Community participation - Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Community participation - Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Community participation - Joseph Rowntree Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Community</strong> <strong>participation</strong><br />
Forces of inclusion and exclusion<br />
These stories paint a different picture of community <strong>participation</strong> to the one that is<br />
typically presented by policy makers. They suggest that, beneath the rhetoric of<br />
community empowerment, many community <strong>participation</strong> arrangements are<br />
characterised by countervailing forces of inclusion and exclusion. Some people find<br />
themselves drawn into an ever greater range of <strong>participation</strong> structures. Others, even<br />
though they may want to participate, find themselves at arm’s length. The result is a<br />
sharp divide between a small group of insiders involved in a disproportionate number<br />
of governance activities, and a much larger group of outsiders, involved in<br />
community life but not necessarily able to translate their social capital into political<br />
leverage over decision making.<br />
People like Greg, Mike Blaney and Graham are very active citizens. Much of their life<br />
is spent trying to create social capital. But, for them, <strong>participation</strong> in governance has<br />
not proved a helpful way to do it. This suggests that we need to be very cautious<br />
about equating community <strong>participation</strong> policies with social capital. Understanding<br />
who benefits from it, and how, depends on identifying the informal, half-hidden<br />
processes that shape how membership of the small group of insiders is composed<br />
and reproduced. This is the question to which we turn in the next chapter.<br />
34