05.03.2014 Views

Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government

Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government

Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 Local government compliance and enforcement<br />

functions<br />

Fiscal capacity affects a council’s ability to resource its regulatory activities. A<br />

council with high levels of fiscal capacity is better placed to purchase expertise, if<br />

lacking, or attract skilled staff. It is also better placed to implement inspections,<br />

audits or other costly enforcement activities. Lack of fiscal capacity may<br />

adversely affect businesses and the community if the result is ill-targeted<br />

enforcement activity undertaken by ill-equipped staff, or delays in responses to<br />

regulatory applications or queries from businesses and the community. Delay<br />

costs are discussed in Chapters 3 and 4.<br />

2.4.2 Regulatory expenditure and capability<br />

The diversity of councils in <strong>NSW</strong> means there is a wide range of staff numbers<br />

per council, as well as a range of different skills and skill shortages across the<br />

State. 33 Specifically, there is also a wide range of expenditure on regulatory<br />

functions and regulatory capability.<br />

According to the PC, in <strong>NSW</strong> the median expenditure dedicated by local<br />

government to undertaking regulatory functions relating to business is around<br />

3%. 34 However, for one council in <strong>NSW</strong>, expenditure on their regulatory<br />

activities was reported to be as high as 50% of their total expenditure. 35<br />

Regulatory activities take approximately 11% of total local government staff<br />

time. 36 The range of time spent on regulatory activities varies markedly between<br />

individual councils. In <strong>NSW</strong>, local government respondents indicated as little as<br />

1% and as much as 80% of their time was spent on undertaking their regulatory<br />

roles. 37 The regulatory workforce is largest in metropolitan areas where there is a<br />

higher concentration of businesses to people.<br />

This wide variation in regulatory activity may have implications for regulatory<br />

burden on businesses and the community if, for example, low activity means<br />

regulatory objectives are not being achieved or very high activity represents<br />

over-zealous or inefficient enforcement. The variation in regulatory activity<br />

across <strong>NSW</strong> may suggest a higher likelihood of inconsistent regulatory<br />

approaches applied across different local government areas. This may also<br />

translate to higher regulatory burden, especially for businesses operating across<br />

local government boundaries.<br />

33 The PC reports vacancy rates in councils to be as high as 15% generally, and much higher for<br />

specific skills, eg, 21% of councils in <strong>NSW</strong> have at least 1 vacancy for Environmental Health<br />

Officers. Productivity Commission, Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business <strong>Regulation</strong>:<br />

The Role of Local <strong>Government</strong> as Regulator, July 2012, Vol 1, Table 4.8, p 149 and Table 4.14, p 161.<br />

34 Ibid, p 142 and Appendix M.<br />

35 Ibid, Table 4.5, p 142.<br />

36 Ibid, p 150.<br />

37 Ibid.<br />

26 <strong>IPART</strong> <strong>Regulation</strong> <strong>Review</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!