- Page 1: October 2010 Climate change assessm
- Page 5 and 6: Foreword In March 2010, the InterAc
- Page 7 and 8: Contents Foreword iii Committee to
- Page 9 and 10: Preface Since its founding more tha
- Page 11 and 12: IAC report review This report was e
- Page 13 and 14: Acknowledgements Community input wa
- Page 15 and 16: management structure comprises the
- Page 17 and 18: amount of evidence available and th
- Page 19 and 20: 1. Introduction The Intergovernment
- Page 21 and 22: assessment, they must carry out the
- Page 23 and 24: Number of authors 1500 1200 900 600
- Page 25 and 26: BOX 1.2 Roles of participants in IP
- Page 27 and 28: The IPCC assessment process in brie
- Page 29 and 30: Preparation of the Synthesis Report
- Page 31 and 32: 2. Evaluation of IPCC’s assessmen
- Page 33 and 34: authors are chosen and others are n
- Page 35 and 36: efore incorporating them (Appendix
- Page 37 and 38: ange of viewpoints offered and pote
- Page 39 and 40: for rejected comments. In the case
- Page 41 and 42: Summary for Policymakers A Summary
- Page 43 and 44: in each of the three Working Group
- Page 45 and 46: 3. IPCC’s evaluation of evidence
- Page 47 and 48: Table 3.3 Likelihood scale used by
- Page 49 and 50: models, conditional on the SRES sce
- Page 51 and 52: 4. The likelihood scale used by Wor
- Page 53 and 54:
change. The area suitable for agric
- Page 55 and 56:
Fourth Assessment Report by present
- Page 57 and 58:
not consistently followed in the fo
- Page 59 and 60:
Recommendation ►The likelihood sc
- Page 61 and 62:
4. Governance and management The IP
- Page 63 and 64:
The IPCC makes all of its major dec
- Page 65 and 66:
The IPCC Bureau The IPCC Bureau com
- Page 67 and 68:
Ismail A.R. El Gizouli (Sudan - Act
- Page 69 and 70:
ex officio member of the Executive
- Page 71 and 72:
were interviewed by the Committee o
- Page 73 and 74:
Working Groups and Technical Suppor
- Page 75 and 76:
Recommendation ►The IPCC should c
- Page 77 and 78:
5. Conclusions IPCC’S processes a
- Page 79 and 80:
Editors could help them provide the
- Page 81 and 82:
Increasing transparency. Transparen
- Page 83 and 84:
making the assessment reports short
- Page 85 and 86:
esponded to the Committee’s quest
- Page 87 and 88:
dents have suggested testing the co
- Page 89 and 90:
References Agrawala, S., 1998a, Con
- Page 91 and 92:
Kahan, D., 2010, Fixing the communi
- Page 93 and 94:
Appendix A Letters of request to th
- Page 95 and 96:
Climate change assessments | Review
- Page 97 and 98:
Climate change assessments | Review
- Page 99 and 100:
Appendix B Questionnaire on IPCC pr
- Page 101 and 102:
F. Crooks, CSIR/SABS, South Africa
- Page 103 and 104:
Girma Orssengo, University of Weste
- Page 105 and 106:
Appendix D Excerpts of IPCC procedu
- Page 107 and 108:
IPCC review process (IPCC, 1999, Se
- Page 109 and 110:
4.2.4.2 Second review (by governmen
- Page 111 and 112:
Plan to treat issues of uncertainty
- Page 113 and 114:
C. An order of magnitude can be giv
- Page 115 and 116:
14. Likelihood, as defined in Table
- Page 117 and 118:
Appendix E Committee biographies Ha
- Page 119 and 120:
to 2001, he worked at the Frontier
- Page 121 and 122:
Appendix F Acronyms and abbreviatio
- Page 123:
IAC Secretariat Het Trippenhuis Klo