Business ethics in a global environment - Dlog
Business ethics in a global environment - Dlog
Business ethics in a global environment - Dlog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>ethics</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>global</strong><br />
<strong>environment</strong><br />
Dr Ina Verstl<br />
Brauwelt International<br />
23 January 2012
What is the bus<strong>in</strong>ess of bus<strong>in</strong>ess?
“The social responsibility of bus<strong>in</strong>ess is<br />
to <strong>in</strong>crease its profits.”<br />
Milton Friedman, New York Times Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, 1970
“The biggest contribution bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />
can make<br />
is to run successful companies,<br />
contribut<strong>in</strong>g to tax revenues<br />
and <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> local economies.”<br />
Graham Mackay, CEO SABMiller, March 2008
…“ turbo capitalism“ …<br />
…“cas<strong>in</strong>o capitalism“…<br />
…“culture of greed“…
Why CSR and not bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>ethics</strong>?<br />
• Globalization…growth of bus<strong>in</strong>ess power and<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
• Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity of governments to address<br />
social challenges<br />
•Increase <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent sector/NGOs as<br />
proxies for the public
What‘s new?<br />
Chang<strong>in</strong>g social contract<br />
between<br />
private sector – public sector – civil society
20th century social contract
21st century social contract
Same content –different packag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• 1960s: <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> Ethics<br />
• 1980s: Stakeholder approach ‐ corporate<br />
social performance<br />
•Late 1980s: ‘Thatcherism’, ‘Reagonomics’
Same content –different packag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
1990s: Corporate Citizenship<br />
Corporate Social Responsibility<br />
Social Responsibility<br />
Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development<br />
Susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
Global Citizenship<br />
Triple Bottom L<strong>in</strong>e
CSR … and why few bus<strong>in</strong>esses can<br />
afford to ignore it<br />
• Governments are tak<strong>in</strong>g an ever keener<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest through laws and regulations<br />
• Companies have to protect their reputation<br />
and the <strong>environment</strong> <strong>in</strong> which they do<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
• Investors are show<strong>in</strong>g more <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
• Employees are demand<strong>in</strong>g it
CSR ‐ too much of a good th<strong>in</strong>g?
The “green<strong>in</strong>g” of corporate<br />
responsibility
Make money by do<strong>in</strong>g good<br />
•AB‐InBev wants to br<strong>in</strong>g its water use down to<br />
3.75 l/l by 2010<br />
• He<strong>in</strong>eken wants to br<strong>in</strong>g it down to 4.6 l/l by 2010<br />
• SABMiller wants to br<strong>in</strong>g it down to 3.5 l/l by 2015<br />
• Carlsberg has not released any official targets<br />
•Foster‘s is down to 3.3 l/l (2008) and wants to<br />
reduce its water use by another 10 percent by<br />
2011
… but avoid accusations of<br />
greenwash<strong>in</strong>g
The challenge<br />
• No <strong>global</strong> standards that set def<strong>in</strong>itive targets<br />
• „voluntary“ is the operative term
CSR is spread<strong>in</strong>g around the world<br />
(but <strong>in</strong> different guises) …
Is CSR already out of fashion?
…or back <strong>in</strong> fashion‐<br />
thanks to outside pressure
It‘s all about profits<br />
From the Economist debate on CSR:<br />
“On its own, a corporation exists to provide<br />
maximum profitability, growth, shareholder value.<br />
Unless we put a price on the earth, price on the<br />
<strong>environment</strong> and all such related commodities, with<br />
consequent losses or profit to bus<strong>in</strong>ess, bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />
will not take mean<strong>in</strong>gful action on susta<strong>in</strong>ability. So<br />
expect<strong>in</strong>g corporations, proactively, without any<br />
outside pressure, to take *mean<strong>in</strong>gful* action on<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability is expect<strong>in</strong>g pigs to fly.”
This is a <strong>global</strong> media world<br />
Fight excessive dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />
UK and Russia<br />
…and sell XXL‐sized conta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />
of alcohol<br />
2 L cask Australia<br />
5 L bottle
“We may not vote anymore, but we all<br />
go shopp<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />
21st century social contract
to be cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />
www.beermonopoly.net