UKSC and JCPC electronic bundle sample - The Supreme Court
UKSC and JCPC electronic bundle sample - The Supreme Court
UKSC and JCPC electronic bundle sample - The Supreme Court
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTHE SI!PBEME COURT OFTHE UNITED KINGDOM<br />
ON APPEAL FROMTUE COYRT OF4,fPEAL (ENGLAND)<br />
BETWEEN:<br />
BRlTISHAIRWAYSPLC<br />
-<strong>and</strong>-<br />
MS S. WlLLIAMS AND OTHERS<br />
PARTICULARS OFSECTION 5 OF NOTICE OFAPPEAL:<br />
INFORMATION ABOUT THE DECISION BEINGAI'PEALED<br />
FIds<br />
J. <strong>The</strong> Appe1l_are airIinopilolS employed by the Respondtnt ("BA"). <strong>The</strong> lead<br />
A • u.sW'tIIi<br />
"" lS""" 8IIIll.<br />
2. PilolS at BA,WIieIl worldng nonnaJly, are paid basic pay IIDd otberal1owallces<br />
induding (i) a DYing pay supplement IIDd (U) the taxable element ofan ollowance fur<br />
tinle away ftonI bI1se (the "rAFB ollowance"). When they.annual 1.."." they are<br />
paid ()lI1y their bilSic PllY. As a result, pUolS are paid less when they tall:e holiday tbac<br />
when they are worldng nonnally. By way of iIlustraIiou, in 2006, Ms Williams<br />
receiVed a meanflyjng pay supplement of £709.16 per mon1h IIDd a mean TAFB<br />
al10waDce of £86.54 per month. Her holiday pay inclcded neither of these two<br />
c:onsti_el_ ofhernonnaJ pay while working.<br />
1 MS Page Number 12 14