the performance of a CDO Security will<br />
also be affected by the ability of the relevant collateral manager to administer the portfolio of collateral assets.<br />
Income from the pool of collateral assets collateralizing CDO Securities is typically separated into tranches<br />
representing different degrees of credit quality. The top tranche of CDO Securities, which represents the highest<br />
credit quality in the pool, has the greatest collateralization and pays the lowest interest rate. Lower CDO tranches<br />
represent lower degrees of credit quality and pay higher interest rates to compensate for the attendant risks. The<br />
bottom tranche, such as CDO equity securities, specifically receives the residual interest payments (i.e., money that<br />
is left over after the higher tiers have been paid) rather than a fixed interest rate. The return on the lower tranches of<br />
CDO Securities (particularly CDO equity securities) are especially sensitive to the rate of defaults in the collateral<br />
pool, which increases the risk of the Issuer losing its investments in lower or bottom CDO Security tranches.<br />
Risks of Bankruptcy Process Affecting Fund Investments. There are a number of significant risks inherent<br />
in the bankruptcy process. First, many events in a bankruptcy are the product of contested matters and adversary<br />
proceedings and are beyond the control of the creditors. While creditors are generally given an opportunity to object<br />
to significant actions, there can be no assurance that a bankruptcy court, in the exercise of its broad powers, would<br />
not approve actions that would be contrary to the interests of the Issuer. Second, the effect of a bankruptcy filing on<br />
a company may adversely and permanently affect the company. The company may lose its market position and key<br />
employees and otherwise become incapable of restoring itself as a viable entity. If for this or any other reason the<br />
proceeding is converted to a liquidation, the liquidation value of the company may not equal the liquidation value<br />
that was believed to exist at the time of the investment. Third, the duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is difficult to<br />
predict. A creditor's return on investment can be adversely impacted by delays while the plan of reorganization is<br />
25