2010-064 - (SUP 10-01) - Town of Morrisville

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EXHIBIT B Zoning Ordinance Version 9.0 - Town of Morrisville, NC Last updated: July 23, 2009 ARTICLE VII - SPECIAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS Proposed Tower at 2399 Weaver Forest Way in Morrisville, NC 2.12 Telecommunication Towers: 1) Communications towers and associated equipment, which are totally concealed within a building or structure so that they are architecturally indiscernible, shall not be considered towers for transmitting and receiving electronic signals. They are permitted in all zoning districts, but are subject to site plan approval by the Town Board. This provision is not applicable. 2) Communications towers shall not interfere with normal radio and television reception in the vicinity. Commercial messages shall not be displayed on any tower. The proposed telecommunications tower and associated equipment will not interfere with normal radio and television reception in the vicinity of the proposed location. No commercial messages will be displayed at any time on the proposed tower. (See attached Exhibit 4 – RF Justification) 3) Lighting shall not exceed the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) minimum if the FAA requires lighting. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to submit documentation from the FAA that the lighting is the minimum lighting required by the FAA. (See attached Exhibit 8 – FAA) 4) Towers shall be constructed and maintained in conformance with all applicable building code requirements. This provision is acknowledged and accepted. (See attached Exhibit 10 Break Point Tower Letter). 5) In order to protect the public from unnecessary exposure to electromagnetic radiation, the tower owner shall provide documentation indicating that the power output levels do not exceed federally approved levels or American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards, whichever provides the stricter requirement. (See attached Exhibit 5 –Emissions Certification) 6) Towers exceeding two hundred (200) feet in height may not locate within the Town of Morrisville’s jurisdiction, and all towers must be a monopole design. The proposed tower is a monopole at a height of 195’ with a 4’ lightning rod. 7) If the top of the tower is thirty (30) feet high or less, the normal setbacks of the zoning district for structures shall apply. This provision is not applicable.
EXHIBIT B 8) Towers located on top of structures (with the exception of concealed towers) tower shall not be more than thirty (30) percent of the building height above the building, or seventy-five (75) feet above the building, whichever is less. The building or structure shall maintain the normal setbacks of the zoning district. This provision is not applicable. 9) If the top of the tower is more than thirty (30) feet high and is adjacent to, or separated by only street right-of-way from property used or zoned for residential use, the setback of the tower and all accessory structures shall be one foot for every foot in the tower’s height, or the setback of the zoning district, whichever is greater. Notwithstanding the above, if the street right-of-way width measures three hundred (300) feet or greater along the entire frontage of the subject property, then the setback of the tower and all accessory structures shall be the setback of the zoning district or other required buffer, whichever is greater. The property is zoned IM so the setback is 50’ plus 1’ for every 1’ of tower height over 150’ or 49’ = 99’. The standard setback for the zoning district is 40’; so the minimum set back should be equal to or greater than 139’. The location of the propose monopole tower is setback 140’ from the right-of-way of I-540 to the north. 10) If the top of the tower is more than thirty (30) feet high and is adjacent to, or separated by only street right-of-way from property used or zoned for nonresidential use, the setback of the tower and all accessory structures shall be at least fifty (50) feet and an additional one (1) foot for every foot of tower height over one hundred fifty (150) feet. Notwithstanding the above, if the street right-ofway width measures three hundred (300) feet or greater along the entire frontage of the subject property, then the setback of the tower and all accessory structures shall be the setback of the zoning district or other required buffer, whichever is greater. This provision is not applicable in this instance. 11) To encourage the shared use of towers, a. Setbacks from adjacent nonresidential zone or land use may be reduced by twenty-five (25) percent for towers which will operate with two users immediately upon completion, however setbacks may not be reduced to less than fifty (50) feet, and setbacks from adjacent residentially zoned or used land may not be reduced. This provision is not applicable because only one telecommunication provider will be installing antennas on the proposed tower initially. b. Setbacks from adjacent nonresidential zone or land use may be reduced by fifty (50) percent for towers, which will operate with three or more users immediately upon completion. This provision is not applicable because only one telecommunication provider will be installing antennas on the proposed tower initially.
Page 1 and 2: 2010-064 SUP 10-01 AT&T CLEGG Telec
Page 7 and 8: visitors 6. Regional partnerships t
Page 11 and 12: TOWN OF MORRISVILLE * PO BOX 166 *
Page 13 and 14: PREPARED BY: TOWN OF MORRISVILLE PL
Page 15 and 16: SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FOR SPECIAL USE
Page 17: EXHIBIT A harmony with the area in
Page 21 and 22: EXHIBIT B notification letters to t
Page 23 and 24: Antenna Reg Lat: 35° 51' 33.3'' N
Page 25 and 26: EXHIBIT 2 2399 Weaver Forest Way, M
Page 27 and 28: EXHIBIT 4 Proposed Telecommunicatio
Page 29 and 30: Figure 3: Map of AT&T Mobility’ C
Page 31 and 32: Based upon the ANSI/FCC standard an
Page 33 and 34: PHOTO RENDERING PROVIDED BY TOWER E
Page 59: PHOTO RENDERING PROVIDED BY TOWER E
Page 62 and 63: RICARDO M III & MICHELLETA P RAZON
Page 64 and 65: A copy of this determination will b
Page 67 and 68: EXHIBIT 10
Page 69 and 70:
EXHIBIT 10
Page 71 and 72:
EXHIBIT 10
Page 73 and 74:
EXHIBIT 10
Page 75 and 76:
EXHIBIT 10
Page 77 and 78:
June 3, 2010 Ms. Jill House Project
Page 79 and 80:
CERTIFICATION The undersigned does
Page 81 and 82:
SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT This consul
Page 83 and 84:
Street Atlas USA® 2008 Data use su
Page 85 and 86:
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS The effective
Page 87 and 88:
HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY The subject
Page 89 and 90:
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
Page 91 and 92:
NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION The genera
Page 93 and 94:
Conclusion This is one of the more
Page 95 and 96:
The telecommunications tower will b
Page 97 and 98:
of 1 http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/ima
Page 99:
Craig D. Smith, MAI 19
Page 102 and 103:
Sales Data Presentation The analyst
Page 104 and 105:
The four sale properties have been
Page 106 and 107:
Interior view within Heritage Pines
Page 108 and 109:
The next step in the analysis is to
Page 110 and 111:
The six home sales within the Cobbl
Page 112 and 113:
Interior view within Cobble Ridge I
Page 114 and 115:
Special Considerations/Assumptions
Page 116 and 117:
APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS CRAIG D. S
Page 118 and 119:
Western portion of subject tract in
Page 120 and 121:
EXHIBIT 14 Stormwater Impact Analys
Page 122 and 123:
Revised 06/03/10 Site Description:
Page 127 and 128:
FIGURE 3
Page 129 and 130:
North Carolina 35.8592 N 78.8497 W
Page 131:
FIGURE 7
Page 134 and 135:
Table 1B Flow Summary Table for Dra
Page 136 and 137:
Revised 06/03/10 Appendix B
Page 138 and 139:
T shallow = 1.36 Paved Section(s):
Page 140 and 141:
T shallow = 0.63 Paved Section(s):
Page 142 and 143:
Culvert Design Calculations - Culve
Page 144 and 145:
Culvert Design Calculations - Culve
Page 146 and 147:
Clegg_Design Routing_Post_DA1 Type
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Revised 06/03/10 Appendix E
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
XVIII. Flexible Design Option: ....
Page 170 and 171:
F. Additional requirements for cert
Page 172 and 173:
VIII. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: A.
Page 174 and 175:
10. Extend sewer to all upstream ar
Page 177 and 178:
4. Supporting calculation Z. The fo
Page 179 and 180:
EXHIBIT 16
Page 181 and 182:
EXHIBIT 16 6. Was the proposed site
Page 183 and 184:
EXHIBIT 17
Page 185 and 186:
EXHIBIT 17
Page 199 and 200:
EXHIBIT 19
Page 201:
R-6 CU R-6 CU ^ Proposed RMF CU NC
show all

2010-064 - (SUP 10-01) - Town of Morrisville

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?