25.04.2014 Views

Supply Chain Report - Logistics Association of Australia

Supply Chain Report - Logistics Association of Australia

Supply Chain Report - Logistics Association of Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S u p p l y C h a i n R e p o r t 2 0 1 0<br />

Section D: <strong>Australia</strong>n Industry Performance<br />

International <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index<br />

• <strong>Australia</strong>’s <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance ranked<br />

18th <strong>of</strong> 150 countries in 2010, down one<br />

place from the previous ranking in 2007.<br />

• Average LPI is currently at 3.84, up<br />

from 3.79. The scores on each <strong>of</strong> the key<br />

dimensions are displayed in the table.<br />

• It is noted that <strong>Australia</strong> is rated better on<br />

every dimension except Track & Trace.<br />

Source: World Bank [17]<br />

LPI<br />

Rank<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Previous<br />

Rank<br />

3<br />

1<br />

4<br />

2<br />

23<br />

7<br />

6<br />

9<br />

12<br />

16<br />

11<br />

15<br />

8<br />

10<br />

14<br />

13<br />

18<br />

17<br />

5<br />

21<br />

Germany<br />

Singapore<br />

Sweden<br />

Netherlands<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Switzerland<br />

Japan<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Belgium<br />

Norway<br />

Ireland<br />

Finland<br />

Hong Kong, China<br />

Canada<br />

United States<br />

Denmark<br />

France<br />

<strong>Australia</strong><br />

Austria<br />

Taiwan<br />

4.11<br />

4.09<br />

4.08<br />

4.07<br />

3.98<br />

3.97<br />

3.97<br />

3.95<br />

3.94<br />

3.93<br />

3.89<br />

3.89<br />

3.88<br />

3.87<br />

3.86<br />

3.85<br />

3.84<br />

3.84<br />

3.76<br />

3.71<br />

4.00<br />

4.02<br />

3.88<br />

3.98<br />

4.04<br />

3.73<br />

3.79<br />

3.74<br />

3.83<br />

3.86<br />

3.60<br />

3.86<br />

3.83<br />

3.71<br />

3.68<br />

3.58<br />

3.63<br />

3.68<br />

3.49<br />

3.35<br />

4.34<br />

4.22<br />

4.03<br />

4.25<br />

4.06<br />

4.17<br />

4.19<br />

3.95<br />

4.01<br />

4.22<br />

3.76<br />

4.08<br />

4.00<br />

4.03<br />

4.15<br />

3.99<br />

4.00<br />

3.78<br />

3.68<br />

3.62<br />

3.66<br />

3.86<br />

3.83<br />

3.61<br />

3.67<br />

3.32<br />

3.55<br />

3.66<br />

3.31<br />

3.35<br />

3.70<br />

3.41<br />

3.67<br />

3.24<br />

3.21<br />

3.46<br />

3.30<br />

3.78<br />

3.78<br />

3.64<br />

4.14<br />

4.12<br />

4.22<br />

4.15<br />

3.67<br />

4.32<br />

4.00<br />

3.92<br />

4.13<br />

3.85<br />

3.82<br />

3.92<br />

3.83<br />

3.99<br />

3.92<br />

3.83<br />

3.87<br />

3.77<br />

3.70<br />

3.65<br />

Tracking &<br />

Tracing<br />

4.18<br />

4.15<br />

4.22<br />

4.12<br />

3.92<br />

4.27<br />

4.13<br />

4.13<br />

4.22<br />

4.10<br />

4.02<br />

4.09<br />

3.94<br />

4.01<br />

4.17<br />

3.94<br />

4.01<br />

3.87<br />

3.83<br />

4.04<br />

International <strong>Logistics</strong> Performance Index 2010<br />

Country LPI Customs Infrastructure<br />

International <strong>Logistics</strong><br />

Shipments<br />

Competence<br />

Timeliness<br />

4.48<br />

4.23<br />

4.32<br />

4.41<br />

4.58<br />

4.20<br />

4.26<br />

4.37<br />

4.29<br />

4.35<br />

4.47<br />

4.08<br />

4.04<br />

4.41<br />

4.19<br />

4.38<br />

4.37<br />

4.16<br />

4.08<br />

3.95<br />

Total Business Inventory<br />

• The cost <strong>of</strong> Total Business Inventory reduced during 2009 to<br />

about $130 billion in December and came back up slightly to<br />

$134 billion in June 2010 Quarter.<br />

• The significant fall <strong>of</strong> inventory level could be linked to the<br />

reaction <strong>of</strong> businesses to the economic crisis. It is expected<br />

that the level <strong>of</strong> inventory will be higher in 2010-2011 because<br />

<strong>of</strong> an improved economic outlook together with the strength <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Australia</strong>n currency. Total inventory alone cannot provide a<br />

full picture <strong>of</strong> the industry performance.<br />

Total Business Inventory (June 2000 to June 2010)<br />

$m<br />

Inventories (Book Value, Current Prices)<br />

160,000<br />

140,000<br />

120,000<br />

100,000<br />

80,000<br />

60,000<br />

40,000<br />

20,000<br />

0<br />

GDP ($m)<br />

Period<br />

Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

Source: ABS [4]<br />

Inventory to Sales Ratio<br />

• In the last report it was noted that the Inventory to Sales ratio<br />

climbed slightly during 2009, which could suggest the delay <strong>of</strong><br />

the industry’s response to declining sales.<br />

• The Inventory to Sales ratio improved again in 2010. Part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the reason could be that business is still cautious about<br />

prospects and avoids building up levels <strong>of</strong> inventory.<br />

• Overall, the Inventory to Sales ratio has continued to improve<br />

over the years due to improved supply chain management<br />

practices.<br />

Ratio<br />

Inventory to Sales Ratio (June 2000 to June 2010)<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

Period<br />

0.0<br />

Jun<br />

00<br />

Jun<br />

01<br />

Jun<br />

02<br />

Jun<br />

03<br />

Jun<br />

04<br />

Jun<br />

05<br />

Jun<br />

06<br />

Jun<br />

07<br />

Jun<br />

08<br />

Jun<br />

09<br />

Jun<br />

10<br />

Source: ABS [3]<br />

www.laa.asn.au 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!