08.03.2014 Views

a guide to peace support operations - The Watson Institute for ...

a guide to peace support operations - The Watson Institute for ...

a guide to peace support operations - The Watson Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

military action that results. Be<strong>for</strong>e 1996, there have been relatively few instances<br />

of successful high-level deployment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> UN (or coalition’s) military element may be up <strong>to</strong> one hundred times larger<br />

in strength and commensurably much more capable than a low-level response.<br />

Initially, the operational environment and plan will be dominated by military<br />

considerations. But the overall objective may be complex and politically influenced<br />

so that a purely military solution is inappropriate. As far as possible the UN<br />

military element should continue <strong>to</strong> operate within the principles of <strong>peace</strong>keeping,<br />

maintaining its impartiality, acting with local <strong>support</strong>, and using only the<br />

minimum <strong>for</strong>ce necessary. <strong>The</strong> distinction between a high-level deployment and<br />

the low- and mid-levels is that in this case, because it is so much stronger, the<br />

international <strong>for</strong>ce can, if it chooses, override <strong>peace</strong>keeping principles and<br />

impose tactical conditions. By deploying in overwhelming strength, the likelihood<br />

of a confrontation by local bands or armed factions is reduced.<br />

<strong>The</strong> authority of the host state may be vested in an interim administration<br />

empowered under an emergency regulation. <strong>The</strong> movement and activity of<br />

civilian relief organizations also can be regulated by emergency powers. However,<br />

once security is res<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong> a workable level, the importance and influence<br />

of the military element is reduced, their role subordinated <strong>to</strong> a long-term process<br />

of national res<strong>to</strong>ration, elections, and rehabilitation of armed elements.<br />

17. Principles <strong>for</strong> Peace Support Operations<br />

In PSO, especially <strong>peace</strong>keeping <strong>operations</strong>, the degree of consent both within the<br />

host state at the operational level and at a much higher level regionally and globally will<br />

influence the selection of the appropriate response level and its conduct. This also dictates<br />

the nature of the mandate.<br />

a. <strong>The</strong> principles which generally apply <strong>to</strong> all aspects of a PSO are: clearly defined<br />

objectives, unity of ef<strong>for</strong>t, political awareness, legitimate conduct, and security.<br />

b. <strong>The</strong> principles more specifically applicable <strong>to</strong> low- and mid-level (<strong>peace</strong>keeping)<br />

responses are: consent, impartiality, minimum use of <strong>for</strong>ce, transparency, and<br />

mutual respect.<br />

18. General principles<br />

<strong>The</strong> following principles apply <strong>to</strong> all <strong>peace</strong> <strong>support</strong> <strong>operations</strong>:<br />

a. Clearly Defined Objectives<br />

Part I, paragraphs 16-18<br />

A clearly defined and attainable objective or end point is essential <strong>for</strong> success.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se should be described in the operational mandate and must include a<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!