Dynamic behaviour of suction caissons
Dynamic behaviour of suction caissons
Dynamic behaviour of suction caissons
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Contents<br />
1 Introduction 1<br />
1.1 Offshore wind turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<br />
1.2 Foundations for <strong>of</strong>fshore wind turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2<br />
1.2.1 Gravity based foundations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />
1.2.2 Monopile Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />
1.2.3 Tripod Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />
1.2.4 Suction <strong>caissons</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />
1.3 Need for further research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8<br />
1.4 Research aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8<br />
1.4.1 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the frequency dependent stiffness <strong>of</strong> <strong>suction</strong> <strong>caissons</strong> 9<br />
1.4.2 Experimental estimation <strong>of</strong> resonance frequencies . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />
1.4.3 Formulation and implementation <strong>of</strong> lumped-parameter models . . 9<br />
1.5 Thesis outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />
2 <strong>Dynamic</strong> stiffness <strong>of</strong> <strong>suction</strong> <strong>caissons</strong>—vertical vibrations 11<br />
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11<br />
2.2 Analysis methods for dynamic soil-structure<br />
interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />
2.3 Boundary element/finite element formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13<br />
2.3.1 Boundary element formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13<br />
2.3.2 Coupling <strong>of</strong> FE and BE regions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15<br />
2.4 Static and dynamic stiffness formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16<br />
2.5 Benchmark tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17<br />
2.5.1 Verification <strong>of</strong> the vertical static stiffness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17<br />
2.5.2 Reproduction <strong>of</strong> the vertical dynamic stiffness <strong>of</strong> a surface footing 18<br />
2.6 <strong>Dynamic</strong> stiffness for vertical vibrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22<br />
2.6.1 Vertical dynamic stiffness—variation <strong>of</strong> Poisson’s ratio . . . . . . . 23<br />
2.6.2 Vertical dynamic stiffness—variation <strong>of</strong> soil stiffness . . . . . . . . 23<br />
2.6.3 Vertical dynamic stiffness—high-frequency <strong>behaviour</strong> . . . . . . . . 23<br />
2.7 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27<br />
2.8 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<br />
— ix —