Synchronicity Cambray

the theoretical prediction of existence of antimatter in 1926. There
was presumed to be a rigorous mirror relationship of antimatter to
matter, a form of parity that was felt by physicists to be at the base of
all laws of physics. When this was proven not to strictly hold for beta
decay, it caused such a sensation that it made front-page news in the
New York Times 27 ; as republished in Atom and Archetype. 28 Wolfgang
Pauli was one of the prominent physicists who was most stunned by
this. Pauli at first could not accept the results: “I do not believe however
that the Lord God is a WEAK left-hander.” 29 In communications,
Markus Fierz, twin brother of the Jungian analyst Heinrich Fierz, told
Pauli that he (WP) had a “mirror complex,” 30 noting its appearance in
his dreams as well as in his beliefs about physics. For Pauli the whole
question of the relationship between physics and psychology “is that
of a mirror image.” 31 At first he attempted to seek a restoration of symmetry
by going more deeply into the observations, “parity is restored
when one takes into consideration enough of the variables characterizing
the phenomenon (such as the ‘CPT [charge, parity, and time]
theorem . . .’).” 32 But even this (CPT) has been called into question.
The attempt to restore symmetry becomes linked to synchronicity
for Pauli, as when he writes Jung: “If the parapsychological phenomena
go deeper, then the psyche has to be taken into consideration so
as to be able to see the full symmetry of the phenomenon. . . . The
question of ‘how deep or how broad does one have to go to achieve
full symmetry’ ultimately seems to lead back to the problem—in your
terminology—of the separation of the self from the ego.” 33
Pauli’s speculations in turn provoke Jung to write his last personal
letter to him. 34 Here is a selection of reflections from this letter:
a constellated, i.e., activated, archetype may not be the cause
but is certainly a condition of synchronistic phenomena . . .
occurrences might be expected that correspond to the archetype
as a sort of mirror image . . . the physical problem of symmetry or
asymmetry which coincides so oddly with my own preoccupation,
is something analogous or parallel. Apart from the mirror image
aspect of the phenomenon, the statements from the unconscious
(represented by UFO legends, dreams, and images) point to a
( 58 ) Chapter 3