30.04.2014 Views

March (pdf) - New York Power Authority

March (pdf) - New York Power Authority

March (pdf) - New York Power Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>March</strong> 29, 2011<br />

SUMMARY<br />

b. <strong>Power</strong> for Jobs Program – Extended Benefits<br />

The President and Chief Executive Officer submitted the following report:<br />

“The Trustees are requested to approve payments for <strong>Power</strong> for Jobs (‘PFJ’) restitution to the companies<br />

listed in Exhibit ‘1b-A-1.’ These companies have been evaluated for restitution and are due a restitution payment.<br />

The Trustees have approved similar restitution payments at past Trustees’ meetings. In addition, the Trustees are<br />

requested to authorize prospectively the payment of restitution to PFJ customers that subsequently are evaluated and<br />

determined to be due restitution in an aggregate amount not to exceed $4 million.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

“In July 1997, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State enacted the PFJ program to provide low-cost power to businesses and notfor-profit<br />

corporations that agree to retain or create jobs in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State. In return for commitments to create or<br />

retain jobs, successful applicants received three-year contracts for PFJ electricity.<br />

“The PFJ program originally made 400 megawatts (‘MW’) of power available and was to be phased in over<br />

three years. As a result of the initial success of the program, the Legislature amended the PFJ statute to accelerate<br />

the distribution of the power and increase the size of the program to 450 MW. In May 2000, legislation was enacted<br />

that authorized additional power to be allocated under the PFJ program. Legislation further amended the PFJ<br />

program in July 2002.<br />

“In 2005, provisions of the enacted State Budget extended the period PFJ customers could receive benefits<br />

until December 31, 2006. Chapter 645 of the Laws of 2006 (‘Chapter 645’) included provisions extending PFJ<br />

program benefits until June 30, 2007. Chapter 89 of the Laws of 2007 included provisions extending PFJ program<br />

benefits until June 30, 2008. Chapter 59 of the Laws of 2008 included provisions extending the PFJ program<br />

benefits until June 30, 2009. Chapter 217 of the Laws of 2009 included provisions extending the PFJ program<br />

benefits until May 15, 2010. Chapter 88 of the Laws of 2010 included provisions extending the PFJ program until<br />

June 2, 2010. Chapter 311 of the Laws of 2010 included provisions extending the program benefits until May 15,<br />

2011.<br />

“Chapter 645 also created the PFJ restitution obligation, which is now set forth in Economic Development<br />

Law (‘EDL’) §189(5) (second paragraph). This provision provides in pertinent part:<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

. . . for the period beginning January 1, 2006, for recipients who choose to elect a contract extension, and<br />

whose unit cost of electricity under the contract extension exceeds the unit cost of electricity of the electric<br />

corporation, the <strong>Power</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> shall reimburse the recipient for all dollars paid in excess of the unit cost<br />

of electricity of the electric corporation.<br />

“As more specifically provided in EDL §189(5), restitution is based on whether the net amount paid by the<br />

customer for PFJ service exceeds the ‘unit cost of electricity’ of the host utility over the measurement period for the<br />

same quantity of electricity. Under current law, the measurement period begins January 1, 2006 and ends with the<br />

date that the eligible customer ceases to be in the PFJ program.<br />

“The host utilities, in conjunction with the <strong>Authority</strong> and the Department of Public Service, determine what<br />

the otherwise applicable full-service electric rates of the host utility would have been for service throughout the<br />

measurement period; calculate what the customer charges would have been under those rates; compare that total to<br />

the total actual charges paid by the customer for PFJ electricity and determine whether the customer had net savings,<br />

overall, in the PFJ program or is due a restitution payment.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!