Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government
Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government
Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 Identifying reform opportunities<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
introducing ‘strategic compatibility certificates’ to enable developments<br />
consistent with regional strategies to proceed even if the local land use plan<br />
has not yet been amended to catch up with the regional strategy<br />
greater use of code-based assessments (complying development)<br />
reducing the number of planning instruments (ie, State Environmental<br />
Planning Policies, Regional Environmental Plans, Local Environmental Plans<br />
and Development Control Plans) to remove complexity and confusion in the<br />
planning system<br />
reducing referrals and concurrence requirements, and consolidating <strong>NSW</strong><br />
<strong>Government</strong> agencies’ requirements for developments<br />
establishing clear principles in relation to the types of development consent<br />
conditions that are appropriate (ie, clear, reasonable, cost effective and<br />
proportionate), removing duplication with other regulatory requirements and<br />
standardising these conditions to improve consistency across councils<br />
requiring mandatory monitoring of State and local government performance<br />
against clear indicators (measurable planning goals), with regular public<br />
reporting and review<br />
adopting an ‘amber light approach’ – formally requiring consent authorities to<br />
provide advice to an applicant of amendments that would make an otherwise<br />
unacceptable proposed development acceptable, if adopted, and allow the<br />
proposal to be so modified<br />
introducing a cultural change program, to be led by the Department of<br />
Planning & Infrastructure in partnership with the Planning Institute of<br />
Australia, local government and stakeholder representatives, to change the<br />
current culture of the planning profession – which has been described as being<br />
overly controlling, highly risk-adverse, unhelpful, bureaucratic and focused<br />
on how to stop outcomes – to a culture of facilitating good outcomes. 59<br />
As discussed in Chapter 1 of this paper, the ToR directs us to ensure any<br />
recommended reforms from our review will enable councils to maximise the<br />
opportunities from the planning system review.<br />
59 <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Government</strong>, A New Planning System for <strong>NSW</strong>: Green Paper, July 2012.<br />
42 <strong>IPART</strong> <strong>Regulation</strong> <strong>Review</strong>