A Process and Outcome Evaluation of the 4-H Mentoring/ Youth and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 45. Change on BERS-2 for YFP Group by Selected Variables ........................................ 111 Table 46. Predictors of Change on Interpersonal Strength For YFP Group ............................... 112 Table 47. Predictors of Change on Family Involvement For YFP Group .................................. 113 Table 48. Predictors of Change on Intrapersonal Strength For YFP Group ............................... 113 Table 49. Predictors of Change on School Functioning For YFP Group ................................... 113 Table 50. Predictors of Change on Affective Strength For YFP Group ..................................... 114 Table 51. Predictors of Change on Career Strength For YFP Group ......................................... 114 Table 52. Correlations for BERS-2 Subscale Scores for YFP Youths and Parents .................... 115 Table 53. BERS-2 Pretest Subscale Scores for YFP Youths and Parents .................................. 116 Table 54. Youth-Mentor Relationship Scale Scores on Last Youth Post-Test ........................... 117 Table 55. Correlation Between YRM Subscales and Youth Characteristics ............................. 118 Table 56. Correlation Between YRM and BERS-2 Subscale Change Scores ............................ 119 Table 57. Youth Perceptions of How Much Program has Helped Them .................................. 120 Table 58. Youth Perceptions of Which Part of Program Helped Most ...................................... 120 Table 59. Change in Official School Days Absent ..................................................................... 121 Table 60. Change in GPA From Pre-Program to Discharge/Last Post-Test Period ................... 122 Table 61. Change in GPA from First In-Program to Discharge/Post-Test Reporting Period ..... 122 Table 62. Change in GPA from First to Second Post-Discharge Reporting Period ................... 123 Table 63. Post-Discharge Change in GPA Compared to In-Program Change in GPA .............. 123 Table 64. Court Involvement in First Year After Discharge/Last Post-Test .............................. 124 Table 65. Court Involvement in Second Year After Discharge/Last Post-Test .......................... 125 Table 66. Court Involvement in Third Year After Discharge/Last Post-Test ............................. 125 Table 67. Court Involvement in First Year After Discharge/Last Post-Test by Race ................ 126 v
Table 68. Court Involvement in Third Year After Discharge by Services Received ................. 126 Table 69. Court Involvement in Third Year After Discharge by Living Arrangements ............ 127 Table 70. How Much the Program Helped (Year 1 Follow-up) ................................................. 130 Table 71. Part of the Program that Helped the Most (Year 1 Follow-up) .................................. 130 Table 72. Changes in Family Relationship (Year 1 Follow-up) ................................................. 131 Table 73. How Much the Program Helped (Year 2 Follow-up) ................................................ 132 Table 74. Part of the Program that Helped the Most (Year 2 Follow-up) ................................. 132 Table 75. Changes in Family Relationship (Year 2 Follow-up) ................................................. 132 Table 76. Self-Reported Outcomes at Year 1 Follow-Up ........................................................... 134 Table 77. Self-Reported Outcomes at Year 2 Follow-up ........................................................... 135 Table 78. Changes in Self-Reported Outcomes from Year 1 to Year 2 Follow-up .................... 136 Table 79. Program Costs from July 2008 to June 2009 .............................................................. 139 vi
Page 1 and 2: A Process and Outcome Evaluation of
Page 3 and 4: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...
Page 5: Table 22. Positive Mentee Changes R
Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There were many pe
Page 11 and 12: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation variou
Page 13 and 14: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation REVIEW
Page 15 and 16: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation have a
Page 17 and 18: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Henrie
Page 19 and 20: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation David
Page 21 and 22: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Rhodes
Page 23 and 24: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation trust
Page 25 and 26: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentee
Page 27 and 28: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation effect
Page 29 and 30: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation progra
Page 31 and 32: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation activi
Page 33 and 34: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation compet
Page 35 and 36: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation of the
Page 37 and 38: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation their
Page 39 and 40: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation activi
Page 41 and 42: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation number
Page 43 and 44: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation more o
Page 45 and 46: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation consid
Page 47 and 48: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
Page 49 and 50: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Progra
Page 55 and 56: YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation monthl
Page 57 and 58:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation found
Page 59 and 60:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation with t
Page 61 and 62:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentor
Page 63 and 64:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Accord
Page 65 and 66:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Three
Page 67 and 68:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Sport
Page 69 and 70:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation one pa
Page 71 and 72:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Table
Page 73 and 74:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation 25 20
Page 75 and 76:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation 250 Nu
Page 77 and 78:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation availa
Page 79 and 80:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation The Pr
Page 81 and 82:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation proxim
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation relati
Page 87 and 88:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation docume
Page 89 and 90:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation mentor
Page 91 and 92:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation OUTCOM
Page 93 and 94:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Youths
Page 95 and 96:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation • Sc
Page 97 and 98:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation form.
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation that t
Page 103 and 104:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation Initia
Page 105 and 106:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation collec
Page 107 and 108:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation are no
Page 109 and 110:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation matche
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
YFP/4-H Mentoring Evaluation If onl
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
• youths ages 12 to 17 at admit,
Page 119 and 120:
etween boys in the two groups. When
Page 121 and 122:
Predicting Change on the BERS-2 Sub
Page 123 and 124:
Table 50. Predictors of Change on A
Page 125 and 126:
Table 53. BERS-2 Pretest Subscale S
Page 127 and 128:
Table 55. Correlation Between YRM S
Page 129 and 130:
two, youths reported that mentor ac
Page 131 and 132:
Given these very low numbers, we di
Page 133 and 134:
differences in the proportion of yo
Page 135 and 136:
Table 67. Court Involvement in Firs
Page 137 and 138:
youths’ perspectives regarding th
Page 139 and 140:
percentage (83%) of comparison yout
Page 141 and 142:
Table 73. How Much the Program Help
Page 143 and 144:
youths were closest to “mostly Bs
Page 145 and 146:
skipped school, but improvement on
Page 147 and 148:
PROGRAM COSTS Overview In order to
Page 149 and 150:
There was substantial variation by
Page 151 and 152:
school performance nor scores on th
Page 153 and 154:
for several subscales they continue
Page 155 and 156:
youth met with their mentor once ev
Page 157 and 158:
differences is the concentration of
Page 159 and 160:
court-involved. It may be that thos
Page 161 and 162:
of a weak method, the “retrospect
Page 163 and 164:
started out equivalent, we would ha
Page 165 and 166:
implementation matched the program
Page 167 and 168:
The results from our study of 4-H M
Page 169 and 170:
REFERENCES Ahrens, K., DuBois, D.,
Page 171 and 172:
Freedman, M. (1993). The Kindness o
Page 173 and 174:
Larose, S., Ceyrenne, D., Garceau,
Page 175 and 176:
Scales, P.C., & Leffert, N. (2004).
Page 177 and 178:
APPENDIX B: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATI
Page 179 and 180:
Table B2. YFP Activities During the
Page 181 and 182:
Table B4. Average Number of In-Pers
Page 183 and 184:
Table B6. Site Type and Use of High
Page 185 and 186:
Table B8. Reasons for Referral Beha
Page 187 and 188:
Table B10. Mentor Characteristics S
show all

A Process and Outcome Evaluation of the 4-H Mentoring/ Youth and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?