28.02.2014 Views

Seismoacoustic Study of the Shallow Gas Transport and ... - E-LIB

Seismoacoustic Study of the Shallow Gas Transport and ... - E-LIB

Seismoacoustic Study of the Shallow Gas Transport and ... - E-LIB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3<br />

3.5. Interpretation <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

3.5.1. Chronostratigraphy<br />

Although for our study area published information on deep penetration drill sites is<br />

rare, age estimates for seismic units can be derived from some published seismic studies<br />

in adjacent areas. Tari (2011) showed an interpreted seismic line (Fig. 14) which clearly<br />

indicated an erosional unconformity between <strong>the</strong> Miocene <strong>and</strong> Pliocene sediments. The<br />

line is located in <strong>the</strong> Southwest <strong>of</strong> our study area. Meisner (2011) presented an<br />

interpreted seismic section through Tuapse Trough in <strong>the</strong> Eastern Black Sea basin, which<br />

showed <strong>the</strong> boundary between <strong>the</strong> Quaternary <strong>and</strong> Pliocene at 1.2 s TWT in <strong>the</strong> deep<br />

basin. Drill site Subbotina-403 from <strong>the</strong> mouth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kerch Strait, which is in <strong>the</strong><br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> our study area, <strong>and</strong> three seismic lines close to our study area are published<br />

by Stovba et al. (2009), providing a crude stratigraphic framework. All <strong>the</strong> abovementioned<br />

seismic studies provide a reference to estimate <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> seismic units in <strong>the</strong><br />

study area. The age correlation is simple <strong>and</strong> limited in accuracy, <strong>and</strong> main results are<br />

summarized in Table 2.<br />

Figure 14 Left figure (a) indicates<br />

“Deepwater play types in <strong>the</strong> area<br />

south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Crimea <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kerch<br />

Peninsula” from Tari (2011), <strong>the</strong><br />

erosional truncation boundary<br />

between <strong>the</strong> Miocene <strong>and</strong> Pliocene<br />

is marked by black arrows. The<br />

location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interpreted seismic<br />

line is shown in <strong>the</strong> figure (b),<br />

which is closely located in <strong>the</strong><br />

southwest area <strong>of</strong> our study area.<br />

Black point shows <strong>the</strong> Drill site<br />

Subbotina-403<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong>se age assignments, we interpreted H5 as <strong>the</strong> boundary between <strong>the</strong><br />

Miocene <strong>and</strong> Pliocene, which may coincide with <strong>the</strong> Messinian erosional truncation<br />

surface (5.3 Ma BP) (Tari, 2011; Stovba et al., 2009). The Messinian erosional truncation<br />

surface is a major unconformity between Miocene <strong>and</strong> Pliocene deposits, which is<br />

associated with a substantial drop <strong>of</strong> sea level during <strong>the</strong> Messinian Salinity Crisis (less<br />

than 6 Ma ago). It has been confirmed by several boreholes (Ryan <strong>and</strong> Cita, 1978; Hsü<br />

<strong>and</strong> Giovanoli, 1979; Gillet et al., 2007) <strong>and</strong> seismic data (Finetti et al., 1988; Robinson<br />

et al., 1996) from <strong>of</strong>fshore areas in <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean Sea <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Black Sea. H3 is <strong>the</strong><br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!