CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT STATISTICS - Oklahoma ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SUMMARY Findings of Investigations and Assessment Conclusions by County State Fiscal Year 2012 Investigated/Assessed Substantiated Other County Abuse Negl. Both Total Abuse Negl. Both Total Svcs. Rec. Svcs. Prv. Svcs. Not Needed Other State Totals 13,634 21,938 8,660 44,232 3,241 4,312 2,289 9,842 14,645 6,823 10,649 2,273 10,202 22% Adair 100 88 71 259 31 14 26 71 19 0 162 7 6 27% Alfalfa 21 35 7 63 5 1 1 7 18 10 28 0 10 11% Atoka 103 160 64 327 37 8 16 61 118 61 83 4 67 19% Beaver 5 11 3 19 2 6 0 8 4 6 1 0 6 42% Beckham 104 142 98 344 42 25 33 100 103 61 73 7 70 29% Blaine 61 97 36 194 25 24 3 52 48 35 53 6 46 27% Bryan 147 307 146 600 61 65 40 166 204 88 121 21 142 28% Caddo 104 246 92 442 14 32 11 57 170 79 119 17 145 13% Canadian 328 545 217 1,090 129 186 80 395 322 109 178 86 176 36% Carter 225 375 124 724 67 103 31 201 202 103 202 16 128 28% Cherokee 178 354 109 641 32 28 13 73 276 137 147 8 244 11% Choctaw 79 127 64 270 24 33 16 73 38 67 88 4 73 27% Cimarron 7 1 1 9 0 1 0 1 4 4 0 0 4 11% Cleveland 692 1,123 410 2,225 71 132 47 250 954 419 530 72 571 11% Coal 55 83 32 170 22 12 4 38 97 14 21 0 21 22% Comanche 527 858 212 1,597 94 165 42 301 438 231 575 52 347 19% Cotton 27 54 21 102 17 14 5 36 31 13 22 0 19 35% Craig 40 111 51 202 5 19 14 38 62 52 40 10 79 19% Creek 292 398 146 836 96 91 30 217 298 124 134 63 170 26% Custer 98 168 85 351 36 21 27 84 122 49 94 2 111 24% Delaware 179 241 98 518 25 34 19 78 117 66 252 5 85 15% Dewey 3 9 6 18 0 0 0 0 9 5 4 0 5 0% Ellis 7 12 2 21 0 6 1 7 13 0 1 0 0 33% Garfield 208 326 131 665 37 42 14 93 158 117 254 43 135 14% Garvin 75 155 56 286 25 32 9 66 109 37 72 2 74 23% Grady 123 228 106 457 29 35 17 81 111 31 225 9 93 18% Grant 18 15 2 35 1 7 0 8 10 2 15 0 2 23% Greer 38 89 27 154 21 16 9 46 65 10 32 1 24 30% Harmon 26 17 6 49 11 4 3 18 14 8 9 0 12 37% Harper 6 6 2 14 2 0 0 2 7 3 1 1 3 14% Haskell 55 74 22 151 17 18 5 40 32 9 67 3 21 26% Hughes 72 107 59 238 28 20 18 66 72 30 63 7 49 28% Jackson 101 181 46 328 28 38 6 72 148 48 54 6 68 22% Jefferson 32 36 10 78 3 9 5 17 28 7 20 6 20 22% Johnston 55 116 23 194 7 16 5 28 61 30 75 0 37 14% Kay 152 157 99 408 29 35 23 87 114 61 122 24 78 21% Kingfisher 29 28 22 79 13 5 2 20 21 15 23 0 19 25% Kiowa 39 63 13 115 8 10 0 18 16 20 54 7 24 16% Assessment Conclusions Conf. Rate Sub- stan- tiated 24 SUMMARY
Investigated/Assessed Substantiated Other County Abuse Negl. Both Total Abuse Negl. Both Total Svcs. Rec. Svcs. Prv. Svcs. Not Needed Other Latimer 43 45 22 110 14 5 2 21 28 27 29 5 28 19% LeFlore 244 291 89 624 70 50 18 138 193 22 244 27 91 22% Lincoln 135 161 113 409 30 46 36 112 142 53 86 16 70 27% Logan 145 188 75 408 41 34 24 99 182 49 61 17 98 24% Love 23 52 14 89 9 11 4 24 19 2 44 0 2 27% Major 17 35 20 72 13 4 3 20 15 17 18 2 19 28% Marshall 78 107 41 226 19 21 9 49 68 37 70 2 39 22% Mayes 110 211 43 364 13 41 17 71 68 46 168 11 66 20% McClain 71 162 58 291 14 41 18 73 100 38 73 7 66 25% McCurtain 183 247 132 562 24 41 34 99 244 90 126 3 234 18% McIntosh 64 140 45 249 23 25 13 61 73 65 47 3 83 24% Murray 53 52 10 115 5 9 0 14 24 19 51 7 21 12% Muskogee 342 582 217 1,141 98 183 62 343 233 104 434 27 190 30% Noble 38 77 39 154 9 11 17 37 31 26 48 12 31 24% Nowata 36 77 29 142 3 19 2 24 43 25 44 6 33 17% Okfuskee 45 88 27 160 18 27 8 53 47 26 30 4 28 33% <strong>Oklahoma</strong> 2,619 4,648 1,969 9,236 597 1,013 748 2,358 3,001 1,236 1,790 851 1,883 26% Okmulgee 151 226 96 473 57 56 21 134 179 81 74 5 98 28% Osage 159 243 95 497 42 50 45 137 91 128 123 18 148 28% Ottawa 141 259 82 482 14 16 9 39 148 108 150 37 229 8% Pawnee 55 93 31 179 13 21 6 40 63 21 52 3 27 22% Payne 190 237 164 591 92 40 25 157 226 97 101 10 105 27% Pittsburg 263 370 199 832 46 75 56 177 288 88 228 51 117 21% Pontotoc 147 212 89 448 47 37 15 99 135 77 115 22 134 22% Pottawatomie 405 609 219 1,233 95 101 52 248 538 189 218 40 313 20% Pushmataha 60 89 30 179 19 13 7 39 35 11 87 7 26 22% Rogers 191 240 109 540 51 29 17 97 217 106 114 6 201 18% Roger Mills 4 9 2 15 1 1 0 2 6 3 3 1 3 13% Seminole 148 173 109 430 59 45 25 129 148 29 118 6 85 30% Sequoyah 199 333 141 673 46 45 43 134 267 48 210 14 146 20% Stephens 160 267 93 520 24 52 16 92 129 66 203 30 93 18% Texas 49 92 35 176 23 22 7 52 52 38 30 4 52 30% Tillman 21 28 2 51 1 3 0 4 24 4 19 0 6 8% Tulsa 2,162 3,237 1,182 6,581 421 626 278 1,325 2,536 1,310 966 444 1,752 20% Wagoner 162 300 133 595 22 74 23 119 154 84 192 46 122 20% Washington 84 323 71 478 17 77 29 123 75 166 98 16 227 26% Washita 58 75 17 150 9 3 1 13 36 32 60 9 45 9% Woods 56 47 30 133 24 7 3 34 38 25 34 2 28 26% Woodward 112 170 69 351 24 31 21 76 116 69 77 13 79 22% All figures provide a duplicated count of children. Other category includes findings of Unable to Locate and Failure to Cooperate. SUMMARY 25 Assessment Conclusions Conf. Rate Sub- stan- tiated
Page 1 and 2: CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT STATISTICS
Page 3 and 4: STATISTICS — INTRODUCTION The Okl
Page 5 and 6: ABUSE AND NEGLECT The following cha
Page 7 and 8: County of Investigation/ Assessment
Page 9 and 10: ASSESSMENTS The map below details a
Page 11 and 12: SUBSTANTIATIONS The chart below pro
Page 13 and 14: SUBSTANTIATIONS Failure to Protect
Page 15 and 16: SUBSTANTIATIONS For substantiated c
Page 17 and 18: CHILD CATEGORIES The chart below sh
Page 19 and 20: CHILD CATEGORIES The race of childr
Page 21 and 22: PERPETRATORS The race of the identi
Page 23: PERPETRATORS The age range of ident
Page 27 and 28: County Alleged Child Victims Substa
Page 29 and 30: County Alleged Child Victims Servic
Page 31: S12091 OKDHS Issued 01/13 This publ

CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT STATISTICS - Oklahoma ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?