- Page 1: PROCEEDINGS FEMA WORKSHOP, JUNE 26-
- Page 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # OVERVIEW
- Page 9 and 10: 2 OUTLINE OF THE WORKSHOP AGENDA __
- Page 11 and 12: 3 SUMMARY OF WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS
- Page 13 and 14: He also discussed research needs to
- Page 15 and 16: what is reasonable to the engineer
- Page 17 and 18: 4 DAM FAILURE ANALYSIS RESEARCH AND
- Page 19 and 20: The break down of the individual to
- Page 21 and 22: The break down of the individual to
- Page 23 and 24: TOPIC NUMBER RESEARCH / DEVELOPMENT
- Page 25 and 26: TOPIC NUMBER RESEARCH / DEVELOPMENT
- Page 27 and 28: TOPICS Research/Development Topics
- Page 29: TOPICS increasing VALUE 2 20 12 15
- Page 33: A AGENDA __________________________
- Page 38 and 39: Dam name: Williamsburg Dam (Mill Ri
- Page 40 and 41: Dam name: Walnut Grove Dam Location
- Page 42 and 43: Dam name: Saint Francis Dam Locatio
- Page 44 and 45: Dam name: Baldwin Hills Dam Locatio
- Page 46 and 47: Dam name: Black Hills Flash Flood (
- Page 48 and 49: Dam name: Kelly Barnes Dam Location
- Page 50 and 51: Dam name: Timber Lake Dam Location:
- Page 53 and 54: Will a Dam Failure Occur? Assessing
- Page 55 and 56: Reclamation’s Risk Management Res
- Page 57 and 58: Roles of Dam Failure Analyses • I
- Page 59: B-3
- Page 62 and 63: 2/6/02 %DFNJURXQG ✦ 7UDGLWLRQDO &
- Page 64 and 65: 2/6/02 (VWDEOLVKLQJ WKH %DVH 6DIHW\
- Page 66 and 67: 2/6/02 &XUUHQW 'DP 6DIHW\ 5 ' ✦ 5
- Page 68 and 69: 2/6/02 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMEN
- Page 70 and 71: 2/6/02 1.6E-02 ([DPSOH /2/ 5LVN 'LV
- Page 72 and 73: 2/6/02 5LVN $QDO\VLV 5 ' ✦ 0HWKRG
- Page 75 and 76: The Uncertainty of Embankment Dam B
- Page 77 and 78: model (Fread 1988). These models si
- Page 79 and 80: Predicted Breach Width (meters) 300
- Page 81 and 82: Table 1. - Uncertainty estimates of
- Page 83 and 84: Summary of Uncertainty Analysis Res
- Page 85 and 86:
control seepage and uplift pressure
- Page 87 and 88:
Results — Peak Outflow Estimates
- Page 89 and 90:
Conclusions This paper has presente
- Page 91:
B-5
- Page 94 and 95:
each failure mechanics are not well
- Page 96 and 97:
Fread (1971,1977,l988,l993) used a
- Page 98 and 99:
3. Analytical Parametric Breach Mod
- Page 100 and 101:
Figure 3. Side View of Dam Showing
- Page 102 and 103:
Figure 5. Teton Dam: Predicted and
- Page 104 and 105:
unsteady flow equations with the se
- Page 106 and 107:
Figure 8. Routing Curves for SMPDBK
- Page 108 and 109:
K and X are computed as follows: K
- Page 110 and 111:
Figure 10. Profile of peak discharg
- Page 112 and 113:
Fread,D.L., and Hsu,K.S. (l993) “
- Page 115:
B-6
- Page 118 and 119:
-Application of the numerical model
- Page 120 and 121:
45 m 3 /s and at low water level di
- Page 122 and 123:
Other recommendation deals with the
- Page 124 and 125:
The 2-d flood calculations and the
- Page 126 and 127:
The breach hydrographs for the loca
- Page 128 and 129:
1) Rectangular mesh # 10m without b
- Page 130 and 131:
5. DEVELOPMENT OF RESCUE ACTIONS De
- Page 132 and 133:
Emergency action plans prepared ear
- Page 134 and 135:
The determination of flow hydrograp
- Page 137 and 138:
FEMA/USDA WORKSHOP OKLAHOMA CITY JU
- Page 139 and 140:
SIGNIFICANT HAZARD POTENTIAL “Dam
- Page 141 and 142:
SELECTING HAZARD POTENTIAL CLASSIFI
- Page 143 and 144:
GUIDELINE GOALS • Repeatable Clas
- Page 145 and 146:
Permanent Structures • Single fam
- Page 147 and 148:
Lifeline Disruption Easy to Restore
- Page 149 and 150:
ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE • Habitat an
- Page 151 and 152:
RISK BASED ASSESSMENT 1. Assume fai
- Page 153:
B-8
- Page 156 and 157:
It is common that dam failure analy
- Page 158 and 159:
A similar situation exists in dams
- Page 160 and 161:
Edison Pond Dam may have resulted i
- Page 163:
B-9
- Page 166 and 167:
However, most of the dams that fail
- Page 168 and 169:
The side slopes are sometimes steep
- Page 170 and 171:
In Georgia, we use dambreak modelin
- Page 172 and 173:
In closing, I wonder if we in the d
- Page 175 and 176:
ADJUSTING REALITY TO FIT THE MODEL
- Page 177 and 178:
CALIBRATION CORRELATION TO REALITY
- Page 179 and 180:
New age modelers Post-modern hydrol
- Page 181:
B-11
- Page 184 and 185:
Step 1: Determine Dam Failure Scena
- Page 186 and 187:
Table 1 Guidance for Estimating Whe
- Page 188 and 189:
The parameter DV may be used to sep
- Page 190 and 191:
Table 2 Recommended Fatality Rates
- Page 193:
B-12
- Page 196 and 197:
The procedure was intended to provi
- Page 198 and 199:
Although this failure occurred seve
- Page 200 and 201:
Qmax equation needs to be updated c
- Page 203 and 204:
Dam Failure Analyses Workshop Oklah
- Page 205 and 206:
Stability Analyses Programs to Dete
- Page 207 and 208:
Milner Dam • Control of Seepage F
- Page 209 and 210:
•7
- Page 211 and 212:
Santee Cooper East Dam • The Emba
- Page 213 and 214:
Dayton Dam Canal Embankment Failure
- Page 215 and 216:
Canal Embankment - before failure 2
- Page 217 and 218:
The Breach • With the reservoir s
- Page 219 and 220:
Breach - 7/20/96 2/12/02 FERC-CRO J
- Page 221 and 222:
July 22, 1996 Inspection • The ne
- Page 223 and 224:
Secondary Breach Location 7/22/96 2
- Page 225 and 226:
Horses on dunes 7/22/96 2/12/02 FER
- Page 227 and 228:
Breach 9/30/96 2/12/02 FERC-CRO Jun
- Page 229 and 230:
Reconstruction of the Canal Embankm
- Page 231 and 232:
Filling in Canal Bottom 8/27/97 2/1
- Page 233 and 234:
Impervious Core in breach 9/30/97 2
- Page 235:
Canal Embankment 1/15/98 2/12/02 FE
- Page 239 and 240:
Presentation for FEMA / USDA Worksh
- Page 241 and 242:
• Life Safety Model • Environme
- Page 243:
B-15
- Page 246 and 247:
Case Study Setting The Chalk Hill h
- Page 248 and 249:
ased on ranges given in the BRAECH
- Page 251:
B-16
- Page 263 and 264:
Current Dam Safety Research Efforts
- Page 265 and 266:
Overtopping Facility • Near-proto
- Page 267 and 268:
Flow Classification Nappe Flow Skim
- Page 269 and 270:
Friction Factor 10.00 Darcy Frictio
- Page 271:
Recent Developments in the Research
- Page 274 and 275:
ACB Mats Placement 12
- Page 276 and 277:
Vegetated Vegetated 14
- Page 278 and 279:
Overtopping Testing Threshold Level
- Page 280 and 281:
30 Design Curves 28 26 24 Articulat
- Page 282 and 283:
Flow Flume Setup Top of flume wall
- Page 284:
10 Analysis D 50 C u -0.25 [1.0805%
- Page 289 and 290:
Limited Overtopping, Embankment Bre
- Page 291 and 292:
development of concentrated flow, 2
- Page 293 and 294:
0.1 k d (m 3 /N-h) 0.01 0.001 τ c
- Page 295 and 296:
SUMMARY Research efforts at the ARS
- Page 297:
B-19
- Page 300 and 301:
Hydrologic Engineering Center Missi
- Page 302 and 303:
Schematic of the Alamo Dam study ar
- Page 304 and 305:
Cross-section Data Editor • Optio
- Page 306 and 307:
Use of GIS/DEM data RAS cross secti
- Page 308 and 309:
RAS Unsteady Flow • Overview •
- Page 310 and 311:
Pre-processing Geometry • For uns
- Page 312 and 313:
Bridge Hydraulic Properties Plot Hy
- Page 314 and 315:
Unsteady Flow Simulation Manager 1.
- Page 316 and 317:
Viewing Unsteady Flow Results • A
- Page 318 and 319:
Gate Section
- Page 320 and 321:
Future Work • Dam & Levee Breachi
- Page 322 and 323:
Product Availability • Internal t
- Page 325 and 326:
MORRIS 1 CADAM & IMPACT: European R
- Page 327 and 328:
MORRIS 3 • To create a database o
- Page 329 and 330:
MORRIS 5 • Dam-break wave along a
- Page 331 and 332:
MORRIS 7 SELECTED RESEARCH FINDINGS
- Page 333 and 334:
MORRIS 9 site. The results varied s
- Page 335 and 336:
MORRIS 11 be appropriate for the si
- Page 337 and 338:
MORRIS 13 Funding of European resea
- Page 339 and 340:
MORRIS 15 Breach Formation Flood Pr
- Page 341 and 342:
MORRIS 17 their findings and future
- Page 343 and 344:
MORRIS 19 Theme 4 Sediment Movement
- Page 345:
MORRIS 21 (Italy), Politechnika Gda
- Page 349 and 350:
Issues, Resolutions, And Research N
- Page 351 and 352:
and is presented in detail by Mark
- Page 353 and 354:
The most commonly applied approach
- Page 355 and 356:
Test no 1,2,3,5,7, and 8 will be us
- Page 357 and 358:
• breach tests A local contractin
- Page 359:
5. BUDGET AND TIME SCHEDULE The who
- Page 362 and 363:
Catalino Cecilio Catalino B. Cecili
- Page 364 and 365:
David Gutierrez California Dept. of
- Page 366 and 367:
John Ritchey Dept. of Environmental