07.03.2014 Views

1991 No. 1 CONTENTS - Institute of Social and Cultural ...

1991 No. 1 CONTENTS - Institute of Social and Cultural ...

1991 No. 1 CONTENTS - Institute of Social and Cultural ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Nuer cannot be said to be stratified into classes. (p.7)<br />

Evans-Pritchard's The Nuer 21<br />

Indeed, the Nuer have no government, <strong>and</strong> their state might be described as an<br />

ordered anarchy. Likewise they lack law, if we underst<strong>and</strong> by this tenn<br />

judgements delivered by an independent <strong>and</strong> impartial authority which has, also,<br />

power to enforce its decisions. (pp. 5-6)<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> governmental organs among the Nuer, the absence <strong>of</strong> legal institutions,<br />

<strong>of</strong> developed leadership <strong>and</strong>, generally, <strong>of</strong> organizoo political life is remarkable.<br />

(p. 181)<br />

The sentence in The Nuer that immediately precedes the second quotation above<br />

is: 'He [the leopard-skin chief] is a sacred person without political authority' (p.<br />

5). Just as. such statements concerning the lack <strong>of</strong> the leopard-skin chief's juridical<br />

authority can be traced to an empirical negation <strong>of</strong> the applicability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Durkheimian conception <strong>of</strong> moral authority (see Free 1988: 74), statements<br />

concerning the lack <strong>of</strong> law or <strong>of</strong> legal institutions can be traced to an empirical<br />

rejection <strong>of</strong> Durkheim's characterization <strong>of</strong> 'segmentary', 'mechanical' societies<br />

as giving rise to 'repressive law'.<br />

Similarly, the statement concerning social class conjures up the first sentence<br />

<strong>of</strong> The Communist Manifesto: 'TIle history <strong>of</strong> all hitherto existing societies is the<br />

history <strong>of</strong> class struggle' (Marx <strong>and</strong> Engels 1967 [1848]: 79) <strong>of</strong> which it is a direct<br />

contradiction <strong>and</strong>, moreover, Engels' footnote to that sentence (ibid.) which points<br />

to the existence <strong>of</strong> primitive communist societies.<br />

2. Rousseau <strong>and</strong> the Pastoral<br />

A central theme <strong>of</strong> Rosaldo's essay in Writing Culture is that <strong>of</strong> 'the pastoral ': The<br />

Nuer is seen as written in 'the pastoral mode'. (This is a theme to which Clifford<br />

returns in his essay in the same volume where he claims (1986: 113) that salvage<br />

anthropology is 'appropriately located within a long Western tradition <strong>of</strong> pastoral'.)<br />

It would be largely fruitless to enter into a defInitional argument concerning the<br />

appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the word 'pastoral'. A more important question than what<br />

pastoral means is what the usage <strong>of</strong> the term does or enables one to do in this<br />

specific argument. Nevertheless, Raymond Williams, whose The Country <strong>and</strong> the<br />

City (1980) is cited by Clifford as an authoritative work on the pastoral, points to<br />

'the confusion that surrounds the whole question <strong>of</strong> "pastoral" , (ibid.: 14) <strong>and</strong> says<br />

that 'the first problem <strong>of</strong> defInition, a persistent problem <strong>of</strong> form, is the question<br />

<strong>of</strong> pastoral, <strong>of</strong> what is known as pastoral' (ibid.: 12). However, these definitional<br />

problems do not seem to daunt the writers <strong>of</strong> culture from writing <strong>of</strong> 'the pastoral<br />

mode', or from continuing to extend its usage from poetry to anthropological<br />

writing. What do they achieve by this?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!