05.03.2014 Views

54. Volume 12- Number 4 - IP Australia

54. Volume 12- Number 4 - IP Australia

54. Volume 12- Number 4 - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 1999 VOL <strong>12</strong> NO. 4<br />

Name of Form Form <strong>Number</strong> Last Updated<br />

Application for Plant Breeders Rights Form P1 September 1998<br />

Part 1 – General Information<br />

Guidelines for Completing Part1 Part1ins September1998<br />

Application Form<br />

Application for Plant Breeders Rights Form P2 May 1999<br />

Part 2 – Description of New Variety<br />

Nomination of a Qualified Person Form QP 1 April 1999<br />

Certification by a Qualified Person Form QP 2 April 1999<br />

Proposed Variety Names Form DEN1 December 1995<br />

Extension of Provisional Protection Form EXT2 December 1999<br />

Exemption of a Taxon from Farm saved seed Form ET1 September 1998<br />

Status of Application Form STAT 1 November 1995<br />

ACRA Herbarium Specimen Form Herb 1 October 1997<br />

Overseas Testing/Data<br />

The PBR Act allows DUS data produced in other countries<br />

(overseas data) be used in lieu of conducting a comparative<br />

trial in <strong>Australia</strong> provided certain conditions relating to the<br />

filing of applications, sufficiency of the data and the<br />

likelihood that the candidate variety will express the<br />

distinctive characteristic(s) in the same way when grown<br />

locally. Briefly the overseas data could be considered<br />

where:<br />

• The first PBR application relating to the candidate<br />

variety has been lodged overseas, and<br />

• the variety has previously been test grown in a UPOV<br />

member country using official UPOV test guidelines<br />

and test procedures, (ie. equivalent to a comparative trial<br />

in <strong>Australia</strong>) and<br />

• either, all the most similar varieties of common<br />

knowledge (including those in <strong>Australia</strong>) have been<br />

included in the overseas DUS trial, or<br />

• the new overseas variety is so clearly distinct from all<br />

the <strong>Australia</strong>n varieties of common knowledge that<br />

further DUS test growing is not warranted, and<br />

• sufficient data and descriptive information is available<br />

to publish a description of the variety in an accepted<br />

format in Plant Varieties Journal; and to satisfy the<br />

requirements of the PBR Act.<br />

The Qualified Person, in consultation with the<br />

agent/applicant, and perhaps other specialists and<br />

taxonomists, will need to evaluate the overseas data, test<br />

report and photographs to see if the application does fulfil<br />

all PBR Office requirements, and then advise the<br />

agent/applicant:<br />

• either, to submit Part 2 incorporating a description for<br />

publication, any additional data and photographs and to<br />

pay the examination fee;<br />

• or, to conduct a DUS trial in <strong>Australia</strong>, recommending to<br />

the applicant/agent which additional varieties of<br />

common knowledge to include;<br />

• or, submit Part 2 including additional data (information<br />

about similar varieties in <strong>Australia</strong> to show that they are<br />

clearly distinct from the candidate variety that a further<br />

DUS test growing including the similar varieties is not<br />

warranted and that the variety displays the distinctive<br />

characteristics when grown in <strong>Australia</strong>)<br />

Please note that the PBR office does not obtain overseas<br />

DUS test reports on behalf of applicants. It is the sole<br />

responsibility of the applicants to obtain these reports<br />

directly from the relevant overseas testing authorities.<br />

Where applicants already have the report they are advised to<br />

submit a certified true copy of the report with the Part 1<br />

application. Applicants, or those duly authorised, may<br />

certify the copy.<br />

If you do not have the test report available at the time of<br />

Part-1 application then you are advised to submit the Part-1<br />

application without the test report. However, you should<br />

make arrangements to procure the DUS test report directly<br />

from the relevant testing authority. When the report<br />

becomes available, a certified copy should be supplied to<br />

the QP and the PBR office.<br />

When the trial is based on an UPOV technical guideline and<br />

test report in an official UPOV language (English, German<br />

or French), it can be lodged in support of the application. In<br />

other cases the test reports must be in English.<br />

The applicant/agent and Qualified Person should use the<br />

overseas test report to complete Part 2 of the application,<br />

making a decision on how to proceed in view of the<br />

completeness of the information, the comparators (if any)<br />

used in the overseas DUS trial and their knowledge of<br />

similar <strong>Australia</strong>n varieties that may not have been included<br />

in the overseas test report.<br />

If a description is based on an overseas test report,<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n PBR will not be granted until after the decision<br />

to grant PBR in the country producing the DUS test is<br />

made. The final decision on the acceptability of overseas<br />

data rest with the PBR office.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!