12.05.2014 Views

Declaring conformance on web accessibility - ANEC

Declaring conformance on web accessibility - ANEC

Declaring conformance on web accessibility - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In total, 23 of the government and public body <strong>web</strong>sites had ten or less failure points and were<br />

selected for manual inspecti<strong>on</strong>. N<strong>on</strong>e of the certified <strong>web</strong>sites passed all elements of the automatic<br />

testing but 12 had ten or less failure points. There were 11 self declared <strong>web</strong>sites having ten or less<br />

failure points and including three passes. (Table 10)<br />

The results of automatic testing for the Commercial organisati<strong>on</strong>s found n<strong>on</strong>e that passed automatic<br />

testing to WCAG 2.0 level A and just <strong>on</strong>e in each category of claim had 10 or less failures. This<br />

included <strong>on</strong>e of the three commercial <strong>web</strong>sites claiming WCAG 2.0 AA. (See Table 10).<br />

Of the worst performing sites, <strong>on</strong>e-third had 21 or more failure points. The worst ten results for the<br />

government and public bodies <strong>web</strong>sites were found to have between 27 and 37 failure points, with<br />

four of these being certified sites and six being self declared. These self declared <strong>web</strong>sites<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sisted four of the .EU <strong>web</strong>sites, <strong>on</strong>e of .ORG <strong>web</strong>site and <strong>on</strong>e health body. The worst performing<br />

<strong>web</strong>site had a .EU <strong>web</strong> address and displayed WCAG 1 level A logos.<br />

Of the worst performing commercial <strong>web</strong>sites, half the sample had 21 or more failure points. The<br />

worst ten results were found to have between 22 and 37 failure points. Six of these were certified,<br />

three had WCAG logos and links and <strong>on</strong>e provided a statement. The worst performing Commercial<br />

site was from the UK and declared <str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>formance</str<strong>on</strong>g> to WCAG 2.0 level A.<br />

Table 10 Summary results of number of <strong>web</strong>sites passing WCAG 2.0 testpoints<br />

Government and public body<br />

Commercial<br />

C<strong>on</strong>formance<br />

claim<br />

Pass automatic<br />

tests to WCAG<br />

2.0<br />

10 or less<br />

testpoints failed<br />

11-20 testpoints<br />

failed<br />

21 or more<br />

testpoints failed<br />

Certified Self<br />

declarati<strong>on</strong><br />

Certified<br />

Self declarati<strong>on</strong><br />

0 3 0 0<br />

12 8 1 1<br />

15 12 5 5<br />

10 14 6 6<br />

<strong>ANEC</strong> Print versi<strong>on</strong> 21 May 2011 Page 23 Declarati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>formance</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!