02.05.2014 Views

When elections are fair, the PEOPLE win. - OCSEA

When elections are fair, the PEOPLE win. - OCSEA

When elections are fair, the PEOPLE win. - OCSEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mitt Romney has a history of stretching <strong>the</strong> truth when<br />

it suits him, especially when it comes to middle class<br />

issues. Instead of sticking to his guns on his core values,<br />

Romney changes his stance depending on <strong>the</strong> audience.<br />

Here <strong>are</strong> some whoppers he’s told lately:<br />

“The ‘48, 49 percent’ that supports<br />

President Barack Obama <strong>are</strong><br />

‘people who pay no income tax.’”<br />

PolitiFact: FalSE<br />

We’ve seen <strong>the</strong> video – Mitt Romney says how he really<br />

feels about half of Americans when he thinks no one’s<br />

listening but high-paying fund raisers:<br />

“There <strong>are</strong> 47 percent of <strong>the</strong> people who will vote for<br />

<strong>the</strong> president no matter what … who <strong>are</strong> dependent<br />

on government, who believe that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>are</strong> victims, who<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> government has a responsibility to c<strong>are</strong> for<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, who believe that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>are</strong> entitled to health c<strong>are</strong>,<br />

to food, to housing, to you-name-it. … These <strong>are</strong> people<br />

who pay no income tax. … My job is not to worry about<br />

those people. I’ll never convince <strong>the</strong>m that <strong>the</strong>y should<br />

take personal responsibility and c<strong>are</strong> for <strong>the</strong>ir lives.”<br />

It’s true, 47% of Americans pay no federal income tax.<br />

But <strong>are</strong> <strong>the</strong>y all Obama supporters with no sense of personal<br />

responsibility? Absolutely not! Nearly half of that 47% <strong>are</strong><br />

senior citizens, veterans, students and o<strong>the</strong>r low-wage earners<br />

who pay <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>fair</strong> sh<strong>are</strong> of taxes and <strong>are</strong> vastly diverse when it<br />

comes to political affiliation.<br />

“I don’t have a $5 trillion tax cut.”<br />

PolitiFact: FliP FloP<br />

Mitt Romney has <strong>the</strong> nation confused about his stance on<br />

taxes. Does he have a $5 trillion tax cut plan or doesn’t he? At<br />

<strong>the</strong> first debate, President Obama confronted Romney several<br />

times on his tax plan that doesn’t add up. But instead of<br />

standing behind it, Romney did an old fashioned political<br />

flip-flop and denied <strong>the</strong> claim.<br />

According to PolitiFact, Romney promises to cut taxes but<br />

also to cut spending on vital programs like Medic<strong>are</strong>, and<br />

even PBS. He says he’s going to pay for it by closing loopholes<br />

and deductions. But instead of closing loopholes that benefit<br />

<strong>the</strong> wealthy, Romney is considering <strong>the</strong> elimination of deductions<br />

that help <strong>the</strong> middle class on things like mortgages,<br />

charitable contributions and employer-paid health insurance.<br />

“Pre-existing conditions <strong>are</strong> covered<br />

under my (health c<strong>are</strong>) plan.”<br />

PolitiFact: MOStlY FalSE<br />

Mitt Romney has been against <strong>the</strong> Patient<br />

Protection and Affordable C<strong>are</strong> Act since <strong>the</strong> beginning.<br />

However, kno<strong>win</strong>g that maintaining coverage<br />

for those with pre-existing conditions polls well<br />

with voters, Romney continues to stand by his statement<br />

regardless of plausibility.<br />

You can’t have your cake and eat it too, Mitt.<br />

According to PolitiFact, “Romney said his health<br />

c<strong>are</strong> proposals include protections for pre-existing<br />

conditions. What he didn’t say at <strong>the</strong> debate – but<br />

which his website states and advisers confirmed<br />

after <strong>the</strong> debate – is that people would be protected<br />

from denial only if <strong>the</strong>y have been continuously<br />

insured.”<br />

The Affordable C<strong>are</strong> Act, which Romney has<br />

promised to repeal on his first day in office, “offers<br />

protections whe<strong>the</strong>r people have current coverage<br />

or not,” but under Romney’s plan, <strong>the</strong>re would be<br />

no such protection.<br />

Did Mitt Romney really <strong>win</strong> <strong>the</strong> first debate?<br />

NOT IF YOU ADD UP HIS LIES.<br />

Fall 2012<br />

Public Employee Quarterly 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!