here. - Koskie Minsky LLP

9 1834 650 With respect to para. 69 of the Statement of Defence (marked
as Exhibit “B”) regarding whether the Crown had knowledge
or information of the allegations of abuse, mistreatment or
neglect, to advise if the incidents that were in fact reported to
HRC, were responded to adequately.
3 2572 870 With respect to the last sentence of para. 71 of the Statement
of Defence (marked as Exhibit “B”), to provide a list of all of
the material facts the defendant relies on to support the
assertion that all safeguards were in place.
Employees Investigated for Abuse
4 1336 478 -
479
To advise whether Mr. Low recalls someone named
Thompson, who was dismissed, and then re-hired after a
grievance.
5 2449 839 Regarding CR030006 (marked as Exhibit “I”), to advise as to
what occurred with Mr. Thompson’s employment with
Huronia in terms of when it ended and under what
circumstances.
6 2458 842 Regarding CR197190 (marked as Exhibit “J”), to advise as to
what happened to Mr. Scarlett’s employment with Huronia in
terms of when it ended and under what circumstances.
To determine whether
allegations of abuse were
dealt with appropriately by
the defendant.
To determine the basis on
which the defendant
substantiates its claim in
its statement of defence
that it met the standard of
care with respect to
safeguards at HRC.
To determine whether
allegations of abuse were
dealt with appropriately by
the defendant.
To determine whether
allegations of abuse were
dealt with appropriately by
the defendant.
To determine whether
allegations of abuse were
dealt with appropriately by
the defendant.