1976-05-11 BCC Meeting Minutes - Orange County Comptroller
1976-05-11 BCC Meeting Minutes - Orange County Comptroller
1976-05-11 BCC Meeting Minutes - Orange County Comptroller
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Meeting</strong> May <strong>11</strong>, <strong>1976</strong> Page 350<br />
Planning<br />
and<br />
Zoning<br />
Appeal<br />
Review<br />
Interstate<br />
Four<br />
Notice having been given that the Board of <strong>County</strong> Commissioners would sit<br />
as a Board of Appeal to hear those for or against the action of the <strong>Orange</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> Planning and Zoning Commission on request by Interstate Four, Inc.,<br />
for a Change of Zoning Classification from R-CE to C-1 on the following<br />
described property:<br />
S 500ft. of SW 1/4 of NE 1/4lying NWly of Interstate Highway 4<br />
and S 500ft. of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4 (less W 30ft. for R/W)<br />
Sec. 22, Twp. 24 S, Rge 28 E, which is located East side of<br />
Magnolia Rd., 750 ft. East and 150 ft. South of Apopka Vineland<br />
Road and Winter Garden Vineland Road (St. Rd. 535) and lying<br />
Northwesterly of Interstate Hiway 4<br />
and the hour having arrived, Chairman Martin called on the Zoning Director<br />
to locate the subject parcel on aerial map.<br />
The Planning and Zoning Commission had denied the request a public hearing<br />
in that it would permit a commercial intrusion into a low-density single<br />
family residential district and further, access is not suitable to permit<br />
neighborhood retail commercial development, and further this request is not<br />
consistent with the policy of encouraging compact commercial development<br />
at major intersections.<br />
Zoning Director Jim Smart located the subject property on the map, stating<br />
that it was presently zoned RCE and undeveloped; immediately to the West an<br />
at the intersection they have C1 zone on all four corners; RCE immediately<br />
to the North undeveloped and immediately to the South is Reedy Creek Improve<br />
ment District.<br />
Mr. King Helie, representing the applicant James Morgan, stated that they<br />
were appealing the decision of the staff which denied a public hearing, and<br />
they feel that they should have the opportunity to go before the Planning and<br />
Zoning in public hearing to present their case. Mr. Helie stated that they wer<br />
asking for commercial in an area that has been well established for commercial<br />
node for many years. He said that he did a report in 1970 that identified<br />
this area as commercial node, and the <strong>County</strong> Land Use Plan shows it.<br />
Chairman Martin stated that there is RCE to the North, West and South -<br />
South Reedy Creek Improvement District.<br />
Mr. Helie stated that to the West of their site is commercial -also church<br />
property. He called attention to Lake Buena Vista area with motels already<br />
built. He said that they were only talking about 18 acres.<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> May <strong>11</strong>, <strong>1976</strong>