02.05.2014 Views

1976-05-11 BCC Meeting Minutes - Orange County Comptroller

1976-05-11 BCC Meeting Minutes - Orange County Comptroller

1976-05-11 BCC Meeting Minutes - Orange County Comptroller

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Meeting</strong> May <strong>11</strong>, <strong>1976</strong> Page 350<br />

Planning<br />

and<br />

Zoning<br />

Appeal<br />

Review<br />

Interstate<br />

Four<br />

Notice having been given that the Board of <strong>County</strong> Commissioners would sit<br />

as a Board of Appeal to hear those for or against the action of the <strong>Orange</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> Planning and Zoning Commission on request by Interstate Four, Inc.,<br />

for a Change of Zoning Classification from R-CE to C-1 on the following<br />

described property:<br />

S 500ft. of SW 1/4 of NE 1/4lying NWly of Interstate Highway 4<br />

and S 500ft. of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4 (less W 30ft. for R/W)<br />

Sec. 22, Twp. 24 S, Rge 28 E, which is located East side of<br />

Magnolia Rd., 750 ft. East and 150 ft. South of Apopka Vineland<br />

Road and Winter Garden Vineland Road (St. Rd. 535) and lying<br />

Northwesterly of Interstate Hiway 4<br />

and the hour having arrived, Chairman Martin called on the Zoning Director<br />

to locate the subject parcel on aerial map.<br />

The Planning and Zoning Commission had denied the request a public hearing<br />

in that it would permit a commercial intrusion into a low-density single<br />

family residential district and further, access is not suitable to permit<br />

neighborhood retail commercial development, and further this request is not<br />

consistent with the policy of encouraging compact commercial development<br />

at major intersections.<br />

Zoning Director Jim Smart located the subject property on the map, stating<br />

that it was presently zoned RCE and undeveloped; immediately to the West an<br />

at the intersection they have C1 zone on all four corners; RCE immediately<br />

to the North undeveloped and immediately to the South is Reedy Creek Improve<br />

ment District.<br />

Mr. King Helie, representing the applicant James Morgan, stated that they<br />

were appealing the decision of the staff which denied a public hearing, and<br />

they feel that they should have the opportunity to go before the Planning and<br />

Zoning in public hearing to present their case. Mr. Helie stated that they wer<br />

asking for commercial in an area that has been well established for commercial<br />

node for many years. He said that he did a report in 1970 that identified<br />

this area as commercial node, and the <strong>County</strong> Land Use Plan shows it.<br />

Chairman Martin stated that there is RCE to the North, West and South -<br />

South Reedy Creek Improvement District.<br />

Mr. Helie stated that to the West of their site is commercial -also church<br />

property. He called attention to Lake Buena Vista area with motels already<br />

built. He said that they were only talking about 18 acres.<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> May <strong>11</strong>, <strong>1976</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!