A Process and Outcome Evaluation of the 4-H Mentoring/ Youth and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Program Implementation This section describes the findings of the process evaluation of the YFP program. We first describe program activities, comparing descriptions in the Program Guide with descriptions provided by site directors and activities as documented in the quarterly reports and online logs maintained by the program. We then examine mentor training and support, operation of program activities, and perceptions of youth participants regarding program activities. We then look at characteristics of YFP youth, mentors, the mentor-mentee matches, and length of time spent in the program by the YFP youth. Program Activities Interventions Received by Program Participants To assess whether program participants received the interventions as designed, we consulted multiple data sources: the Program Guide, Site Descriptions, Quarterly Reports and the Online Log, and the Mentor Survey. The Program Guide, produced by the program, provides information on the formal program design. Site Descriptions include information on program implementation submitted by program site coordinators to JRSA. The Mentor Survey reflects what mentors stated they were supposed to be doing with the program (see Table 3). JRSA collected information from site coordinators and mentors because we learned that sites modified the program, as set out in the Program Guide, to fit their needs. In this report we compare actual program implementation, according to the Quarterly Reports and Online Log and Mentor Surveys, to what was expected to occur according to the Program Guide and Site Descriptions. Comparisons are also made between the Program Guide and the Site Descriptions to permit understanding of how site coordinators modified the program. 41
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table 3. Data Sources for Intervention Analyses Source Information Provided Perspective Program Guide Formal program design State YFP Office Site descriptions Site-specific variations in program design Site Coordinators Mentor survey Planned mentor activities Mentors Quarterly reports and online log Actual services received by youths Interventions documented by sites It is difficult to assess whether youths are participating in program activities as expected because of cross-site variation in activity schedules and because requirements for some program activities differ substantially from guidelines for program activities (see Table 2) and what the sites themselves claim to provide when asked. The requirements for mentoring require three meetings per month, while the guidelines suggest four. For 4-H, youths are required to attend six hours per year and do one community service project annually, while the guideline is monthly participation in 4-H. Finally, sites are required to hold six FNOs annually, but there are no requirements for attendance; the guidelines request that sites hold FNOs monthly and that families attend monthly. All sites offering FNOs indicated in site descriptions that they offer them monthly during the school year and most indicated that they offer them monthly in the summer. So, the desired number of in-person intervention contacts per youth per month is six (four mentor meetings, one FNO, and one 4-H activity), but the monthly requirement can be estimated to be about four (three mentor meetings, one-half FNO, and one-half 4-H activity). 12 Program Guide v. Site Coordinators’ Descriptions This section compares the formal program design, as specified in the Program Guide, with the site-specific variations in the program design, as reported by the site coordinators. As indicated in Table 4, site coordinators generally reported in site descriptions that they provide the 12 This assumes that by participating in six 4-H activities youths will reach the minimum of six hours annually. Data on the amount of time youths spent in 4-H activities were not available for this analysis. However, we had access to data on the dates that youths attended 4-H activities. 42
Page 1 and 2: A Process and Outcome Evaluation of
Page 3 and 4: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...
Page 5 and 6: Table 22. Positive Mentee Changes R
Page 7 and 8: Table 68. Court Involvement in Thir
Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There were many pe
Page 11 and 12: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation variou
Page 13 and 14: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation REVIEW
Page 15 and 16: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation have a
Page 17 and 18: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Henrie
Page 19 and 20: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation David
Page 21 and 22: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Rhodes
Page 23 and 24: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation trust
Page 25 and 26: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentee
Page 27 and 28: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation effect
Page 29 and 30: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation progra
Page 31 and 32: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation activi
Page 33 and 34: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation compet
Page 35 and 36: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation of the
Page 37 and 38: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation their
Page 39 and 40: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation activi
Page 41 and 42: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation number
Page 43 and 44: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation more o
Page 45 and 46: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation consid
Page 47 and 48: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
Page 49: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Progra
Page 55 and 56: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation monthl
Page 57 and 58: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation found
Page 59 and 60: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation with t
Page 61 and 62: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentor
Page 63 and 64: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Accord
Page 65 and 66: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Three
Page 67 and 68: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Sport
Page 69 and 70: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation one pa
Page 73 and 74: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation 25 20
Page 75 and 76: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation 250 Nu
Page 77 and 78: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation availa
Page 79 and 80: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation The Pr
Page 81 and 82: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation proxim
Page 85 and 86: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation relati
Page 87 and 88: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation docume
Page 89 and 90: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentor
Page 91 and 92: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation OUTCOM
Page 93 and 94: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Youths
Page 95 and 96: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation • Sc
Page 97 and 98: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation form.
Page 101 and 102:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation that t
Page 103 and 104:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Initia
Page 105 and 106:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation collec
Page 107 and 108:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation are no
Page 109 and 110:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation matche
Page 111 and 112:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
Page 113 and 114:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation If onl
Page 115 and 116:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
Page 117 and 118:
• youths ages 12 to 17 at admit,
Page 119 and 120:
etween boys in the two groups. When
Page 121 and 122:
Predicting Change on the BERS-2 Sub
Page 123 and 124:
Table 50. Predictors of Change on A
Page 125 and 126:
Table 53. BERS-2 Pretest Subscale S
Page 127 and 128:
Table 55. Correlation Between YRM S
Page 129 and 130:
two, youths reported that mentor ac
Page 131 and 132:
Given these very low numbers, we di
Page 133 and 134:
differences in the proportion of yo
Page 135 and 136:
Table 67. Court Involvement in Firs
Page 137 and 138:
youths’ perspectives regarding th
Page 139 and 140:
percentage (83%) of comparison yout
Page 141 and 142:
Table 73. How Much the Program Help
Page 143 and 144:
youths were closest to “mostly Bs
Page 145 and 146:
skipped school, but improvement on
Page 147 and 148:
PROGRAM COSTS Overview In order to
Page 149 and 150:
There was substantial variation by
Page 151 and 152:
school performance nor scores on th
Page 153 and 154:
for several subscales they continue
Page 155 and 156:
youth met with their mentor once ev
Page 157 and 158:
differences is the concentration of
Page 159 and 160:
court-involved. It may be that thos
Page 161 and 162:
of a weak method, the “retrospect
Page 163 and 164:
started out equivalent, we would ha
Page 165 and 166:
implementation matched the program
Page 167 and 168:
The results from our study of 4-H M
Page 169 and 170:
REFERENCES Ahrens, K., DuBois, D.,
Page 171 and 172:
Freedman, M. (1993). The Kindness o
Page 173 and 174:
Larose, S., Ceyrenne, D., Garceau,
Page 175 and 176:
Scales, P.C., & Leffert, N. (2004).
Page 177 and 178:
APPENDIX B: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATI
Page 179 and 180:
Table B2. YFP Activities During the
Page 181 and 182:
Table B4. Average Number of In-Pers
Page 183 and 184:
Table B6. Site Type and Use of High
Page 185 and 186:
Table B8. Reasons for Referral Beha
Page 187 and 188:
Table B10. Mentor Characteristics S
show all

A Process and Outcome Evaluation of the 4-H Mentoring/ Youth and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?