10.03.2014 Views

True Coincidence Summing Correction in Gamma Spectroscopy

True Coincidence Summing Correction in Gamma Spectroscopy

True Coincidence Summing Correction in Gamma Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2.3 Count rate of sources of different geometry<br />

All sources have same amount of Eu-152. Aqueous and sand are 13 mm diameter and 20 mm high<br />

Plott<strong>in</strong>g the data graphically as <strong>in</strong> Figure-2.9 sketches scattered peaks areas for the<br />

distributed sources relative to the po<strong>in</strong>t source. This unexpected scatter of po<strong>in</strong>ts is<br />

not due to the peak area uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty, rather it is rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of the scatter on the<br />

close geometry calibration. Certa<strong>in</strong> factors lead to such peaks; the Eu-152 <strong>in</strong> the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

source, on the average, is closer to the detector than <strong>in</strong> the distributed sources. The<br />

scatter represents the difference <strong>in</strong> TCS between the two source geometries.<br />

Moreover the difference between the aqueous and sand matrix sources can, <strong>in</strong><br />

addition to self-absorption, be attributed to the lower TCS <strong>in</strong> the sand source<br />

because of absorption of the Sm X-rays by the sand.<br />

Figure 2.9 Relative peak areas for sources of different geometry and density [10]<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!