Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government
Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government
Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 Estimating the impacts of recommended reforms<br />
Recent surveys of Australian business on regulation and its costs<br />
Australian Industry Group National CEO Survey: Business <strong>Regulation</strong> (2011)<br />
Around 320 CEOs were surveyed regarding their experience with business regulatory<br />
regimes across Australia. The survey found that the average business spends close to<br />
4% of total annual expenditures on complying with regulation. It also found that larger<br />
(100 employees or more) businesses spend relatively more time on compliance related<br />
activities (27.2 hours per week) compared to medium (16.8 hours) or small businesses<br />
(7.3 hours).<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Business Chamber Red Tape Survey (2011)<br />
Most of the 581 businesses surveyed were small to medium size (less than 50<br />
employees). The survey found that around 39% of these businesses spend more than 5<br />
hours per week on compliance activities.<br />
Productivity Commission National Survey of Business Perceptions (local<br />
government) (2012)<br />
The PC engaged Sensis to conduct a survey of 1,913 small and medium sized<br />
businesses across Australia. It found that 60% of these businesses had regulatory<br />
dealings with local government over the last 3 years. 83% of businesses said they were<br />
treated fairly in their regulatory dealings with local government, but 43% claim that the<br />
time and effort required to comply with regulations is excessive. More than one-third<br />
believe there is significant duplication with state government regulation.<br />
Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission (VCEC) Business Perception<br />
Survey about Local <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Regulation</strong> (2010)<br />
Roy Morgan Research undertook a survey of 1,917 Victorian businesses on behalf of<br />
the VCEC. Of these businesses, just one-third had regulatory dealings with the local<br />
government in the last 3 years. Most interaction was in planning and land use, and<br />
building and construction regulations. 68% of Victorian businesses felt they were<br />
treated fairly in terms of regulation, but 30% stated there was too much duplication<br />
between state and local regulation.<br />
Sources: Australian Industry Group, National CEO Survey: Business <strong>Regulation</strong>, 2011. <strong>NSW</strong> Business<br />
Chamber, Red Tape Survey, September 2011. Productivity Commission, Performance Benchmarking of<br />
Australian Business <strong>Regulation</strong>: The Role of Local <strong>Government</strong> as Regulator, July 2012, Vol 1, p 228-238.<br />
VCEC, Local government for a better Victoria: An inquiry into streamlining local government regulation, August<br />
2010, pp 40 – 46.<br />
4.2.2 Considering indirect impacts of regulatory reform<br />
The section above discussed how we would seek to estimate direct cost savings<br />
from regulatory reform – ie, those cost savings that can be counted towards the<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Government</strong>’s red tape reduction target of $750 million by June 2015.<br />
<strong>Regulation</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>IPART</strong> 55