05.03.2014 Views

Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government

Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government

Regulation Review - IPART - NSW Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Estimating the impacts of recommended reforms<br />

Fees and charges<br />

Fees and charges include licence fees, permit fees, registration fees, and other fees<br />

relating to the administration of regulation. Ideally, regulatory administration<br />

fees and charges should be set to allow regulators to recover the efficient costs<br />

they incur in administering and enforcing regulations.<br />

To estimate fee and charge cost savings of a recommended reform, we will seek<br />

to:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

identify the fees or charges reduced or eliminated if the reform were to be<br />

implemented – eg, a licence fee may be reduced to reflect a more targeted and<br />

efficient enforcement regime<br />

place a dollar value on the amended fee or charge – eg, the annual licence fee<br />

may be reduced from $200 to $20, which equates to a reduction of $180 per<br />

licence<br />

multiply the value of the reduced fee or charge by the relevant population<br />

of businesses or individuals affected – eg, if 1,000 businesses are subject to<br />

the annual licence fee, the annual value of the reduction is $180,000 (1,000 x<br />

$180).<br />

According to BRO, reductions in fees and charges should be the easiest cost<br />

savings to calculate. This is because they are known to regulators, who are also<br />

likely to have access to data on the number of individuals, businesses and notfor-profit<br />

organisations that would be liable for the fee or charge. 88<br />

Delay costs<br />

Delay costs result from delays in regulatory processes – eg, delays in receiving<br />

approval to undertake a certain activity. Delay costs generally include the cost of<br />

holding assets (land, capital, labour).<br />

BRO observes that delay costs may be reduced where:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

regulators are required to process applications within a set period<br />

the quantity of material required for an application is reduced, allowing faster<br />

processing<br />

there is a significant change to an approval process – eg, the process for<br />

handling objections. 89<br />

88 Ibid, p 15.<br />

89 Ibid, p 16.<br />

<strong>Regulation</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>IPART</strong> 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!