07.03.2014 Views

ALBA 2007 – 1 plc - Irish Stock Exchange

ALBA 2007 – 1 plc - Irish Stock Exchange

ALBA 2007 – 1 plc - Irish Stock Exchange

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

the borrower is liable to pay interest, or any early repayment charge or other charge for credit<br />

under the cancelled agreement, only if the borrower received certain prescribed information at<br />

the prescribed time and if other conditions are met; and<br />

any security is to be treated as never having had effect for the cancelled agreement.<br />

Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994 and 1999<br />

The 1999 Regulations and (in so far as applicable) the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts<br />

Regulations 1994 (together with the 1999 Regulations, the "UTCCR") apply to agreements made on or<br />

after 1 July 1995 and affect all or almost all of the Mortgage Loans. The UTCCR provide that (a) a<br />

consumer may challenge a standard term in an agreement on the basis that it is "unfair" within the<br />

UTCCR and therefore not binding on the consumer and (b) the OFT, the FSA and any other<br />

"qualifying body" may seek to enjoin a business against relying on unfair terms, although the rest of the<br />

agreement will remain enforceable if it is capable of continuing in existence without the relevant unfair<br />

term.<br />

This will not generally affect "core terms", which set out the main subject-matter of the contract (for<br />

example, the borrower's obligation to repay the principal), but may affect terms deemed to be ancillary<br />

terms, which may well include the ability to choose a substitute for LIBOR or Bank of England repo<br />

rate (as applicable) where LIBOR or Bank of England repo rate (as applicable) cannot be determined<br />

under the Mortgage Loan and other terms the application of which are in the lender's discretion, or the<br />

ability to impose a charge upon repayment by reference to the Mortgage Early Repayment Charges.<br />

Where a term for interest variation does not provide for precise and immediate tracking of an external<br />

rate outside the lender's control, and if the borrower is locked in, for example by an early repayment<br />

charge that is considered to be a penalty, the term is likely to be regarded as unfair under the UTCCR<br />

unless the lender (i) notifies the affected borrower in writing at least 30 days before the rate change and<br />

(ii) permits the affected borrower to repay the whole loan during the next three months after the rate<br />

change, without paying the early repayment charge. See "Servicing and Special Servicing of the<br />

Mortgage Pool – Repayment".<br />

If a term imposing a charge upon redemption by reference to the Mortgage Early Repayment Charges is<br />

unfair, the Borrower will not be liable to pay the charge or, to the extent that he has paid it, will be<br />

able, as against the Seller or any assignee such as the Issuer, to claim restitution of the amount or to set<br />

off the amount of such claim against the amount owing by the Borrower under the relevant Mortgage<br />

Loan or any other mortgage loan that the Borrower has taken. Any such non-recovery, claim or set-off<br />

may adversely affect the ability of the Issuer to make payments to the Noteholders and<br />

Instrumentholders.<br />

In August 2002, the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission issued a joint consultation on<br />

proposals to consolidate the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the 1999 Regulations into a single<br />

piece of legislation, and a final report, together with a draft bill on unfair terms, was published in<br />

February 2005. It is not proposed that there should be any significant increase in the extent of controls<br />

over terms in consumer contracts. Some changes are proposed, however, such as that (a) a consumer<br />

may also challenge a negotiated term in an agreement on the basis that it is unfair and unreasonable<br />

within the legislation and therefore not binding on the consumer and (b) in any challenge by a consumer<br />

(but not by the OFT, the FSA or any other qualifying body) of a standard term or a negotiated term,<br />

the burden of proof lies on the lender to show that the term is fair and reasonable. It is too early to tell<br />

how the proposals, if enacted, would affect the Mortgage Loans.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!