March (pdf) - New York Power Authority
March (pdf) - New York Power Authority
March (pdf) - New York Power Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>March</strong> 29, 2011<br />
SUMMARY<br />
b. <strong>Power</strong> for Jobs Program – Extended Benefits<br />
The President and Chief Executive Officer submitted the following report:<br />
“The Trustees are requested to approve payments for <strong>Power</strong> for Jobs (‘PFJ’) restitution to the companies<br />
listed in Exhibit ‘1b-A-1.’ These companies have been evaluated for restitution and are due a restitution payment.<br />
The Trustees have approved similar restitution payments at past Trustees’ meetings. In addition, the Trustees are<br />
requested to authorize prospectively the payment of restitution to PFJ customers that subsequently are evaluated and<br />
determined to be due restitution in an aggregate amount not to exceed $4 million.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
“In July 1997, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State enacted the PFJ program to provide low-cost power to businesses and notfor-profit<br />
corporations that agree to retain or create jobs in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State. In return for commitments to create or<br />
retain jobs, successful applicants received three-year contracts for PFJ electricity.<br />
“The PFJ program originally made 400 megawatts (‘MW’) of power available and was to be phased in over<br />
three years. As a result of the initial success of the program, the Legislature amended the PFJ statute to accelerate<br />
the distribution of the power and increase the size of the program to 450 MW. In May 2000, legislation was enacted<br />
that authorized additional power to be allocated under the PFJ program. Legislation further amended the PFJ<br />
program in July 2002.<br />
“In 2005, provisions of the enacted State Budget extended the period PFJ customers could receive benefits<br />
until December 31, 2006. Chapter 645 of the Laws of 2006 (‘Chapter 645’) included provisions extending PFJ<br />
program benefits until June 30, 2007. Chapter 89 of the Laws of 2007 included provisions extending PFJ program<br />
benefits until June 30, 2008. Chapter 59 of the Laws of 2008 included provisions extending the PFJ program<br />
benefits until June 30, 2009. Chapter 217 of the Laws of 2009 included provisions extending the PFJ program<br />
benefits until May 15, 2010. Chapter 88 of the Laws of 2010 included provisions extending the PFJ program until<br />
June 2, 2010. Chapter 311 of the Laws of 2010 included provisions extending the program benefits until May 15,<br />
2011.<br />
“Chapter 645 also created the PFJ restitution obligation, which is now set forth in Economic Development<br />
Law (‘EDL’) §189(5) (second paragraph). This provision provides in pertinent part:<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
. . . for the period beginning January 1, 2006, for recipients who choose to elect a contract extension, and<br />
whose unit cost of electricity under the contract extension exceeds the unit cost of electricity of the electric<br />
corporation, the <strong>Power</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> shall reimburse the recipient for all dollars paid in excess of the unit cost<br />
of electricity of the electric corporation.<br />
“As more specifically provided in EDL §189(5), restitution is based on whether the net amount paid by the<br />
customer for PFJ service exceeds the ‘unit cost of electricity’ of the host utility over the measurement period for the<br />
same quantity of electricity. Under current law, the measurement period begins January 1, 2006 and ends with the<br />
date that the eligible customer ceases to be in the PFJ program.<br />
“The host utilities, in conjunction with the <strong>Authority</strong> and the Department of Public Service, determine what<br />
the otherwise applicable full-service electric rates of the host utility would have been for service throughout the<br />
measurement period; calculate what the customer charges would have been under those rates; compare that total to<br />
the total actual charges paid by the customer for PFJ electricity and determine whether the customer had net savings,<br />
overall, in the PFJ program or is due a restitution payment.<br />
12