Community participation - Joseph Rowntree Foundation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Community participation 20 GEM Project, Looking at Gender and Community Engagement in Manchester, available at http://www.manchesterwomen.net/project_details.php?project_id=5 (accessed 28 November 2005). 21 C. Bromley, J. Curtice and B. Seyd, Is Britain Facing a Crisis of Democracy?, CREST Working Paper No. 106 (June 2004), available at http:// www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p106.pdf; Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, 2003 Home Office Citizenship Survey: People, Families and Communities, Home Office Research Study 289 (London: Home Office, 2004), available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/hors289.pdf. 22 T. Munton and A. Zurawan, Active Communities: Headline Findings from the 2003 Home Office Citizenship Survey (London: Home Office, 2004). 23 J. Birchall and R. Simmons, User Power: The Participation of Users in Public Services (London: National Consumer Council, 2004); V. Lowndes, L. Pratchett and G. Stoker, ‘Social capital and political participation: how do local institutions constrain or enable the mobilisation of social capital?’, St John’s Social Capital Seminar, University of Cambridge, 19 November 2002. 24 G. Chanan, Out of the Shadows: Local Community Action in the European Community (Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 1992), paraphrased in M. Taylor, Public Policy in the Community (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), p. 76. 25 V. Lowndes, L. Pratchett and G. Stoker, ‘The locality effect: local government and citizen participation’, cited in J. Aspden and D. Birch, New Localism – Citizen Engagement, Neighbourhoods and Public Services: Evidence from Local Government (London: ODPM, 2005). 26 M. Taylor, Public Policy in the Community (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003). 27 A. Ellis, Barriers to Participation for Under-represented Groups in School Governance, Institute for Volunteering Research, Brief No. RB500, December 2003; written evidence to Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill from Engage, available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200304/ jtselect/jtdisab/82/82we81.htm (accessed 27 November 2005); T. O’Toole, ‘“Race”, participation and the public sphere’, in Civil Renewal Research Centre, Researching Civil Renewal: A Set of Scoping Papers Prepared for the Home Office Civil Renewal Unit (Birmingham: University of Birmingham/Home Office Civil Renewal Unit, 2004). 68
Notes 28 C. Barnes and G. Mercer, Disability (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003). 29 See C. Barnes and G. Mercer, Disability (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003); see also Disability Rights Commission (DRC), Attitudes and Awareness Survey (London: DRC, 2003). 30 E. Glaser, ‘The formation of social capital’, ISUMA: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, Vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 34–40 (Spring 2001). 31 V. Lowndes, L. Pratchett and G. Stoker, ‘The locality effect: local government and citizen participation’, cited in J. Aspden and D. Birch, New Localism – Citizen Engagement, Neighbourhoods and Public Services: Evidence from Local Government (London: ODPM, 2005). 32 M. Coulthard, A. Walker and A. Morgan, People’s Perceptions of their Neighbourhood and Community Involvement: Results from the Social Capital Module of the General Household Survey 2000 (London: The Stationery Office, 2002). 33 NVCO, It’s Who You Know that Counts: The Role of the Voluntary Sector in the Development of Social Capital in Rural Areas (London: NCVO, 2003). 34 L. Debertin and S. Goetz, ‘A comparison of social capital in rural and urban settings’, in Proceedings: Using Housing Policy to Build Healthy Communities: A Response to Devolution and Welfare Reform (Washington DC: Fannie Mae Foundation Housing Conference, April 1997). 35 M. Barnes, G. Stoker and P. Whiteley, Delivering Civil Renewal: Some Lessons from the Research, ESRC Seminar Series Mapping the Public Policy Landscape (Swindon: ESRC, 2003). 36 M. Barnes, H. Sullivan, A. Knops and J. Newman, ‘Power, participation and political renewal: issues from a study of public participation in two English cities’, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 58–66 (2004). 37 V. Lowndes, L. Pratchett and G. Stoker, ‘The locality effect: local government and citizen participation’, cited in J. Aspden and D. Birch, New Localism – Citizen Engagement, Neighbourhoods and Public Services: Evidence from Local Government (London: ODPM, 2005). 69
Page 1 and 2:
Community participation Who benefit
Page 3 and 4:
Community participation Who benefit
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Acknowledgements Executive
Page 7 and 8:
Executive summary Key concepts This
Page 9 and 10:
Executive summary What the literatu
Page 11 and 12:
Executive summary The bottom line T
Page 13 and 14:
Executive summary 2 Rather than try
Page 15 and 16:
Executive summary representatives a
Page 17 and 18:
Conceptual note Many of the terms a
Page 19 and 20:
1 Putting the public back into publ
Page 21 and 22:
Putting the public back into public
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Understanding the links between par
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36: Understanding the links between par
Page 37 and 38: Understanding the links between par
Page 39 and 40: Community participation in two depr
Page 53 and 54: 4 Network dynamics: explaining the
Page 55 and 56: Network dynamics: explaining the pa
Page 65 and 66: 5 Making the most of community part
Page 67 and 68: Making the most of community partic
Page 81 and 82: Notes Executive summary 1 S. Alinsk
Page 83 and 84: Notes Chapter 2 1 Other studies hav
Page 85: Notes 12 M. Woolcock, ‘The place
Page 89 and 90: Notes 47 C. Pattie, P. Seyd and P.
Page 91 and 92: Notes Chapter 4 1 J. Guare, Six Deg
Page 93 and 94: Notes 20 M. Woolcock, ‘The place
Page 95: Notes give community organisations
show all

Community participation - Joseph Rowntree Foundation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?