30.03.2014 Views

conference proceedin.. - Facultatea de Drept

conference proceedin.. - Facultatea de Drept

conference proceedin.. - Facultatea de Drept

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conference Proceedings - Galaţi, 24 th -25 th of April 2009<br />

Year I, Vol. II - 2009<br />

Andrada TRUȘCĂ TRANDAFIR 1<br />

HOW TO ACHIEVE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO A HEALTHY<br />

ENVIRONMENT AND THE JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY THROUGH<br />

THE PRINCIPLE OF THE PUBLIC’S INFORMATION AND<br />

PARTICIPATION IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS*<br />

Abstract<br />

In the domain of the protection of the environment, the general ten<strong>de</strong>ncy is that<br />

the environment should be protected by laws meant to settle down those activities able to<br />

bring prejudices; there shall be passed more laws to prevent prejudices and less to lay<br />

responsibilities: very often the ecological prejudices are <strong>de</strong>finitive, the <strong>de</strong>gradation is<br />

irreversible and the costs of the reparations –be they partial or total – are very high. The<br />

result is that an ”a posteriori” step in the domain of ”the committed evil” will more often<br />

than not be unclear and its effects will not lead to a complete and efficient reparation.<br />

Introduction<br />

From the linguistic point of view, “responsibility” is the way a<br />

person un<strong>de</strong>rstands his/ her obligation as reported to society, to the group<br />

of people he/ she is living and working in, and to the seriousness with<br />

which he/ she realizes the importance of adopting a responsible behavior<br />

(Rădulescu, 2006, pg 159).<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>a of a judicial responsibility makes the object of all the<br />

domains of law, suggesting reparation or sanctioning. Practically it is about<br />

a social relationship judicially sanctioned; this relationship is based on the<br />

principle according to which any person has a social relationship with<br />

another person and, consequently, any prejudice that appeared between<br />

them shall be repaired or penalized accordingly (Marinescu, 2008, pg. 635).<br />

We do agree with those authors (Uliescu, 1998, 56) who say that<br />

the ”classic” juridical responsibility is manifested in the civil,<br />

administrative and penal responsibilities (which is certainly stipulated in<br />

the common law applied to all these branches) becomes insufficient and<br />

ina<strong>de</strong>quate in case the laws concerning the norms on the protection of the<br />

environment are infringed or in case prejudices against the environment<br />

are noticed (in case of an ecologic prejudice).<br />

1 Asist. univ. drd. Andrada Trușcă Trandafir, “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian<br />

University, 176 Splaiul Unirii Rd. sect. 4 Bucharest Romania, Tel. no. 021/330 79 12,<br />

Fax no. 021/330 87 74, E-mail andrada_trandafir@yahoo.com<br />

* Translation from romanian to english ma<strong>de</strong> by asist. univ. Smaranda Lozinschi,<br />

“Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!