19.04.2014 Views

Safety issues with transdermal opioid medications - Australian and ...

Safety issues with transdermal opioid medications - Australian and ...

Safety issues with transdermal opioid medications - Australian and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Safety</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>transdermal</strong><br />

<strong>opioid</strong> <strong>medications</strong> – do they<br />

matter?<br />

Diane Reeves<br />

Medication safety officer, NSCCH


Are patches a problem?<br />

By 2005 the FDA reported 230 patients had died from using<br />

Fentanyl patches in North America, 127 probably from<br />

accidental overdose. However, there were numerous<br />

deaths in California alone in that year.<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> deaths <strong>and</strong> near misses have been reported<br />

Ongoing legal action commonplace in the US<br />

• Birth Control Patch Law Firm – “News about our Class<br />

Action Lawsuit <strong>and</strong> Ortho Evra® Dangers”<br />

• FDA Issues Warning About Ortho Evra® Birth Control<br />

Patch<br />

• Contact us for Fentanyl Duragesic Patch Lawyer<br />

Representation in …


An example<br />

• Patient arrived in ED from ….. With a GCS<br />

of 3 <strong>and</strong> a respiratory rate of 6 <strong>with</strong> pin<br />

point pupils.


History<br />

• 1982 - Glyceryl trinitrate<br />

• 1994 – Fentanyl<br />

• 2002 – contraceptive patch<br />

• 2004 – Buprenorphine<br />

• Also <strong>transdermal</strong> <strong>medications</strong> for urinary<br />

incontinence, Parkinson’s, s, Alzheimer’s<br />

• In progress - for ADHD <strong>and</strong> oxycodone


Cross section of a Norspan<br />

<strong>transdermal</strong> patch


IIMS NOTIFICATIONS – A SIGNAL<br />

• Notification to the NSW incident database<br />

is voluntary. Culture <strong>and</strong> enthusiasm<br />

varies amongst <strong>and</strong> <strong>with</strong>in the Areas.<br />

• Quality of data entry varies <strong>with</strong> notifier,<br />

but qualitative data can be very useful.<br />

• The notifications are useful for emerging<br />

trends – a signal but not reliable for<br />

quantitative reporting.


New South Wales IIMS data<br />

1. - Medications<br />

Transdermal <strong>medications</strong> reported to NSW IIMS July 06 to June 07 ( 330)<br />

Frequency<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Medication<br />

GTN<br />

Fentanyl<br />

Buprenorphine<br />

Nicotine<br />

Fent/bup<br />

Unknown<br />

Hyoscine<br />

Emla<br />

HRT<br />

Frequency 128 108 49 28 9 4 3 1 1<br />

Percent 38.7 32.6 14.8 8.5 2.7 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.3<br />

Cum % 38.7 71.3 86.1 94.6 97.3 98.5 99.4 99.7 100.0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Percent


What exactly is the problem?


Well, this doesn’t t appear to be one!<br />

Not one report of an illegible order


But definitely about ambiguity<br />

It’s s all about communication - 1


And again – a common notification


New South Wales IIMS data<br />

2 - Type of notification<br />

NSW IIMS Transdermal medication <strong>issues</strong> ( all meds) July 06 to June 07<br />

350<br />

100<br />

300<br />

250<br />

80<br />

Frequency<br />

200<br />

150<br />

60<br />

40<br />

Percent<br />

100<br />

50<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Issue Admin Presc Other S8 <strong>issues</strong> Disp<br />

Frequency 197 67 43 19 4<br />

Percent 59.7 20.3 13.0 5.8 1.2<br />

Cum % 59.7 80.0 93.0 98.8 100.0<br />

0


Perceived problems <strong>with</strong> patches<br />

Perceived problems <strong>with</strong> patches<br />

Pareto Chart of Voting on Issues of Transdermal Medications<br />

Vote<br />

Percent<br />

Medication chart needs On <strong>and</strong> O ff charted<br />

Patch es no t visible designed to be discreet<br />

No process for documenting patch location<br />

Education of Doctors<br />

Staff working too fast. Put o n & no t remove<br />

Patient education<br />

Other<br />

Issue<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Count 7 7 6 4 4 3 6<br />

Percent 18.9 18.9 16.2 10.8 10.8 8.1 16.2<br />

Cum % 18.9 37.8 54.1 64.9 75.7 83.8 100.0


Fishbone diagram of patch <strong>issues</strong><br />

Environment<br />

Staff working too fast.<br />

Policy <strong>and</strong><br />

Procedure<br />

Staff<br />

Education of Doctors<br />

Education of nurses<br />

Signed <strong>and</strong> then was distracted<br />

Forgot to sign<br />

Forgot to remove<br />

Medication chart needs On<br />

<strong>and</strong> Off charted<br />

No process for documenting<br />

patch location<br />

Wrong patch applied<br />

Not physically examining patient<br />

Education pharmacist<br />

Nurses inexperienced <strong>with</strong> patches<br />

Not aware of implication of errors<br />

Perceptions that patches are safe<br />

Equipment<br />

Still active after "replace time"<br />

Safe disposal important<br />

Different patches expire different times<br />

Patches fall off<br />

M ultiple patches to make up dose<br />

Differing duration of action/dwell time<br />

Not enough pharmacists<br />

Dispensed wrong patch<br />

Cutting patches<br />

Can't find patch, too small<br />

Patch put on in ED, not h<strong>and</strong>ed over<br />

Not visible designed to be discreet<br />

Patient<br />

Doctors unaware different<br />

Hairy skin requires special prep<br />

Patient tells staff incorrect<br />

information<br />

Drug absorption varies <strong>with</strong> age<br />

Body temperature affects<br />

absorption<br />

Patient removes patch<br />

Patient doesn't perceive patch as<br />

medication<br />

Patient telling nurse patch is<br />

removed<br />

Patient education<br />

Unintended<br />

outcome to<br />

patient


And the culprits are?<br />

100<br />

95<br />

Notifications to IIMS Database by NSCCH<br />

Jul-06<br />

Feb-08<br />

80<br />

Number e<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

54<br />

44<br />

19<br />

13<br />

13 15<br />

2<br />

1 2<br />

GTN Fentanyl Buprenorphine Nicotine HRT<br />

Medication


100<br />

80<br />

Percent<br />

60<br />

Fentanyl<br />

Fentanyl Transdermal Notifications 2005 to 2008<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Prescribing <strong>issues</strong><br />

Multiple patches in place<br />

Not put on<br />

Missed off med history/error<br />

Not changed on expiry<br />

Not taken Patch fell off/missing<br />

Taken off after procedures<br />

Wrong timing<br />

Wrong strength<br />

Dispensing error<br />

Other<br />

Medication<br />

0<br />

Frequency 14 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 10<br />

Percent 25.9 9.3 7.4 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 3.7 1.9 18.5<br />

Cum % 25.9 35.2 42.6 48.1 53.7 59.3 64.8 70.4 75.9 79.6 81.5100.0<br />

Frequency


100<br />

80<br />

Percent<br />

60<br />

Buprenorphine<br />

Buprenorphine Transdermal Notifications 2005 to 2008<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

40<br />

20<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Missed off med history/error<br />

Patch fell off/missing<br />

Prescribing <strong>issues</strong><br />

Taken off after procedures<br />

Clerical error<br />

Not changed on expiry<br />

Not put on<br />

Other<br />

Medication<br />

0<br />

Frequency 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 8<br />

Percent 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 5.3 5.3 5.3 42.1<br />

Cum % 10.5 21.1 31.6 42.1 47.4 52.6 57.9 100.0<br />

Frequency


• FDA ALERT 7/15/2005;<br />

“Fentanyl Transdermal System (marketed<br />

as Duragesic) Information”<br />

• Then<br />

Update 12/21/2007: This update<br />

highlights important information on<br />

appropriate prescribing, dose<br />

selection, <strong>and</strong> the safe use of the<br />

fentanyl <strong>transdermal</strong> system.


Did the Alert make a difference?<br />

• “Despite these efforts FDA has continued<br />

to receive reports of death <strong>and</strong> life-<br />

threatening adverse events .. when the<br />

fentanyl patch was:<br />

• used to treat pain in <strong>opioid</strong>-na<br />

naïve patients<br />

• <strong>opioid</strong>-tolerant patients have applied more<br />

patches than prescribed,<br />

• changed the patch too frequently,<br />

• <strong>and</strong> exposed the patch to a heat source. “


<strong>Australian</strong> Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin<br />

Volume 26, Number 6, December 2007<br />

• Transdermal <strong>medications</strong> - look for the<br />

patch<br />

• Despite a thorough medical history……<br />

• the patient omitted to tell the anaesthetist <strong>and</strong><br />

other medical staff that she was using Norspan<br />

patches, <strong>and</strong> she had applied a fresh patch on<br />

the day of surgery. Medical staff discovered the<br />

patch when the patient became comatose <strong>with</strong><br />

significant respiratory depression after the<br />

conventional dose of morphine was given.


Warnings at Home


Problems <strong>and</strong> potential solutions -<br />

Operational<br />

• Medication needs On <strong>and</strong> Off charted<br />

• No process for documenting patch location<br />

Solution: - Have uniform policy re signing <strong>and</strong> dating<br />

patch<br />

Solution: - Work on hospital policy<br />

Solution: - Patch NIMC (unlikely)<br />

Solution: - Wipeable chart, X marks the spot<br />

Solution: - Have a patch location chart<br />

Solution: - Include on h<strong>and</strong>over chart<br />

• Patch too small<br />

Solution: - Colour spot the patch whilst in hospital or<br />

care facility


MIMS Prescribing information also confusing<br />

Medication Trade name Listed as<br />

Glyceryl<br />

Trinitrate<br />

Nicotine<br />

Nitro-Dur<br />

Transiderm<br />

- Nitro<br />

Nicorette<br />

QuitX<br />

Nicabate<br />

Pack 5mg/24hours (10cm 2 ), 10mg/24 hours<br />

(20cm 2 ), 15mg/24hours (30cm 2 )<br />

Pack 5mg/24hours (25mg)Pack 10mg/24 hours<br />

(50mg)<br />

Nicotine 0.83mg/cm 2 , 15mg/16 hours,<br />

10mg/16 hours, 5mg/16 hours<br />

52.5mg delivers 21mg/24hours,<br />

35mg -14mg in 24 hours,<br />

17.5mg - 7mg in 24 hours<br />

114mg (21mg/day),<br />

78mg (14mg/day),<br />

36mg (7mg/day)<br />

Buprenorphine Norspan 10<br />

<strong>and</strong> 20<br />

Buprenorphine = 10mcg/hr. Patch 10mg.<br />

And 20mg<br />

Fentanyl Durogesic Pack 12mcg/hr(2.1mg) Pack 25mcg/hr (4.2mg)<br />

Pack 50mcg/hr (8.4mg) Pack 75mcg/hr (12.6mg)<br />

Pack 100mcg/hr (16.8mg)


The Way Forward<br />

• Acknowledge that this is a<br />

multidisciplinary issue, not any one group<br />

of staff<br />

• Realise that <strong>transdermal</strong> technology is on<br />

the move <strong>and</strong> the number of <strong>medications</strong><br />

is only going to increase ( there’s s an<br />

oxycodone patch en route too..)


What can you do as pain specialists<br />

<strong>and</strong> prescribers<br />

• Realise that patients don’t t always underst<strong>and</strong><br />

what we may think as straightforward.<br />

• Ensure that both the medical officers in your<br />

team <strong>and</strong> the nursing staff at ward level,<br />

appreciate the importance of orders being<br />

prescribed <strong>and</strong> administered as expected<br />

• Ensure that you are advised of any<br />

deviations from your intended treatment<br />

plan.<br />

• Pharmacist available for patient counselling?


Don’t t forget the patient<br />

• Educate the patient <strong>and</strong> their carers about<br />

their patches.<br />

• Patches are often forgotten both in their<br />

medication history <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />

prescribing <strong>and</strong> administration.<br />

• Prompt the patient as for other frequently<br />

omitted <strong>medications</strong>, Eye drops?<br />

Complementary <strong>medications</strong>? Patches?


All about communication - 2


Acknowledgments<br />

• Clinical governance unit, NSCCH<br />

• The Patch Project Team, RNSH<br />

• Kai Zhang IIMS Project officer at the<br />

Clinical Excellence Commission<br />

• Charles Brooker for inviting me<br />

And lastly but not least<br />

• The staff at NSCCH who took the time to<br />

enter notifications into the IIMS database

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!