- Page 1 and 2:
A Process and Outcome Evaluation of
- Page 3 and 4:
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...
- Page 5 and 6:
Table 22. Positive Mentee Changes R
- Page 7 and 8:
Table 68. Court Involvement in Thir
- Page 9 and 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There were many pe
- Page 11 and 12:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation variou
- Page 13 and 14:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation REVIEW
- Page 15 and 16:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation have a
- Page 17 and 18:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Henrie
- Page 19 and 20:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation David
- Page 21 and 22:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Rhodes
- Page 23 and 24:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation trust
- Page 25 and 26:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentee
- Page 27 and 28:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation effect
- Page 29 and 30:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation progra
- Page 31 and 32:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation activi
- Page 33 and 34:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation compet
- Page 35 and 36:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation of the
- Page 37 and 38:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation their
- Page 39 and 40:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation activi
- Page 41 and 42:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation number
- Page 43 and 44:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation more o
- Page 45 and 46:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation consid
- Page 47 and 48:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 49 and 50:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Progra
- Page 51 and 52:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 53 and 54:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 55 and 56: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation monthl
- Page 57 and 58: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation found
- Page 59 and 60: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation with t
- Page 61 and 62: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentor
- Page 63 and 64: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Accord
- Page 65 and 66: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Three
- Page 67 and 68: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Sport
- Page 69 and 70: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation one pa
- Page 71 and 72: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 73 and 74: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation 25 20
- Page 75 and 76: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation 250 Nu
- Page 77 and 78: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation availa
- Page 79 and 80: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation The Pr
- Page 81 and 82: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation proxim
- Page 83 and 84: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 85 and 86: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation relati
- Page 87 and 88: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation docume
- Page 89 and 90: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentor
- Page 91 and 92: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation OUTCOM
- Page 93 and 94: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Youths
- Page 95 and 96: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation • Sc
- Page 97 and 98: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation form.
- Page 99 and 100: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 101 and 102: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation that t
- Page 103 and 104: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Initia
- Page 105: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation collec
- Page 109 and 110: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation matche
- Page 111 and 112: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 113 and 114: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation If onl
- Page 115 and 116: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
- Page 117 and 118: • youths ages 12 to 17 at admit,
- Page 119 and 120: etween boys in the two groups. When
- Page 121 and 122: Predicting Change on the BERS-2 Sub
- Page 123 and 124: Table 50. Predictors of Change on A
- Page 125 and 126: Table 53. BERS-2 Pretest Subscale S
- Page 127 and 128: Table 55. Correlation Between YRM S
- Page 129 and 130: two, youths reported that mentor ac
- Page 131 and 132: Given these very low numbers, we di
- Page 133 and 134: differences in the proportion of yo
- Page 135 and 136: Table 67. Court Involvement in Firs
- Page 137 and 138: youths’ perspectives regarding th
- Page 139 and 140: percentage (83%) of comparison yout
- Page 141 and 142: Table 73. How Much the Program Help
- Page 143 and 144: youths were closest to “mostly Bs
- Page 145 and 146: skipped school, but improvement on
- Page 147 and 148: PROGRAM COSTS Overview In order to
- Page 149 and 150: There was substantial variation by
- Page 151 and 152: school performance nor scores on th
- Page 153 and 154: for several subscales they continue
- Page 155 and 156: youth met with their mentor once ev
- Page 157 and 158:
differences is the concentration of
- Page 159 and 160:
court-involved. It may be that thos
- Page 161 and 162:
of a weak method, the “retrospect
- Page 163 and 164:
started out equivalent, we would ha
- Page 165 and 166:
implementation matched the program
- Page 167 and 168:
The results from our study of 4-H M
- Page 169 and 170:
REFERENCES Ahrens, K., DuBois, D.,
- Page 171 and 172:
Freedman, M. (1993). The Kindness o
- Page 173 and 174:
Larose, S., Ceyrenne, D., Garceau,
- Page 175 and 176:
Scales, P.C., & Leffert, N. (2004).
- Page 177 and 178:
APPENDIX B: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATI
- Page 179 and 180:
Table B2. YFP Activities During the
- Page 181 and 182:
Table B4. Average Number of In-Pers
- Page 183 and 184:
Table B6. Site Type and Use of High
- Page 185 and 186:
Table B8. Reasons for Referral Beha
- Page 187 and 188:
Table B10. Mentor Characteristics S