Climate change assessments Review of the processes and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IPCC, 1999, Procedures for the preparation, review, acceptance, adoption, approval and publication of IPCC reports: Appendix A to the principles governing IPCC work, Adopted at the 15th session (San Jose, 15-18 April 1999) and amended at the 20th session (Paris, 19-21 February 2003), 21st session (Vienna, 3 and 6-7 November 2003), and 29th session (Geneva, 31 August - 4 September 2008), 14 pp., available at http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization_procedures.htm. IPCC, 2000, IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Contribution of the Working Group III to the Plenary Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, N. Nakicenovic, J. Alcamo, G. Davis, B. de Vries, J. Fenhann, S. Gaffin, K. Gregory, A. Grübler, T. Yong Jung, T. Kram, E. La Rovere, L. Michaelis, S. Mori, T. Morita, W. Pepper, H. Pitcher, L. Price, K. Riahi, A. Roehrl, H. Rogner, A. Sankovski, M. Schlesinger, P. Shukla, S. Smith, R. Swart, S. van Rooijen, N. Victor, and Z. Dadi, eds., available at http://www.grida.no/ publications/other/ipcc_sr/?src=/climate/ipcc/emission/. IPCC, 2003, Note on Outreach, 21st Session of the IPCC, Vienna, November 3 and 6-7, 2003, available at http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session21/doc20.pdf. IPCC, 2005a, Framework Communications Strategy for Release and Dissemination of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Report by Communications & Network Consulting (CNC), 24th Session of the IPCC, Montreal, September 26-28, 2005, available at http:// www.ipcc.ch/pdf/session24/inf3.pdf. IPCC, 2005b, Guidance notes for lead authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on addressing uncertainties, 4 pp., available at http://www.ipcc-wg1.unibe.ch/guidancepaper/ guidancepaper.html. IPCC, 2006, Rules of procedures for the election of the IPCC Bureau and any Task Force Bureau: Appendix C to the principles governing IPCC work, Adopted at the 25th session of the IPCC (Mauritius, 26-28 April 2006), 11 pp., available at http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization_procedures.htm. IPCC, 2007a, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, N.Y. IPCC, 2007b, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, and C.E. Hanson, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, N.Y. IPCC, 2007c, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, N.Y. IPCC, 2009, Reinforcement of the IPCC Secretariat: Report from the Task Group, 30th Session of the IPCC, Antalya, April 21-23, 2009, 14 pp., available at http://www.ipcc.ch/ meetings/session30/doc19.pdf. Jasanoff, S., 2010, Testing time for climate science, Science, 328, 695-696. Jonas, E., S. Schulz-Hardt, D. Frey, and N. Thelen, 2001, Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557-571. Jowit, J., 2010, Sharp decline in public’s belief in climate threat, British poll reveals, Guardian, February 23, 2010, available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/ feb/23/british-public-belief-climate-poll. 72 Climate change assessments | Review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC
Kahan, D., 2010, Fixing the communications failure, Nature, 463, 296-297. Karoly, D., H. Kheshgi, N. Leary, L. Mearns, R. Moss, R. Richels, J. Weyant, T. Wilbanks, and G. Yohe, 2007, Alternative futures for the IPCC: Observations arising from discussions stimulated by the Energy Modeling Forum, Snowmass, Colorado, October 2007, 12 pp. Lahsen, M., 2004, Transnational locals: Brazilian experiences of the climate regime, in Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, S. Jasanoff and M.L. Martello, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 151-172. Leake, J., 2010, UN wrongly linked global warming to natural disasters, The Sunday Times of London, January 24, 2010, available at http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7000063.ece. Lichtenstein, S., P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, M. Layman, and B. Combs, 1978, Judged frequency of lethal events, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551-578. Liverman, D., 2008, Assessing impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Reflections on the Working Group II Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Global Environmental Change, 18, 4-7. Morgan, M.G., P.J. Adams, and D. Keith, 2006, Elicitation of expert judgments of aerosol forcing, Climatic Change, 75, 195-214. Morgan, M.G., H. Dowlatabadi, M. Henrion, D. Keith, R. Lempert, S. McBride, M. Small, and T. Wilbanks, eds., 2009, Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making, A report by the Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Climate Change Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C., 96 pp. Moss, R., and S. Schneider, 2000, Uncertainties, in Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, R. Pachauri, T. Taniguchi, and K. Tanaka, eds., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. Moss, R., M. Babiker, S. Brinkman, E. Calvo, T. Carter, J. Edmonds, I. Elgizouli, S. Emori, L. Erda, K. Hibbard, R. Jones, M. Kainuma, J. Kelleher, J.F. Lamarque, M. Manning, B. Matthews, J. Meehl, L. Meyer, J. Mitchell, N. Nakicenovic, B. O’Neill, R. Pichs, K. Riahi, S. Rose, P. Runci, R. Stouffer, D. van Vuuren, J. Weyant, T. Wilbanks, J.P. van Ypersele, and M. Zurek, 2008, Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, 132 pp. Muir Russell, A., G. Boulton, P. Clarke, D. Eyton, and J. Norton, 2010, The Independent Climate Change E-mails Review, Report to the University of East Anglia, 160 pp. NAS (U.S. National Academy of Sciences), 2003, Policy and procedures on committee composition and balance and conflicts of interest for committees used in the development of reports, available at http://www.nationalacademies.org/coi/index.html. Nisbet, M., and D. Scheufele, 2009, What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions, American Journal of Botany, 96, 1767-1778. NRC (National Research Council), 1998, Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs: The Department of Energy’s Office of Science and Technology, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., p. 5. NRC, 2001, An Analysis of Some Key Questions, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 29 pp. NRC, 2002, Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 120 pp. NRC, 2007, Analysis of Global Change Assessments: Lessons Learned, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 196 pp. Climate change assessments | Review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC 73
Page 1 and 2:
October 2010 Climate change assessm
Page 3 and 4:
Climate change assessments
Page 5 and 6:
Foreword In March 2010, the InterAc
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Foreword iii Committee to
Page 9 and 10:
Preface Since its founding more tha
Page 11 and 12:
IAC report review This report was e
Page 13 and 14:
Acknowledgements Community input wa
Page 15 and 16:
management structure comprises the
Page 17 and 18:
amount of evidence available and th
Page 19 and 20:
1. Introduction The Intergovernment
Page 21 and 22:
assessment, they must carry out the
Page 23 and 24:
Number of authors 1500 1200 900 600
Page 25 and 26:
BOX 1.2 Roles of participants in IP
Page 27 and 28:
The IPCC assessment process in brie
Page 29 and 30:
Preparation of the Synthesis Report
Page 31 and 32:
2. Evaluation of IPCC’s assessmen
Page 33 and 34:
authors are chosen and others are n
Page 35 and 36:
efore incorporating them (Appendix
Page 37 and 38:
ange of viewpoints offered and pote
Page 39 and 40: for rejected comments. In the case
Page 41 and 42: Summary for Policymakers A Summary
Page 43 and 44: in each of the three Working Group
Page 45 and 46: 3. IPCC’s evaluation of evidence
Page 47 and 48: Table 3.3 Likelihood scale used by
Page 49 and 50: models, conditional on the SRES sce
Page 51 and 52: 4. The likelihood scale used by Wor
Page 53 and 54: change. The area suitable for agric
Page 55 and 56: Fourth Assessment Report by present
Page 57 and 58: not consistently followed in the fo
Page 59 and 60: Recommendation ►The likelihood sc
Page 61 and 62: 4. Governance and management The IP
Page 63 and 64: The IPCC makes all of its major dec
Page 65 and 66: The IPCC Bureau The IPCC Bureau com
Page 67 and 68: Ismail A.R. El Gizouli (Sudan - Act
Page 69 and 70: ex officio member of the Executive
Page 71 and 72: were interviewed by the Committee o
Page 73 and 74: Working Groups and Technical Suppor
Page 75 and 76: Recommendation ►The IPCC should c
Page 77 and 78: 5. Conclusions IPCC’S processes a
Page 79 and 80: Editors could help them provide the
Page 81 and 82: Increasing transparency. Transparen
Page 83 and 84: making the assessment reports short
Page 85 and 86: esponded to the Committee’s quest
Page 87 and 88: dents have suggested testing the co
Page 89: References Agrawala, S., 1998a, Con
Page 93 and 94: Appendix A Letters of request to th
Page 95 and 96: Climate change assessments | Review
Page 97 and 98: Climate change assessments | Review
Page 99 and 100: Appendix B Questionnaire on IPCC pr
Page 101 and 102: F. Crooks, CSIR/SABS, South Africa
Page 103 and 104: Girma Orssengo, University of Weste
Page 105 and 106: Appendix D Excerpts of IPCC procedu
Page 107 and 108: IPCC review process (IPCC, 1999, Se
Page 109 and 110: 4.2.4.2 Second review (by governmen
Page 111 and 112: Plan to treat issues of uncertainty
Page 113 and 114: C. An order of magnitude can be giv
Page 115 and 116: 14. Likelihood, as defined in Table
Page 117 and 118: Appendix E Committee biographies Ha
Page 119 and 120: to 2001, he worked at the Frontier
Page 121 and 122: Appendix F Acronyms and abbreviatio
Page 123: IAC Secretariat Het Trippenhuis Klo
show all

Climate change assessments Review of the processes and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?