24.03.2014 Views

Revelation: - Knights of Columbus, Supreme Council

Revelation: - Knights of Columbus, Supreme Council

Revelation: - Knights of Columbus, Supreme Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Why The Apocalypse?<br />

But if this is so – if the Apo calypse has been so subject to<br />

misinterpretation, if it really is not a detailed glimpse <strong>of</strong> world history – why<br />

was it written in such a fashion? Why all the involved images and symbols?<br />

Why was it necessary to put into such a form what, after all, is basically con -<br />

tained in the Gospels and the rest <strong>of</strong> the New Testament?<br />

To answer this, we need know two things. First, the state <strong>of</strong> the Church<br />

when the Apocalypse was written. Second, what kind <strong>of</strong> per son was its author.<br />

The first answer is given from the Pauline Epistles and the Gospels as<br />

well as from the Apocalypse. Persecutions, <strong>of</strong> the sort Paul had to console his<br />

readers about, had begun to afflict the Church. Even worse persecutions, in<br />

fact, had descended than any <strong>of</strong> those Paul had to face. There was no longer<br />

question <strong>of</strong> Jewish discrimination against Christians, <strong>of</strong> petty restric tions on a<br />

local level, <strong>of</strong> the indi vidual riot at Ephesus or the beat ing at Philippi and the<br />

single mob in Jerusalem. Now the whole might <strong>of</strong> a vast and well organized<br />

Empire was beginning to turn upon Chris tianity. Throughout the Acts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Apostles, Luke tells us by implica tion that the Romans were more likely to be<br />

favorably disposed to Christians than not, as contrasted with their attitude to<br />

the Jews. Certainly there had been no open hostility <strong>of</strong> Romans as Romans<br />

directed against the Christians as Christians. If Felix had kept Paul in prison<br />

unjustly, it was because he was a corrupt man, not because he was a Roman,<br />

and because Paul was a potential source <strong>of</strong> income, not because he was a<br />

Christian. Felix could not have cared less about Christianity as a religion. And<br />

so it had been generally. But now all this had changed.<br />

Roman Persecution<br />

Paul had been in prison in Rome between the years A.D 61-63. He had<br />

been released for lack <strong>of</strong> any evidence against him, and he had been imprisoned<br />

in the first place because <strong>of</strong> charges made by his own people. But shortly after<br />

Paul’s re lease the madman who ruled Rome under the name <strong>of</strong> Nero first fired<br />

the city <strong>of</strong> Rome, as the Roman historians acknowledge, and then used the<br />

Christian community as the scapegoat on which to lay the blame. Persecution<br />

began. Paul himself was to be hunted down and executed in the year 67. The<br />

ter rible spectacles were enacted that have been faithfully chronicled by<br />

contemporary authors – the degen erate emperor feasting in a garden illumined<br />

- 9 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!