19.02.2014 Views

AMPTIAC Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer/Fall 2005 - Advanced ...

AMPTIAC Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer/Fall 2005 - Advanced ...

AMPTIAC Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer/Fall 2005 - Advanced ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. Typical Fiber Properties. a<br />

Glass<br />

Aramid<br />

HMWPE<br />

PBO<br />

PIPD<br />

Fiber Density (g/cm 3 ) Elastic Modulus (GPa) Tensile Strength (MPa) Strain to Failure (%)<br />

S-glass[10] 2.48 90 4400 5.7<br />

Technora[10] 1.39 70 3000 4.4<br />

Twaron[10] 1.45 121 3100 2.0<br />

Kevlar 29[17] 1.44 70 2965 4.2<br />

Kevlar 129[17] 1.44 96 3390 3.5<br />

Kevlar 49[17] 1.44 113 2965 2.6<br />

Kelvar KM2[18] 1.44 70 3300 4.0<br />

Spectra 900[17] 0.97 73 2400 2.8<br />

Spectra 1000[17] 0.97 103 2830 2.8<br />

Spectra 2000[19] 0.97 124 3340 3.0<br />

Dyneema[20] 0.97 87 2600 3.5<br />

Zylon AS[20] 1.54 180 5800 3.5<br />

Zylon HM[20] 1.56 270 5800 2.5<br />

M5 (2001 sample)[21] 1.70 271 3960 1.4<br />

M5 (goal)[21] - 450 9500 2.5<br />

aThe data presented are typical values and thus will vary dependent upon fiber denier.<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

0.30 cal. Fragment Simulating Projectile<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

0.30 cal. Fragment Simulating Projectile<br />

V 50 (ft/s)<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

Spectra 1000,<br />

650 denier-plain weave<br />

Kevlar 29,<br />

1500 denier-basket weave<br />

500<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Areal Density (lb/ft 2 )<br />

V 50 (ft/s)<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

Spectra 1000,<br />

650 denier-plain weave<br />

Kevlar 29,<br />

1500 denier-basket weave<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2<br />

Thickness (in.)<br />

(a) V 50 versus Areal Density<br />

(b) V 50 versus Thickness<br />

Figure 9. V 50 Comparison of Fabrics[18].<br />

Polypyridobisimidazole<br />

A new high performance fiber – polypyridobisimidazole<br />

(PIPD), denoted M5 ®†† – has been developed at Akzo <strong>No</strong>bel<br />

and shows promising results. Similar to PBO, it is a rigid-rod<br />

structure as shown in Figure 8. Due to strong intermolecular<br />

hydrogen bonding, however, its compressive strength is significantly<br />

improved over that of PBO fibers. Its decomposition<br />

temperature is about 985°F, which is close to that of PBO<br />

fibers.[12] The fabrication technologies for M5 fibers are still<br />

in developmental phases, as some properties of the fibers fall<br />

short of their theoretical potential.<br />

Comparison of High Performance Fibers<br />

As discussed in the section on energy absorption mechanisms,<br />

the major properties used to assess probable ballistic performance<br />

are the tensile strength, elastic modulus, and strain to<br />

failure. Table 1 provides a general comparison of these properties,<br />

along with density, for the various high performance<br />

fiber materials. <strong>No</strong>te the difference in tensile strength<br />

between Kevlar 29 used for the old PASGT vests and Kelvar<br />

KM2 used for the new Interceptor vests. The HMWPE and<br />

aramid fibers are used as fabrics for flexible military body<br />

armors, whereas S-2 Glass is used in rigid composite armor<br />

applications. PBO fibers have not been used for military<br />

applications, and M5 is still in developmental stages. Both<br />

HMWPE and aramid fibers are also used in fiber-reinforced<br />

PMCs for rigid armor applications. Figure 9a indicates that<br />

Spectra 1000 fabrics provide a higher V 50<br />

PBL at a lighter<br />

weight than Kevlar 29. Figure 9b shows that Spectra 1000<br />

provides a higher level of protection at the same thickness as<br />

Kevlar 29 up until approximately 0.7 inches, where the level<br />

of protection provided by the two fibers is approximately<br />

equal. At thicknesses greater than 0.7 inches Kevlar 29 outperforms<br />

Spectra 1000 in terms of ballistic performance.<br />

RESINS<br />

Resins for fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite armors<br />

can be either thermoplastics or thermosets. In general, thermoplastics<br />

offer greater impact resistance and processibility,<br />

but lack the thermal and chemical resistance of thermosets.<br />

6<br />

The <strong>AMPTIAC</strong> <strong>Quarterly</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>ume 9, Number 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!