When elections are fair, the PEOPLE win. - OCSEA
When elections are fair, the PEOPLE win. - OCSEA
When elections are fair, the PEOPLE win. - OCSEA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mitt Romney has a history of stretching <strong>the</strong> truth when<br />
it suits him, especially when it comes to middle class<br />
issues. Instead of sticking to his guns on his core values,<br />
Romney changes his stance depending on <strong>the</strong> audience.<br />
Here <strong>are</strong> some whoppers he’s told lately:<br />
“The ‘48, 49 percent’ that supports<br />
President Barack Obama <strong>are</strong><br />
‘people who pay no income tax.’”<br />
PolitiFact: FalSE<br />
We’ve seen <strong>the</strong> video – Mitt Romney says how he really<br />
feels about half of Americans when he thinks no one’s<br />
listening but high-paying fund raisers:<br />
“There <strong>are</strong> 47 percent of <strong>the</strong> people who will vote for<br />
<strong>the</strong> president no matter what … who <strong>are</strong> dependent<br />
on government, who believe that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>are</strong> victims, who<br />
believe <strong>the</strong> government has a responsibility to c<strong>are</strong> for<br />
<strong>the</strong>m, who believe that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>are</strong> entitled to health c<strong>are</strong>,<br />
to food, to housing, to you-name-it. … These <strong>are</strong> people<br />
who pay no income tax. … My job is not to worry about<br />
those people. I’ll never convince <strong>the</strong>m that <strong>the</strong>y should<br />
take personal responsibility and c<strong>are</strong> for <strong>the</strong>ir lives.”<br />
It’s true, 47% of Americans pay no federal income tax.<br />
But <strong>are</strong> <strong>the</strong>y all Obama supporters with no sense of personal<br />
responsibility? Absolutely not! Nearly half of that 47% <strong>are</strong><br />
senior citizens, veterans, students and o<strong>the</strong>r low-wage earners<br />
who pay <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>fair</strong> sh<strong>are</strong> of taxes and <strong>are</strong> vastly diverse when it<br />
comes to political affiliation.<br />
“I don’t have a $5 trillion tax cut.”<br />
PolitiFact: FliP FloP<br />
Mitt Romney has <strong>the</strong> nation confused about his stance on<br />
taxes. Does he have a $5 trillion tax cut plan or doesn’t he? At<br />
<strong>the</strong> first debate, President Obama confronted Romney several<br />
times on his tax plan that doesn’t add up. But instead of<br />
standing behind it, Romney did an old fashioned political<br />
flip-flop and denied <strong>the</strong> claim.<br />
According to PolitiFact, Romney promises to cut taxes but<br />
also to cut spending on vital programs like Medic<strong>are</strong>, and<br />
even PBS. He says he’s going to pay for it by closing loopholes<br />
and deductions. But instead of closing loopholes that benefit<br />
<strong>the</strong> wealthy, Romney is considering <strong>the</strong> elimination of deductions<br />
that help <strong>the</strong> middle class on things like mortgages,<br />
charitable contributions and employer-paid health insurance.<br />
“Pre-existing conditions <strong>are</strong> covered<br />
under my (health c<strong>are</strong>) plan.”<br />
PolitiFact: MOStlY FalSE<br />
Mitt Romney has been against <strong>the</strong> Patient<br />
Protection and Affordable C<strong>are</strong> Act since <strong>the</strong> beginning.<br />
However, kno<strong>win</strong>g that maintaining coverage<br />
for those with pre-existing conditions polls well<br />
with voters, Romney continues to stand by his statement<br />
regardless of plausibility.<br />
You can’t have your cake and eat it too, Mitt.<br />
According to PolitiFact, “Romney said his health<br />
c<strong>are</strong> proposals include protections for pre-existing<br />
conditions. What he didn’t say at <strong>the</strong> debate – but<br />
which his website states and advisers confirmed<br />
after <strong>the</strong> debate – is that people would be protected<br />
from denial only if <strong>the</strong>y have been continuously<br />
insured.”<br />
The Affordable C<strong>are</strong> Act, which Romney has<br />
promised to repeal on his first day in office, “offers<br />
protections whe<strong>the</strong>r people have current coverage<br />
or not,” but under Romney’s plan, <strong>the</strong>re would be<br />
no such protection.<br />
Did Mitt Romney really <strong>win</strong> <strong>the</strong> first debate?<br />
NOT IF YOU ADD UP HIS LIES.<br />
Fall 2012<br />
Public Employee Quarterly 3