08.04.2014 Views

Unit - Anna Lee

Unit - Anna Lee

Unit - Anna Lee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Income Statement and<br />

Comprehensive Income<br />

An income<br />

statement for a<br />

hypothetical<br />

manufacturing<br />

company that you<br />

can refer to as we<br />

proceed through<br />

the chapter.<br />

Note: Dividend revenue: other income


4-2<br />

Separately Reported Items<br />

Reported separately, net of taxes:<br />

Discontinued<br />

operations<br />

Extraordinary<br />

items


4-3<br />

Intraperiod Income Tax Allocation<br />

Income Tax Expense must be associated with<br />

each component of income that causes it.<br />

Show Income Tax<br />

Expense related to<br />

Income from Continuing<br />

Operations.<br />

Report effects of<br />

Discontinued Operations and<br />

Extraordinary Items net of<br />

related income tax effect.


4-4<br />

Discontinued Operations<br />

As part of the continuing process to converge U.S. GAAP and<br />

international standards, the FASB and IASB have been working<br />

together to develop a common definition and a common set of<br />

disclosures for discontinued operations.<br />

The proposed ASU (Accounting Standards Updates) defines a<br />

discontinued operation as a “component” that either (a) has<br />

been disposed of or (b) is classified as held for sale, and<br />

represents one of the following:<br />

1. a separate major line of business or major geographical area<br />

of operations,<br />

2. part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate<br />

major line of business or geographical area of operations, or<br />

3. a business that meets the criteria to be classified as held for<br />

sale on acquisition.


Reporting Discontinued Operations<br />

Reporting for Components Sold<br />

4-5<br />

1. Income or loss from<br />

operations of the component<br />

from the beginning of the<br />

reporting period to the<br />

disposal date.<br />

2. Gain or loss on the disposal of<br />

the component’s assets.<br />

Reporting for Components Held For Sale<br />

1. Income or loss from<br />

operations of the component<br />

from the beginning of the<br />

reporting period to the end<br />

of the reporting period.<br />

2. An “impairment loss”<br />

if asset’s carrying value (book value) ><br />

(fair value - cost to sell, i.e., net<br />

realizable value).<br />

1 & 2 can be combined or separately<br />

reported.<br />

If 1 & 2 are combined, the impairment<br />

loss must be disclosed.


Impairment of Value<br />

Accounting treatment differs.<br />

Test for<br />

impairment<br />

of value when<br />

considered<br />

for sale.<br />

4-6<br />

Long-term assets<br />

to be held and used<br />

Long-term assets<br />

held for sale<br />

Tangible and<br />

intangible<br />

with finite<br />

useful lives<br />

Intangibles<br />

with<br />

indefinite<br />

useful lives<br />

Test for impairment of value<br />

when it is suspected that book<br />

value may not be recoverable.<br />

Goodwill<br />

Test for<br />

impairment of<br />

value at least<br />

annually.<br />

Other than<br />

Goodwill: Test<br />

for impairment<br />

of value when it<br />

is likely that<br />

the fair value of<br />

a reporting unit<br />

is less than its<br />

book value.


4-7<br />

Finite-Life Assets to be Held and Used<br />

Measurement – Step 1<br />

An asset is impaired when . . .<br />

The undiscounted<br />

sum of its estimated<br />

future cash flows<br />

<<br />

Its<br />

book<br />

value<br />

Recoverability Test


4-8<br />

Finite-Life Assets to be Held and Used<br />

Impairment<br />

loss =<br />

Measurement – Step 2<br />

Book<br />

value<br />

–<br />

Fair<br />

value<br />

Reported in the income<br />

statement as a separate<br />

component of operating<br />

expenses<br />

Market value, price of similar assets,<br />

or PV of future net cash inflows.<br />

Undiscounted future<br />

Fair value<br />

cash flows<br />

$0 $125<br />

$250<br />

Case 1: $50 book value.<br />

No loss recognized<br />

Case 3: $275 book value.<br />

Loss = $275 BV– $125 FV<br />

Case 2: $250 > $150 book value. No loss recognized


4-9<br />

Assets Held for Sale<br />

Assets held for sale:<br />

assets that management<br />

has committed to sell immediately in<br />

their present condition and<br />

for which sale is probable.<br />

Impairment<br />

loss<br />

=<br />

Book<br />

value<br />

–<br />

Fair value less<br />

cost to sell (NRV)


4-10<br />

U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS<br />

Impairment of Value: Property, Plant, and<br />

Equipment and Finite-Life Intangible Assets<br />

<br />

<br />

Assets are tested for impairment<br />

when events or changes<br />

indicates that book value may<br />

not be recoverable.<br />

An impairment loss is required<br />

when an asset’s book value ><br />

the undiscounted sum of the<br />

estimated future cash flows.<br />

<br />

<br />

Assets must be assessed for<br />

circumstances of impairment at<br />

the end of each reporting period.<br />

An impairment loss is required<br />

when an asset’s book value ><br />

Recoverable amount: higher<br />

of the asset’s value-in-use (present<br />

value of estimated future cash<br />

flow) and fair value less costs to<br />

sell (NRV).


4-11<br />

U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS<br />

Impairment of Value: Property, Plant, and<br />

Equipment and Finite-Life Intangible Assets<br />

<br />

<br />

The impairment loss: book value<br />

- fair value.<br />

Reversals of impairment losses are<br />

prohibited.<br />

The impairment loss: book value -<br />

recoverable amount (the higher of<br />

the asset’s value-in-use and fair<br />

value less costs to sell).<br />

<br />

An impairment loss is reversed if<br />

the circumstances that caused the<br />

impairment are resolved.


4-12<br />

Finite-Life Assets to be Held and Used<br />

Because Acme Auto Parts has seen its sales steadily decrease due to the<br />

decline in new car sales, Acme’s management believes that equipment<br />

that originally cost $350 million, with a $200 million book value, may not<br />

be recoverable. Management estimates that future undiscounted cash<br />

flows associated with the equipment’s remaining useful life will be only<br />

$140 million, and that the equipment’s fair value is $120 million.<br />

Has Acme suffered an impairment loss and, if so, how should it be<br />

recorded?<br />

Step 1<br />

$140 million < $200 million<br />

Impairment loss is indicated.


4-13<br />

Finite-Life Assets to be Held and Used<br />

Because Acme Auto Parts has seen its sales steadily decrease due to the<br />

decline in new car sales, Acme’s management believes that equipment<br />

that originally cost $350 million, with a $200 million book value, may not<br />

be recoverable. Management estimates that future undiscounted cash<br />

flows associated with the equipment’s remaining useful life will be only<br />

$140 million, and that the equipment’s fair value is $120 million. Has<br />

Acme suffered an impairment loss and, if so, how should it be recorded?<br />

Step 2<br />

Impairment loss = $200 million BV – $120 million FV = $80 million<br />

Impairment loss ................................... 80,000,000<br />

Accumulated depreciation ................... 150,000,000<br />

Equipment ……………………. 230,000,000<br />

To record impairment loss.


Indefinite-Life Intangibles<br />

4-14<br />

Goodwill<br />

(Special treatment)<br />

Other Indefinitelife<br />

intangibles<br />

Step 1 If BV of reporting unit<br />

> FV, impairment indicated.<br />

Step 2 Loss = BV of goodwill<br />

- implied value of goodwill.<br />

One-Step Process<br />

If asset’s BV > FV,<br />

recognize<br />

impairment loss.<br />

A reporting unit is an operating segment of a company or a component of an<br />

operating segment for which discrete financial information is available (and<br />

segment managers regularly review the operating results of that component).<br />

Implied value = segment’s (reporting unit’s) FV – segment’s net assets (excluding<br />

good will)


4-15<br />

U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS<br />

Impairment of Value: Indefinite-Life Intangible<br />

Assets Other Than Goodwill<br />

<br />

Indefinite-life intangible assets<br />

other than goodwill are tested for<br />

impairment at least annually.<br />

<br />

Indefinite-life intangible assets<br />

other than goodwill are tested for<br />

impairment at least annually.<br />

<br />

The impairment loss: = book value<br />

- fair value.<br />

<br />

The impairment loss = book value<br />

- recoverable amount (the<br />

higher of the asset’s value-in-use<br />

(present value of estimated future<br />

cash flows) and fair value less costs<br />

to sell (NRV)).


4-16<br />

U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS (cont’d)<br />

Impairment of Value: Indefinite-Life Intangible<br />

Assets Other Than Goodwill<br />

<br />

<br />

Reversals of impairment losses are<br />

prohibited.<br />

If certain criteria are met,<br />

indefinite-life intangible assets are<br />

combined for the required annual<br />

impairment test.<br />

<br />

<br />

An impairment loss is reversed if<br />

the circumstances that caused the<br />

impairment are resolved.<br />

Indefinite-life intangible assets may<br />

not be combined with other<br />

indefinite-life intangible assets for<br />

the required annual impairment<br />

test.


4-17<br />

U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS<br />

Impairment of Value: Goodwill<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Goodwill is tested for impairment<br />

when it is likely that the fair value<br />

of a reporting unit is less than its<br />

book value.<br />

Reversals of impairment losses are<br />

prohibited.<br />

The level of testing (reporting<br />

unit) is a segment or a component<br />

of an operating segment for which<br />

discrete financial information is<br />

available.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Goodwill is tested for impairment<br />

at least annually.<br />

Reversals of impairment losses are<br />

prohibited.<br />

The level of testing (cashgenerating<br />

unit) is the smallest<br />

identifiable group of assets that<br />

generates cash flows that are<br />

largely independent of the cash<br />

flows from other assets.


U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS<br />

4-18<br />

Impairment of Value: Goodwill<br />

<br />

Measurement of an impairment<br />

loss is a two-step process. In step<br />

one the fair value of the reporting<br />

unit is compared to its book value.<br />

A loss is indicated if the fair value<br />

is less than the book value. In<br />

step two, the impairment loss is<br />

calculated as the excess of book<br />

value of goodwill over the implied<br />

fair value of goodwill.<br />

<br />

Measurement of an impairment<br />

loss is a one-step process. The<br />

recoverable amount of the cashgenerating<br />

unit is compared to its<br />

book value. If the recoverable<br />

amount is < BV, 1 st , reduce<br />

goodwill, 2 nd , reduce other assets.


4-19<br />

Impairment of Goodwill<br />

Simmons Company recorded $150 million of goodwill when it acquired<br />

Blake Company. Blake continues to operate as a separate company and is<br />

considered to be a reporting unit. At the end of the current year Simmons<br />

noted the following related to Blake: (1) book value of net assets, including<br />

$150 million of goodwill, is $500 million; (2) fair value of Blake is $400 million;<br />

and (3) fair value of Blake’s identifiable net assets, excluding goodwill, is<br />

$350 million. Is goodwill impaired and, if so, by what amount?<br />

Step 1<br />

$500 million net assets > $400 million FV<br />

Impairment loss is indicated.


4-20<br />

Impairment of Goodwill<br />

Simmons Company recorded $150 million of goodwill when it acquired<br />

Blake Company. Blake continues to operate as a separate company and is<br />

considered to be a reporting unit. At the end of the current year Simmons<br />

noted the following related to Blake: (1) book value of net assets, including<br />

$150 million of goodwill, is $500 million; (2) fair value of Blake is $400<br />

million; and (3) fair value of Blake’s identifiable net assets, excluding goodwill,<br />

is $350 million. Is goodwill impaired and, if so, by what amount?<br />

Step 2<br />

Determination of implied goodwill<br />

Fair value of Blake $ 400,000,000<br />

Fair value of Blake's net assets excluding goodwill 350,000,000<br />

Implied value of goodwill $ 50,000,000<br />

Measure of impairment loss<br />

Book value of goodwill $ 150,000,000<br />

Implied value of goodwill 50,000,000<br />

Impairment loss $ 100,000,000


4-21<br />

Extraordinary Items<br />

An extraordinary item is a material<br />

event or transaction that is both:<br />

1. Unusual in nature, and<br />

2. Infrequent in occurrence<br />

Extraordinary items are reported net<br />

of related taxes


4-22<br />

Items Not Extraordinary<br />

1. Write-downs of receivables, inventories, intangible<br />

assets.<br />

2. Gains & losses from foreign currencies exchange or<br />

translation.<br />

3. Gains & losses on disposal of a component or entity.<br />

4. Other gains or losses from sale of abandonment of<br />

property, plant, & equipment.<br />

5. Strikes<br />

6. Adjustments of accruals on long-term contracts.


4-23<br />

U. S. GAAP vs. IFRS<br />

The scarcity of extraordinary gains and losses reported in<br />

corporate income statements and the desire to converge<br />

U.S. and international accounting standards could guide<br />

the FASB to the elimination of the extraordinary item<br />

classification.<br />

<br />

Report extraordinary items<br />

separately in the income<br />

statement.<br />

<br />

Prohibits reporting extraordinary<br />

items in the income statement or<br />

notes.


4-24<br />

Unusual or Infrequent Items<br />

Items that are material and are<br />

either unusual or infrequent—but not<br />

both—are included as separate<br />

items in continuing operations, not<br />

net of tax.


4-25<br />

Accounting Changes<br />

Type of Accounting<br />

Changes<br />

Change in Accounting<br />

Principle<br />

Change in Accounting<br />

Estimate<br />

Change in Reporting<br />

Entity<br />

Definition<br />

Change from one GAAP method<br />

to another GAAP method<br />

Revision of an estimate<br />

because of new information or<br />

new experience<br />

Preparation of financial<br />

statements for an accounting<br />

entity other than the entity that<br />

existed in the previous period


4-26<br />

Change in Accounting Principle<br />

Occurs when changing from one GAAP method to<br />

another GAAP method, for example, a change from LIFO<br />

to FIFO<br />

GAAP requires that most voluntary accounting changes be<br />

accounted for retrospectively by revising prior years’<br />

financial statements.<br />

For mandated changes in accounting principles, the FASB<br />

often allows companies to choose to account for the<br />

change retrospectively or as a separately reported<br />

item below extraordinary items.


4-27<br />

Change in Accounting Principle - Example<br />

Change in Accounting Principle: Gaubert Inc. decided in<br />

March 2012 to change from FIFO to weighted-average inventory<br />

pricing. Gaubert’s income before taxes, using the new weightedaverage<br />

method in 2012, is $30,000.<br />

Pretax Income Data<br />

Calculation of a Change in<br />

Accounting Principle<br />

Income Statement<br />

Presentation of a Change<br />

in Accounting Principle<br />

(Based on 30% tax rate)<br />

Under the retrospective approach, the co. recasts the prior year’s income<br />

Numbers under the new method.


4-28<br />

Changes in Estimates<br />

ESTIMATED<br />

service life<br />

ESTIMATED<br />

residual value<br />

Changes in estimates are accounted for prospectively.<br />

The book value less any residual value at the date of change is<br />

depreciated over the remaining useful life. A disclosure note<br />

should describe the effect of a change.<br />

Example: On January 1, equipment was purchased that cost<br />

$30,000, has a useful life of 10 years, and no residual value. At the<br />

beginning of the fourth year, it was decided that there were only 5<br />

years remaining, instead of 7 years.<br />

Calculate depreciation for the fourth<br />

year using the straight-line method.


4-29<br />

Changes in Estimates<br />

Asset cost $ 30,000<br />

Accumulated depreciation<br />

($3,000 per year × 3 years) 9,000<br />

Remaining book value 21,000<br />

Divide by remaining life ÷ 5<br />

Revised annual depreciation $ 4,200


4-30<br />

Change in Depreciation Method<br />

A change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion<br />

method is considered a change in accounting estimate that<br />

is a result of (achieved by) a change in accounting principle.<br />

We account for these changes prospectively,<br />

exactly as we would any other change in estimate.<br />

On January 1, 2011, Matrix Inc. purchased office equipment for $400,000.<br />

Matrix expected a residual value $40,000, and a service life of 5 years.<br />

Matrix uses the double-declining-balance method to depreciate this type of<br />

asset. During 2013, the company switched from double-declining balance to<br />

straight-line depreciation. The residual value remained at $40,000. Let’s<br />

determine the amount of depreciation to be recorded for 2013.


4-31<br />

Change in Depreciation Method<br />

Depreciation - 2011 $ 160,000 ($400,000 × 40%)<br />

Depreciation - 2012 96,000 [($400,000 - $160,000) × 40%]<br />

Total Depreciation $ 256,000<br />

Cost of asset $ 400,000<br />

Less: Accumulated depreciation 256,000<br />

Undepreciated balance $ 144,000<br />

Less: residual value (40,000)<br />

New depreciable amount 104,000<br />

Remaining service life ÷ 3<br />

Annual depreciation $ 34,667<br />

December 31, 2013:<br />

Depreciation expense ................................... 34,667<br />

Accumulated depreciation................ 34,667<br />

To record depreciation expense.


Beginning inventory<br />

Plus: Net purchases<br />

Less: Ending inventory<br />

Cost of goods sold<br />

Corrections of Errors<br />

Example: Inventory Errors<br />

Revenues<br />

Less: Cost of goods sold<br />

Less: Other expenses<br />

Net income<br />

When analyzing inventory errors, it’s<br />

helpful to visualize the way cost of goods<br />

sold, net income, and retained earnings are<br />

determined.<br />

Beginning retained earnings<br />

Plus: net income<br />

Less: Dividends<br />

Ending retained earnings<br />

4-32


4-33<br />

Inventory Errors<br />

• Overstatement of ending inventory<br />

◦ Understates cost of goods sold and<br />

◦ Overstates pretax income.<br />

• Understatement of ending inventory<br />

◦ Overstates cost of goods sold and<br />

◦ Understates pretax income.


4-34<br />

Inventory Errors<br />

• Overstatement of beginning inventory<br />

◦ Overstates cost of goods sold and<br />

◦ Understates pretax income.<br />

• Understatement of beginning inventory<br />

◦ Understates cost of goods sold and<br />

◦ Overstates pretax income.


Correction of Inventory Errors -<br />

Summary<br />

4-35<br />

Discovered the Following Year:<br />

Example: If an inventory error was made in 2013, but not discovered<br />

until 2014 (the following year), the 2013 financial statements were<br />

incorrect as a result of the error. The error should be retrospectively<br />

restated to reflect the correct inventory amount, cost of goods sold, net<br />

income, and retained earnings when the comparative 2014 and 2013<br />

financial statements are issued for 2014.<br />

Dr. Retained Earnings<br />

Cr. Inventory<br />

Discovered Subsequent to the Following Year:<br />

Example: If an error was made in 2013, but not discovered until 2015,<br />

No correcting entry is needed in 2015. The error has self-corrected and<br />

no prior period adjustment is needed.


4-36<br />

Correction of Errors<br />

Errors occur when transactions are either<br />

recorded incorrectly or not recorded at all.<br />

Errors<br />

Discovered in<br />

Same Year<br />

Reverse original erroneous journal entry<br />

and record the appropriate journal entry.<br />

Material Errors<br />

Discovered in<br />

Subsequent Year<br />

Record a prior period adjustment to the<br />

beginning retained earnings balance in a<br />

statement of shareholders’ equity.<br />

Previous years’ financial statements that<br />

are incorrect as a result of the error are<br />

retrospectively restated to reflect the<br />

correction.


4-37<br />

Corrections of Errors (Cont’d)<br />

In addition, a disclosure note is needed to describe the nature of<br />

the error and the impact of its correction on net income, income<br />

before extraordinary items, and earnings per share.


4-38<br />

Corrections of Errors<br />

– Sales Rev & Accounts Receivable Overstated<br />

Example: in 2013, Hillsboro Co. determined that it incorrectly<br />

overstated its accounts receivable and sales revenue by<br />

$100,000 in 2010. In 2013, Hillboro makes the following entry<br />

to correct for this error (ignore income taxes).<br />

Retained earnings 100,000<br />

Accounts receivable 100,000


4-39<br />

Earnings Per Share<br />

- Special Reporting Issues<br />

BEPS =<br />

Net income - Preferred dividends<br />

Weighted average number of shares outstanding<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

An important business indicator.<br />

Measures the dollars earned by each share of common<br />

stock.<br />

Must be disclosed on the income statement.


Earnings Per Share<br />

- Example<br />

4-40<br />

Earnings Per Share: In 2012, Hollis Corporation reported net<br />

income of $1,000,000. It declared and paid preferred stock<br />

dividends of $250,000. During 2012, Hollis had a weighted<br />

average of 190,000 common shares outstanding. Compute<br />

Hollis’s 2012 earnings per share.<br />

Net income - Preferred dividends<br />

Weighted average number of shares outstanding<br />

$1,000,000<br />

190,000<br />

- $250,000<br />

= $3.95 per share


Special Reporting Issues<br />

4-41<br />

Assume that the co. had 100,000 shares outstanding for the entire year.<br />

Divide by<br />

weightedaverage<br />

shares<br />

outstanding<br />

EPS


4-42<br />

Earnings Per Share Disclosure<br />

One of the most widely used ratios is earnings per<br />

share (EPS), which shows the amount of income<br />

earned by a company expressed on a per share basis.<br />

Basic EPS<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

Net income less preferred dividends<br />

Weighted-average number of<br />

common shares outstanding for the<br />

period<br />

Reflects the potential dilution that could<br />

occur for companies that have certain<br />

securities outstanding that are convertible<br />

into common shares or stock options that<br />

could create additional common shares if<br />

the options were exercised.


4-43<br />

Computing Earnings Per Share<br />

Earnings per share indicates the income earned by each share of<br />

common stock.<br />

<br />

<br />

Companies report earnings per share only for common stock.<br />

When the income statement contains intermediate<br />

components of income (such as discontinued operations or<br />

extraordinary items), companies should disclose earnings per<br />

share for each component.<br />

Illustration 16-7


4-44<br />

EPS - Simple Capital Structure<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Simple Structure--Only common stock; no potentially<br />

dilutive securities.<br />

Complex Structure--Potentially dilutive securities are<br />

present.<br />

“Dilutive” means the ability to influence the EPS in a<br />

downward direction.


4-45<br />

EPS - Simple Capital Structure<br />

Preferred Stock Dividends<br />

Subtracts the current-year preferred stock dividend from net<br />

income to arrive at income available to common stockholders.<br />

Preferred dividends are subtracted on cumulative preferred<br />

stock, whether declared or not.


4-46<br />

EPS - Simple Capital Structure<br />

Weighted-Average Number of Shares<br />

Companies must weight the shares by the fraction of the period<br />

they are outstanding.<br />

When stock dividends or share splits occur, companies need to<br />

restate the shares outstanding before the share dividend or split.


4-47<br />

EPS - Simple Capital Structure<br />

Illustration: Franks Inc. has the following changes in its common<br />

stock during the period.<br />

Compute the weighted-average number of shares outstanding<br />

for Frank Inc.


4-48<br />

Weighted-average Number of Shares Outstanding<br />

Weighted-average Number of Shares Outstanding<br />

Dates Outstanding (A) Shares Outstanding (B) Fraction of Year Weighted Shares (AxB)<br />

1/1 - 12/31 90,000 90,000<br />

4/1 - 12/31 30,000 9/12 22,500<br />

7/1 - 12/31 (39,000) 6/12 (19,500)<br />

11/1 - 12/31 60,000 2/12 10,000<br />

Weighted-average<br />

# of shares<br />

outstanding 103,000


4-49<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Complex Capital Structure exists when a business has<br />

<br />

<br />

convertible securities,<br />

options, warrants, or other rights<br />

that upon conversion or exercise could dilute earnings per<br />

share.<br />

Company is required to report both basic and diluted<br />

earnings per share.


EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Diluted EPS includes the effect of all potential dilutive common<br />

shares that were outstanding during the period.<br />

4-50<br />

Companies will not report diluted EPS if the securities in their capital<br />

structure are antidilutive. Ignore antidilutive securities in all calculations<br />

and in computing diluted earnings per share.<br />

The effect of the conversion or exercise of potential common shares<br />

would increase rather than decrease the EPS, they are referred to as<br />

“Antidilutive Securities”.


4-51<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Diluted EPS – Convertible Securities<br />

Measure the dilutive effects of potential conversion on EPS<br />

using the if-converted method.<br />

This method for a convertible bond assumes:<br />

(1) the conversion at the beginning of the period (or at<br />

the time of issuance of the security, if issued during<br />

the period), and<br />

(2) the elimination of related interest, net of tax.


4-52<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Example - Convertible Bonds: In 2012 Buraka Enterprises issued, at par,<br />

75, $1,000, 8% bonds, each convertible into 100 shares of common<br />

stock. Buraka had revenues of $17,500 and expenses other than<br />

interest and taxes of $8,400 for 2013. (Assume that the tax rate is 40%.)<br />

Throughout 2013, 2,000 shares of common stock were<br />

outstanding; none of the bonds was converted or redeemed.<br />

Instructions<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2013.<br />

(b) Assume same facts as those for Part (a), except the 75 bonds were<br />

issued on September 1, 2013 (rather than in 2012), and none have<br />

been converted or redeemed.


4-53<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2013.<br />

Calculation of Net Income<br />

Revenues $17,500<br />

Expenses 8,400<br />

Bond interest expense (75 x $1,000 x 8%) 6,000<br />

Income before taxes 3,100<br />

Income tax expense (40%) 1,240<br />

Net income $ 1,860


4-54<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2013.<br />

When calculating Diluted EPS, begin with Basis EPS.<br />

Basic EPS<br />

Net income = $1,860<br />

Weighted average shares = 2,000<br />

= $.93


4-55<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2013.<br />

When calculating Diluted EPS, begin with Basic EPS.<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

$1,860<br />

2,000<br />

+ $6,000 (1 - .40)<br />

+<br />

7,500<br />

$5,460<br />

= = $.57<br />

9,500<br />

Basic EPS<br />

= .93<br />

Effect on EPS = .48<br />

Adjustment for interest: interest is adjusted (added back as net income)<br />

at “net of tax” if the 75 bonds are converted.<br />

7,500 shares = 75x 100 shares, if converted


4-56<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(b) Assume bonds were issued on Sept. 1, 2013 .<br />

Calculation of Net Income<br />

Revenues $ 17,500<br />

Expenses 8,400<br />

Bond interest expense (75 x $1,000 x 8% x 4/12) 2,000<br />

Income before taxes 7,100<br />

Income taxes (40%) 2,840<br />

Net income $ 4,260


4-57<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(b) Assume bonds were issued on Sept. 1, 2013 .<br />

When calculating Diluted EPS, begin with Basic EPS.<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

$4,260<br />

2,000<br />

+<br />

+<br />

$2,000 (1 - .40)<br />

7,500 x 4/12 yr.<br />

$5,460<br />

= = $1.21<br />

4,500<br />

Basic EPS<br />

= 2.13<br />

Effect on EPS = .48<br />

2,000 interest = 6,000 x 4/12


4-58<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Variation-Convertible Preferred Stock: Prior to 2012, Barkley<br />

Company issued 40,000 shares of 6% convertible, cumulative preferred<br />

stock, $100 par value. Each share is convertible into 5 shares of<br />

common stock. Net income for 2012 was $1,200,000. There were<br />

600,000 common shares outstanding during 2012. There were no<br />

changes during 2012 in the number of common or preferred shares<br />

outstanding.<br />

Instructions<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2012.


4-59<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2012.<br />

When calculating Diluted EPS, begin with Basic EPS.<br />

Basic EPS<br />

Net income $1,200,000 – Pfd. Div. $240,000*<br />

Weighted average shares = 600,000<br />

= $1.60<br />

* 40,000 shares x $100 par x 6% = $240,000 dividend


4-60<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2012.<br />

When calculating Diluted EPS, begin with Basic EPS.<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

$1,200,000 – $240,000<br />

600,000<br />

+<br />

+<br />

$240,000<br />

200,000*<br />

=<br />

$1,200,000<br />

800,000<br />

=<br />

Basic EPS = 1.60<br />

Effect on<br />

EPS = 1.20<br />

$1.50<br />

*(40,000 x 5)


4-61<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2012 assuming each<br />

share of preferred is convertible into 3 shares of common stock.<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

$1,200,000 – $240,000<br />

600,000<br />

+<br />

+<br />

$240,000<br />

120,000*<br />

=<br />

$1,200,000<br />

720,000<br />

=<br />

$1.67<br />

Basic EPS = 1.60<br />

Effect on<br />

EPS = 2.00<br />

*(40,000 x 3)


4-62<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

P16-8 (a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2012 assuming<br />

each share of preferred is convertible into 3 shares of common<br />

stock.<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

Basic = Diluted EPS<br />

$1,200,000 – $240,000<br />

600,000<br />

Basic EPS = 1.60<br />

+<br />

+<br />

$240,000<br />

120,000*<br />

Antidilutive<br />

Effect on<br />

EPS = 2.00<br />

=<br />

$1,200,000<br />

720,000<br />

$1.67<br />

*(40,000 x 3)<br />

Because the $1.67 DEPS is > the $1.60 BEPS, the effective is antidilutive.<br />

=


4-63<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Diluted EPS – Options and Warrants<br />

Measure the dilutive effects of potential conversion using the<br />

treasury-stock method.<br />

This method assumes:<br />

(1) company exercises the options or warrants at the<br />

beginning of the year (or date of issue if later), and<br />

(2) that it uses those proceeds to purchase common<br />

stock for the treasury.


4-64<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Example - EPS with Options: Zambrano Company’s net income for 2012<br />

is $40,000. The only potentially dilutive securities outstanding were<br />

1,000 options issued during 2011, each exercisable for one share at $8.<br />

None has been exercised, and 10,000 shares of common were<br />

outstanding during 2012. The average market price of the stock during<br />

2012 was $20.<br />

Instructions<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share.<br />

(b) Assume the 1,000 options were issued on October 1, 2012 (rather<br />

than in 2011). The average market price during the last 3 months of<br />

2012 was $20.


4-65<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2012.<br />

Treasury-Stock Method<br />

Proceeds if shares issued (1,000 x $8) $8,000<br />

Purchase price for treasury shares $20<br />

Shares assumed purchased 400<br />

Shares assumed issued 1,000<br />

Incremental share increase 600<br />

÷


4-66<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2012; the options were<br />

issued at beginning of the year.<br />

When calculating Diluted EPS, begin with Basic EPS.<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

$40,000<br />

10,000<br />

+<br />

+<br />

600<br />

=<br />

$40,000<br />

= $3.77<br />

10,600<br />

Basic EPS<br />

= 4.00<br />

Options


4-67<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(b) Compute diluted earnings per share assuming the 1,000 options<br />

were issued on October 1, 2012.<br />

Treasury-Stock Method<br />

Proceeds if shares issued (1,000 x $8) $ 8,000<br />

Purchase price for treasury shares $ 20<br />

Shares assumed purchased 400<br />

Shares assumed issued 1,000<br />

Incremental share increase 600<br />

Weight for 3 months assumed outstanding 3/12<br />

Weighted incremental share increase 150<br />

÷<br />

x


4-68<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

(b) Compute diluted earnings per share assuming the 1,000 options<br />

were issued on October 1, 2012.<br />

Diluted EPS<br />

$40,000<br />

10,000<br />

+<br />

150<br />

=<br />

$40,000<br />

= $3.94<br />

10,150<br />

Basic EPS<br />

= 4.00<br />

Options


4-69<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

EPS Presentation and Disclosure<br />

A company should show BEPS (if only has common stocks<br />

outstanding) and DEPS (if has both common stocks and dilutive<br />

“potential common stocks” (PCS)) for:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Income from continuing operations,<br />

Income before extraordinary items, and<br />

Net income.<br />

Per share amounts for a discontinued operation or an extraordinary<br />

item should be presented on the face of the income statement or in<br />

the notes.


4-70<br />

EPS - Complex Capital Structure<br />

Complex capital structures and dual presentation of EPS require the<br />

following additional disclosures in note form.<br />

1. Description of pertinent rights and privileges of the various securities<br />

outstanding.<br />

2. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and<br />

diluted per share computations, including individual income and share<br />

amount effects of all securities that affect EPS.<br />

3. The effect given preferred dividends in determining income available to<br />

common stockholders in computing basic EPS.<br />

4. Securities that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future that were<br />

excluded in the computation because they would be antidilutive.<br />

5. Effect of conversions subsequent to year-end, but before issuing<br />

statements (subsequent event).


Revenue Recognition Before Delivery<br />

Completed Contract and Percentage-of-Completion<br />

Methods Compared<br />

4-71<br />

Example: At the beginning of 2013, the Harding Construction Company<br />

received a contract to build an office building for $5 million. The project is<br />

estimated to take three years to complete. According to the contract,<br />

Harding will bill the buyer in installments over the construction period<br />

according to a prearranged schedule. Information related to the contract is<br />

as follows:


Accounting for the Cost of Construction<br />

and Accounts Receivable<br />

4-72<br />

With both the completed contract and percentage-ofcompletion<br />

methods, all costs of construction are recorded in<br />

an asset account called construction in progress.


Gross Profit Recognition—General<br />

Approach<br />

4-73<br />

In both methods the same<br />

amounts of revenue, cost,<br />

and gross profit are<br />

recognized.<br />

In both methods we add<br />

gross profit to the<br />

construction in progress<br />

asset.


4-74<br />

How to Determine Gross Profit and Revenue<br />

– Completed Contract Method 3 steps<br />

How To Calculate Gross Profit and Revenue :<br />

1. % of completion = cost incurred/Total actual and estimated cost<br />

2. Gross profit recognized = % of completion x Estimated total gross profit (that is "Contract price - Total actual and estimated cost")<br />

3. Revenue recognized for long-term contract for the year = Gross profit recognized + Cost of construction<br />

Demonstration for Relevant Amounts in 2013 Journal Entry<br />

1. % of completion for 2013 = 1500000/3750000 = 40%<br />

2. 500,000, Gross Profit for 2013 = 40% x (5000000 - 3750000)<br />

3. 2,000,000 Revenue = 500,000 + 1,500,000


Gross Profit Recognition<br />

- Completed Contract<br />

4-75<br />

The same journal entry is recorded to close out the billings<br />

on construction contract and construction in progress<br />

accounts under the completed contract and percentage-ofcompletion<br />

methods.


Timing of Gross Profit Recognition<br />

- Completed Contract Method<br />

4-76<br />

Under the completed contract method, all revenues<br />

and expenses related to the project are recognized<br />

when the contract is completed.


Timing of Gross Profit Recognition<br />

- the Percentage-of-Completion Method<br />

4-77<br />

Under the percentage-of-completion method, profit<br />

is recognized over the life of the project as the<br />

project is completed.<br />

We determine the amount of gross profit recognized in each<br />

period using the following logic:


Percentage-of-Completion Method<br />

Allocation of Gross Profit<br />

4-78


Percentage-of-Completion Method<br />

- Allocation of Gross Profit<br />

4-79<br />

Notice that the gross profit recognized in each period is<br />

added to the construction in progress account.<br />

Percentage-of-Completion<br />

Construction in<br />

Progress<br />

Billings on<br />

Construction Contract<br />

2013 construction costs 1,500,000 1,200,000 2013 billings<br />

2013 gross profit 500,000 2,000,000 2014 billings<br />

End balance, 2013 2,000,000 1,800,000 2015 billings<br />

2014 construction costs 1,000,000 5,000,000 Balance, before closing<br />

2014 gross profit 125,000<br />

End balance, 2014 3,125,000<br />

2015 construction costs 1,600,000<br />

2015 gross profit 275,000<br />

Balance, before closing 5,000,000


Percentage-of-Completion Method<br />

Income Statement - Allocation of Gross Profit<br />

4-80<br />

The income statement for each year will report<br />

the appropriate revenue and cost of<br />

construction amounts.


4-81<br />

Income Recognition<br />

The same total amount of profit or loss is recognized under<br />

both the completed contract and the percentage-ofcompletion<br />

methods, but the timing of recognition differs.<br />

Percentage-of-Completion<br />

Completed Contract<br />

Gross profit recognized:<br />

2013 $500,000 –0–<br />

2014 125,000 –0–<br />

2015 275,000 $900,000<br />

Total gross profit $900,000 $900,000


4-82<br />

Balance Sheet Recognition<br />

The balance in the construction in progress account<br />

differs between methods because of the earlier<br />

gross profit recognition that occurs under the<br />

percentage-of-completion method.


4-83<br />

Balance Sheet Recognition<br />

Billings on construction contract are subtracted<br />

from construction in progress to determine balance<br />

sheet presentation.<br />

CIP > Billings<br />

Asset<br />

Billings > CIP<br />

Liability


4-84<br />

U. S. GAAP vs. IFRS<br />

There are similarities and differences between<br />

IFRS and U.S. GAAP when considering revenue<br />

recognition for long-term construction<br />

contracts.<br />

<br />

Requires percentage-ofcompletion<br />

when reliable<br />

estimates can be made.<br />

<br />

Requires percentage-ofcompletion<br />

when reliable<br />

estimates can be made.<br />

<br />

Requires completed contract<br />

method when reliable estimates<br />

can’t be made.<br />

<br />

Requires cost recovery method<br />

when reliable estimates can’t be<br />

made.


Revenue Recognition after Delivery<br />

Installment Sales Method & Cost Recovery Method<br />

Recognizing revenue when goods and services are delivered assumes we are able to<br />

make reasonable estimates of amounts due from customers that potentially might be<br />

uncollectible. For product sales, this also includes amounts not collectible due to<br />

customers returning the products they purchased. Otherwise, we would violate one of the<br />

requirements of the revenue realization principle—that there must be reasonable<br />

certainty as to the collectibility of cash from the customer.<br />

4-85<br />

In a few situations in which uncertainties are so severe that they could cause a delay<br />

in recognizing revenue from a sale of a product or service. For each of these situations,<br />

notice that the accounting is essentially the same—deferring recognition of the gross<br />

profit arising from a sale of a product or service until uncertainties have been<br />

resolved.<br />

Installment sales can be accounted for using the installment sales method or the cost<br />

recovery method.<br />

The installment sales method recognizes the gross profit by applying the gross profit<br />

percentage on the sale to the amount of cash actually collected.<br />

The cost recovery method defers all gross profit recognition until cash equal to the cost<br />

of the item sold has been collected.


4-86<br />

Installment Sales Method<br />

On November 1, 2013, the Belmont Corporation, a real<br />

estate developer, sold a tract of land for $800,000. The<br />

sales agreement requires the customer to make four<br />

equal annual payments of $200,000 plus interest on<br />

each November 1, beginning November 1, 2013. The<br />

land cost $560,000 to develop. The company’s fiscal<br />

year ends on December 31.<br />

Gross Profit<br />

$240,000 ÷ $800,000<br />

= 30%<br />

Amount Allocated to:<br />

Gross<br />

Date<br />

Cash<br />

Collected<br />

Cost<br />

(70%)<br />

Profit<br />

(30%)<br />

Nov. 1, 2013 $ 200,000 $ 140,000 $ 60,000<br />

Nov. 1, 2014 200,000 140,000 60,000<br />

Nov. 1, 2015 200,000 140,000 60,000<br />

Nov. 1, 2016 200,000 140,000 60,000<br />

Totals $ 800,000 $ 560,000 $ 240,000


Installment Sales Method<br />

4-87<br />

11/1/2013<br />

Record installment sales:<br />

Cash 200,000<br />

Installment receivable 600,000<br />

Cost of Goods Sold 560,000<br />

Inventory 560,000<br />

Installment Sales 800,000<br />

During 2013, Belmont Corporation collected<br />

$200,000 on its installment sales.<br />

This entry records the realized gross profit by<br />

adjusting the deferred gross profit account.


4-88<br />

Cost Recovery Method<br />

On November 1, 2013, the Belmont Corporation, a real<br />

estate developer, sold a tract of land for $800,000. The<br />

sales agreement requires the customer to make four<br />

equal annual payments of $200,000 plus interest on<br />

each November 1, beginning November 1, 2013. The<br />

land cost $560,000 to develop. The company’s fiscal<br />

year ends on December 31.<br />

Date<br />

Cash<br />

Collected<br />

Cost<br />

Recovery<br />

Gross Profit<br />

Recognized<br />

Nov. 1, 2013 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ -<br />

Nov. 1, 2014 200,000 200,000 -<br />

Nov. 1, 2015 200,000 160,000 40,000<br />

Nov. 1, 2016 200,000 - 200,000<br />

Totals $ 800,000 $ 560,000 $ 240,000


Cost Recovery Method<br />

4-89


4-90<br />

Revenue Recognition Prior to Delivery<br />

Long-term<br />

Contracts<br />

Completed<br />

Contract Method<br />

Percentage-of-<br />

Completion<br />

Method


Revenue Recognition – General Principles<br />

generally occurs (1) when earned and when realized or<br />

realizable.<br />

FASB Concepts Statement No. 5:<br />

Revenue is not recognized until earned. Revenues are considered to have been<br />

earned when the entity has substantially accomplished what it must do to be<br />

entitled to the benefits represented by the revenues.<br />

Revenues are realized when goods or services are exchanged for cash or<br />

claims to cash. Revenues are realizable when related assets received in<br />

exchanges are readily convertible to known amounts of cash or claims to cash.<br />

Short and Sweet Tricks:<br />

(1). Earned = work is done.<br />

(2). (a) Realized = cash was exchanged.<br />

(b) Realizable = claim to cash.<br />

C, D, E, F: Collectability (1); Delivery (1); Evidence of an arrangement (2);<br />

Fee is fixed or determinable (2) (SOP 97-2 Software Revenue Recognition)<br />

4-91


Measuring Assets and Liabilities<br />

- Fair Value Valuation Techniques<br />

4-92<br />

Fair value: is the price that would be received to sell and<br />

asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly market<br />

participants at the measurement date.<br />

Market approached: based valuation on market<br />

information.<br />

Income approach: by estimating future amounts (earnings<br />

or cash flows) and converting those amounts to a single<br />

present value.<br />

Cost approach: estimating the amount that would be<br />

required to buy or construct an asset of similar quality<br />

and condition.


4-93<br />

Fair Value Hierarchy<br />

U.S. GAAP gives companies the option to report some or all of<br />

their financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!