JARC Coordination Plan - Oklahoma Department of Transportation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Section 2: State Demographic Profile populations in all five categories. Cherokee, Hughes, McCurtain, McIntosh, Seminole and Tillman counties have high concentrations in four categories, and Adair, Atoka, Cimarron, Delaware, Jefferson, and Okfuskee Counties have high concentrations in three categories. Six of these counties have populations exceeding 20,000: Cherokee (46,987), Delaware (41,487), McCurtain (33,151), Seminole (24,894), Adair (22,683), and McIntosh (20,252). Geographically, nearly all of these counties are located in the eastern half of the state, east of Interstate Highway 35, with the exception of Jefferson, Tillman and Cimarron counties. Table 2.8: Counties Exceeding the 75th Percentile for 3 or more Target Populations County Percent Noninstitutionalized Population Households Percent of Percent of Percent of 2010 Population Median Population over with Income with no over Age Household Age 5 with a Below Vehicles 65 Income Disability Poverty Level Available Adair 27.1% 12.9% 26.5% $29,811 5.6% Atoka No Data* 16.1% 22.5% $31,179 5.3% Cimarron No Data 21.4% 21.8% $34,096 6.1% Delaware 21.3% 20.6% 21.2% $34,383 3.9% Jefferson No Data 19.1% 16.7% $32,750 7.0% Okfuskee No Data 16.7% 24.6% $33,286 7.7% Cherokee 21.4% 13.5% 26.3% $32,322 6.4% Hughes No Data* 17.2% 21.9% $32,677 6.3% McCurtain 27.2% 15.5% 27.7% $31,082 9.6% McIntosh 30.6% 21.9% 22.5% $30,620 6.0% Seminole 22.8% 16.1% 23.8% $32,985 6.8% Tillman No Data 17.7% 21.1% $29,832 6.7% Choctaw No Data* 18.1% 24.6% $27,549 9.2% Coal No Data* 17.8% 21.6% $31,764 11.0% Pushmataha No Data* 20.2% 27.1% $26,742 7.7% * No county data available, but was included in Choctaw OTSA with a disability rate of 24.1% Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 75th Percentile 21.4% 17.6% 20.5% $35,096 6.3% Oklahoma Locally Coordinated Public Transit 18 Human Service Transportation Plan
Section 2: State Demographic Profile Small Urbanized Area Population Characteristics Target population characteristics for the Lawton and Norman urbanized areas are included in this section. An urbanized area is one that is defined by the U.S. Census as having a geographic area with a population of 50,000 persons or more (U.S. Code, Title 23, Section 101). An urbanized area does not have to follow existing political jurisdictional boundaries. Urbanized areas are subject to metropolitan transportation planning requirements as designated in U.S. Code, Title 23, Section 134 and Section 8 of the Federal Transit Act and promulgated by Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Section 450.300. This study focuses primarily on the Lawton and Norman small urban areas, whose transportation funds are dispersed by the state. The Oklahoma City and Tulsa large urban areas receive funding through the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG) and the Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG), respectively. ACOG and INCOG maintain their own locally coordinated public transit / human service transportation plans and are not included in the state plan. Table 2.9 shows land area, population and density for the Lawton and Norman urbanized areas as compared to Tulsa, Oklahoma City and the State. At the time of the Plan, 2010 U.S. Census data was not available for urbanized areas, thus 2010 American Community Survey one-year population estimates were used instead. Both the Lawton and Norman urbanized areas lost population between 2000 and 2005; however,by 2010, Oklahoma Locally Coordinated Public Transit 19 Human Service Transportation Plan
Page 1: February 2012
Page 4 and 5: Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES Ta
Page 6 and 7: This page is intentionally left bla
Page 8 and 9: Section 1: Introduction to the Plan
Page 10 and 11: Section 1: Introduction to the Plan
Page 12 and 13: Section 2: State Demographic Profil
Page 14 and 15: Table 2.3: Data Categories U.S. Cen
Page 30 and 31: Section 3: Summary of Transportatio
Page 34 and 35: Coordination with Other Transportat
Page 38 and 39: Table 4.1: Projects Receiving Fundi
Page 40 and 41: Section 4: Previously Funded Projec
Page 42 and 43: Section 5: Transportation Gaps and
Page 50 and 51: Section 6: Key Issues Impacting Ser
Page 58 and 59: Section 7: Evaluation the project o
Page 60 and 61: Section 7: Evaluation Other Project
Page 62 and 63: This page is intentionally left bla
Page 64 and 65: Oklahoma Locally Coordinated Public
Page 66 and 67: Appendix A: Funding Sources Job Acc
Page 68 and 69: Appendix A: Funding Sources Urbaniz
Page 70 and 71: The Temporary Assistance for Needy
Page 72 and 73: Appendix A: Funding Sources Senior
Page 74 and 75:
Table B.1: County Specific Populati
Page 76 and 77:
Appendix B: County Specific Data Ta
Page 78 and 79:
Appendix B: County Specific Data Ta
Page 80 and 81:
Appendix C: Oklahoma Department of
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88:
show all

JARC Coordination Plan - Oklahoma Department of Transportation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?